Retry to checkin a version of gmock, modified to use our boost_tuple in VS2005.

This checkin adds gmock, and a small example of how to write a gmock-based unittest.

Original Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/113807

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/115846

git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@17066 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98

22 files changed, 13869 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2446260
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,1034 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the built-in actions.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-actions.h>
+#include <algorithm>
+#include <iterator>
+#include <string>
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-port.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+
+namespace {
+
+using ::std::tr1::get;
+using ::std::tr1::make_tuple;
+using ::std::tr1::tuple;
+using ::std::tr1::tuple_element;
+using testing::internal::BuiltInDefaultValue;
+using testing::internal::Int64;
+using testing::internal::UInt64;
+// This list should be kept sorted.
+using testing::_;
+using testing::Action;
+using testing::ActionInterface;
+using testing::Assign;
+using testing::DefaultValue;
+using testing::DoDefault;
+using testing::IgnoreResult;
+using testing::Invoke;
+using testing::InvokeWithoutArgs;
+using testing::MakePolymorphicAction;
+using testing::Ne;
+using testing::PolymorphicAction;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::ReturnNull;
+using testing::ReturnRef;
+using testing::SetArgumentPointee;
+using testing::SetArrayArgument;
+
+#ifndef _WIN32_WCE
+using testing::SetErrnoAndReturn;
+#endif  // _WIN32_WCE
+
+#if GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+using testing::internal::TestMessage;
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T*>::Get() returns NULL.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsNullForPointerTypes) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<int*>::Get() == NULL);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<const char*>::Get() == NULL);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<void*>::Get() == NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T*>::Exists() return true.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, ExistsForPointerTypes) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<int*>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<const char*>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<void*>::Exists());
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T>::Get() returns 0 when T is a
+// built-in numeric type.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsZeroForNumericTypes) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned char>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<signed char>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<char>::Get());
+#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned wchar_t>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<signed wchar_t>::Get());
+#endif  // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<wchar_t>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned short>::Get());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<signed short>::Get());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<short>::Get());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned int>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<signed int>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<int>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned long>::Get());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<signed long>::Get());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<long>::Get());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<UInt64>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<Int64>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<float>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<double>::Get());
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T>::Exists() returns true when T is a
+// built-in numeric type.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, ExistsForNumericTypes) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned char>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<signed char>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<char>::Exists());
+#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned wchar_t>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<signed wchar_t>::Exists());
+#endif  // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<wchar_t>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned short>::Exists());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<signed short>::Exists());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<short>::Exists());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned int>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<signed int>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<int>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned long>::Exists());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<signed long>::Exists());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<long>::Exists());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<UInt64>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<Int64>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<float>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<double>::Exists());
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<bool>::Get() returns false.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsFalseForBool) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(BuiltInDefaultValue<bool>::Get());
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<bool>::Exists() returns true.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, BoolExists) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<bool>::Exists());
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T>::Get() returns "" when T is a
+// string type.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsEmptyStringForString) {
+#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING
+  EXPECT_EQ("", BuiltInDefaultValue< ::string>::Get());
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING
+  EXPECT_EQ("", BuiltInDefaultValue< ::std::string>::Get());
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T>::Exists() returns true when T is a
+// string type.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, ExistsForString) {
+#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue< ::string>::Exists());
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue< ::std::string>::Exists());
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<const T>::Get() returns the same
+// value as BuiltInDefaultValue<T>::Get() does.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, WorksForConstTypes) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("", BuiltInDefaultValue<const std::string>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<const int>::Get());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<char* const>::Get() == NULL);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(BuiltInDefaultValue<const bool>::Get());
+}
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T>::Get() aborts the program with
+// the correct error message when T is a user-defined type.
+struct UserType {
+  UserType() : value(0) {}
+
+  int value;
+};
+
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, UserTypeHasNoDefault) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(BuiltInDefaultValue<UserType>::Exists());
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T&>::Get() aborts the program.
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueDeathTest, IsUndefinedForReferences) {
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    BuiltInDefaultValue<int&>::Get();
+  }, "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    BuiltInDefaultValue<const char&>::Get();
+  }, "");
+}
+
+TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueDeathTest, IsUndefinedForUserTypes) {
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    BuiltInDefaultValue<UserType>::Get();
+  }, "");
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<T>::IsSet() is false initially.
+TEST(DefaultValueTest, IsInitiallyUnset) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<int>::IsSet());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<const UserType>::IsSet());
+}
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<T> can be set and then unset.
+TEST(DefaultValueTest, CanBeSetAndUnset) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<int>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<const UserType>::Exists());
+
+  DefaultValue<int>::Set(1);
+  DefaultValue<const UserType>::Set(UserType());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, DefaultValue<int>::Get());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, DefaultValue<const UserType>::Get().value);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<int>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<const UserType>::Exists());
+
+  DefaultValue<int>::Clear();
+  DefaultValue<const UserType>::Clear();
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<int>::IsSet());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<const UserType>::IsSet());
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<int>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<const UserType>::Exists());
+}
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<T>::Get() returns the
+// BuiltInDefaultValue<T>::Get() when DefaultValue<T>::IsSet() is
+// false.
+TEST(DefaultValueDeathTest, GetReturnsBuiltInDefaultValueWhenUnset) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<int>::IsSet());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<int>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<UserType>::IsSet());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<UserType>::Exists());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, DefaultValue<int>::Get());
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    DefaultValue<UserType>::Get();
+  }, "");
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+}
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<void>::Get() returns void.
+TEST(DefaultValueTest, GetWorksForVoid) {
+  return DefaultValue<void>::Get();
+}
+
+// Tests using DefaultValue with a reference type.
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<T&>::IsSet() is false initially.
+TEST(DefaultValueOfReferenceTest, IsInitiallyUnset) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<int&>::IsSet());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<UserType&>::IsSet());
+}
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<T&>::Exists is false initiallly.
+TEST(DefaultValueOfReferenceTest, IsInitiallyNotExisting) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<int&>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<UserType&>::Exists());
+}
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<T&> can be set and then unset.
+TEST(DefaultValueOfReferenceTest, CanBeSetAndUnset) {
+  int n = 1;
+  DefaultValue<const int&>::Set(n);
+  UserType u;
+  DefaultValue<UserType&>::Set(u);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<const int&>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<UserType&>::Exists());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &(DefaultValue<const int&>::Get()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&u, &(DefaultValue<UserType&>::Get()));
+
+  DefaultValue<const int&>::Clear();
+  DefaultValue<UserType&>::Clear();
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<const int&>::Exists());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<UserType&>::Exists());
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<const int&>::IsSet());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<UserType&>::IsSet());
+}
+
+// Tests that DefaultValue<T&>::Get() returns the
+// BuiltInDefaultValue<T&>::Get() when DefaultValue<T&>::IsSet() is
+// false.
+TEST(DefaultValueOfReferenceDeathTest, GetReturnsBuiltInDefaultValueWhenUnset) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<int&>::IsSet());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(DefaultValue<UserType&>::IsSet());
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    DefaultValue<int&>::Get();
+  }, "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    DefaultValue<UserType>::Get();
+  }, "");
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+}
+
+// Tests that ActionInterface can be implemented by defining the
+// Perform method.
+
+typedef int MyFunction(bool, int);
+
+class MyActionImpl : public ActionInterface<MyFunction> {
+ public:
+  virtual int Perform(const tuple<bool, int>& args) {
+    return get<0>(args) ? get<1>(args) : 0;
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(ActionInterfaceTest, CanBeImplementedByDefiningPerform) {
+  MyActionImpl my_action_impl;
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(my_action_impl.IsDoDefault());
+}
+
+TEST(ActionInterfaceTest, MakeAction) {
+  Action<MyFunction> action = MakeAction(new MyActionImpl);
+
+  // When exercising the Perform() method of Action<F>, we must pass
+  // it a tuple whose size and type are compatible with F's argument
+  // types.  For example, if F is int(), then Perform() takes a
+  // 0-tuple; if F is void(bool, int), then Perform() takes a
+  // tuple<bool, int>, and so on.
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, action.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Action<F> can be contructed from a pointer to
+// ActionInterface<F>.
+TEST(ActionTest, CanBeConstructedFromActionInterface) {
+  Action<MyFunction> action(new MyActionImpl);
+}
+
+// Tests that Action<F> delegates actual work to ActionInterface<F>.
+TEST(ActionTest, DelegatesWorkToActionInterface) {
+  const Action<MyFunction> action(new MyActionImpl);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, action.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, action.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Action<F> can be copied.
+TEST(ActionTest, IsCopyable) {
+  Action<MyFunction> a1(new MyActionImpl);
+  Action<MyFunction> a2(a1);  // Tests the copy constructor.
+
+  // a1 should continue to work after being copied from.
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+
+  // a2 should work like the action it was copied from.
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+
+  a2 = a1;  // Tests the assignment operator.
+
+  // a1 should continue to work after being copied from.
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+
+  // a2 should work like the action it was copied from.
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests that an Action<From> object can be converted to a
+// compatible Action<To> object.
+
+class IsNotZero : public ActionInterface<bool(int)> {  // NOLINT
+ public:
+  virtual bool Perform(const tuple<int>& arg) {
+    return get<0>(arg) != 0;
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(ActionTest, CanBeConvertedToOtherActionType) {
+  const Action<bool(int)> a1(new IsNotZero);  // NOLINT
+  const Action<int(char)> a2 = Action<int(char)>(a1);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a2.Perform(make_tuple('a')));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple('\0')));
+}
+
+// The following two classes are for testing MakePolymorphicAction().
+
+// Implements a polymorphic action that returns the second of the
+// arguments it receives.
+class ReturnSecondArgumentAction {
+ public:
+  // We want to verify that MakePolymorphicAction() can work with a
+  // polymorphic action whose Perform() method template is either
+  // const or not.  This lets us verify the non-const case.
+  template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple>
+  Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) { return get<1>(args); }
+};
+
+// Implements a polymorphic action that can be used in a nullary
+// function to return 0.
+class ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunctionAction {
+ public:
+  // For testing that MakePolymorphicAction() works when the
+  // implementation class' Perform() method template takes only one
+  // template parameter.
+  //
+  // We want to verify that MakePolymorphicAction() can work with a
+  // polymorphic action whose Perform() method template is either
+  // const or not.  This lets us verify the const case.
+  template <typename Result>
+  Result Perform(const tuple<>&) const { return 0; }
+};
+
+// These functions verify that MakePolymorphicAction() returns a
+// PolymorphicAction<T> where T is the argument's type.
+
+PolymorphicAction<ReturnSecondArgumentAction> ReturnSecondArgument() {
+  return MakePolymorphicAction(ReturnSecondArgumentAction());
+}
+
+PolymorphicAction<ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunctionAction>
+ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunction() {
+  return MakePolymorphicAction(ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunctionAction());
+}
+
+// Tests that MakePolymorphicAction() turns a polymorphic action
+// implementation class into a polymorphic action.
+TEST(MakePolymorphicActionTest, ConstructsActionFromImpl) {
+  Action<int(bool, int, double)> a1 = ReturnSecondArgument();  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5, 2.0)));
+}
+
+// Tests that MakePolymorphicAction() works when the implementation
+// class' Perform() method template has only one template parameter.
+TEST(MakePolymorphicActionTest, WorksWhenPerformHasOneTemplateParameter) {
+  Action<int()> a1 = ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunction();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  Action<void*()> a2 = ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunction();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(make_tuple()) == NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests that Return() works as an action for void-returning
+// functions.
+TEST(ReturnTest, WorksForVoid) {
+  const Action<void(int)> ret = Return();  // NOLINT
+  return ret.Perform(make_tuple(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that Return(v) returns v.
+TEST(ReturnTest, ReturnsGivenValue) {
+  Action<int()> ret = Return(1);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  ret = Return(-5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(-5, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests that Return("string literal") works.
+TEST(ReturnTest, AcceptsStringLiteral) {
+  Action<const char*()> a1 = Return("Hello");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("Hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  Action<std::string()> a2 = Return("world");
+  EXPECT_EQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests that Return(v) is covaraint.
+
+struct Base {
+  bool operator==(const Base&) { return true; }
+};
+
+struct Derived : public Base {
+  bool operator==(const Derived&) { return true; }
+};
+
+TEST(ReturnTest, IsCovariant) {
+  Base base;
+  Derived derived;
+  Action<Base*()> ret = Return(&base);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&base, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  ret = Return(&derived);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&derived, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests that ReturnNull() returns NULL in a pointer-returning function.
+TEST(ReturnNullTest, WorksInPointerReturningFunction) {
+  const Action<int*()> a1 = ReturnNull();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a1.Perform(make_tuple()) == NULL);
+
+  const Action<const char*(bool)> a2 = ReturnNull();  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(make_tuple(true)) == NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests that ReturnRef(v) works for reference types.
+TEST(ReturnRefTest, WorksForReference) {
+  const int n = 0;
+  const Action<const int&(bool)> ret = ReturnRef(n);  // NOLINT
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &ret.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ReturnRef(v) is covariant.
+TEST(ReturnRefTest, IsCovariant) {
+  Base base;
+  Derived derived;
+  Action<Base&()> a = ReturnRef(base);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&base, &a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  a = ReturnRef(derived);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&derived, &a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests that DoDefault() does the default action for the mock method.
+
+class MyClass {};
+
+class MockClass {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD1(IntFunc, int(bool flag));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD0(Foo, MyClass());
+};
+
+// Tests that DoDefault() returns the built-in default value for the
+// return type by default.
+TEST(DoDefaultTest, ReturnsBuiltInDefaultValueByDefault) {
+  MockClass mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFunc(_))
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.IntFunc(true));
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that DoDefault() aborts the process when there is no built-in
+// default value for the return type.
+TEST(DoDefaultDeathTest, DiesForUnknowType) {
+  MockClass mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo())
+      .WillRepeatedly(DoDefault());
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    mock.Foo();
+  }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that using DoDefault() inside a composite action leads to a
+// run-time error.
+
+void VoidFunc(bool flag) {}
+
+TEST(DoDefaultDeathTest, DiesIfUsedInCompositeAction) {
+  MockClass mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFunc(_))
+      .WillRepeatedly(DoAll(Invoke(VoidFunc),
+                            DoDefault()));
+
+  // Ideally we should verify the error message as well.  Sadly,
+  // EXPECT_DEATH() can only capture stderr, while Google Mock's
+  // errors are printed on stdout.  Therefore we have to settle for
+  // not verifying the message.
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    mock.IntFunc(true);
+  }, "");
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that DoDefault() returns the default value set by
+// DefaultValue<T>::Set() when it's not overriden by an ON_CALL().
+TEST(DoDefaultTest, ReturnsUserSpecifiedPerTypeDefaultValueWhenThereIsOne) {
+  DefaultValue<int>::Set(1);
+  MockClass mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFunc(_))
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mock.IntFunc(false));
+  DefaultValue<int>::Clear();
+}
+
+// Tests that DoDefault() does the action specified by ON_CALL().
+TEST(DoDefaultTest, DoesWhatOnCallSpecifies) {
+  MockClass mock;
+  ON_CALL(mock, IntFunc(_))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFunc(_))
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, mock.IntFunc(false));
+}
+
+// Tests that using DoDefault() in ON_CALL() leads to a run-time failure.
+TEST(DoDefaultTest, CannotBeUsedInOnCall) {
+  MockClass mock;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    ON_CALL(mock, IntFunc(_))
+      .WillByDefault(DoDefault());
+  }, "DoDefault() cannot be used in ON_CALL()");
+}
+
+// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(v) sets the variable pointed to by
+// the N-th (0-based) argument to v.
+TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointee) {
+  typedef void MyFunction(bool, int*, char*);
+  Action<MyFunction> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(2);
+
+  int n = 0;
+  char ch = '\0';
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch);
+
+  a = SetArgumentPointee<2>('a');
+  n = 0;
+  ch = '\0';
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
+}
+
+#if GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+
+// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) sets the v1 protobuf
+// variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to proto_buffer.
+TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProtoBufferType) {
+  TestMessage* const msg = new TestMessage;
+  msg->set_member("yes");
+  TestMessage orig_msg;
+  orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg);
+
+  Action<void(bool, TestMessage*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg);
+  // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) makes a copy of proto_buffer
+  // s.t. the action works even when the original proto_buffer has
+  // died.  We ensure this behavior by deleting msg before using the
+  // action.
