diff options
author | thestig@chromium.org <thestig@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2013-02-16 04:30:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | thestig@chromium.org <thestig@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2013-02-16 04:30:42 +0000 |
commit | 9be7a32aa4714bcd216fba8256f1e914443ad663 (patch) | |
tree | 271dc3c64602f7b1ca4255dfa2caac5f9c40e355 /sync/internal_api/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc | |
parent | b0101d770f09d722dab872dd5dce34a6e631c5ed (diff) | |
download | chromium_src-9be7a32aa4714bcd216fba8256f1e914443ad663.zip chromium_src-9be7a32aa4714bcd216fba8256f1e914443ad663.tar.gz chromium_src-9be7a32aa4714bcd216fba8256f1e914443ad663.tar.bz2 |
Cleanup: Remove deprecated base::Value methods from sync. Use base::Value too.
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/12262057
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@182922 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
Diffstat (limited to 'sync/internal_api/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | sync/internal_api/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc | 117 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 58 deletions
diff --git a/sync/internal_api/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc b/sync/internal_api/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc index ba62a4d..cc84e17 100644 --- a/sync/internal_api/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc +++ b/sync/internal_api/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ namespace { const char kTestChromeVersion[] = "test chrome version"; void ExpectInt64Value(int64 expected_value, - const DictionaryValue& value, const std::string& key) { + const base::DictionaryValue& value, + const std::string& key) { std::string int64_str; EXPECT_TRUE(value.GetString(key, &int64_str)); int64 val = 0; @@ -108,7 +109,8 @@ void ExpectInt64Value(int64 expected_value, } void ExpectTimeValue(const base::Time& expected_value, - const DictionaryValue& value, const std::string& key) { + const base::DictionaryValue& value, + const std::string& key) { std::string time_str; EXPECT_TRUE(value.GetString(key, &time_str)); EXPECT_EQ(GetTimeDebugString(expected_value), time_str); @@ -527,7 +529,7 @@ TEST_F(SyncApiTest, BaseNodeSetSpecificsPreservesUnknownFields) { namespace { -void CheckNodeValue(const BaseNode& node, const DictionaryValue& value, +void CheckNodeValue(const BaseNode& node, const base::DictionaryValue& value, bool is_detailed) { ExpectInt64Value(node.GetId(), value, "id"); { @@ -559,11 +561,11 @@ void CheckNodeValue(const BaseNode& node, const DictionaryValue& value, ExpectInt64Value(node.GetSuccessorId(), value, "successorId"); ExpectInt64Value(node.GetFirstChildId(), value, "firstChildId"); { - scoped_ptr<DictionaryValue> expected_entry( + scoped_ptr<base::DictionaryValue> expected_entry( node.GetEntry()->ToValue(NULL)); - const Value* entry = NULL; + const base::Value* entry = NULL; EXPECT_TRUE(value.Get("entry", &entry)); - EXPECT_TRUE(Value::Equals(entry, expected_entry.get())); + EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(entry, expected_entry.get())); } EXPECT_EQ(11u, value.size()); } else { @@ -577,7 +579,7 @@ TEST_F(SyncApiTest, BaseNodeGetSummaryAsValue) { ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, test_user_share_.user_share()); ReadNode node(&trans); node.InitByRootLookup(); - scoped_ptr<DictionaryValue> details(node.GetSummaryAsValue()); + scoped_ptr<base::DictionaryValue> details(node.GetSummaryAsValue()); if (details.get()) { CheckNodeValue(node, *details, false); } else { @@ -589,7 +591,7 @@ TEST_F(SyncApiTest, BaseNodeGetDetailsAsValue) { ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, test_user_share_.user_share()); ReadNode node(&trans); node.InitByRootLookup(); - scoped_ptr<DictionaryValue> details(node.GetDetailsAsValue()); + scoped_ptr<base::DictionaryValue> details(node.GetDetailsAsValue()); if (details.get()) { CheckNodeValue(node, *details, true); } else { @@ -1040,9 +1042,8 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, ProcessJsMessage) { StrictMock<MockJsReplyHandler> reply_handler; - ListValue