summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/sandbox/linux
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormdempsky@chromium.org <mdempsky@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98>2014-05-20 07:25:10 +0000
committermdempsky@chromium.org <mdempsky@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98>2014-05-20 07:25:10 +0000
commit2e886e3973dc9ec174ad406410483906d7c570f4 (patch)
tree61ce95bc6c6bf6f0a28eaebbfd8b64447243731f /sandbox/linux
parentba67dc1aa6b3fb4baa57cfd786e44b0941f50642 (diff)
downloadchromium_src-2e886e3973dc9ec174ad406410483906d7c570f4.zip
chromium_src-2e886e3973dc9ec174ad406410483906d7c570f4.tar.gz
chromium_src-2e886e3973dc9ec174ad406410483906d7c570f4.tar.bz2
Remove SandboxBPF's dependency on CompatibilityPolicy
SandboxBPF users are now required to always provide a SandboxBPFPolicy instead of a SyscallEvaluator. CompatibilityPolicy can't be removed just yet though because it's still used by the deprecated BPF_TEST macros. Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/290223002 git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@271607 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
Diffstat (limited to 'sandbox/linux')
-rw-r--r--sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/demo.cc17
-rw-r--r--sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc70
-rw-r--r--sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h25
-rw-r--r--sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc112
4 files changed, 120 insertions, 104 deletions
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/demo.cc b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/demo.cc
index 1cf45114..d9fd342 100644
--- a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/demo.cc
+++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/demo.cc
@@ -26,12 +26,15 @@
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include "base/macros.h"
#include "base/posix/eintr_wrapper.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h"
+#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_policy.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/services/linux_syscalls.h"
using sandbox::ErrorCode;
using sandbox::SandboxBPF;
+using sandbox::SandboxBPFPolicy;
using sandbox::arch_seccomp_data;
#define ERR EPERM
@@ -237,7 +240,17 @@ intptr_t DefaultHandler(const struct arch_seccomp_data& data, void *) {
return -ERR;
}
-ErrorCode Evaluator(SandboxBPF* sandbox, int sysno, void *) {
+class DemoPolicy : public SandboxBPFPolicy {
+ public:
+ DemoPolicy() {}
+ virtual ErrorCode EvaluateSyscall(SandboxBPF* sandbox,
+ int sysno) const OVERRIDE;
+
+ private:
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(DemoPolicy);
+};
+
+ErrorCode DemoPolicy::EvaluateSyscall(SandboxBPF* sandbox, int sysno) const {
switch (sysno) {
#if defined(__NR_accept)
case __NR_accept: case __NR_accept4:
@@ -420,7 +433,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
}
SandboxBPF sandbox;
sandbox.set_proc_fd(proc_fd);
- sandbox.SetSandboxPolicyDeprecated(Evaluator, NULL);
+ sandbox.SetSandboxPolicy(new DemoPolicy());
if (!sandbox.StartSandbox(SandboxBPF::PROCESS_SINGLE_THREADED)) {
fprintf(stderr, "StartSandbox() failed");
_exit(1);
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc
index 18bd30f..c5c6f61 100644
--- a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc
+++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc
@@ -22,10 +22,10 @@
#include "base/compiler_specific.h"
#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/macros.h"
#include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
#include "base/posix/eintr_wrapper.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/codegen.h"
-#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_compatibility_policy.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_policy.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall_iterator.h"
@@ -57,20 +57,26 @@ void WriteFailedStderrSetupMessage(int out_fd) {
// We define a really simple sandbox policy. It is just good enough for us
// to tell that the sandbox has actually been activated.
-ErrorCode ProbeEvaluator(SandboxBPF*, int sysnum, void*) __attribute__((const));
-ErrorCode ProbeEvaluator(SandboxBPF*, int sysnum, void*) {
- switch (sysnum) {
- case __NR_getpid:
- // Return EPERM so that we can check that the filter actually ran.
- return ErrorCode(EPERM);
- case __NR_exit_group:
- // Allow exit() with a non-default return code.
- return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
- default:
- // Make everything else fail in an easily recognizable way.