+  delete msg;
+
+  TestMessage dest;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(orig_msg.Equals(dest));
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &dest));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(orig_msg.Equals(dest));
+}
+
+// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) sets the
+// ::ProtocolMessage variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based)
+// argument to proto_buffer.
+TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProtoBufferBaseType) {
+  TestMessage* const msg = new TestMessage;
+  msg->set_member("yes");
+  TestMessage orig_msg;
+  orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg);
+
+  Action<void(bool, ::ProtocolMessage*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg);
+  // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) makes a copy of proto_buffer
+  // s.t. the action works even when the original proto_buffer has
+  // died.  We ensure this behavior by deleting msg before using the
+  // action.
+  delete msg;
+
+  TestMessage dest;
+  ::ProtocolMessage* const dest_base = &dest;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(orig_msg.Equals(dest));
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, dest_base));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(orig_msg.Equals(dest));
+}
+
+// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) sets the v2
+// protobuf variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to
+// proto2_buffer.
+TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProto2BufferType) {
+  using testing::internal::FooMessage;
+  FooMessage* const msg = new FooMessage;
+  msg->set_int_field(2);
+  msg->set_string_field("hi");
+  FooMessage orig_msg;
+  orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg);
+
+  Action<void(bool, FooMessage*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg);
+  // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) makes a copy of
+  // proto2_buffer s.t. the action works even when the original
+  // proto2_buffer has died.  We ensure this behavior by deleting msg
+  // before using the action.
+  delete msg;
+
+  FooMessage dest;
+  dest.set_int_field(0);
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &dest));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, dest.int_field());
+  EXPECT_EQ("hi", dest.string_field());
+}
+
+// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) sets the
+// proto2::Message variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument
+// to proto2_buffer.
+TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProto2BufferBaseType) {
+  using testing::internal::FooMessage;
+  FooMessage* const msg = new FooMessage;
+  msg->set_int_field(2);
+  msg->set_string_field("hi");
+  FooMessage orig_msg;
+  orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg);
+
+  Action<void(bool, ::proto2::Message*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg);
+  // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) makes a copy of
+  // proto2_buffer s.t. the action works even when the original
+  // proto2_buffer has died.  We ensure this behavior by deleting msg
+  // before using the action.
+  delete msg;
+
+  FooMessage dest;
+  dest.set_int_field(0);
+  ::proto2::Message* const dest_base = &dest;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, dest_base));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, dest.int_field());
+  EXPECT_EQ("hi", dest.string_field());
+}
+
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+
+// Tests that SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) sets the elements of the array
+// pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to values in range [first, last).
+TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArray) {
+  typedef void MyFunction(bool, int*, char*);
+  int numbers[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(numbers, numbers + 3);
+
+  int n[4] = {};
+  int* pn = n;
+  char ch[4] = {};
+  char* pch = ch;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pn, pch));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n[0]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n[1]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, n[2]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[3]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch[0]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch[1]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch[2]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch[3]);
+
+  // Tests first and last are iterators.
+  std::string letters = "abc";
+  a = SetArrayArgument<2>(letters.begin(), letters.end());
+  std::fill_n(n, 4, 0);
+  std::fill_n(ch, 4, '\0');
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pn, pch));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[0]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[1]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[2]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[3]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', ch[0]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', ch[1]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', ch[2]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch[3]);
+}
+
+// Tests SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) where first == last.
+TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithEmptyRange) {
+  typedef void MyFunction(bool, int*);
+  int numbers[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(numbers, numbers);
+
+  int n[4] = {};
+  int* pn = n;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pn));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[0]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[1]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[2]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n[3]);
+}
+
+// Tests SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) where *first is convertible
+// (but not equal) to the argument type.
+TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithConvertibleType) {
+  typedef void MyFunction(bool, char*);
+  int codes[] = { 97, 98, 99 };
+  Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(codes, codes + 3);
+
+  char ch[4] = {};
+  char* pch = ch;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pch));
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', ch[0]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', ch[1]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', ch[2]);
+  EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch[3]);
+}
+
+// Test SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) with iterator as argument.
+TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithIteratorArgument) {
+  typedef void MyFunction(bool, std::back_insert_iterator<std::string>);
+  std::string letters = "abc";
+  Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(letters.begin(), letters.end());
+
+  std::string s;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, back_inserter(s)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(letters, s);
+}
+
+// Sample functions and functors for testing Invoke() and etc.
+int Nullary() { return 1; }
+
+class NullaryFunctor {
+ public:
+  int operator()() { return 2; }
+};
+
+bool g_done = false;
+void VoidNullary() { g_done = true; }
+
+class VoidNullaryFunctor {
+ public:
+  void operator()() { g_done = true; }
+};
+
+bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; }
+
+const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; }
+
+void VoidUnary(int n) { g_done = true; }
+
+bool ByConstRef(const std::string& s) { return s == "Hi"; }
+
+const double g_double = 0;
+bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; }
+
+std::string ByNonConstRef(std::string& s) { return s += "+"; }  // NOLINT
+
+struct UnaryFunctor {
+  int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; }
+};
+
+const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; }
+
+int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; }
+
+int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; }
+
+void VoidFunctionWithFourArguments(char, int, float, double) { g_done = true; }
+
+int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
+
+struct SumOf5Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e;
+  }
+};
+
+int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+  return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+}
+
+struct SumOf6Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+  }
+};
+
+class Foo {
+ public:
+  Foo() : value_(123) {}
+
+  int Nullary() const { return value_; }
+  short Unary(long x) { return static_cast<short>(value_ + x); }  // NOLINT
+  std::string Binary(const std::string& str, char c) const { return str + c; }
+  int Ternary(int x, bool y, char z) { return value_ + x + y*z; }
+  int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) const {
+    return a + b + c + d + value_;
+  }
+  int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
+  int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+  }
+ private:
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests InvokeWithoutArgs(function).
+TEST(InvokeWithoutArgsTest, Function) {
+  // As an action that takes one argument.
+  Action<int(int)> a = InvokeWithoutArgs(Nullary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+
+  // As an action that takes two arguments.
+  Action<short(int, double)> a2 = InvokeWithoutArgs(Nullary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a2.Perform(make_tuple(2, 3.5)));
+
+  // As an action that returns void.
+  Action<void(int)> a3 = InvokeWithoutArgs(VoidNullary);  // NOLINT
+  g_done = false;
+  a3.Perform(make_tuple(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+// Tests InvokeWithoutArgs(functor).
+TEST(InvokeWithoutArgsTest, Functor) {
+  // As an action that takes no argument.
+  Action<int()> a = InvokeWithoutArgs(NullaryFunctor());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  // As an action that takes three arguments.
+  Action<short(int, double, char)> a2 =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeWithoutArgs(NullaryFunctor());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a2.Perform(make_tuple(3, 3.5, 'a')));
+
+  // As an action that returns void.
+  Action<void()> a3 = InvokeWithoutArgs(VoidNullaryFunctor());
+  g_done = false;
+  a3.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+// Tests InvokeWithoutArgs(obj_ptr, method).
+TEST(InvokeWithoutArgsTest, Method) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(bool, char)> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeWithoutArgs(&foo, &Foo::Nullary);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(true, 'a')));
+}
+
+// Tests using IgnoreResult() on a polymorphic action.
+TEST(IgnoreResultTest, PolymorphicAction) {
+  Action<void(int)> a = IgnoreResult(Return(5));  // NOLINT
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(1));
+}
+
+// Tests using IgnoreResult() on a monomorphic action.
+
+int ReturnOne() {
+  g_done = true;
+  return 1;
+}
+
+TEST(IgnoreResultTest, MonomorphicAction) {
+  g_done = false;
+  Action<void()> a = IgnoreResult(Invoke(ReturnOne));
+  a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+// Tests using IgnoreResult() on an action that returns a class type.
+
+MyClass ReturnMyClass(double x) {
+  g_done = true;
+  return MyClass();
+}
+
+TEST(IgnoreResultTest, ActionReturningClass) {
+  g_done = false;
+  Action<void(int)> a = IgnoreResult(Invoke(ReturnMyClass));  // NOLINT
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+TEST(AssignTest, Int) {
+  int x = 0;
+  Action<void(int)> a = Assign(&x, 5);
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, x);
+}
+
+TEST(AssignTest, String) {
+  ::std::string x;
+  Action<void(void)> a = Assign(&x, "Hello, world");
+  a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello, world", x);
+}
+
+TEST(AssignTest, CompatibleTypes) {
+  double x = 0;
+  Action<void(int)> a = Assign(&x, 5);
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(0));
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, x);
+}
+
+#ifndef _WIN32_WCE
+
+class SetErrnoAndReturnTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  virtual void SetUp() { errno = 0; }
+  virtual void TearDown() { errno = 0; }
+};
+
+TEST_F(SetErrnoAndReturnTest, Int) {
+  Action<int(void)> a = SetErrnoAndReturn(ENOTTY, -5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(-5, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(ENOTTY, errno);
+}
+
+TEST_F(SetErrnoAndReturnTest, Ptr) {
+  int x;
+  Action<int*(void)> a = SetErrnoAndReturn(ENOTTY, &x);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&x, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(ENOTTY, errno);
+}
+
+TEST_F(SetErrnoAndReturnTest, CompatibleTypes) {
+  Action<double()> a = SetErrnoAndReturn(EINVAL, 5);
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5.0, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+}
+
+#endif  // _WIN32_WCE
+
+}  // Unnamed namespace
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f3f1e10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the built-in cardinalities.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+
+namespace {
+
+using std::stringstream;
+using testing::AnyNumber;
+using testing::AtLeast;
+using testing::AtMost;
+using testing::Between;
+using testing::Cardinality;
+using testing::CardinalityInterface;
+using testing::Exactly;
+using testing::IsSubstring;
+using testing::MakeCardinality;
+
+class MockFoo {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD0(Bar, int());  // NOLINT
+};
+
+// Tests that Cardinality objects can be default constructed.
+TEST(CardinalityTest, IsDefaultConstructable) {
+  Cardinality c;
+}
+
+// Tests that Cardinality objects are copyable.
+TEST(CardinalityTest, IsCopyable) {
+  // Tests the copy constructor.
+  Cardinality c = Exactly(1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  // Tests the assignment operator.
+  c = Exactly(2);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(2));
+}
+
+TEST(CardinalityTest, IsOverSaturatedByCallCountWorks) {
+  const Cardinality c = AtMost(5);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsOverSaturatedByCallCount(4));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsOverSaturatedByCallCount(5));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsOverSaturatedByCallCount(6));
+}
+
+// Tests that Cardinality::DescribeActualCallCountTo() creates the
+// correct description.
+TEST(CardinalityTest, CanDescribeActualCallCount) {
+  stringstream ss0;
+  Cardinality::DescribeActualCallCountTo(0, &ss0);
+  EXPECT_EQ("never called", ss0.str());
+
+  stringstream ss1;
+  Cardinality::DescribeActualCallCountTo(1, &ss1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("called once", ss1.str());
+
+  stringstream ss2;
+  Cardinality::DescribeActualCallCountTo(2, &ss2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("called twice", ss2.str());
+
+  stringstream ss3;
+  Cardinality::DescribeActualCallCountTo(3, &ss3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("called 3 times", ss3.str());
+}
+
+// Tests AnyNumber()
+TEST(AnyNumber, Works) {
+  const Cardinality c = AnyNumber();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(9));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(9));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called any number of times",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(AnyNumberTest, HasCorrectBounds) {
+  const Cardinality c = AnyNumber();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, c.ConservativeLowerBound());
+  EXPECT_EQ(INT_MAX, c.ConservativeUpperBound());
+}
+
+// Tests AtLeast(n).
+
+TEST(AtLeastTest, OnNegativeNumber) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    AtLeast(-1);
+  }, "The invocation lower bound must be >= 0");
+}
+
+TEST(AtLeastTest, OnZero) {
+  const Cardinality c = AtLeast(0);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "any number of times",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(AtLeastTest, OnPositiveNumber) {
+  const Cardinality c = AtLeast(2);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(2));
+
+  stringstream ss1;
+  AtLeast(1).DescribeTo(&ss1);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "at least once",
+                      ss1.str());
+
+  stringstream ss2;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss2);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "at least twice",
+                      ss2.str());
+
+  stringstream ss3;
+  AtLeast(3).DescribeTo(&ss3);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "at least 3 times",
+                      ss3.str());
+}
+
+TEST(AtLeastTest, HasCorrectBounds) {
+  const Cardinality c = AtLeast(2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, c.ConservativeLowerBound());
+  EXPECT_EQ(INT_MAX, c.ConservativeUpperBound());
+}
+
+// Tests AtMost(n).
+
+TEST(AtMostTest, OnNegativeNumber) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    AtMost(-1);
+  }, "The invocation upper bound must be >= 0");
+}
+
+TEST(AtMostTest, OnZero) {
+  const Cardinality c = AtMost(0);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "never called",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(AtMostTest, OnPositiveNumber) {
+  const Cardinality c = AtMost(2);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(2));
+
+  stringstream ss1;
+  AtMost(1).DescribeTo(&ss1);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called at most once",
+                      ss1.str());
+
+  stringstream ss2;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss2);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called at most twice",
+                      ss2.str());
+
+  stringstream ss3;
+  AtMost(3).DescribeTo(&ss3);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called at most 3 times",
+                      ss3.str());
+}
+
+TEST(AtMostTest, HasCorrectBounds) {
+  const Cardinality c = AtMost(2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, c.ConservativeLowerBound());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, c.ConservativeUpperBound());
+}
+
+// Tests Between(m, n).
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, OnNegativeStart) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    Between(-1, 2);
+  }, "The invocation lower bound must be >= 0, but is actually -1");
+}
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, OnNegativeEnd) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    Between(1, -2);
+  }, "The invocation upper bound must be >= 0, but is actually -2");
+}
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, OnStartBiggerThanEnd) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    Between(2, 1);
+  }, "The invocation upper bound (1) must be >= "
+     "the invocation lower bound (2)");
+}
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, OnZeroStartAndZeroEnd) {
+  const Cardinality c = Between(0, 0);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "never called",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, OnZeroStartAndNonZeroEnd) {
+  const Cardinality c = Between(0, 2);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(2));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(4));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(4));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called at most twice",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, OnSameStartAndEnd) {
+  const Cardinality c = Between(3, 3);
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(2));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(3));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(4));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(4));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called 3 times",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, OnDifferentStartAndEnd) {
+  const Cardinality c = Between(3, 5);
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(2));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(3));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(3));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(5));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(5));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(6));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(6));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called between 3 and 5 times",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(BetweenTest, HasCorrectBounds) {
+  const Cardinality c = Between(3, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, c.ConservativeLowerBound());
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, c.ConservativeUpperBound());
+}
+
+// Tests Exactly(n).
+
+TEST(ExactlyTest, OnNegativeNumber) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    Exactly(-1);
+  }, "The invocation lower bound must be >= 0");
+}
+
+TEST(ExactlyTest, OnZero) {
+  const Cardinality c = Exactly(0);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(1));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "never called",
+                      ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(ExactlyTest, OnPositiveNumber) {
+  const Cardinality c = Exactly(2);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(0));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(2));
+
+  stringstream ss1;
+  Exactly(1).DescribeTo(&ss1);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called once",
+                      ss1.str());
+
+  stringstream ss2;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss2);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called twice",
+                      ss2.str());
+
+  stringstream ss3;
+  Exactly(3).DescribeTo(&ss3);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "called 3 times",
+                      ss3.str());
+}
+
+TEST(ExactlyTest, HasCorrectBounds) {
+  const Cardinality c = Exactly(3);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, c.ConservativeLowerBound());
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, c.ConservativeUpperBound());
+}
+
+// Tests that a user can make his own cardinality by implementing
+// CardinalityInterface and calling MakeCardinality().
+
+class EvenCardinality : public CardinalityInterface {
+ public:
+  // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality.
+  virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const {
+    return (call_count % 2 == 0);
+  }
+
+  // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality.
+  virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const { return false; }
+
+  // Describes self to an ostream.
