diff options
author | jar@chromium.org <jar@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2011-12-09 03:41:04 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | jar@chromium.org <jar@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2011-12-09 03:41:04 +0000 |
commit | 7ceb4448df82ced9a4a311923d0465e33444effe (patch) | |
tree | 1b7ea12dc1a90acc1431ba19d1cfe941c86785f6 /base/tracked_objects.cc | |
parent | 356dc759f225c84ed45075d87f3358936abaac36 (diff) | |
download | chromium_src-7ceb4448df82ced9a4a311923d0465e33444effe.zip chromium_src-7ceb4448df82ced9a4a311923d0465e33444effe.tar.gz chromium_src-7ceb4448df82ced9a4a311923d0465e33444effe.tar.bz2 |
Minor cleanup preparing for recording parent-child data
I removed the branch-free macro. I really need to
use a profiler to see if such changes are valuable.
I cleaned up the placement of slots, putting the
rare-to-use values together (so they'll probably get
better handled by cache lines.
r=rtenneti
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8888004
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@113749 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
Diffstat (limited to 'base/tracked_objects.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | base/tracked_objects.cc | 26 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/base/tracked_objects.cc b/base/tracked_objects.cc index ffb083b..614c17a 100644 --- a/base/tracked_objects.cc +++ b/base/tracked_objects.cc @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ DeathData::DeathData(int count) { count_ = count; } -// TODO(jar): I need to see if this macro to optimize branching is worth it. +// TODO(jar): I need to see if this macro to optimize branching is worth using. // // This macro has no branching, so it is surely fast, and is equivalent to: // if (assign_it) @@ -56,28 +56,24 @@ DeathData::DeathData(int count) { void DeathData::RecordDeath(const DurationInt queue_duration, const DurationInt run_duration, int32 random_number) { + ++count_; queue_duration_sum_ += queue_duration; run_duration_sum_ += run_duration; - ++count_; + + if (queue_duration_max_ < queue_duration) + queue_duration_max_ = queue_duration; + if (run_duration_max_ < run_duration) + run_duration_max_ = run_duration; // Take a uniformly distributed sample over all durations ever supplied. // The probability that we (instead) use this new sample is 1/count_. This // results in a completely uniform selection of the sample. // We ignore the fact that we correlated our selection of a sample of run // and queue times. - bool take_sample = 0 == (random_number % count_); - CONDITIONAL_ASSIGN(take_sample, queue_duration_sample_, queue_duration); - CONDITIONAL_ASSIGN(take_sample, run_duration_sample_, run_duration); - - CONDITIONAL_ASSIGN(queue_duration_max_ < queue_duration, queue_duration_max_, - queue_duration); - CONDITIONAL_ASSIGN(run_duration_max_ < run_duration, run_duration_max_, - run_duration); - // Ensure we got the macros right. - DCHECK_GE(queue_duration_max_, queue_duration); - DCHECK_GE(run_duration_max_, run_duration); - DCHECK(!take_sample || run_duration_sample_ == run_duration); - DCHECK(!take_sample || queue_duration_sample_ == queue_duration); + if (0 == (random_number % count_)) { + queue_duration_sample_ = queue_duration; + run_duration_sample_ = run_duration; + } } int DeathData::count() const { return count_; } |