disabled_args; - disabled_args.Append( - Value::CreateStringValue("TRANSIENT_INVALIDATION_ERROR")); + base::ListValue disabled_args; + disabled_args.Append(new base::StringValue("TRANSIENT_INVALIDATION_ERROR")); EXPECT_CALL(reply_handler, HandleJsReply("getNotificationState", @@ -1068,7 +1069,7 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, ProcessJsMessageGetRootNodeDetails) { SendJsMessage("getRootNodeDetails", kNoArgs, reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); EXPECT_EQ(1u, return_args.Get().GetSize()); - const DictionaryValue* node_info = NULL; + const base::DictionaryValue* node_info = NULL; EXPECT_TRUE(return_args.Get().GetDictionary(0, &node_info)); if (node_info) { ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, sync_manager_.GetUserShare()); @@ -1085,11 +1086,11 @@ void CheckGetNodesByIdReturnArgs(SyncManager* sync_manager, int64 id, bool is_detailed) { EXPECT_EQ(1u, return_args.Get().GetSize()); - const ListValue* nodes = NULL; + const base::ListValue* nodes = NULL; ASSERT_TRUE(return_args.Get().GetList(0, &nodes)); ASSERT_TRUE(nodes); EXPECT_EQ(1u, nodes->GetSize()); - const DictionaryValue* node_info = NULL; + const base::DictionaryValue* node_info = NULL; EXPECT_TRUE(nodes->GetDictionary(0, &node_info)); ASSERT_TRUE(node_info); ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, sync_manager->GetUserShare()); @@ -1125,10 +1126,10 @@ class SyncManagerGetNodesByIdTest : public SyncManagerTest { .Times(arraysize(ids)).WillRepeatedly(SaveArg<1>(&return_args)); for (size_t i = 0; i < arraysize(ids); ++i) { - ListValue args; - ListValue* id_values = new ListValue(); + base::ListValue args; + base::ListValue* id_values = new base::ListValue(); args.Append(id_values); - id_values->Append(Value::CreateStringValue(base::Int64ToString(ids[i]))); + id_values->Append(new base::StringValue(base::Int64ToString(ids[i]))); SendJsMessage(message_name, JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); @@ -1140,8 +1141,8 @@ class SyncManagerGetNodesByIdTest : public SyncManagerTest { void RunGetNodesByIdFailureTest(const char* message_name) { StrictMock<MockJsReplyHandler> reply_handler; - ListValue empty_list_args; - empty_list_args.Append(new ListValue()); + base::ListValue empty_list_args; + empty_list_args.Append(new base::ListValue()); EXPECT_CALL(reply_handler, HandleJsReply(message_name, @@ -1149,50 +1150,50 @@ class SyncManagerGetNodesByIdTest : public SyncManagerTest { .Times(6); { - ListValue args; + base::ListValue args; SendJsMessage(message_name, JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - args.Append(new ListValue()); + base::ListValue args; + args.Append(new base::ListValue()); SendJsMessage(message_name, JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - ListValue* ids = new ListValue(); + base::ListValue args; + base::ListValue* ids = new base::ListValue(); args.Append(ids); - ids->Append(Value::CreateStringValue("")); + ids->Append(new base::StringValue("")); SendJsMessage(message_name, JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - ListValue* ids = new ListValue(); + base::ListValue args; + base::ListValue* ids = new base::ListValue(); args.Append(ids); - ids->Append(Value::CreateStringValue("nonsense")); + ids->Append(new base::StringValue("nonsense")); SendJsMessage(message_name, JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - ListValue* ids = new ListValue(); + base::ListValue args; + base::ListValue* ids = new base::ListValue(); args.Append(ids); - ids->Append(Value::CreateStringValue("0")); + ids->Append(new base::StringValue("0")); SendJsMessage(message_name, JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - ListValue* ids = new ListValue(); + base::ListValue args; + base::ListValue* ids = new base::ListValue(); args.Append(ids); - ids->Append(Value::CreateStringValue("9999")); + ids->Append(new base::StringValue("9999")); SendJsMessage(message_name, JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } @@ -1225,14 +1226,14 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, GetChildNodeIds) { .Times(1).WillRepeatedly(SaveArg<1>(&return_args)); { - ListValue args; - args.Append(Value::CreateStringValue("1")); + base::ListValue args; + args.Append(new