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* ss) const {
+    *ss << "called even number of times";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(MakeCardinalityTest, ConstructsCardinalityFromInterface) {
+  const Cardinality c = MakeCardinality(new EvenCardinality);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSatisfiedByCallCount(3));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(c.IsSaturatedByCallCount(10000));
+
+  stringstream ss;
+  c.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  EXPECT_EQ("called even number of times", ss.str());
+}
+
+}  // Unnamed namespace
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..84e5a41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,1651 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the built-in actions generated by a script.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h>
+
+#include <functional>
+#include <string>
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace gmock_generated_actions_test {
+
+using ::std::plus;
+using ::std::string;
+using ::std::tr1::get;
+using ::std::tr1::make_tuple;
+using ::std::tr1::tuple;
+using ::std::tr1::tuple_element;
+using testing::_;
+using testing::Action;
+using testing::ActionInterface;
+using testing::ByRef;
+using testing::DeleteArg;
+using testing::DoAll;
+using testing::Invoke;
+using testing::InvokeArgument;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::ReturnNew;
+using testing::SaveArg;
+using testing::SetArgReferee;
+using testing::SetArgumentPointee;
+using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
+using testing::Unused;
+using testing::WithArg;
+using testing::WithArgs;
+using testing::WithoutArgs;
+
+// Sample functions and functors for testing Invoke() and etc.
+int Nullary() { return 1; }
+
+class NullaryFunctor {
+ public:
+  int operator()() { return 2; }
+};
+
+bool g_done = false;
+void VoidNullary() { g_done = true; }
+
+class VoidNullaryFunctor {
+ public:
+  void operator()() { g_done = true; }
+};
+
+bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; }
+
+const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; }
+
+void VoidUnary(int n) { g_done = true; }
+
+bool ByConstRef(const string& s) { return s == "Hi"; }
+
+const double g_double = 0;
+bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; }
+
+string ByNonConstRef(string& s) { return s += "+"; }  // NOLINT
+
+struct UnaryFunctor {
+  int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; }
+};
+
+const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; }
+
+int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; }
+
+int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; }
+
+int SumOfFirst2(int a, int b, Unused, Unused) { return a + b; }
+
+void VoidFunctionWithFourArguments(char, int, float, double) { g_done = true; }
+
+string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4;
+}
+
+int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
+
+struct SumOf5Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e;
+  }
+};
+
+string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5;
+}
+
+int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+  return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+}
+
+struct SumOf6Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+  }
+};
+
+string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6;
+}
+
+string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7;
+}
+
+string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7, const char* s8) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8;
+}
+
+string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9;
+}
+
+string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9,
+                const char* s10) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10;
+}
+
+class Foo {
+ public:
+  Foo() : value_(123) {}
+
+  int Nullary() const { return value_; }
+
+  short Unary(long x) { return static_cast<short>(value_ + x); }  // NOLINT
+
+  string Binary(const string& str, char c) const { return str + c; }
+
+  int Ternary(int x, bool y, char z) { return value_ + x + y*z; }
+
+  int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) const {
+    return a + b + c + d + value_;
+  }
+
+  int SumOfLast2(Unused, Unused, int a, int b) const { return a + b; }
+
+  int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
+
+  int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+  }
+
+  string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                 const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                 const char* s7) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7;
+  }
+
+  string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                 const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                 const char* s7, const char* s8) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8;
+  }
+
+  string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                 const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                 const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9;
+  }
+
+  string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                  const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                  const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9,
+                  const char* s10) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10;
+  }
+ private:
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a nullary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Nullary) {
+  Action<int()> a = Invoke(Nullary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a unary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Unary) {
+  Action<bool(int)> a = Invoke(Unary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(-1)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a binary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Binary) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*, short)> a = Invoke(Binary);  // NOLINT
+  const char* p = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(p + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(p, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a ternary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Ternary) {
+  Action<int(int, char, short)> a = Invoke(Ternary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(make_tuple(1, '\2', 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 4-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes4Arguments) {
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf4);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1234, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 5-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes5Arguments) {
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf5);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 6-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes6Arguments) {
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf6);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 7-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes7Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(Concat7);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes8Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(Concat8);
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes9Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*)> a = Invoke(Concat9);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes10Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*)> a = Invoke(Concat10);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6",
+                                               "7", "8", "9", "0")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with functions with parameters declared as Unused.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithUnusedParameters) {
+  Action<int(int, int, double, const string&)> a1 =
+      Invoke(SumOfFirst2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10, 2, 5.6, "hi")));
+
+  Action<int(int, int, bool, int*)> a2 =
+      Invoke(SumOfFirst2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(23, a2.Perform(make_tuple(20, 3, true, static_cast<int*>(NULL))));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with methods with parameters declared as Unused.
+TEST(InvokeTest, MethodWithUnusedParameters) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(string, bool, int, int)> a1 =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(make_tuple("hi", true, 10, 2)));
+
+  Action<int(char, double, int, int)> a2 =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(23, a2.Perform(make_tuple('a', 2.5, 20, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a functor.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Functor) {
+  Action<int(short, char)> a = Invoke(plus<short>());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke(f) as an action of a compatible type.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithCompatibleType) {
+  Action<long(int, short, char, bool)> a = Invoke(SumOf4);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(4321, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000, 300, 20, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with an object pointer and a method pointer.
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a nullary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Nullary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int()> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Nullary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a unary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Unary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<short(long)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Unary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(4123, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a binary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Binary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const string&, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Binary);
+  string s("Hell");
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello", a.Perform(make_tuple(s, 'o')));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a ternary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Ternary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, bool, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Ternary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1124, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, true, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 4-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes4Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf4);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1357, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 5-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes5Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf5);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 6-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes6Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 7-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes7Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat7);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes8Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat8);
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes9Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat9);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes10Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat10);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6",
+                                               "7", "8", "9", "0")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke(f) as an action of a compatible type.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodWithCompatibleType) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<long(int, short, char, bool)> a =  // NOLINT
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf4);
+  EXPECT_EQ(4444, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000, 300, 20, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests ByRef().
+
+// Tests that ReferenceWrapper<T> is copyable.
+TEST(ByRefTest, IsCopyable) {
+  const string s1 = "Hi";
+  const string s2 = "Hello";
+
+  ::testing::internal::ReferenceWrapper<const string> ref_wrapper = ByRef(s1);
+  const string& r1 = ref_wrapper;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&s1, &r1);
+
+  // Assigns a new value to ref_wrapper.
+  ref_wrapper = ByRef(s2);
+  const string& r2 = ref_wrapper;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&s2, &r2);
+
+  ::testing::internal::ReferenceWrapper<const string> ref_wrapper1 = ByRef(s1);
+  // Copies ref_wrapper1 to ref_wrapper.
+  ref_wrapper = ref_wrapper1;
+  const string& r3 = ref_wrapper;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&s1, &r3);
+}
+
+// Tests using ByRef() on a const value.
+TEST(ByRefTest, ConstValue) {
+  const int n = 0;
+  // int& ref = ByRef(n);  // This shouldn't compile - we have a
+                           // negative compilation test to catch it.
+  const int& const_ref = ByRef(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &const_ref);
+}
+
+// Tests using ByRef() on a non-const value.
+TEST(ByRefTest, NonConstValue) {
+  int n = 0;
+
+  // ByRef(n) can be used as either an int&,
+  int& ref = ByRef(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &ref);
+
+  // or a const int&.
+  const int& const_ref = ByRef(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &const_ref);
+}
+
+struct Base {
+  bool operator==(const Base&) { return true; }
+};
+
+struct Derived : public Base {
+  bool operator==(const Derived&) { return true; }
+};
+
+// Tests explicitly specifying the type when using ByRef().
+TEST(ByRefTest, ExplicitType) {
+  int n = 0;
+  const int& r1 = ByRef<const int>(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &r1);
+
+  // ByRef<char>(n);  // This shouldn't compile - we have a negative
+                      // compilation test to catch it.
+
+
+  Derived d;
+  Derived& r2 = ByRef<Derived>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r2);
+
+  const Derived& r3 = ByRef<const Derived>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r3);
+
+  Base& r4 = ByRef<Base>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r4);
+
+  const Base& r5 = ByRef<const Base>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r5);
+
+  // The following shouldn't compile - we have a negative compilation
+  // test for it.
+  //
+  // Base b;
+  // ByRef<Derived>(b);
+}
+
+// Tests InvokeArgument<N>(...).
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) {
+  Action<int(int, int(*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>();  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, &Nullary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) {
+  Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(UnaryFunctor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) {
+  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf5)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) {
+  Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf5Functor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) {
+  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf6)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) {
+  Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf6Functor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7");
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat7)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8");
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat8)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9");
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat9)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0");
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), 1);
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char*
+// by passing it a C-string literal.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", 1);
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) {
+  Action<bool(bool(*function)(const string& s))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(string("Hi"));
+  // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary
+  // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the
+  // temporary object has already died.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ByConstRef)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a
+// const reference.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) {
+  Action<bool(bool(*)(const double& x))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double));
+  // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
+
+  double x = 0;
+  a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x));  // This calls ByRef() on a non-const.
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithoutArgs with an action that takes no argument.
+TEST(WithoutArgsTest, NoArg) {
+  Action<int(int n)> a = WithoutArgs(Invoke(Nullary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs and WithArg with an action that takes 1 argument.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, OneArg) {
+  Action<bool(double x, int n)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
+
+  // Also tests the synonym WithArg.
+  Action<bool(double x, int n)> b = WithArg<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
+
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 2 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TwoArgs) {
+  Action<const char*(const char* s, double x, int n)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 2>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(s, 0.5, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 3 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ThreeArgs) {
+  Action<int(int, double, char, short)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 6.5, 20, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 4 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, FourArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4));
+  EXPECT_EQ("4310", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", 2.5, "3", "4")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 5 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("43210", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3", "4")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 6 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat6));
+  EXPECT_EQ("012210", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 7 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat7));
+  EXPECT_EQ("0123210", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 8 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat8));
+  EXPECT_EQ("01230123", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 9 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat9));
+  EXPECT_EQ("012312323", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat10));
+  EXPECT_EQ("0123210123", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that is not Invoke().
+class SubstractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> {  // NOLINT
+ public:
+  virtual int Perform(const tuple<int, int>& args) {
+    return get<0>(args) - get<1>(args);
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) {
+  Action<int(const string&, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubstractAction));
+  EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(make_tuple("hi", 2, 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, Identity) {
+  Action<int(int x, char y, short z)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 20, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with repeated arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, RepeatedArguments) {
+  Action<int(bool, int m, int n)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 1, 1, 1>(Invoke(SumOf4));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1, 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with reversed argument order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ReversedArgumentOrder) {
+  Action<const char*(short n, const char* input)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 0>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, s)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with compatible, but not identical, argument types.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ArgsOfCompatibleTypes) {
+  Action<long(short x, int y, double z, char c)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 20, 5.6, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that returns void.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, VoidAction) {
+  Action<void(double x, char c, int n)> a = WithArgs<2, 1>(Invoke(VoidBinary));
+  g_done = false;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 'a', 3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2).
+TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) {
+  int n = 0;
+  Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
+                              Return(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple(&n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3).
+TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
+                                    SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+                                    Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4).
+TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char ch = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*)> a =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5).
+TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a6).
+TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a7).
+TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a8).
+TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a9).
+TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0', f = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*, char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<7>('f'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a10).
+TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
+  char e = '\0', f = '\0', g = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*, char*, char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<7>('f'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<8>('g'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
+  EXPECT_EQ('g', g);
+}
+
+// Tests the ACTION*() macro family.
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the
+// mock function arguments.
+ACTION(Return5) { return 5; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) {
+  Action<double()> a1 = Return5();
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5();
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void.
+ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) {
+  Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1();
+  int n = 0;
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, &n));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the type of the
+// argument.
+ACTION(IncrementArg2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, arg2_type>();
+  arg2_type temp = arg2;
+  (*temp)++;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) {
+  Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2();
+  int n = 0;
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, false, &n));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple
+// via args_type and args.
+ACTION(Sum2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq< ::std::tr1::tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>();
+  args_type args_copy = args;
+  return get<0>(args_copy) + get<1>(args_copy);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) {
+  Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2();
+  int dummy = 0;
+  EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, static_cast<char>(6), &dummy)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function
+// type.
+int Dummy(bool flag) { return flag? 1 : 0; }
+
+ACTION(InvokeDummy) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int(bool), function_type>();
+  function_type* fp = &Dummy;
+  return (*fp)(true);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) {
+  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's
+// return type.
+ACTION(InvokeDummy2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int, return_type>();
+  return_type result = Dummy(true);
+  return result;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) {
+  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference.
+ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<const bool&, arg1_type>();
+  return &arg1;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) {
+  Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg();
+  const bool b = false;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference.
+ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int&, arg0_type>();
+  return &arg0;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) {
+  Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg();
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace.
+namespace action_test {
+ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }
+}  // namespace action_test
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) {
+  Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum();
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with
+// different argument numbers.
+ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo();
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+
+  Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo();
+  int dummy;
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action.
+ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }
+
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) {
+  Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types
+// and the parameter type.
+ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) {
+  arg0_type t1 = arg0;
+  n_type t2 = n;
+  return t1 + t2;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) {
+  Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(static_cast<char>(1), true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function
+// whose type is compatible.
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) {
+  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail");
+  const std::string re = "re";
+  EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(make_tuple(re)));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the
+// number of parameters.
+
+ACTION(OverloadedAction) { return arg0 ? arg1 : "hello"; }
+
+ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, default_value) {
+  return arg0 ? arg1 : default_value;
+}
+
+ACTION_P2(OverloadedAction, true_value, false_value) {
+  return arg0 ? true_value : false_value;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) {
+  typedef Action<const char*(bool, const char*)> MyAction;
+
+  const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction();
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, "world")));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, "world")));
+
+  const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, "world")));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, "world")));
+
+  const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(make_tuple(true, "world")));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(make_tuple(false, "world")));
+}
+
+// Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3.
+
+ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) {
+  Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4);
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(3000, true)));
+
+  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">");
+  const std::string re = "re";
+  EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(make_tuple(re)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) {
+  arg0_type t0 = arg0;
+  last_param_type t9 = last_param;
+  return t0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + t9;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10,
+            a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types.
+
+ACTION_P2(PadArgument, prefix, suffix) {
+  // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types.
+  std::string prefix_str(prefix);
+  char suffix_char(suffix);
+  return prefix_str + arg0 + suffix_char;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) {
+  Action<std::string(const char*)> no_promo =
+      PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r');
+  Action<std::string(const char*)> promo =
+      PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(make_tuple("ba")));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(make_tuple("ba")));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a
+// straight-forward pattern.
+
+// Defines a generic action that doesn't restrict the types of its
+// parameters.
+ACTION_P3(ConcatImpl, a, b, c) {
+  std::stringstream ss;
+  ss << a << b << c;
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Next, we try to restrict that either the first parameter is a
+// string, or the second parameter is an int.
+
+// Defines a partially specialized wrapper that restricts the first
+// parameter to std::string.
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+// ConcatImplActionP3 is the class template ACTION_P3 uses to
+// implement ConcatImpl.  We shouldn't change the name as this
+// pattern requires the user to use it directly.
+ConcatImplActionP3<std::string, T1, T2>
+Concat(const std::string& a, T1 b, T2 c) {
+  if (true) {
+    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can be invoked without
+    // explicit template arguments.
+    return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
+  } else {
+    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can also be invoked with
+    // explicit template arguments.  It doesn't really need to be
+    // executed as this is a compile-time verification.
+    return ConcatImpl<std::string, T1, T2>(a, b, c);
+  }
+}
+
+// Defines another partially specialized wrapper that restricts the
+// second parameter to int.
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+ConcatImplActionP3<T1, int, T2>
+Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) {
+  return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) {
+  Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Verifies the type of an ACTION*.
+
+ACTION(DoFoo) {}
+ACTION_P(DoFoo, p) {}
+ACTION_P2(DoFoo, p0, p1) {}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) {
+  // DoFoo() must be assignable to a DoFooAction variable.
+  DoFooAction a0 = DoFoo();
+
+  // DoFoo(1) must be assignable to a DoFooActionP variable.
+  DoFooActionP<int> a1 = DoFoo(1);
+
+  // DoFoo(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a DoFooActionPk
+  // variable, and so on.
