summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/stdatomic_test.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/stdatomic_test.cpp')
-rw-r--r--tests/stdatomic_test.cpp248
1 files changed, 248 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/stdatomic_test.cpp b/tests/stdatomic_test.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b7fb19b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/stdatomic_test.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2014 The Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include <stdatomic.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+TEST(stdatomic, LOCK_FREE) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_BOOL_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_CHAR16_T_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_CHAR32_T_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_CHAR_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_POINTER_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_SHORT_LOCK_FREE);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ATOMIC_WCHAR_T_LOCK_FREE);
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, init) {
+ atomic_int v = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(123);
+ ASSERT_EQ(123, atomic_load(&v));
+
+ atomic_init(&v, 456);
+ ASSERT_EQ(456, atomic_load(&v));
+
+ atomic_flag f = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_flag_test_and_set(&f));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_thread_fence) {
+ atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_relaxed);
+ atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_consume);
+ atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_acquire);
+ atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_release);
+ atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_acq_rel);
+ atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_seq_cst);
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_signal_fence) {
+ atomic_signal_fence(memory_order_relaxed);
+ atomic_signal_fence(memory_order_consume);
+ atomic_signal_fence(memory_order_acquire);
+ atomic_signal_fence(memory_order_release);
+ atomic_signal_fence(memory_order_acq_rel);
+ atomic_signal_fence(memory_order_seq_cst);
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_is_lock_free) {
+ atomic_char small;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_is_lock_free(&small));
+#if defined(__clang__) || __GNUC_PREREQ(4, 7)
+ // Otherwise stdatomic.h doesn't handle this.
+ atomic_intmax_t big;
+ // atomic_intmax_t(size = 64) is not lock free on mips32.
+#if defined(__mips__) && !defined(__LP64__)
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_is_lock_free(&big));
+#else
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_is_lock_free(&big));
+#endif
+#endif
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_flag) {
+ atomic_flag f = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_flag_test_and_set(&f));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_flag_test_and_set(&f));
+
+ atomic_flag_clear(&f);
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(&f, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(&f, memory_order_relaxed));
+
+ atomic_flag_clear_explicit(&f, memory_order_relaxed);
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(&f, memory_order_relaxed));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_store) {
+ atomic_int i;
+ atomic_store(&i, 123);
+ ASSERT_EQ(123, atomic_load(&i));
+ atomic_store_explicit(&i, 123, memory_order_relaxed);
+ ASSERT_EQ(123, atomic_load_explicit(&i, memory_order_relaxed));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_exchange) {
+ atomic_int i;
+ atomic_store(&i, 123);
+ ASSERT_EQ(123, atomic_exchange(&i, 456));
+ ASSERT_EQ(456, atomic_exchange_explicit(&i, 123, memory_order_relaxed));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_compare_exchange) {
+ atomic_int i;
+ int expected;
+
+ atomic_store(&i, 123);
+ expected = 123;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_compare_exchange_strong(&i, &expected, 456));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_compare_exchange_strong(&i, &expected, 456));
+ ASSERT_EQ(456, expected);
+
+ atomic_store(&i, 123);
+ expected = 123;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit(&i, &expected, 456, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit(&i, &expected, 456, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_EQ(456, expected);
+
+ atomic_store(&i, 123);
+ expected = 123;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_compare_exchange_weak(&i, &expected, 456));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_compare_exchange_weak(&i, &expected, 456));
+ ASSERT_EQ(456, expected);
+
+ atomic_store(&i, 123);
+ expected = 123;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(atomic_compare_exchange_weak_explicit(&i, &expected, 456, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(atomic_compare_exchange_weak_explicit(&i, &expected, 456, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_EQ(456, expected);
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_fetch_add) {
+ atomic_int i = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(123);
+ ASSERT_EQ(123, atomic_fetch_add(&i, 1));
+ ASSERT_EQ(124, atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&i, 1, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_EQ(125, atomic_load(&i));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_fetch_sub) {
+ atomic_int i = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(123);
+ ASSERT_EQ(123, atomic_fetch_sub(&i, 1));
+ ASSERT_EQ(122, atomic_fetch_sub_explicit(&i, 1, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_EQ(121, atomic_load(&i));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_fetch_or) {
+ atomic_int i = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0x100);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x100, atomic_fetch_or(&i, 0x020));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x120, atomic_fetch_or_explicit(&i, 0x003, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x123, atomic_load(&i));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_fetch_xor) {
+ atomic_int i = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0x100);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x100, atomic_fetch_xor(&i, 0x120));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x020, atomic_fetch_xor_explicit(&i, 0x103, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x123, atomic_load(&i));
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, atomic_fetch_and) {
+ atomic_int i = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0x123);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x123, atomic_fetch_and(&i, 0x00f));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x003, atomic_fetch_and_explicit(&i, 0x2, memory_order_relaxed));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x002, atomic_load(&i));
+}
+
+// And a rudimentary test of acquire-release memory ordering:
+
+constexpr static uint_least32_t BIG = 10000000ul; // Assumed even below.
