diff options
author | dglazkov@chromium.org <dglazkov@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2010-01-12 19:02:54 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | dglazkov@chromium.org <dglazkov@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2010-01-12 19:02:54 +0000 |
commit | ed86a70901c4a9082fc0b29e8c4665487e094575 (patch) | |
tree | 9092a3613c3194a23bc49f233632f097ad739586 | |
parent | 1225c9cdd78365e114fb2b063161494dfdab7575 (diff) | |
download | chromium_src-ed86a70901c4a9082fc0b29e8c4665487e094575.zip chromium_src-ed86a70901c4a9082fc0b29e8c4665487e094575.tar.gz chromium_src-ed86a70901c4a9082fc0b29e8c4665487e094575.tar.bz2 |
Consolidate mask-related failures under one bug
TBR=gdk
TEST=none
BUG=3244
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/542033
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@36026 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
-rw-r--r-- | webkit/tools/layout_tests/test_expectations.txt | 26 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/webkit/tools/layout_tests/test_expectations.txt b/webkit/tools/layout_tests/test_expectations.txt index 31e3070..88297994 100644 --- a/webkit/tools/layout_tests/test_expectations.txt +++ b/webkit/tools/layout_tests/test_expectations.txt @@ -981,15 +981,6 @@ BUG10296 LINUX : LayoutTests/svg/W3C-SVG-1.1/pservers-grad-14-b.svg = FAIL // No anti-aliasing on the text. BUG10298 LINUX : LayoutTests/svg/custom/use-on-disallowed-foreign-object-3.svg = FAIL -// Marking this again as failed. This test failed even after rebaseline due to -// the fact that the font is not specified in the test and it seems that the -// test falls back on a different font locally than on the buildbot so the -// baseline is invalid. This might indicate a failure in our font fallback code -// or might be expected and that we should either go with the buildbot output -// or change the test upstream to specify explicitly what font to use. -// The mask part of this test is totally wrong. -BUG3244 LINUX WIN : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/svg-as-background-6.html = FAIL - // The failures listed below have never passed in Chromium and need to be // investigated, categorized, and (one hopes) fixed. @@ -1052,6 +1043,18 @@ BUG3244 LINUX WIN : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/svg-as-mask.html = FAIL BUG3244 WIN DEBUG : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/animated-svg-as-mask.html = FAIL BUG3244 SLOW WIN RELEASE : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/animated-svg-as-mask.html = FAIL BUG3244 LINUX : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/animated-svg-as-mask.html = FAIL +// More tests that fail because of masks not working properly. +// New tests. We should fix these, but they don't need to block the current release +BUG3244 WIN LINUX : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/mask-composite.html = FAIL +BUG3244 WIN LINUX : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/repeat/mask-negative-offset-repeat.html = FAIL +// Marking this again as failed. This test failed even after rebaseline due to +// the fact that the font is not specified in the test and it seems that the +// test falls back on a different font locally than on the buildbot so the +// baseline is invalid. This might indicate a failure in our font fallback code +// or might be expected and that we should either go with the buildbot output +// or change the test upstream to specify explicitly what font to use. +// The mask part of this test is totally wrong. +BUG3244 LINUX WIN : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/svg-as-background-6.html = FAIL BUG10302 LINUX : LayoutTests/svg/W3C-SVG-1.1/pservers-grad-10-b.svg = FAIL @@ -1168,11 +1171,6 @@ BUG22700 LINUX WIN : LayoutTests/fast/canvas/canvas-getImageData.html = FAIL // and gif, which is a low priority. BUG10318 WIN LINUX : LayoutTests/fast/canvas/toDataURL-supportedTypes.html = FAIL -// More tests that fail because of masks not working properly. -// New tests. We should fix these, but they don't need to block the current release -BUG10319 WIN LINUX : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/mask-composite.html = FAIL -BUG10319 WIN LINUX : LayoutTests/fast/backgrounds/repeat/mask-negative-offset-repeat.html = FAIL - // This test finishes while in the middle of a CSS animation. This is // intentional, but it makes pixel results unreliable. // http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21491 |