base::StringValue("1")); SendJsMessage("getChildNodeIds", JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } EXPECT_EQ(1u, return_args.Get().GetSize()); - const ListValue* nodes = NULL; + const base::ListValue* nodes = NULL; ASSERT_TRUE(return_args.Get().GetList(0, &nodes)); ASSERT_TRUE(nodes); EXPECT_EQ(9u, nodes->GetSize()); @@ -1241,8 +1242,8 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, GetChildNodeIds) { TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, GetChildNodeIdsFailure) { StrictMock<MockJsReplyHandler> reply_handler; - ListValue empty_list_args; - empty_list_args.Append(new ListValue()); + base::ListValue empty_list_args; + empty_list_args.Append(new base::ListValue()); EXPECT_CALL(reply_handler, HandleJsReply("getChildNodeIds", @@ -1250,35 +1251,35 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, GetChildNodeIdsFailure) { .Times(5); { - ListValue args; + base::ListValue args; SendJsMessage("getChildNodeIds", JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - args.Append(Value::CreateStringValue("")); + base::ListValue args; + args.Append(new base::StringValue("")); SendJsMessage("getChildNodeIds", JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - args.Append(Value::CreateStringValue("nonsense")); + base::ListValue args; + args.Append(new base::StringValue("nonsense")); SendJsMessage("getChildNodeIds", JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - args.Append(Value::CreateStringValue("0")); + base::ListValue args; + args.Append(new base::StringValue("0")); SendJsMessage("getChildNodeIds", JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } { - ListValue args; - args.Append(Value::CreateStringValue("9999")); + base::ListValue args; + args.Append(new base::StringValue("9999")); SendJsMessage("getChildNodeIds", JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } @@ -1293,7 +1294,7 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, GetAllNodesTest) { .Times(1).WillRepeatedly(SaveArg<1>(&return_args)); { - ListValue args; + base::ListValue args; SendJsMessage("getAllNodes", JsArgList(&args), reply_handler.AsWeakHandle()); } @@ -1306,8 +1307,8 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, GetAllNodesTest) { // would make this test brittle without greatly increasing our chances of // catching real bugs. - const ListValue* node_list; - const DictionaryValue* first_result; + const base::ListValue* node_list; + const base::DictionaryValue* first_result; // The resulting argument list should have one argument, a list of nodes. ASSERT_EQ(1U, return_args.Get().GetSize()); @@ -1330,14 +1331,14 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, GetAllNodesTest) { TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, OnInvalidatorStateChangeJsEvents) { StrictMock<MockJsEventHandler> event_handler; - DictionaryValue enabled_details; + base::DictionaryValue enabled_details; enabled_details.SetString("state", "INVALIDATIONS_ENABLED"); - DictionaryValue credentials_rejected_details; + base::DictionaryValue credentials_rejected_details; credentials_rejected_details.SetString( "state", "INVALIDATION_CREDENTIALS_REJECTED"); - DictionaryValue transient_error_details; + base::DictionaryValue transient_error_details; transient_error_details.SetString("state", "TRANSIENT_INVALIDATION_ERROR"); - DictionaryValue auth_error_details; + base::DictionaryValue auth_error_details; auth_error_details.SetString("status", "CONNECTION_AUTH_ERROR"); EXPECT_CALL(manager_observer_, @@ -1404,15 +1405,15 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, OnIncomingNotification) { // Build expected_args to have a single argument with the string // equivalents of model_types. - DictionaryValue expected_details; + base::DictionaryValue expected_details; { - ListValue* model_type_list = new ListValue(); + base::ListValue* model_type_list = new base::ListValue(); expected_details.SetString("source", "REMOTE_INVALIDATION"); expected_details.Set("changedTypes", model_type_list); for (ModelTypeSet::Iterator it = model_types.First(); it.Good(); it.Inc()) { model_type_list->Append( - Value::CreateStringValue(ModelTypeToString(it.Get()))); + new base::StringValue(ModelTypeToString(it.Get()))); } } |