+
+struct three_atomics {
+ atomic_uint_least32_t x;
+ char a[123]; // Everything in different cache lines,
+ // increase chance of compiler getting alignment wrong.
+ atomic_uint_least32_t y;
+ char b[4013];
+ atomic_uint_least32_t z;
+};
+
+// Very simple acquire/release memory ordering sanity check.
+static void* writer(void* arg) {
+ three_atomics* a = reinterpret_cast<three_atomics*>(arg);
+ for (uint_least32_t i = 0; i <= BIG; i+=2) {
+ atomic_store_explicit(&a->x, i, memory_order_relaxed);
+ atomic_store_explicit(&a->z, i, memory_order_relaxed);
+ atomic_store_explicit(&a->y, i, memory_order_release);
+ atomic_store_explicit(&a->x, i+1, memory_order_relaxed);
+ atomic_store_explicit(&a->z, i+1, memory_order_relaxed);
+ atomic_store_explicit(&a->y, i+1, memory_order_release);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void* reader(void* arg) {
+ three_atomics* a = reinterpret_cast<three_atomics*>(arg);
+ uint_least32_t xval = 0, yval = 0, zval = 0;
+ size_t repeat = 0;
+ size_t repeat_limit = 1000;
+ while (yval != BIG + 1) {
+ yval = atomic_load_explicit(&a->y, memory_order_acquire);
+ zval = atomic_load_explicit(&a->z, memory_order_relaxed);
+ xval = atomic_load_explicit(&a->x, memory_order_relaxed);
+ // If we see a given value of y, the immediately preceding
+ // stores to z and x, or later ones, should also be visible.
+ if (zval < yval) {
+ // Cant just ASSERT, since we are in a non-void function.
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "acquire-release ordering violation: "
+ << zval << " < " << yval << ", " << xval << "\n";
+ return 0; // Only report once.
+ }
+ if (xval < yval) {
+ // Cant just ASSERT, since we are in a non-void function.
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "acquire-release ordering violation: "
+ << xval << " < " << yval << ", " << zval << "\n";
+ return 0; // Only report once.
+ }
+ if (repeat < repeat_limit) ++repeat;
+ }
+ // The following assertion is not technically guaranteed to hold.
+ // But if it fails to hold, this test was useless, and we have a
+ // serious scheduling issue that we should probably know about.
+ EXPECT_EQ(repeat, repeat_limit);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+TEST(stdatomic, ordering) {
+ // Run a memory ordering sanity test.
+ void* result;
+ three_atomics a;
+ atomic_init(&a.x, 0ul);
+ atomic_init(&a.y, 0ul);
+ atomic_init(&a.z, 0ul);
+ pthread_t t1,t2;
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t1, 0, reader, &a));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t2, 0, writer, &a));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t1, &result));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, result);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t2, &result));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, result);
+ EXPECT_EQ(atomic_load_explicit(&a.x, memory_order_consume), BIG + 1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(atomic_load_explicit(&a.y, memory_order_seq_cst), BIG + 1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(atomic_load(&a.z), BIG + 1);
+}