diff options
author | jar@chromium.org <jar@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2009-12-28 06:59:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | jar@chromium.org <jar@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2009-12-28 06:59:52 +0000 |
commit | 2753b39e0c2e83d3b497ebadc2d720f12b74db40 (patch) | |
tree | 01edf034e65922a229b3ccbaef8291059ac5e2bc /base/message_loop.cc | |
parent | e660e88dc26b9b31c48c815b2358212ea4067ca5 (diff) | |
download | chromium_src-2753b39e0c2e83d3b497ebadc2d720f12b74db40.zip chromium_src-2753b39e0c2e83d3b497ebadc2d720f12b74db40.tar.gz chromium_src-2753b39e0c2e83d3b497ebadc2d720f12b74db40.tar.bz2 |
Cleanup histogram classes mixing SetFlags into FactoryGet arguments
Generic cleanup of histogram class, renaming *FactoryGet to FactoryGet,
along with reformatting.
The macros were cleaned up to use common sub-macros rather than
repeating code as much.
Removed ThreadSafeHistogram (and associated ASSET_HISTOGRAM macros)
since this class was not getting used.
I introduced UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION to support the common use
of LinearHistograms to count various enumerated values.
I added a Flags argument to all the FactoryGet routines to help avoid
needing to call SetFlags each time a new sample is Add()ed. This also
simplifies the code.
This will all help prepare for a "don't histogram at all" macro setting
so that I can test the impact of the histogram macro calls on
performance (since there are now so many active histograms).
BUG=31206
r=raman.tenneti
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/515033
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@35295 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
Diffstat (limited to 'base/message_loop.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | base/message_loop.cc | 13 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/base/message_loop.cc b/base/message_loop.cc index 64913e5..9799100 100644 --- a/base/message_loop.cc +++ b/base/message_loop.cc @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ void MessageLoop::PostTask_Helper( pending_task.delayed_run_time = Time::Now() + TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(delay_ms); } else { - DCHECK(delay_ms == 0) << "delay should not be negative"; + DCHECK_EQ(delay_ms, 0) << "delay should not be negative"; } // Warning: Don't try to short-circuit, and handle this thread's tasks more @@ -531,13 +531,10 @@ void MessageLoop::StartHistogrammer() { if (enable_histogrammer_ && !message_histogram_.get() && StatisticsRecorder::WasStarted()) { DCHECK(!thread_name_.empty()); - message_histogram_ = - LinearHistogram::LinearHistogramFactoryGet( - ("MsgLoop:" + thread_name_), - kLeastNonZeroMessageId, - kMaxMessageId, - kNumberOfDistinctMessagesDisplayed); - message_histogram_->SetFlags(message_histogram_->kHexRangePrintingFlag); + message_histogram_ = LinearHistogram::FactoryGet("MsgLoop:" + thread_name_, + kLeastNonZeroMessageId, kMaxMessageId, + kNumberOfDistinctMessagesDisplayed, + message_histogram_->kHexRangePrintingFlag); message_histogram_->SetRangeDescriptions(event_descriptions_); } } |