- return ErrorCode(EINVAL);
+class ProbePolicy : public SandboxBPFPolicy {
+ public:
+ ProbePolicy() {}
+ virtual ErrorCode EvaluateSyscall(SandboxBPF*, int sysnum) const OVERRIDE {
+ switch (sysnum) {
+ case __NR_getpid:
+ // Return EPERM so that we can check that the filter actually ran.
+ return ErrorCode(EPERM);
+ case __NR_exit_group:
+ // Allow exit() with a non-default return code.
+ return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
+ default:
+ // Make everything else fail in an easily recognizable way.
+ return ErrorCode(EINVAL);
+ }
}
-}
+
+ private:
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ProbePolicy);
+};
void ProbeProcess(void) {
if (syscall(__NR_getpid) < 0 && errno == EPERM) {
@@ -78,10 +84,17 @@ void ProbeProcess(void) {
}
}
-ErrorCode AllowAllEvaluator(SandboxBPF*, int sysnum, void*) {
- DCHECK(SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysnum));
- return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
-}
+class AllowAllPolicy : public SandboxBPFPolicy {
+ public:
+ AllowAllPolicy() {}
+ virtual ErrorCode EvaluateSyscall(SandboxBPF*, int sysnum) const OVERRIDE {
+ DCHECK(SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysnum));
+ return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
+ }
+
+ private:
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(AllowAllPolicy);
+};
void TryVsyscallProcess(void) {
time_t current_time;
@@ -239,8 +252,7 @@ bool SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(int sysnum) {
}
bool SandboxBPF::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*code_in_sandbox)(),
- EvaluateSyscall syscall_evaluator,
- void* aux) {
+ scoped_ptr<SandboxBPFPolicy> policy) {
// Block all signals before forking a child process. This prevents an
// attacker from manipulating our test by sending us an unexpected signal.
sigset_t old_mask, new_mask;
@@ -310,7 +322,7 @@ bool SandboxBPF::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*code_in_sandbox)(),
#endif
}
- SetSandboxPolicyDeprecated(syscall_evaluator, aux);
+ SetSandboxPolicy(policy.release());
if (!StartSandbox(PROCESS_SINGLE_THREADED)) {
SANDBOX_DIE(NULL);
}
@@ -359,8 +371,11 @@ bool SandboxBPF::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*code_in_sandbox)(),
}
bool SandboxBPF::KernelSupportSeccompBPF() {
- return RunFunctionInPolicy(ProbeProcess, ProbeEvaluator, 0) &&
- RunFunctionInPolicy(TryVsyscallProcess, AllowAllEvaluator, 0);
+ return RunFunctionInPolicy(ProbeProcess,
+ scoped_ptr<SandboxBPFPolicy>(new ProbePolicy())) &&
+ RunFunctionInPolicy(
+ TryVsyscallProcess,
+ scoped_ptr<SandboxBPFPolicy>(new AllowAllPolicy()));
}
SandboxBPF::SandboxStatus SandboxBPF::SupportsSeccompSandbox(int proc_fd) {
@@ -475,15 +490,6 @@ void SandboxBPF::PolicySanityChecks(SandboxBPFPolicy* policy) {
return;
}
-// Deprecated API, supported with a wrapper to the new API.
-void SandboxBPF::SetSandboxPolicyDeprecated(EvaluateSyscall syscall_evaluator,
- void* aux) {
- if (sandbox_has_started_ || !conds_) {
- SANDBOX_DIE("Cannot change policy after sandbox has started");
- }
- SetSandboxPolicy(new CompatibilityPolicy<void>(syscall_evaluator, aux));
-}
-
// Don't take a scoped_ptr here, polymorphism make their use awkward.
void SandboxBPF::SetSandboxPolicy(SandboxBPFPolicy* policy) {
DCHECK(!policy_);
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h
index 923a9f3..9bb414a 100644
--- a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h
+++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h
@@ -65,14 +65,6 @@ class SANDBOX_EXPORT SandboxBPF {
PROCESS_MULTI_THREADED, // The program may be multi-threaded.