+  DoFooActionP2<int, char> a2 = DoFoo(1, '2');
+  PlusActionP3<int, int, char> a3 = Plus(1, 2, '3');
+  PlusActionP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = Plus(1, 2, 3, '4');
+  PlusActionP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, '5');
+  PlusActionP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6');
+  PlusActionP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7');
+  PlusActionP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8');
+  PlusActionP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9');
+  PlusActionP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0');
+}
+
+// Tests that an ACTION_P*() action can be explicitly instantiated
+// with reference-typed parameters.
+
+ACTION_P(Plus1, x) { return x; }
+ACTION_P2(Plus2, x, y) { return x + y; }
+ACTION_P3(Plus3, x, y, z) { return x + y + z; }
+ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) {
+  return a0 + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) {
+  int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3;
+  const tuple<> empty = make_tuple();
+
+  Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  a = Plus2<const int&, int&>(x, y);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  a = Plus3<int&, const int&, int&>(x, y, z);
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  int n[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };
+  a = Plus10<const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&,
+      int&, const int&, int&>(n[0], n[1], n[2], n[3], n[4], n[5], n[6], n[7],
+                              n[8], n[9]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(empty));
+}
+
+TEST(SaveArgActionTest, WorksForSameType) {
+  int result = 0;
+  const Action<void(int n)> a1 = SaveArg<0>(&result);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, result);
+}
+
+TEST(SaveArgActionTest, WorksForCompatibleType) {
+  int result = 0;
+  const Action<void(bool, char)> a1 = SaveArg<1>(&result);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 'a'));
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', result);
+}
+
+TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksForSameType) {
+  int value = 0;
+  const Action<void(int&)> a1 = SetArgReferee<0>(1);
+  a1.Perform(tuple<int&>(value));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, value);
+}
+
+TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksForCompatibleType) {
+  int value = 0;
+  const Action<void(int, int&)> a1 = SetArgReferee<1>('a');
+  a1.Perform(tuple<int, int&>(0, value));
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', value);
+}
+
+TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksWithExtraArguments) {
+  int value = 0;
+  const Action<void(bool, int, int&, const char*)> a1 = SetArgReferee<2>('a');
+  a1.Perform(tuple<bool, int, int&, const char*>(true, 0, value, "hi"));
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', value);
+}
+
+class NullaryConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  NullaryConstructorClass() : value_(123) {}
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a nullary constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, NoArgs) {
+  Action<NullaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<NullaryConstructorClass>();
+  NullaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+class UnaryConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  explicit UnaryConstructorClass(int value) : value_(value) {}
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a unary constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, Unary) {
+  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodHasArgs) {
+  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*(bool, int)> a =
+      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodReturnsPointerToConst) {
+  Action<const UnaryConstructorClass*()> a =
+      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  const UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+class TenArgConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  TenArgConstructorClass(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5,
+                         int a6, int a7, int a8, int a9, int a10)
+    : value_(a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10) {
+  }
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a 10-argument constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, ConstructorThatTakes10Arguments) {
+  Action<TenArgConstructorClass*()> a =
+      ReturnNew<TenArgConstructorClass>(1000000000, 200000000, 30000000,
+                                        4000000, 500000, 60000,
+                                        7000, 800, 90, 0);
+  TenArgConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1234567890, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+// A class that can be used to verify that its destructor is called: it will set
+// the bool provided to the constructor to true when destroyed.
+class DeletionTester {
+ public:
+  explicit DeletionTester(bool* is_deleted)
+    : is_deleted_(is_deleted) {
+    // Make sure the bit is set to false.
+    *is_deleted_ = false;
+  }
+
+  ~DeletionTester() {
+    *is_deleted_ = true;
+  }
+
+ private:
+  bool* is_deleted_;
+};
+
+TEST(DeleteArgActionTest, OneArg) {
+  bool is_deleted = false;
+  DeletionTester* t = new DeletionTester(&is_deleted);
+  const Action<void(DeletionTester*)> a1 = DeleteArg<0>();      // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_deleted);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(t));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(is_deleted);
+}
+
+TEST(DeleteArgActionTest, TenArgs) {
+  bool is_deleted = false;
+  DeletionTester* t = new DeletionTester(&is_deleted);
+  const Action<void(bool, int, int, const char*, bool,
+                    int, int, int, int, DeletionTester*)> a1 = DeleteArg<9>();
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_deleted);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5, 6, "hi", false, 7, 8, 9, 10, t));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(is_deleted);
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInVoidFunction) {
+  const Action<void(int n)> a = Throw('a');
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple(0)), char);
+}
+
+class MyException {};
+
+TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInNonVoidFunction) {
+  const Action<double(char ch)> a = Throw(MyException());
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple('0')), MyException);
+}
+
+TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInNullaryFunction) {
+  const Action<double()> a = Throw(MyException());
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple()), MyException);
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there is no value parameter.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
+                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
+  return new T;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) {
+  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>();
+  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  delete p;
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there are value parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(a0)) {
+  return new T(a0);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) {
+  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42);
+  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
+  delete p;
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for integral template parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k),
+                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
+  delete std::tr1::get<k>(args);
+}
+
+// Resets a bool variable in the destructor.
+class BoolResetter {
+ public:
+  explicit BoolResetter(bool* value) : value_(value) {}
+  ~BoolResetter() { *value_ = false; }
+ private:
+  bool* const value_;
+};
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) {
+  const Action<void(int*, BoolResetter*)> a = MyDeleteArg<1>();
+  int n = 0;
+  bool b = true;
+  BoolResetter* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b);
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(&n, resetter));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(b);  // Verifies that resetter is deleted.
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATES works for template template parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(template <typename Pointee> class,
+                                      Pointer),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(pointee)) {
+  return Pointer<pointee_type>(new pointee_type(pointee));
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) {
+  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
+  const Action<linked_ptr<int>()> a = ReturnSmartPointer<linked_ptr>(42);
+  linked_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 template parameters.
+template <typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, int k4, bool k5,
+          unsigned int k6, typename T7, typename T8, typename T9>
+struct GiantTemplate {
+ public:
+  explicit GiantTemplate(int a_value) : value(a_value) {}
+  int value;
+};
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant,
+                HAS_10_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(
+                    typename, T1,
+                    typename, T2,
+                    typename, T3,
+                    int, k4,
+                    bool, k5,
+                    unsigned int, k6,
+                    class, T7,
+                    class, T8,
+                    class, T9,
+                    template <typename T> class, T10),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(value)) {
+  return GiantTemplate<T10<T1>, T2, T3, k4, k5, k6, T7, T8, T9>(value);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) {
+  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
+  typedef GiantTemplate<linked_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5,
+      true, 6, char, unsigned, int> Giant;
+  const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<
+      int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, unsigned, int, linked_ptr>(42);
+  Giant giant = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value);
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 value parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + v5 + v6 + v7 + v8 + v9 + v10;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) {
+  const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
+  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded
+// on the number of value parameters.
+
+ACTION(ReturnSum) { return 0; }
+
+ACTION_P(ReturnSum, x) { return x; }
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2;
+}
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3;
+}
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number, int, k),
+                AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + k;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) {
+  const Action<int()> a0 = ReturnSum();
+  const Action<int()> a1 = ReturnSum(1);
+  const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2);
+  const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3);
+  const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+}  // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7267c10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,466 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the function mocker classes.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h>
+
+#include <map>
+#include <string>
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+// MSDN says the header file to be included for STDMETHOD is BaseTyps.h but
+// we are getting compiler errors if we use basetyps.h, hence including
+// objbase.h for definition of STDMETHOD.
+#include <objbase.h>
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+// There is a bug in MSVC (fixed in VS 2008) that prevents creating a
+// mock for a function with const arguments, so we don't test such
+// cases for MSVC versions older than 2008.
+#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
+#define GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+#endif  // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace gmock_generated_function_mockers_test {
+
+using testing::internal::string;
+using testing::_;
+using testing::A;
+using testing::An;
+using testing::AnyNumber;
+using testing::Const;
+using testing::DoDefault;
+using testing::Eq;
+using testing::Lt;
+using testing::Ref;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::ReturnRef;
+using testing::TypedEq;
+
+class FooInterface {
+ public:
+  virtual ~FooInterface() {}
+
+  virtual void VoidReturning(int x) = 0;
+
+  virtual int Nullary() = 0;
+  virtual bool Unary(int x) = 0;
+  virtual long Binary(short x, int y) = 0;  // NOLINT
+  virtual int Decimal(bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f,  // NOLINT
+                      float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, const string& k)
+      = 0;
+
+  virtual bool TakesNonConstReference(int& n) = 0;  // NOLINT
+  virtual string TakesConstReference(const int& n) = 0;
+#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+  virtual bool TakesConst(const int x) = 0;
+#endif  // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+
+  virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber() = 0;
+  virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(int n) = 0;
+
+  virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentType(int n) = 0;
+  virtual char OverloadedOnArgumentType(char c) = 0;
+
+  virtual int OverloadedOnConstness() = 0;
+  virtual char OverloadedOnConstness() const = 0;
+
+  virtual int TypeWithHole(int (*func)()) = 0;
+  virtual int TypeWithComma(const std::map<int, string>& a_map) = 0;
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  STDMETHOD_(int, CTNullary)() = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(bool, CTUnary)(int x) = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(int, CTDecimal)(bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f,  // NOLINT
+      float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, const string& k) = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(char, CTConst)(int x) const = 0;
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+};
+
+class MockFoo : public FooInterface {
+ public:
+  // Makes sure that a mock function parameter can be named.
+  MOCK_METHOD1(VoidReturning, void(int n));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD0(Nullary, int());  // NOLINT
+
+  // Makes sure that a mock function parameter can be unnamed.
+  MOCK_METHOD1(Unary, bool(int));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD2(Binary, long(short, int));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD10(Decimal, int(bool, char, short, int, long, float,  // NOLINT
+                             double, unsigned, char*, const string& str));
+
+  MOCK_METHOD1(TakesNonConstReference, bool(int&));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD1(TakesConstReference, string(const int&));
+#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+  MOCK_METHOD1(TakesConst, bool(const int));  // NOLINT
+#endif  // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+  MOCK_METHOD0(OverloadedOnArgumentNumber, int());  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD1(OverloadedOnArgumentNumber, int(int));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD1(OverloadedOnArgumentType, int(int));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD1(OverloadedOnArgumentType, char(char));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD0(OverloadedOnConstness, int());  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(OverloadedOnConstness, char());  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD1(TypeWithHole, int(int (*)()));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD1(TypeWithComma, int(const std::map<int, string>&));  // NOLINT
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  MOCK_METHOD0_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTNullary, int());
+  MOCK_METHOD1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTUnary, bool(int));
+  MOCK_METHOD10_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTDecimal, int(bool b, char c,
+      short d, int e, long f, float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j,
+      const string& k));
+  MOCK_CONST_METHOD1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTConst, char(int));
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+};
+
+class FunctionMockerTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  FunctionMockerTest() : foo_(&mock_foo_) {}
+
+  FooInterface* const foo_;
+  MockFoo mock_foo_;
+};
+
+// Tests mocking a void-returning function.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksVoidFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, VoidReturning(Lt(100)));
+  foo_->VoidReturning(0);
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a nullary function.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksNullaryFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Nullary())
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, foo_->Nullary());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo_->Nullary());
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a unary function.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksUnaryFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Unary(Eq(2)))
+      .Times(2)
+      .WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(foo_->Unary(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->Unary(2));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a binary function.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksBinaryFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Binary(2, _))
+      .WillOnce(Return(3));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, foo_->Binary(2, 1));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a decimal function.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksDecimalFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Decimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(),
+                                 Lt(100), 5U, NULL, "hi"))
+      .WillOnce(Return(5));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, foo_->Decimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 5, NULL, "hi"));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a function that takes a non-const reference.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithNonConstReferenceArgument) {
+  int a = 0;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesNonConstReference(Ref(a)))
+      .WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(foo_->TakesNonConstReference(a));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a function that takes a const reference.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstReferenceArgument) {
+  int a = 0;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesConstReference(Ref(a)))
+      .WillOnce(Return("Hello"));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello", foo_->TakesConstReference(a));
+}
+
+#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+// Tests mocking a function that takes a const variable.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstArgument) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesConst(Lt(10)))
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault());
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->TakesConst(5));
+}
+#endif  // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the number of arguments.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnArgumentNumber) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentNumber())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentNumber());
+}
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the types of argument.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnArgumentType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentType(An<int>()))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentType(TypedEq<char>('a')))
+      .WillOnce(Return('b'));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentType(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentType('a'));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnConstnessOfThis) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnConstness());
+  EXPECT_CALL(Const(mock_foo_), OverloadedOnConstness())
+      .WillOnce(Return('a'));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, foo_->OverloadedOnConstness());
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', Const(*foo_).OverloadedOnConstness());
+}
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+// Tests mocking a nullary function with calltype.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksNullaryFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTNullary())
+      .WillOnce(Return(-1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(0));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(-1, foo_->CTNullary());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, foo_->CTNullary());
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a unary function with calltype.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksUnaryFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTUnary(Eq(2)))
+      .Times(2)
+      .WillOnce(Return(true))
+      .WillOnce(Return(false));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(foo_->CTUnary(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->CTUnary(2));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a decimal function with calltype.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksDecimalFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(),
+                                   Lt(100), 5U, NULL, "hi"))
+      .WillOnce(Return(10));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, foo_->CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 5, NULL, "hi"));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object.
+TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsConstFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(Const(mock_foo_), CTConst(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return('a'));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', Const(*foo_).CTConst(0));
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+class MockB {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD0(DoB, void());
+};
+
+// Tests that functions with no EXPECT_CALL() ruls can be called any
+// number of times.
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, UnmentionedFunctionCanBeCalledAnyNumberOfTimes) {
+  {
+    MockB b;
+  }
+
+  {
+    MockB b;
+    b.DoB();
+  }
+
+  {
+    MockB b;
+    b.DoB();
+    b.DoB();
+  }
+}
+
+// Tests mocking template interfaces.
+
+template <typename T>
+class StackInterface {
+ public:
+  virtual ~StackInterface() {}
+
+  // Template parameter appears in function parameter.
+  virtual void Push(const T& value) = 0;
+  virtual void Pop() = 0;
+  virtual int GetSize() const = 0;
+  // Template parameter appears in function return type.
+  virtual const T& GetTop() const = 0;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class MockStack : public StackInterface<T> {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD1_T(Push, void(const T& elem));
+  MOCK_METHOD0_T(Pop, void());
+  MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetSize, int());  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetTop, const T&());
+};
+
+// Tests that template mock works.
+TEST(TemplateMockTest, Works) {
+  MockStack<int> mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetSize())
+      .WillOnce(Return(0))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(0));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Push(_));
+  int n = 5;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetTop())
+      .WillOnce(ReturnRef(n));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Pop())
+      .Times(AnyNumber());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+  mock.Push(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mock.GetSize());
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.GetTop());
+  mock.Pop();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+}
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+// Tests mocking template interfaces with calltype.
+
+template <typename T>
+class StackInterfaceWithCallType {
+ public:
+  virtual ~StackInterfaceWithCallType() {}
+
+  // Template parameter appears in function parameter.
+  STDMETHOD_(void, Push)(const T& value) = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(void, Pop)() = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(int, GetSize)() const = 0;
+  // Template parameter appears in function return type.
+  STDMETHOD_(const T&, GetTop)() const = 0;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class MockStackWithCallType : public StackInterfaceWithCallType<T> {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD1_T_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Push, void(const T& elem));
+  MOCK_METHOD0_T_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Pop, void());
+  MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, GetSize, int());
+  MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, GetTop, const T&());
+};
+
+// Tests that template mock with calltype works.
