Attempt to fix the ImageOperations::CreateMaskedBitmap UMR by bringing the unittest code in line with the other tests in image_operations_unittest. My half-educated suspicion is that alpha wasn't getting initted correctly, as a new UMR appeared in the "SkColor alpha_pixel = " line. (Can't verify as all my machines are in boxes).

(This is TBR because the build is red).

TBR=tony
BUG=15762
TEST=Run valgrind/purify as in bug

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/159381

git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@21610 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/skia/ext/image_operations_unittest.cc b/skia/ext/image_operations_unittest.cc
index 40e63bd..5066683 100644
--- a/skia/ext/image_operations_unittest.cc
+++ b/skia/ext/image_operations_unittest.cc
@@ -202,19 +202,20 @@ TEST(ImageOperations, CreateMaskedBitmap) {
   SkBitmap alpha;
   alpha.setConfig(SkBitmap::kARGB_8888_Config, src_w, src_h);
   alpha.allocPixels();
-
-  unsigned char* src_data =
-      reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(alpha.getAddr32(0, 0));
-  for (int i = 0; i < src_w * src_h; i++) {
-    src_data[i * 4] = SkColorSetARGB(i + 128 % 255,
-                                     i + 128 % 255,
-                                     i + 64 % 255,
-                                     i + 0 % 255);
+  for (int y = 0, i = 0; y < src_h; y++) {
+    for (int x = 0; x < src_w; x++) {
+      *alpha.getAddr32(x, y) = SkColorSetARGB(i + 128 % 255,
+                                              i + 128 % 255,
+                                              i + 64 % 255,
+                                              i + 0 % 255);
+      i++;
+    }
   }
 
   SkBitmap masked = skia::ImageOperations::CreateMaskedBitmap(src, alpha);
 
   SkAutoLockPixels src_lock(src);
+  SkAutoLockPixels alpha_lock(alpha);
   SkAutoLockPixels masked_lock(masked);
   for (int y = 0; y < src_h; y++) {
     for (int x = 0; x < src_w; x++) {