};
- // When calling setSandboxPolicy(), the caller can provide an arbitrary
- // pointer in |aux|. This pointer will then be forwarded to the sandbox
- // policy each time a call is made through an EvaluateSyscall function
- // pointer. One common use case would be to pass the "aux" pointer as an
- // argument to Trap() functions.
- typedef ErrorCode (*EvaluateSyscall)(SandboxBPF* sandbox_compiler,
- int system_call_number,
- void* aux);
// A vector of BPF instructions that need to be installed as a filter
// program in the kernel.
typedef std::vector<struct sock_filter> Program;
@@ -109,20 +101,6 @@ class SANDBOX_EXPORT SandboxBPF {
// eventually close it when "StartSandbox()" executes.
void set_proc_fd(int proc_fd);
- // The system call evaluator function is called with the system
- // call number. It can decide to allow the system call unconditionally
- // by returning ERR_ALLOWED; it can deny the system call unconditionally by
- // returning an appropriate "errno" value; or it can request inspection
- // of system call argument(s) by returning a suitable ErrorCode.
- // The "aux" parameter can be used to pass optional data to the system call
- // evaluator. There are different possible uses for this data, but one of the
- // use cases would be for the policy to then forward this pointer to a Trap()
- // handler. In this case, of course, the data that is pointed to must remain
- // valid for the entire time that Trap() handlers can be called; typically,
- // this would be the lifetime of the program.
- // DEPRECATED: use the policy interface below.
- void SetSandboxPolicyDeprecated(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator, void* aux);
-
// Set the BPF policy as |policy|. Ownership of |policy| is transfered here
// to the sandbox object.
void SetSandboxPolicy(SandboxBPFPolicy* policy);
@@ -229,8 +207,7 @@ class SANDBOX_EXPORT SandboxBPF {
// policy. The caller has to make sure that "this" has not yet been
// initialized with any other policies.
bool RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*code_in_sandbox)(),
- EvaluateSyscall syscall_evaluator,
- void* aux);
+ scoped_ptr<SandboxBPFPolicy> policy);
// Performs a couple of sanity checks to verify that the kernel supports the
// features that we need for successful sandboxing.
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc
index 3b7470b..b5bfd35 100644
--- a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc
+++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include "base/bind.h"
#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/macros.h"
#include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
#include "build/build_config.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/bpf_tests.h"
@@ -84,29 +85,38 @@ intptr_t FakeGetPid(const struct arch_seccomp_data& args, void* aux) {
return (*pid_ptr)++;
}
-ErrorCode VerboseAPITestingPolicy(SandboxBPF* sandbox, int sysno, void* aux) {
- if (!SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysno)) {
- return ErrorCode(ENOSYS);
- } else if (sysno == __NR_getpid) {
- return sandbox->Trap(FakeGetPid, aux);
- } else {
+class VerboseAPITestingPolicy : public SandboxBPFPolicy {
+ public:
+ VerboseAPITestingPolicy(pid_t* pid_ptr) : pid_ptr_(pid_ptr) {}
+
+ virtual ErrorCode EvaluateSyscall(SandboxBPF* sandbox,
+ int sysno) const OVERRIDE {
+ DCHECK(SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysno));
+ if (sysno == __NR_getpid) {
+ return sandbox->Trap(FakeGetPid, pid_ptr_);
+ }
return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
}
-}
+
+ private:
+ pid_t* pid_ptr_;
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(VerboseAPITestingPolicy);
+};
SANDBOX_TEST(SandboxBPF, DISABLE_ON_TSAN(VerboseAPITesting)) {
if (SandboxBPF::SupportsSeccompSandbox(-1) ==
sandbox::SandboxBPF::STATUS_AVAILABLE) {
- pid_t test_var = 0;
+ pid_t pid;
+
SandboxBPF sandbox;
- sandbox.SetSandboxPolicyDeprecated(VerboseAPITestingPolicy, &test_var);
+ sandbox.SetSandboxPolicy(new VerboseAPITestingPolicy(&pid));
BPF_ASSERT(sandbox.StartSandbox(SandboxBPF::PROCESS_SINGLE_THREADED));
- BPF_ASSERT(test_var == 0);
- BPF_ASSERT(syscall(__NR_getpid) == 0);
- BPF_ASSERT(test_var == 1);
- BPF_ASSERT(syscall(__NR_getpid) == 1);
- BPF_ASSERT(test_var == 2);
+ BPF_ASSERT_EQ(0, pid);
+ BPF_ASSERT_EQ(0, syscall(__NR_getpid));
+ BPF_ASSERT_EQ(1, pid);
+ BPF_ASSERT_EQ(1, syscall(__NR_getpid));
+ BPF_ASSERT_EQ(2, pid);
// N.B.: Any future call to getpid() would corrupt the stack.