+TEST(TemplateMockTestWithCallType, Works) {
+  MockStackWithCallType<int> mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetSize())
+      .WillOnce(Return(0))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(0));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Push(_));
+  int n = 5;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetTop())
+      .WillOnce(ReturnRef(n));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Pop())
+      .Times(AnyNumber());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+  mock.Push(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mock.GetSize());
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.GetTop());
+  mock.Pop();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+#define MY_MOCK_METHODS1_ \
+    MOCK_METHOD0(Overloaded, void()); \
+    MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(int n)); \
+    MOCK_METHOD2(Overloaded, bool(bool f, int n))
+
+class MockOverloadedOnArgNumber {
+ public:
+  MY_MOCK_METHODS1_;
+};
+
+TEST(OverloadedMockMethodTest, CanOverloadOnArgNumberInMacroBody) {
+  MockOverloadedOnArgNumber mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded());
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded(1)).WillOnce(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded(true, 1)).WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+  mock.Overloaded();
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, mock.Overloaded(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(mock.Overloaded(true, 1));
+}
+
+#define MY_MOCK_METHODS2_ \
+    MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(int n)); \
+    MOCK_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(int n));
+
+class MockOverloadedOnConstness {
+ public:
+  MY_MOCK_METHODS2_;
+};
+
+TEST(OverloadedMockMethodTest, CanOverloadOnConstnessInMacroBody) {
+  MockOverloadedOnConstness mock;
+  const MockOverloadedOnConstness* const_mock = &mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded(1)).WillOnce(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(*const_mock, Overloaded(1)).WillOnce(Return(3));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, mock.Overloaded(1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, const_mock->Overloaded(1));
+}
+
+}  // namespace gmock_generated_function_mockers_test
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..13b4c5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the internal utilities.
+
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h>
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+namespace {
+
+using ::std::tr1::tuple;
+using ::testing::Matcher;
+using ::testing::internal::CompileAssertTypesEqual;
+using ::testing::internal::MatcherTuple;
+using ::testing::internal::Function;
+using ::testing::internal::IgnoredValue;
+
+// Tests the MatcherTuple template struct.
+
+TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize0) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<>, MatcherTuple<tuple<> >::type>();
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize1) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<int> >,
+                          MatcherTuple<tuple<int> >::type>();
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize2) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char> >,
+                          MatcherTuple<tuple<int, char> >::type>();
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize5) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>,
+                                Matcher<double>, Matcher<char*> >,
+                          MatcherTuple<tuple<int, char, bool, double, char*>
+                                      >::type>();
+}
+
+// Tests the Function template struct.
+
+TEST(FunctionTest, Nullary) {
+  typedef Function<int()> F;  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, F::Result>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<>, F::ArgumentTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<>, F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(), F::MakeResultVoid>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<IgnoredValue(), F::MakeResultIgnoredValue>();
+}
+
+TEST(FunctionTest, Unary) {
+  typedef Function<int(bool)> F;  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, F::Result>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<bool, F::Argument1>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool>, F::ArgumentTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<bool> >, F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool), F::MakeResultVoid>();  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<IgnoredValue(bool),  // NOLINT
+      F::MakeResultIgnoredValue>();
+}
+
+TEST(FunctionTest, Binary) {
+  typedef Function<int(bool, const long&)> F;  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, F::Result>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<bool, F::Argument1>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const long&, F::Argument2>();  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool, const long&>, F::ArgumentTuple>();  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<const long&> >,  // NOLINT
+                          F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool, const long&), F::MakeResultVoid>();  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<IgnoredValue(bool, const long&),  // NOLINT
+      F::MakeResultIgnoredValue>();
+}
+
+TEST(FunctionTest, LongArgumentList) {
+  typedef Function<char(bool, int, char*, int&, const long&)> F;  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<char, F::Result>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<bool, F::Argument1>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, F::Argument2>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<char*, F::Argument3>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int&, F::Argument4>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const long&, F::Argument5>();  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool, int, char*, int&, const long&>,  // NOLINT
+                          F::ArgumentTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<int>, Matcher<char*>,
+                                Matcher<int&>, Matcher<const long&> >,  // NOLINT
+                          F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool, int, char*, int&, const long&),  // NOLINT
+                          F::MakeResultVoid>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<
+      IgnoredValue(bool, int, char*, int&, const long&),  // NOLINT
+      F::MakeResultIgnoredValue>();
+}
+
+}  // Unnamed namespace
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..669652b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,834 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the built-in matchers generated by a script.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h>
+
+#include <list>
+#include <map>
+#include <set>
+#include <sstream>
+#include <string>
+#include <utility>
+#include <vector>
+
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+
+namespace {
+
+using std::list;
+using std::map;
+using std::pair;
+using std::set;
+using std::stringstream;
+using std::vector;
+using testing::_;
+using testing::Contains;
+using testing::ElementsAre;
+using testing::ElementsAreArray;
+using testing::Eq;
+using testing::Ge;
+using testing::Gt;
+using testing::MakeMatcher;
+using testing::Matcher;
+using testing::MatcherInterface;
+using testing::Ne;
+using testing::Not;
+using testing::Pointee;
+using testing::Ref;
+using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
+using testing::StrEq;
+using testing::internal::string;
+
+// Returns the description of the given matcher.
+template <typename T>
+string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Returns the description of the negation of the given matcher.
+template <typename T>
+string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.DescribeNegationTo(&ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Returns the reason why x matches, or doesn't match, m.
+template <typename MatcherType, typename Value>
+string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.ExplainMatchResultTo(x, &ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// For testing ExplainMatchResultTo().
+class GreaterThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<int> {
+ public:
+  explicit GreaterThanMatcher(int rhs) : rhs_(rhs) {}
+
+  virtual bool Matches(int lhs) const { return lhs > rhs_; }
+
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "is greater than " << rhs_;
+  }
+
+  virtual void ExplainMatchResultTo(int lhs, ::std::ostream* os) const {
+    const int diff = lhs - rhs_;
+    if (diff > 0) {
+      *os << "is " << diff << " more than " << rhs_;
+    } else if (diff == 0) {
+      *os << "is the same as " << rhs_;
+    } else {
+      *os << "is " << -diff << " less than " << rhs_;
+    }
+  }
+ private:
+  const int rhs_;
+};
+
+Matcher<int> GreaterThan(int n) {
+  return MakeMatcher(new GreaterThanMatcher(n));
+}
+
+// Tests for ElementsAre().
+
+// Evaluates to the number of elements in 'array'.
+#define GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(array) (sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]))
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingNoElement) {
+  Matcher<const vector<int>&> m = ElementsAre();
+  EXPECT_EQ("is empty", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingOneElement) {
+  Matcher<vector<int> > m = ElementsAre(Gt(5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("has 1 element that is greater than 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingManyElements) {
+  Matcher<list<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("one"), "two");
+  EXPECT_EQ("has 2 elements where\n"
+            "element 0 is equal to \"one\",\n"
+            "element 1 is equal to \"two\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingNoElement) {
+  Matcher<vector<int> > m = ElementsAre();
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not empty", DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingOneElment) {
+  Matcher<const list<int>& > m = ElementsAre(Gt(5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("does not have 1 element, or\n"
+            "element 0 is not greater than 5", DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingManyElements) {
+  Matcher<const list<string>& > m = ElementsAre("one", "two");
+  EXPECT_EQ("does not have 2 elements, or\n"
+            "element 0 is not equal to \"one\", or\n"
+            "element 1 is not equal to \"two\"", DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotExplainTrivialMatch) {
+  Matcher<const list<int>& > m = ElementsAre(1, Ne(2));
+
+  list<int> test_list;
+  test_list.push_back(1);
+  test_list.push_back(3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, test_list));  // No need to explain anything.
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, ExplainsNonTrivialMatch) {
+  Matcher<const vector<int>& > m =
+      ElementsAre(GreaterThan(1), 0, GreaterThan(2));
+
+  const int a[] = { 10, 0, 100 };
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_EQ("element 0 is 9 more than 1,\n"
+            "element 2 is 98 more than 2", Explain(m, test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanExplainMismatchWrongSize) {
+  Matcher<const list<int>& > m = ElementsAre(1, 3);
+
+  list<int> test_list;
+  // No need to explain when the container is empty.
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, test_list));
+
+  test_list.push_back(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("has 1 element", Explain(m, test_list));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanExplainMismatchRightSize) {
+  Matcher<const vector<int>& > m = ElementsAre(1, GreaterThan(5));
+
+  vector<int> v;
+  v.push_back(2);
+  v.push_back(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("element 0 doesn't match", Explain(m, v));
+
+  v[0] = 1;
+  EXPECT_EQ("element 1 doesn't match (is 4 less than 5)", Explain(m, v));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementVector) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("test string");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(StrEq("test string")));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementList) {
+  list<string> test_list;
+  test_list.push_back("test string");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_list, ElementsAre("test string"));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesThreeElementVector) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("one");
+  test_vector.push_back("two");
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre("one", StrEq("two"), _));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementEqMatcher) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(Eq(4)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementAnyMatcher) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(_));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementValue) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(4));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesThreeElementsMixedMatchers) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(1);
+  test_vector.push_back(2);
+  test_vector.push_back(3);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(1, Eq(2), _));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesTenElementVector) {
+  const int a[] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 };
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector,
+              // The element list can contain values and/or matchers
+              // of different types.
+              ElementsAre(0, Ge(0), _, 3, 4, Ne(2), Eq(6), 7, 8, _));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongSize) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("test string");
+  test_vector.push_back("test string");
+
+  Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongValue) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("other string");
+
+  Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongOrder) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("one");
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+  test_vector.push_back("two");
+
+  Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(
+    StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), StrEq("three"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksForNestedContainer) {
+  const char* strings[] = {
+    "Hi",
+    "world"
+  };
+
+  vector<list<char> > nested;
+  for (int i = 0; i < GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(strings); i++) {
+    nested.push_back(list<char>(strings[i], strings[i] + strlen(strings[i])));
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(nested, ElementsAre(ElementsAre('H', Ne('e')),
+                                  ElementsAre('w', 'o', _, _, 'd')));
+  EXPECT_THAT(nested, Not(ElementsAre(ElementsAre('H', 'e'),
+                                      ElementsAre('w', 'o', _, _, 'd'))));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithByRefElementMatchers) {
+  int a[] = { 0, 1, 2 };
+  vector<int> v(a, a + GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(v, ElementsAre(Ref(v[0]), Ref(v[1]), Ref(v[2])));
+  EXPECT_THAT(v, Not(ElementsAre(Ref(v[0]), Ref(v[1]), Ref(a[2]))));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithContainerPointerUsingPointee) {
+  int a[] = { 0, 1, 2 };
+  vector<int> v(a, a + GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(&v, Pointee(ElementsAre(0, 1, _)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(&v, Not(Pointee(ElementsAre(0, _, 3))));
+}
+
+// Tests for ElementsAreArray().  Since ElementsAreArray() shares most
+// of the implementation with ElementsAre(), we don't test it as
+// thoroughly here.
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithValueArray) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a));
+
+  test_vector[2] = 0;
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(a)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithArraySize) {
+  const char* a[] = { "one", "two", "three" };
+
+  vector<string> test_vector(a, a + GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a, GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)));
+
+  const char** p = a;
+  test_vector[0] = "1";
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(p, GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a))));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithoutArraySize) {
+  const char* a[] = { "one", "two", "three" };
+
+  vector<string> test_vector(a, a + GMOCK_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a));
+
+  test_vector[0] = "1";
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(a)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithMatcherArray) {
+  const Matcher<string> kMatcherArray[] =
+    { StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), StrEq("three") };
+
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("one");
+  test_vector.push_back("two");
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(kMatcherArray));
+
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(kMatcherArray)));
+}
+
+// Tests for the MATCHER*() macro family.
+
+// Tests that a simple MATCHER() definition works.
+
+MATCHER(IsEven, "") { return (arg % 2) == 0; }
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, Works) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = IsEven();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(6));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(7));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is even", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is even)", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 6));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 7));
+}
+
+// Tests that the description string supplied to MATCHER() must be
+// valid.
+
+MATCHER(HasBadDescription, "Invalid%") { return true; }
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest,
+     CreatingMatcherWithBadDescriptionGeneratesNonfatalFailure) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      HasBadDescription(),
+      "Syntax error at index 7 in matcher description \"Invalid%\": "
+      "use \"%%\" instead of \"%\" to print \"%\".");
+}
+
+MATCHER(HasGoodDescription, "good") { return true; }
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, AcceptsValidDescription) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = HasGoodDescription();
+  EXPECT_EQ("good", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of MATCHER() can reference the type of the
+// value being matched.
+
+MATCHER(IsEmptyString, "") {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq< ::std::string, arg_type>();
+  return arg == "";
+}
+
+MATCHER(IsEmptyStringByRef, "") {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<const ::std::string&, arg_type>();
+  return arg == "";
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, CanReferenceArgType) {
+  const Matcher< ::std::string> m1 = IsEmptyString();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(""));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::std::string&> m2 = IsEmptyStringByRef();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(""));
+}
+
+// Tests that MATCHER() can be used in a namespace.
+
+namespace matcher_test {
+MATCHER(IsOdd, "") { return (arg % 2) != 0; }
+}  // namespace matcher_test
+
+TEST(MatcherTest, WorksInNamespace) {
+  Matcher<int> m = matcher_test::IsOdd();
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(4));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(5));
+}
+
+// Tests that a simple MATCHER_P() definition works.
+
+MATCHER_P(IsGreaterThan32And, n, "") { return arg > 32 && arg > n; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, Works) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = IsGreaterThan32And(5);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(36));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(5));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is greater than 32 and 5", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is greater than 32 and 5)", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 36));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 5));
+}
+
+// Tests that the description string supplied to MATCHER_P() must be
+// valid.
+
+MATCHER_P(HasBadDescription1, n, "not %(m)s good") {
+  return arg > n;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest,
+     CreatingMatcherWithBadDescriptionGeneratesNonfatalFailure) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      HasBadDescription1(2),
+      "Syntax error at index 6 in matcher description \"not %(m)s good\": "
+      "\"m\" is an invalid parameter name.");
+}
+
+
+MATCHER_P(HasGoodDescription1, n, "good %(n)s") { return true; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, AcceptsValidDescription) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = HasGoodDescription1(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("good 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that the description is calculated correctly from the matcher name.
+MATCHER_P(_is_Greater_Than32and_, n, "") { return arg > 32 && arg > n; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, GeneratesCorrectDescription) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = _is_Greater_Than32and_(5);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is greater than 32 and 5", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is greater than 32 and 5)", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 36));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 5));
+}
+
+// Tests that a MATCHER_P matcher can be explicitly instantiated with
+// a reference parameter type.
+
+class UncopyableFoo {
+ public:
+  explicit UncopyableFoo(char value) : value_(value) {}
+ private:
+  UncopyableFoo(const UncopyableFoo&);
+  void operator=(const UncopyableFoo&);
+
+  char value_;
+};
+
+MATCHER_P(ReferencesUncopyable, variable, "") { return &arg == &variable; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, WorksWhenExplicitlyInstantiatedWithReference) {
+  UncopyableFoo foo1('1'), foo2('2');
+  const Matcher<const UncopyableFoo&> m =
+      ReferencesUncopyable<const UncopyableFoo&>(foo1);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(foo1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(foo2));
+
+  // We don't want the address of the parameter printed, as most
+  // likely it will just annoy the user.  If the address is
+  // interesting, the user should consider passing the parameter by
+  // pointer instead.
+  EXPECT_EQ("references uncopyable 1-byte object <31>", Describe(m));
+}
+
+
+// Tests that the description string supplied to MATCHER_Pn() must be
+// valid.
+
+MATCHER_P2(HasBadDescription2, m, n, "not %(good") {
+  return arg > m + n;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest,
+     CreatingMatcherWithBadDescriptionGeneratesNonfatalFailure) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      HasBadDescription2(3, 4),
+      "Syntax error at index 4 in matcher description \"not %(good\": "
+      "an interpolation must end with \")s\", but \"%(good\" does not.");
+}
+
+MATCHER_P2(HasComplexDescription, foo, bar,
+           "is as complex as %(foo)s %(bar)s (i.e. %(*)s or %%%(foo)s!)") {
+  return true;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, AcceptsValidDescription) {
+  Matcher<int> m = HasComplexDescription(100, "ducks");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is as complex as 100 \"ducks\" (i.e. (100, \"ducks\") or %100!)",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of MATCHER_Pn() can reference the parameter
+// types.