// This is OK. The SANDBOX_TEST() macro is guaranteed to
@@ -284,43 +294,53 @@ BPF_TEST(SandboxBPF, ErrnoTest, ErrnoTestPolicy) {
// Testing the stacking of two sandboxes
-ErrorCode StackingPolicyPartOne(SandboxBPF* sandbox, int sysno, void*) {
- if (!SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysno)) {
- return ErrorCode(ENOSYS);
+class StackingPolicyPartOne : public SandboxBPFPolicy {
+ public:
+ StackingPolicyPartOne() {}
+ virtual ErrorCode EvaluateSyscall(SandboxBPF* sandbox,
+ int sysno) const OVERRIDE {
+ DCHECK(SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysno));
+ switch (sysno) {
+ case __NR_getppid:
+ return sandbox->Cond(0,
+ ErrorCode::TP_32BIT,
+ ErrorCode::OP_EQUAL,
+ 0,
+ ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED),
+ ErrorCode(EPERM));
+ default:
+ return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
+ }
}
- switch (sysno) {
- case __NR_getppid:
- return sandbox->Cond(0,
- ErrorCode::TP_32BIT,
- ErrorCode::OP_EQUAL,
- 0,
- ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED),
- ErrorCode(EPERM));
- default:
- return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
- }
-}
+ private:
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(StackingPolicyPartOne);
+};
-ErrorCode StackingPolicyPartTwo(SandboxBPF* sandbox, int sysno, void*) {
- if (!SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysno)) {
- return ErrorCode(ENOSYS);
+class StackingPolicyPartTwo : public SandboxBPFPolicy {
+ public:
+ StackingPolicyPartTwo() {}
+ virtual ErrorCode EvaluateSyscall(SandboxBPF* sandbox,
+ int sysno) const OVERRIDE {
+ DCHECK(SandboxBPF::IsValidSyscallNumber(sysno));
+ switch (sysno) {
+ case __NR_getppid:
+ return sandbox->Cond(0,
+ ErrorCode::TP_32BIT,
+ ErrorCode::OP_EQUAL,
+ 0,
+ ErrorCode(EINVAL),
+ ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED));
+ default:
+ return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
+ }
}
- switch (sysno) {
- case __NR_getppid:
- return sandbox->Cond(0,
- ErrorCode::TP_32BIT,
- ErrorCode::OP_EQUAL,
- 0,
- ErrorCode(EINVAL),
- ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED));
- default:
- return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
- }
-}
+ private:
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(StackingPolicyPartTwo);
+};
-BPF_TEST(SandboxBPF, StackingPolicy, StackingPolicyPartOne) {
+BPF_TEST_C(SandboxBPF, StackingPolicy, StackingPolicyPartOne) {
errno = 0;
BPF_ASSERT(syscall(__NR_getppid, 0) > 0);
BPF_ASSERT(errno == 0);
@@ -331,7 +351,7 @@ BPF_TEST(SandboxBPF, StackingPolicy, StackingPolicyPartOne) {
// Stack a second sandbox with its own policy. Verify that we can further
// restrict filters, but we cannot relax existing filters.
SandboxBPF sandbox;
- sandbox.SetSandboxPolicyDeprecated(StackingPolicyPartTwo, NULL);
+ sandbox.SetSandboxPolicy(new StackingPolicyPartTwo());
BPF_ASSERT(sandbox.StartSandbox(SandboxBPF::PROCESS_SINGLE_THREADED));
errno = 0;