+
+MATCHER_P3(ParamTypesAreIntLongAndChar, foo, bar, baz, "") {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int, foo_type>();
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<long, bar_type>();  // NOLINT
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<char, baz_type>();
+  return arg == 0;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, CanReferenceParamTypes) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(0, ParamTypesAreIntLongAndChar(10, 20L, 'a'));
+}
+
+// Tests that a MATCHER_Pn matcher can be explicitly instantiated with
+// reference parameter types.
+
+MATCHER_P2(ReferencesAnyOf, variable1, variable2, "") {
+  return &arg == &variable1 || &arg == &variable2;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, WorksWhenExplicitlyInstantiatedWithReferences) {
+  UncopyableFoo foo1('1'), foo2('2'), foo3('3');
+  const Matcher<const UncopyableFoo&> m =
+      ReferencesAnyOf<const UncopyableFoo&, const UncopyableFoo&>(foo1, foo2);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(foo1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(foo2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(foo3));
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest,
+     GeneratesCorretDescriptionWhenExplicitlyInstantiatedWithReferences) {
+  UncopyableFoo foo1('1'), foo2('2');
+  const Matcher<const UncopyableFoo&> m =
+      ReferencesAnyOf<const UncopyableFoo&, const UncopyableFoo&>(foo1, foo2);
+
+  // We don't want the addresses of the parameters printed, as most
+  // likely they will just annoy the user.  If the addresses are
+  // interesting, the user should consider passing the parameters by
+  // pointers instead.
+  EXPECT_EQ("references any of (1-byte object <31>, 1-byte object <32>)",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that a simple MATCHER_P2() definition works.
+
+MATCHER_P2(IsNotInClosedRange, low, hi, "") { return arg < low || arg > hi; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, Works) {
+  const Matcher<const long&> m = IsNotInClosedRange(10, 20);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(36L));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(15L));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not in closed range (10, 20)", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is not in closed range (10, 20))", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 36L));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 15L));
+}
+
+// Tests that MATCHER*() definitions can be overloaded on the number
+// of parameters; also tests MATCHER_Pn() where n >= 3.
+
+MATCHER(EqualsSumOf, "") { return arg == 0; }
+MATCHER_P(EqualsSumOf, a, "") { return arg == a; }
+MATCHER_P2(EqualsSumOf, a, b, "") { return arg == a + b; }
+MATCHER_P3(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, "") { return arg == a + b + c; }
+MATCHER_P4(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, "") { return arg == a + b + c + d; }
+MATCHER_P5(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, "") { return arg == a + b + c + d + e; }
+MATCHER_P6(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f;
+}
+MATCHER_P7(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g;
+}
+MATCHER_P8(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h;
+}
+MATCHER_P9(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h + i;
+}
+MATCHER_P10(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h + i + j;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfParameters) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(0, EqualsSumOf());
+  EXPECT_THAT(1, EqualsSumOf(1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(12, EqualsSumOf(10, 2));
+  EXPECT_THAT(123, EqualsSumOf(100, 20, 3));
+  EXPECT_THAT(1234, EqualsSumOf(1000, 200, 30, 4));
+  EXPECT_THAT(12345, EqualsSumOf(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdef",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f'));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefg",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g'));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefgh",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                          "h"));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghi",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                          "h", 'i'));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghij",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                          "h", 'i', ::std::string("j")));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(1, Not(EqualsSumOf()));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-1, Not(EqualsSumOf(1)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-12, Not(EqualsSumOf(10, 2)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-123, Not(EqualsSumOf(100, 20, 3)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-1234, Not(EqualsSumOf(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-12345, Not(EqualsSumOf(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdef ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f')));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefg ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f',
+                              'g')));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefgh ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                              "h")));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghi ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                              "h", 'i')));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghij ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                              "h", 'i', ::std::string("j"))));
+}
+
+// Tests that a MATCHER_Pn() definition can be instantiated with any
+// compatible parameter types.
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, WorksForDifferentParameterTypes) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(123, EqualsSumOf(100L, 20, static_cast<char>(3)));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcd", EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), "b", 'c', "d"));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(124, Not(EqualsSumOf(100L, 20, static_cast<char>(3))));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcde", Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), "b", 'c', "d")));
+}
+
+// Tests that the matcher body can promote the parameter types.
+
+MATCHER_P2(EqConcat, prefix, suffix, "") {
+  // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types.
+  std::string prefix_str(prefix);
+  char suffix_char(suffix);
+  return arg == prefix_str + suffix_char;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) {
+  Matcher<std::string> no_promo =
+      EqConcat(std::string("foo"), 't');
+  Matcher<const std::string&> promo =
+      EqConcat("foo", static_cast<int>('t'));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(no_promo.Matches("fool"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(promo.Matches("fool"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(no_promo.Matches("foot"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(promo.Matches("foot"));
+}
+
+// Verifies the type of a MATCHER*.
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) {
+  // EqualsSumOf() must be assignable to a EqualsSumOfMatcher variable.
+  EqualsSumOfMatcher a0 = EqualsSumOf();
+
+  // EqualsSumOf(1) must be assignable to a EqualsSumOfMatcherP variable.
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP<int> a1 = EqualsSumOf(1);
+
+  // EqualsSumOf(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a EqualsSumOfMatcherPk
+  // variable, and so on.
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP2<int, char> a2 = EqualsSumOf(1, '2');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP3<int, int, char> a3 = EqualsSumOf(1, 2, '3');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, '4');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, '5');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0');
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ListMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  list<int> some_list;
+  some_list.push_back(3);
+  some_list.push_back(1);
+  some_list.push_back(2);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(3.0));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(2.0f));
+
+  list<string> another_list;
+  another_list.push_back("fee");
+  another_list.push_back("fie");
+  another_list.push_back("foe");
+  another_list.push_back("fum");
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_list, Contains(string("fee")));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ListDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  list<int> some_list;
+  some_list.push_back(3);
+  some_list.push_back(1);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Not(Contains(4)));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, SetMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  set<int> some_set;
+  some_set.insert(3);
+  some_set.insert(1);
+  some_set.insert(2);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Contains(1.0));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Contains(3.0f));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Contains(2));
+
+  set<const char*> another_set;
+  another_set.insert("fee");
+  another_set.insert("fie");
+  another_set.insert("foe");
+  another_set.insert("fum");
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_set, Contains(string("fum")));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, SetDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  set<int> some_set;
+  some_set.insert(3);
+  some_set.insert(1);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Not(Contains(4)));
+
+  set<const char*> c_string_set;
+  c_string_set.insert("hello");
+  EXPECT_THAT(c_string_set, Not(Contains(string("hello").c_str())));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, DescribesItselfCorrectly) {
+  Matcher<vector<int> > m = Contains(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("contains 1", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, MapMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  map<const char*, int> my_map;
+  const char* bar = "a string";
+  my_map[bar] = 2;
+  EXPECT_THAT(my_map, Contains(pair<const char* const, int>(bar, 2)));
+
+  map<string, int> another_map;
+  another_map["fee"] = 1;
+  another_map["fie"] = 2;
+  another_map["foe"] = 3;
+  another_map["fum"] = 4;
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Contains(pair<const string, int>(string("fee"), 1)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Contains(pair<const string, int>("fie", 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, MapDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  map<int, int> some_map;
+  some_map[1] = 11;
+  some_map[2] = 22;
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_map, Not(Contains(pair<const int, int>(2, 23))));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ArrayMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  const char* string_array[] = { "fee", "fie", "foe", "fum" };
+  EXPECT_THAT(string_array, Contains(string("fum")));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ArrayDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  int int_array[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(int_array, Not(Contains(5)));
+}
+
+}  // namespace
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5e4dc03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,698 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the internal utilities.
+
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <map>
+#include <string>
+#include <sstream>
+#include <vector>
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-port.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+
+#if GTEST_OS_CYGWIN
+#include <sys/types.h>  // For ssize_t. NOLINT
+#endif
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace internal {
+
+namespace {
+
+using ::std::tr1::tuple;
+
+TEST(ConvertIdentifierNameToWordsTest, WorksWhenNameContainsNoWord) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(""));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("__"));
+}
+
+TEST(ConvertIdentifierNameToWordsTest, WorksWhenNameContainsDigits) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("1", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_1"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("2", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("2_"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("34", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_34_"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("34 56", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_34_56"));
+}
+
+TEST(ConvertIdentifierNameToWordsTest, WorksWhenNameContainsCamelCaseWords) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("a big word", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("ABigWord"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo bar", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("FooBar"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("Foo_"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo bar", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_Foo_Bar_"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo and bar", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_Foo__And_Bar"));
+}
+
+TEST(ConvertIdentifierNameToWordsTest, WorksWhenNameContains_SeparatedWords) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo bar", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("foo_bar"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_foo_"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo bar", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_foo_bar_"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo and bar", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_foo__and_bar"));
+}
+
+TEST(ConvertIdentifierNameToWordsTest, WorksWhenNameIsMixture) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("foo bar 123", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("Foo_bar123"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("chapter 11 section 1",
+            ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_Chapter11Section_1_"));
+}
+
+// Tests that CompileAssertTypesEqual compiles when the type arguments are
+// equal.
+TEST(CompileAssertTypesEqual, CompilesWhenTypesAreEqual) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<void, void>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int*, int*>();
+}
+
+// Tests that RemoveReference does not affect non-reference types.
+TEST(RemoveReferenceTest, DoesNotAffectNonReferenceType) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, RemoveReference<int>::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const char, RemoveReference<const char>::type>();
+}
+
+// Tests that RemoveReference removes reference from reference types.
+TEST(RemoveReferenceTest, RemovesReference) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, RemoveReference<int&>::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const char, RemoveReference<const char&>::type>();
+}
+
+// Tests GMOCK_REMOVE_REFERENCE_.
+
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+void TestGMockRemoveReference() {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<T1, GMOCK_REMOVE_REFERENCE_(T2)>();
+}
+
+TEST(RemoveReferenceTest, MacroVersion) {
+  TestGMockRemoveReference<int, int>();
+  TestGMockRemoveReference<const char, const char&>();
+}
+
+
+// Tests that RemoveConst does not affect non-const types.
+TEST(RemoveConstTest, DoesNotAffectNonConstType) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, RemoveConst<int>::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<char&, RemoveConst<char&>::type>();
+}
+
+// Tests that RemoveConst removes const from const types.
+TEST(RemoveConstTest, RemovesConst) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, RemoveConst<const int>::type>();
+}
+
+// Tests GMOCK_REMOVE_CONST_.
+
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+void TestGMockRemoveConst() {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<T1, GMOCK_REMOVE_CONST_(T2)>();
+}
+
+TEST(RemoveConstTest, MacroVersion) {
+  TestGMockRemoveConst<int, int>();
+  TestGMockRemoveConst<double&, double&>();
+  TestGMockRemoveConst<char, const char>();
+}
+
+// Tests that AddReference does not affect reference types.
+TEST(AddReferenceTest, DoesNotAffectReferenceType) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int&, AddReference<int&>::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const char&, AddReference<const char&>::type>();
+}
+
+// Tests that AddReference adds reference to non-reference types.
+TEST(AddReferenceTest, AddsReference) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int&, AddReference<int>::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const char&, AddReference<const char>::type>();
+}
+
+// Tests GMOCK_ADD_REFERENCE_.
+
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+void TestGMockAddReference() {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<T1, GMOCK_ADD_REFERENCE_(T2)>();
+}
+
+TEST(AddReferenceTest, MacroVersion) {
+  TestGMockAddReference<int&, int>();
+  TestGMockAddReference<const char&, const char&>();
+}
+
+// Tests GMOCK_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_.
+
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+void TestGMockReferenceToConst() {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<T1, GMOCK_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T2)>();
+}
+
+TEST(GMockReferenceToConstTest, Works) {
+  TestGMockReferenceToConst<const char&, char>();
+  TestGMockReferenceToConst<const int&, const int>();
+  TestGMockReferenceToConst<const double&, double>();
+  TestGMockReferenceToConst<const string&, const string&>();
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeOfTest, WorksForSmartPointers) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const char,
+      PointeeOf<internal::linked_ptr<const char> >::type>();
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeOfTest, WorksForRawPointers) {
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, PointeeOf<int*>::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const char, PointeeOf<const char*>::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<void, PointeeOf<void*>::type>();
+}
+
+TEST(GetRawPointerTest, WorksForSmartPointers) {
+  const char* const raw_p4 = new const char('a');  // NOLINT
+  const internal::linked_ptr<const char> p4(raw_p4);
+  EXPECT_EQ(raw_p4, GetRawPointer(p4));
+}
+
+TEST(GetRawPointerTest, WorksForRawPointers) {
+  int* p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ(NULL, GetRawPointer(p));
+  int n = 1;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, GetRawPointer(&n));
+}
+
+class Base {};
+class Derived : public Base {};
+
+// Tests that ImplicitlyConvertible<T1, T2>::value is a compile-time constant.
+TEST(ImplicitlyConvertibleTest, ValueIsCompileTimeConstant) {
+  GMOCK_COMPILE_ASSERT_((ImplicitlyConvertible<int, int>::value), const_true);
+  GMOCK_COMPILE_ASSERT_((!ImplicitlyConvertible<void*, int*>::value),
+                        const_false);
+}
+
+// Tests that ImplicitlyConvertible<T1, T2>::value is true when T1 can
+// be implicitly converted to T2.
+TEST(ImplicitlyConvertibleTest, ValueIsTrueWhenConvertible) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE((ImplicitlyConvertible<int, double>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((ImplicitlyConvertible<double, int>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((ImplicitlyConvertible<int*, void*>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((ImplicitlyConvertible<int*, const int*>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((ImplicitlyConvertible<Derived&, const Base&>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((ImplicitlyConvertible<const Base, Base>::value));
+}
+
+// Tests that ImplicitlyConvertible<T1, T2>::value is false when T1
+// cannot be implicitly converted to T2.
+TEST(ImplicitlyConvertibleTest, ValueIsFalseWhenNotConvertible) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE((ImplicitlyConvertible<double, int*>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((ImplicitlyConvertible<void*, int*>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((ImplicitlyConvertible<const int*, int*>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((ImplicitlyConvertible<Base&, Derived&>::value));
+}
+
+// Tests KindOf<T>.
+
+TEST(KindOfTest, Bool) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(kBool, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(bool));  // NOLINT
+}
+
+TEST(KindOfTest, Integer) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(char));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(signed char));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(unsigned char));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(short));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(unsigned short));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(int));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(unsigned int));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(long));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(unsigned long));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(wchar_t));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(Int64));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(UInt64));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(size_t));  // NOLINT
+#if GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC || GTEST_OS_CYGWIN
+  // ssize_t is not defined on Windows and possibly some other OSes.
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInteger, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(ssize_t));  // NOLINT
+#endif
+}
+
+TEST(KindOfTest, FloatingPoint) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(kFloatingPoint, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(float));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kFloatingPoint, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(double));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kFloatingPoint, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(long double));  // NOLINT
+}
+
+TEST(KindOfTest, Other) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(kOther, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(void*));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kOther, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(char**));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(kOther, GMOCK_KIND_OF_(Base));  // NOLINT
+}
+
+// Tests LosslessArithmeticConvertible<T, U>.
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, BoolToBool) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<bool, bool>::value));
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, BoolToInteger) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<bool, char>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<bool, int>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(
+      (LosslessArithmeticConvertible<bool, unsigned long>::value));  // NOLINT
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, BoolToFloatingPoint) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<bool, float>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<bool, double>::value));
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, IntegerToBool) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<unsigned char, bool>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<int, bool>::value));
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, IntegerToInteger) {
+  // Unsigned => larger signed is fine.
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<unsigned char, int>::value));
+
+  // Unsigned => larger unsigned is fine.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(
+      (LosslessArithmeticConvertible<unsigned short, UInt64>::value)); // NOLINT
+
+  // Signed => unsigned is not fine.
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<short, UInt64>::value)); // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<
+      signed char, unsigned int>::value));  // NOLINT
+
+  // Same size and same signedness: fine too.
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<
+               unsigned char, unsigned char>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<int, int>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<wchar_t, wchar_t>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<
+               unsigned long, unsigned long>::value));  // NOLINT
+
+  // Same size, different signedness: not fine.
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<
+                unsigned char, signed char>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<int, unsigned int>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<UInt64, Int64>::value));
+
+  // Larger size => smaller size is not fine.
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<long, char>::value));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<int, signed char>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<Int64, unsigned int>::value));
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, IntegerToFloatingPoint) {
+  // Integers cannot be losslessly converted to floating-points, as
+  // the format of the latter is implementation-defined.
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<char, float>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<int, double>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<
+                short, long double>::value));  // NOLINT
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, FloatingPointToBool) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<float, bool>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<double, bool>::value));
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, FloatingPointToInteger) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<float, long>::value));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<double, Int64>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<long double, int>::value));
+}
+
+TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, FloatingPointToFloatingPoint) {
+  // Smaller size => larger size is fine.
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<float, double>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<float, long double>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<double, long double>::value));
+
+  // Same size: fine.
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<float, float>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<double, double>::value));
+
+  // Larger size => smaller size is not fine.
+  EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<double, float>::value));
+  if (sizeof(double) == sizeof(long double)) {  // NOLINT
+    // In some implementations (e.g. MSVC), double and long double
+    // have the same size.
+    EXPECT_TRUE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<long double, double>::value));
+  } else {
+    EXPECT_FALSE((LosslessArithmeticConvertible<long double, double>::value));
+  }
+}
+
+// Tests that IsAProtocolMessage<T>::value is a compile-time constant.
+TEST(IsAProtocolMessageTest, ValueIsCompileTimeConstant) {
+  GMOCK_COMPILE_ASSERT_(IsAProtocolMessage<ProtocolMessage>::value, const_true);
+  GMOCK_COMPILE_ASSERT_(!IsAProtocolMessage<int>::value, const_false);
+}
+
+// Tests that IsAProtocolMessage<T>::value is true when T is
+// ProtocolMessage or a sub-class of it.
+TEST(IsAProtocolMessageTest, ValueIsTrueWhenTypeIsAProtocolMessage) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(IsAProtocolMessage<ProtocolMessage>::value);
+#if GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+  EXPECT_TRUE(IsAProtocolMessage<const TestMessage>::value);
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+}
+
+// Tests that IsAProtocolMessage<T>::value is false when T is neither
+// ProtocolMessage nor a sub-class of it.
+TEST(IsAProtocolMessageTest, ValueIsFalseWhenTypeIsNotAProtocolMessage) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(IsAProtocolMessage<int>::value);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(IsAProtocolMessage<const Base>::value);
+}
+
+// Tests IsContainerTest.
+
+class NonContainer {};
+
+TEST(IsContainerTestTest, WorksForNonContainer) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(IsNotContainer), sizeof(IsContainerTest<int>(0)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(IsNotContainer), sizeof(IsContainerTest<char[5]>(0)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(IsNotContainer), sizeof(IsContainerTest<NonContainer>(0)));
+}
+
+TEST(IsContainerTestTest, WorksForContainer) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(IsContainer),
+            sizeof(IsContainerTest<std::vector<bool> >(0)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(IsContainer),
+            sizeof(IsContainerTest<std::map<int, double> >(0)));
+}
+
+// Tests the TupleMatches() template function.
+
+TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize0) {
+  tuple<> matchers;
+  tuple<> values;
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values));
+}
+
+TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize1) {
+  tuple<Matcher<int> > matchers(Eq(1));
+  tuple<int> values1(1),
+      values2(2);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(TupleMatches(matchers, values2));
+}
+
+TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize2) {
+  tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char> > matchers(Eq(1), Eq('a'));
+  tuple<int, char> values1(1, 'a'),
+      values2(1, 'b'),
+      values3(2, 'a'),
+      values4(2, 'b');
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(TupleMatches(matchers, values2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(TupleMatches(matchers, values3));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(TupleMatches(matchers, values4));
+}
+
+TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize5) {
+  tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>, Matcher<long>,  // NOLINT
+      Matcher<string> >
+      matchers(Eq(1), Eq('a'), Eq(true), Eq(2L), Eq("hi"));
+  tuple<int, char, bool, long, string>  // NOLINT
+      values1(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hi"),
+      values2(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hello"),
+      values3(2, 'a', true, 2L, "hi");
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(TupleMatches(matchers, values2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(TupleMatches(matchers, values3));
+}
+
+// Tests that Assert(true, ...) succeeds.
+TEST(AssertTest, SucceedsOnTrue) {
+  Assert(true, __FILE__, __LINE__, "This should succeed.");
+  Assert(true, __FILE__, __LINE__);  // This should succeed too.
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that Assert(false, ...) generates a fatal failure.
+TEST(AssertTest, FailsFatallyOnFalse) {
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    Assert(false, __FILE__, __LINE__, "This should fail.");
+  }, "");
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    Assert(false, __FILE__, __LINE__);
+  }, "");
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that Expect(true, ...) succeeds.
+TEST(ExpectTest, SucceedsOnTrue) {
+  Expect(true, __FILE__, __LINE__, "This should succeed.");
+  Expect(true, __FILE__, __LINE__);  // This should succeed too.
+}
+
+// Tests that Expect(false, ...) generates a non-fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectTest, FailsNonfatallyOnFalse) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    Expect(false, __FILE__, __LINE__, "This should fail.");
+  }, "This should fail");
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    Expect(false, __FILE__, __LINE__);
+  }, "Expectation failed");
+}
+
+// TODO(wan@google.com): find a way to re-enable these tests.
+#if 0
+
+// Tests the Log() function.
+
+// Verifies that Log() behaves correctly for the given verbosity level
+// and log severity.
+void TestLogWithSeverity(const string& verbosity, LogSeverity severity,
+                         bool should_print) {
+  const string old_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = verbosity;
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  Log(severity, "Test log.\n", 0);
+  if (should_print) {
+    EXPECT_PRED2(RE::FullMatch,
+                 GetCapturedTestStdout(),
+                 severity == WARNING ?
+                 "\nGMOCK WARNING:\nTest log\\.\nStack trace:\n[\\s\\S]*" :
+                 "\nTest log\\.\nStack trace:\n[\\s\\S]*");
+  } else {
+    EXPECT_EQ("", GetCapturedTestStdout());
+  }
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = old_flag;
+}
+
+// Tests that when the stack_frames_to_skip parameter is negative,
+// Log() doesn't include the stack trace in the output.
+TEST(LogTest, NoStackTraceWhenStackFramesToSkipIsNegative) {
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = kInfoVerbosity;
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  Log(INFO, "Test log.\n", -1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("\nTest log.\n", GetCapturedTestStdout());
+}
+
+// Tests that in opt mode, a positive stack_frames_to_skip argument is
+// treated as 0.
+TEST(LogTest, NoSkippingStackFrameInOptMode) {
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  Log(WARNING, "Test log.\n", 100);
+  const string log = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+#ifdef NDEBUG
+  // In opt mode, no stack frame should be skipped.
+  EXPECT_THAT(log, ContainsRegex("\nGMOCK WARNING:\n"
+                                 "Test log\\.\n"
+                                 "Stack trace:\n"
+                                 ".+"));
+#else
+  // In dbg mode, the stack frames should be skipped.
+  EXPECT_EQ("\nGMOCK WARNING:\n"
+            "Test log.\n"
+            "Stack trace:\n", log);
+#endif  // NDEBUG
+}
+
+// Tests that all logs are printed when the value of the
+// --gmock_verbose flag is "info".
+TEST(LogTest, AllLogsArePrintedWhenVerbosityIsInfo) {
+  TestLogWithSeverity(kInfoVerbosity, INFO, true);
+  TestLogWithSeverity(kInfoVerbosity, WARNING, true);
+}
+
+// Tests that only warnings are printed when the value of the
+// --gmock_verbose flag is "warning".
+TEST(LogTest, OnlyWarningsArePrintedWhenVerbosityIsWarning) {
+  TestLogWithSeverity(kWarningVerbosity, INFO, false);
+  TestLogWithSeverity(kWarningVerbosity, WARNING, true);
+}
+
+// Tests that no logs are printed when the value of the
+// --gmock_verbose flag is "error".
+TEST(LogTest, NoLogsArePrintedWhenVerbosityIsError) {
+  TestLogWithSeverity(kErrorVerbosity, INFO, false);
+  TestLogWithSeverity(kErrorVerbosity, WARNING, false);
+}
+
+// Tests that only warnings are printed when the value of the
+// --gmock_verbose flag is invalid.
+TEST(LogTest, OnlyWarningsArePrintedWhenVerbosityIsInvalid) {
+  TestLogWithSeverity("invalid", INFO, false);
+  TestLogWithSeverity("invalid", WARNING, true);
+}
+
+#endif  // 0
+
+TEST(TypeTraitsTest, true_type) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(true_type::value);
+}
+
+TEST(TypeTraitsTest, false_type) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(false_type::value);
+}
+
+TEST(TypeTraitsTest, is_reference) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_reference<int>::value);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_reference<char*>::value);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(is_reference<const int&>::value);
+}
+
+TEST(TypeTraitsTest, is_pointer) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_pointer<int>::value);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_pointer<char&>::value);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(is_pointer<const int*>::value);
+}
+
+TEST(TypeTraitsTest, type_equals) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE((type_equals<int, const int>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((type_equals<int, int&>::value));
+  EXPECT_FALSE((type_equals<int, double>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((type_equals<char, char>::value));
+}
+
+TEST(TypeTraitsTest, remove_reference) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE((type_equals<char, remove_reference<char&>::type>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((type_equals<const int,
+               remove_reference<const int&>::type>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((type_equals<int, remove_reference<int>::type>::value));
+  EXPECT_TRUE((type_equals<double*, remove_reference<double*>::type>::value));
+}
+
+// TODO(wan@google.com): find a way to re-enable these tests.
+#if 0
+
+// Verifies that Log() behaves correctly for the given verbosity level
+// and log severity.
+string GrabOutput(void(*logger)(), const char* verbosity) {
+  const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = verbosity;
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  logger();
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag;
+  return GetCapturedTestStdout();
+}
+
+class DummyMock {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD0(TestMethod, void());
+  MOCK_METHOD1(TestMethodArg, void(int dummy));
+};
+
+void ExpectCallLogger() {
+  DummyMock mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, TestMethod());
+  mock.TestMethod();
+};
+
+// Verifies that EXPECT_CALL logs if the --gmock_verbose flag is set to "info".
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, LogsWhenVerbosityIsInfo) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(GrabOutput(ExpectCallLogger, kInfoVerbosity),
+              HasSubstr("EXPECT_CALL(mock, TestMethod())"));
+}
+
+// Verifies that EXPECT_CALL doesn't log
+// if the --gmock_verbose flag is set to "warning".
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, DoesNotLogWhenVerbosityIsWarning) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("", GrabOutput(ExpectCallLogger, kWarningVerbosity));
+}
+
+// Verifies that EXPECT_CALL doesn't log
+// if the --gmock_verbose flag is set to "error".
+TEST(ExpectCallTest,  DoesNotLogWhenVerbosityIsError) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("", GrabOutput(ExpectCallLogger, kErrorVerbosity));
+}
+
+void OnCallLogger() {
+  DummyMock mock;
+  ON_CALL(mock, TestMethod());
+};
+
+// Verifies that ON_CALL logs if the --gmock_verbose flag is set to "info".
+TEST(OnCallTest, LogsWhenVerbosityIsInfo) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(GrabOutput(OnCallLogger, kInfoVerbosity),
+              HasSubstr("ON_CALL(mock, TestMethod())"));
+}
+
+// Verifies that ON_CALL doesn't log
+// if the --gmock_verbose flag is set to "warning".
+TEST(OnCallTest, DoesNotLogWhenVerbosityIsWarning) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("", GrabOutput(OnCallLogger, kWarningVerbosity));
+}
+
+// Verifies that ON_CALL doesn't log if
+// the --gmock_verbose flag is set to "error".
+TEST(OnCallTest, DoesNotLogWhenVerbosityIsError) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("", GrabOutput(OnCallLogger, kErrorVerbosity));
+}
+
+void OnCallAnyArgumentLogger() {
+  DummyMock mock;
+  ON_CALL(mock, TestMethodArg(_));
+}
+
+// Verifies that ON_CALL prints provided _ argument.
+TEST(OnCallTest, LogsAnythingArgument) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(GrabOutput(OnCallAnyArgumentLogger, kInfoVerbosity),
+              HasSubstr("ON_CALL(mock, TestMethodArg(_)"));
+}
+
+#endif  // 0
+
+}  // namespace
+}  // namespace internal
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e770901
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,3199 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests some commonly used argument matchers.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-matchers.h>
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <functional>
+#include <list>
+#include <map>
+#include <set>
+#include <sstream>
+#include <string>
+#include <vector>
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+
+namespace testing {
+
+namespace internal {
+string FormatMatcherDescriptionSyntaxError(const char* description,
+                                           const char* error_pos);
+int GetParamIndex(const char* param_names[], const string& param_name);
+string JoinAsTuple(const Strings& fields);
+bool SkipPrefix(const char* prefix, const char** pstr);
+}  // namespace internal
+
+namespace gmock_matchers_test {
+
+using std::stringstream;
+using testing::A;
+using testing::AllOf;
+using testing::An;
+using testing::AnyOf;
+using testing::ByRef;
+using testing::DoubleEq;
+using testing::EndsWith;
+using testing::Eq;
+using testing::Field;
+using testing::FloatEq;
+using testing::Ge;
+using testing::Gt;
+using testing::HasSubstr;
+using testing::Le;
+using testing::Lt;
+using testing::MakeMatcher;
+using testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher;
+using testing::Matcher;
+using testing::MatcherCast;
+using testing::MatcherInterface;
+using testing::Matches;
+using testing::NanSensitiveDoubleEq;
+using testing::NanSensitiveFloatEq;
+using testing::Ne;
+using testing::Not;
+using testing::NotNull;
+using testing::Pointee;
+using testing::PolymorphicMatcher;
+using testing::Property;
+using testing::Ref;
+using testing::ResultOf;
+using testing::StartsWith;
+using testing::StrCaseEq;
+using testing::StrCaseNe;
+using testing::StrEq;
+using testing::StrNe;
+using testing::Truly;
+using testing::TypedEq;
+using testing::_;
+using testing::internal::FloatingEqMatcher;
+using testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescriptionSyntaxError;
+using testing::internal::GetParamIndex;
+using testing::internal::Interpolation;
+using testing::internal::Interpolations;
+using testing::internal::JoinAsTuple;
+using testing::internal::SkipPrefix;
+using testing::internal::String;
+using testing::internal::Strings;
+using testing::internal::ValidateMatcherDescription;
+using testing::internal::kInvalidInterpolation;
+using testing::internal::kPercentInterpolation;
+using testing::internal::kTupleInterpolation;
+using testing::internal::string;
+
+#ifdef GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+using testing::ContainsRegex;
+using testing::MatchesRegex;
+using testing::internal::RE;
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+
+// Returns the description of the given matcher.
+template <typename T>
+string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Returns the description of the negation of the given matcher.
+template <typename T>
+string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.DescribeNegationTo(&ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Returns the reason why x matches, or doesn't match, m.
+template <typename MatcherType, typename Value>
+string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.ExplainMatchResultTo(x, &ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Makes sure that the MatcherInterface<T> interface doesn't
+// change.
+class EvenMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<int> {
+ public:
+  virtual bool Matches(int x) const { return x % 2 == 0; }
+
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "is an even number";
+  }
+
+  // We deliberately don't define DescribeNegationTo() and
+  // ExplainMatchResultTo() here, to make sure the definition of these
+  // two methods is optional.
+};
+
+TEST(MatcherInterfaceTest, CanBeImplemented) {
+  EvenMatcherImpl m;
+}
+
+// Tests default-constructing a matcher.
+TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeDefaultConstructed) {
+  Matcher<double> m;
+}
+
+// Tests that Matcher<T> can be constructed from a MatcherInterface<T>*.
+TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeConstructedFromMatcherInterface) {
+  const MatcherInterface<int>* impl = new EvenMatcherImpl;
+  Matcher<int> m(impl);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(4));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(5));
+}
+
+// Tests that value can be used in place of Eq(value).
+TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromValue) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = 5;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(5));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(6));
+}
+
+// Tests that NULL can be used in place of Eq(NULL).
+TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromNULL) {
+  Matcher<int*> m1 = NULL;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(&n));
+}
+
+// Tests that matchers are copyable.
+TEST(MatcherTest, IsCopyable) {
+  // Tests the copy constructor.
+  Matcher<bool> m1 = Eq(false);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(false));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(true));
+
+  // Tests the assignment operator.
+  m1 = Eq(true);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(true));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(false));
+}
+
+// Tests that Matcher<T>::DescribeTo() calls
+// MatcherInterface<T>::DescribeTo().
+TEST(MatcherTest, CanDescribeItself) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("is an even number",
+            Describe(Matcher<int>(new EvenMatcherImpl)));
+}
+
+// Tests that a C-string literal can be implicitly converted to a
+// Matcher<string> or Matcher<const string&>.
+TEST(StringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromCStringLiteral) {
+  Matcher<string> m1 = "hi";
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello"));
+
+  Matcher<const string&> m2 = "hi";
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello"));
+}
+
+// Tests that a string object can be implicitly converted to a
+// Matcher<string> or Matcher<const string&>.
+TEST(StringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromString) {
+  Matcher<string> m1 = string("hi");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello"));
+
+  Matcher<const string&> m2 = string("hi");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello"));
+}
+
+// Tests that MakeMatcher() constructs a Matcher<T> from a
+// MatcherInterface* without requiring the user to explicitly
+// write the type.
+TEST(MakeMatcherTest, ConstructsMatcherFromMatcherInterface) {
+  const MatcherInterface<int>* dummy_impl = NULL;
+  Matcher<int> m = MakeMatcher(dummy_impl);
+}
+
+// Tests that MakePolymorphicMatcher() constructs a polymorphic
+// matcher from its implementation.
+const int bar = 1;
+class ReferencesBarOrIsZeroImpl {
+ public:
+  template <typename T>
+  bool Matches(const T& x) const {
+    const void* p = &x;
+    return p == &bar || x == 0;
+  }
+
+  void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "bar or zero"; }
+
+  void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "doesn't reference bar and is not zero";
+  }
+};
+
+// This function verifies that MakePolymorphicMatcher() returns a
+// PolymorphicMatcher<T> where T is the argument's type.
+PolymorphicMatcher<ReferencesBarOrIsZeroImpl> ReferencesBarOrIsZero() {
+  return MakePolymorphicMatcher(ReferencesBarOrIsZeroImpl());
+}
+
+TEST(MakePolymorphicMatcherTest, ConstructsMatcherFromImpl) {
+  // Using a polymorphic matcher to match a reference type.
+  Matcher<const int&> m1 = ReferencesBarOrIsZero();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(0));
+  // Verifies that the identity of a by-reference argument is preserved.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(bar));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("bar or zero", Describe(m1));
+
+  // Using a polymorphic matcher to match a value type.
+  Matcher<double> m2 = ReferencesBarOrIsZero();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(0.0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(0.1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("bar or zero", Describe(m2));
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a polymorphic matcher.
+TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromPolymorphicMatcher) {
+  Matcher<int> m = MatcherCast<int>(Eq(5));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(5));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(6));
+}
+
+// For testing casting matchers between compatible types.
+class IntValue {
+ public:
+  // An int can be statically (although not implicitly) cast to a
+  // IntValue.
+  explicit IntValue(int value) : value_(value) {}
+
+  int value() const { return value_; }
+ private:
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// For testing casting matchers between compatible types.
+bool IsPositiveIntValue(const IntValue& foo) {
+  return foo.value() > 0;
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a Matcher<U> where T
+// can be statically converted to U.
+TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromCompatibleType) {
+  Matcher<double> m1 = Eq(2.0);
+  Matcher<int> m2 = MatcherCast<int>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(3));
+
+  Matcher<IntValue> m3 = Truly(IsPositiveIntValue);
+  Matcher<int> m4 = MatcherCast<int>(m3);
+  // In the following, the arguments 1 and 0 are statically converted
+  // to IntValue objects, and then tested by the IsPositiveIntValue()
+  // predicate.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m4.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m4.Matches(0));
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a Matcher<const T&>.
+TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromConstReferenceToNonReference) {
+  Matcher<const int&> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<int> m2 = MatcherCast<int>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a Matcher<T&>.
+TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromReferenceToNonReference) {
+  Matcher<int&> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<int> m2 = MatcherCast<int>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<const T&>(m) works when m is a Matcher<T>.
+TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromNonReferenceToConstReference) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<const int&> m2 = MatcherCast<const int&>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<T&>(m) works when m is a Matcher<T>.
+TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromNonReferenceToReference) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = MatcherCast<int&>(m1);
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(n));
+  n = 1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(n));
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a Matcher<T>.
+TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromSameType) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<int> m2 = MatcherCast<int>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1));
+}
+
+class Base {};
+class Derived : public Base {};
+
+// Tests that SafeMatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a polymorphic matcher.
+TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromPolymorphicMatcher) {
+  Matcher<char> m2 = SafeMatcherCast<char>(Eq(32));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(' '));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches('\n'));
+}
+
+// Tests that SafeMatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a Matcher<U> where
+// T and U are arithmetic types and T can be losslessly converted to
+// U.
+TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromLosslesslyConvertibleArithmeticType) {
+  Matcher<double> m1 = DoubleEq(1.0);
+  Matcher<float> m2 = SafeMatcherCast<float>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(1.0f));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(2.0f));
+
+  Matcher<char> m3 = SafeMatcherCast<char>(TypedEq<int>('a'));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches('a'));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches('b'));
+}
+
+// Tests that SafeMatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a Matcher<U> where T and U
+// are pointers or references to a derived and a base class, correspondingly.
+TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromBaseClass) {
+  Derived d, d2;
+  Matcher<Base*> m1 = Eq(&d);
+  Matcher<Derived*> m2 = SafeMatcherCast<Derived*>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(&d));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(&d2));
+
+  Matcher<Base&> m3 = Ref(d);
+  Matcher<Derived&> m4 = SafeMatcherCast<Derived&>(m3);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m4.Matches(d));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m4.Matches(d2));
+}
+
+// Tests that SafeMatcherCast<T&>(m) works when m is a Matcher<const T&>.
+TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromConstReferenceToReference) {
+  int n = 0;
+  Matcher<const int&> m1 = Ref(n);
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = SafeMatcherCast<int&>(m1);
+  int n1 = 0;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(n));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(n1));
+}
+
+// Tests that MatcherCast<const T&>(m) works when m is a Matcher<T>.
+TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromNonReferenceToConstReference) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<const int&> m2 = SafeMatcherCast<const int&>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that SafeMatcherCast<T&>(m) works when m is a Matcher<T>.
+TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromNonReferenceToReference) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = SafeMatcherCast<int&>(m1);
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(n));
+  n = 1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(n));
+}
+
+// Tests that SafeMatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a Matcher<T>.
+TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromSameType) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Eq(0);
+  Matcher<int> m2 = SafeMatcherCast<int>(m1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that A<T>() matches any value of type T.
+TEST(ATest, MatchesAnyValue) {
+  // Tests a matcher for a value type.
+  Matcher<double> m1 = A<double>();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(91.43));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(-15.32));
+
+  // Tests a matcher for a reference type.
+  int a = 2;
+  int b = -6;
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = A<int&>();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(a));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(b));
+}
+
+// Tests that A<T>() describes itself properly.
+TEST(ATest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("is anything", Describe(A<bool>()));
+}
+
+// Tests that An<T>() matches any value of type T.
+TEST(AnTest, MatchesAnyValue) {
+  // Tests a matcher for a value type.
+  Matcher<int> m1 = An<int>();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(9143));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(-1532));
+
+  // Tests a matcher for a reference type.
+  int a = 2;
+  int b = -6;
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = An<int&>();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(a));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(b));
+}
+
+// Tests that An<T>() describes itself properly.
+TEST(AnTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("is anything", Describe(An<int>()));
+}
+
+// Tests that _ can be used as a matcher for any type and matches any
+// value of that type.
+TEST(UnderscoreTest, MatchesAnyValue) {
+  // Uses _ as a matcher for a value type.
+  Matcher<int> m1 = _;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(123));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(-242));
+
+  // Uses _ as a matcher for a reference type.
+  bool a = false;
+  const bool b = true;
+  Matcher<const bool&> m2 = _;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(a));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(b));
+}
+
+// Tests that _ describes itself properly.
+TEST(UnderscoreTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = _;
+  EXPECT_EQ("is anything", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Eq(x) matches any value equal to x.
+TEST(EqTest, MatchesEqualValue) {
+  // 2 C-strings with same content but different addresses.
+  const char a1[] = "hi";
+  const char a2[] = "hi";
+
+  Matcher<const char*> m1 = Eq(a1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(a1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(a2));
+}
+
+// Tests that Eq(v) describes itself properly.
+
+class Unprintable {
+ public:
+  Unprintable() : c_('a') {}
+
+  bool operator==(const Unprintable& rhs) { return true; }
+ private:
+  char c_;
+};
+
+TEST(EqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<Unprintable> m = Eq(Unprintable());
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to 1-byte object <61>", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Eq(v) can be used to match any type that supports
+// comparing with type T, where T is v's type.
+TEST(EqTest, IsPolymorphic) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Eq(1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(2));
+
+  Matcher<char> m2 = Eq(1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches('\1'));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches('a'));
+}
+
+// Tests that TypedEq<T>(v) matches values of type T that's equal to v.
+TEST(TypedEqTest, ChecksEqualityForGivenType) {
+  Matcher<char> m1 = TypedEq<char>('a');
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches('a'));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches('b'));
+
+  Matcher<int> m2 = TypedEq<int>(6);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(6));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(7));
+}
+
+// Tests that TypedEq(v) describes itself properly.
+TEST(TypedEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to 2", Describe(TypedEq<int>(2)));
+}
+
+// Tests that TypedEq<T>(v) has type Matcher<T>.
+
+// Type<T>::IsTypeOf(v) compiles iff the type of value v is T, where T
+// is a "bare" type (i.e. not in the form of const U or U&).  If v's
+// type is not T, the compiler will generate a message about
+// "undefined referece".
+template <typename T>
+struct Type {
+  static bool IsTypeOf(const T& v) { return true; }
+
+  template <typename T2>
+  static void IsTypeOf(T2 v);
+};
+
+TEST(TypedEqTest, HasSpecifiedType) {
+  // Verfies that the type of TypedEq<T>(v) is Matcher<T>.
+  Type<Matcher<int> >::IsTypeOf(TypedEq<int>(5));
+  Type<Matcher<double> >::IsTypeOf(TypedEq<double>(5));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ge(v) matches anything >= v.
+TEST(GeTest, ImplementsGreaterThanOrEqual) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Ge(0);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(-1));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ge(v) describes itself properly.
+TEST(GeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Ge(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is greater than or equal to 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Gt(v) matches anything > v.
+TEST(GtTest, ImplementsGreaterThan) {
+  Matcher<double> m1 = Gt(0);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(1.0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(0.0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(-1.0));
+}
+
+// Tests that Gt(v) describes itself properly.
+TEST(GtTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Gt(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is greater than 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Le(v) matches anything <= v.
+TEST(LeTest, ImplementsLessThanOrEqual) {
+  Matcher<char> m1 = Le('b');
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches('a'));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches('b'));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches('c'));
+}
+
+// Tests that Le(v) describes itself properly.
+TEST(LeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Le(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is less than or equal to 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Lt(v) matches anything < v.
+TEST(LtTest, ImplementsLessThan) {
+  Matcher<const string&> m1 = Lt("Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("Abc"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("Hello, world!"));
+}
+
+// Tests that Lt(v) describes itself properly.
+TEST(LtTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Lt(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is less than 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ne(v) matches anything != v.
+TEST(NeTest, ImplementsNotEqual) {
+  Matcher<int> m1 = Ne(0);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(-1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(0));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ne(v) describes itself properly.
+TEST(NeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Ne(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that NotNull() matches any non-NULL pointer of any type.
+TEST(NotNullTest, MatchesNonNullPointer) {
+  Matcher<int*> m1 = NotNull();
+  int* p1 = NULL;
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(p1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(&n));
+
+  Matcher<const char*> m2 = NotNull();
+  const char* p2 = NULL;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(p2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi"));
+}
+
+// Tests that NotNull() describes itself properly.
+TEST(NotNullTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int*> m = NotNull();
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not NULL", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ref(variable) matches an argument that references
+// 'variable'.
+TEST(RefTest, MatchesSameVariable) {
+  int a = 0;
+  int b = 0;
+  Matcher<int&> m = Ref(a);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(b));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ref(variable) describes itself properly.
+TEST(RefTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  int n = 5;
+  Matcher<int&> m = Ref(n);
+  stringstream ss;
+  ss << "references the variable @" << &n << " 5";
+  EXPECT_EQ(string(ss.str()), Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Test that Ref(non_const_varialbe) can be used as a matcher for a
+// const reference.
+TEST(RefTest, CanBeUsedAsMatcherForConstReference) {
+  int a = 0;
+  int b = 0;
+  Matcher<const int&> m = Ref(a);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(b));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ref(variable) is covariant, i.e. Ref(derived) can be
+// used wherever Ref(base) can be used (Ref(derived) is a sub-type
+// of Ref(base), but not vice versa.
+
+TEST(RefTest, IsCovariant) {
+  Base base, base2;
+  Derived derived;
+  Matcher<const Base&> m1 = Ref(base);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(base));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(base2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(derived));
+
+  m1 = Ref(derived);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(derived));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(base));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(base2));
+}
+
+// Tests string comparison matchers.
+
+TEST(StrEqTest, MatchesEqualString) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = StrEq(string("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+
+  Matcher<const string&> m2 = StrEq("Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hi"));
+}
+
+TEST(StrEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<string> m = StrEq("Hi-\'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\xD3");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to \"Hi-\'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\v\\xD3\"",
+      Describe(m));
+
+  string str("01204500800");
+  str[3] = '\0';
+  Matcher<string> m2 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to \"012\\04500800\"", Describe(m2));
+  str[0] = str[6] = str[7] = str[9] = str[10] = '\0';
+  Matcher<string> m3 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to \"\\012\\045\\0\\08\\0\\0\"", Describe(m3));
+}
+
+TEST(StrNeTest, MatchesUnequalString) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = StrNe("Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(""));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("Hello"));
+
+  Matcher<string> m2 = StrNe(string("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hello"));
+}
+
+TEST(StrNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = StrNe("Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to \"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(StrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringIgnoringCase) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = StrCaseEq(string("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches("hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("Hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+
+  Matcher<const string&> m2 = StrCaseEq("Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hi"));
+}
+
+TEST(StrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringWith0IgnoringCase) {
+  string str1("oabocdooeoo");
+  string str2("OABOCDOOEOO");
+  Matcher<const string&> m0 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m0.Matches(str2 + string(1, '\0')));
+
+  str1[3] = str2[3] = '\0';
+  Matcher<const string&> m1 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(str2));
+
+  str1[0] = str1[6] = str1[7] = str1[10] = '\0';
+  str2[0] = str2[6] = str2[7] = str2[10] = '\0';
+  Matcher<const string&> m2 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  str1[9] = str2[9] = '\0';
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(str2));
+
+  Matcher<const string&> m3 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(str2));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2 + "x"));
+  str2.append(1, '\0');
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(string(str2, 0, 9)));
+}
+
+TEST(StrCaseEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<string> m = StrCaseEq("Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to (ignoring case) \"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(StrCaseNeTest, MatchesUnequalStringIgnoringCase) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = StrCaseNe("Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches("Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("hello"));
+
+  Matcher<string> m2 = StrCaseNe(string("Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hello"));
+}
+
+TEST(StrCaseNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = StrCaseNe("Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to (ignoring case) \"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching string-typed values.
+TEST(HasSubstrTest, WorksForStringClasses) {
+  const Matcher<string> m1 = HasSubstr("foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(string("I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(string("tofo")));
+
+  const Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = HasSubstr("foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(std::string("I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(std::string("tofo")));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching C-string-typed values.
+TEST(HasSubstrTest, WorksForCStrings) {
+  const Matcher<char*> m1 = HasSubstr("foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(const_cast<char*>("I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(const_cast<char*>("tofo")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const char*> m2 = HasSubstr("foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("I love food."));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("tofo"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr(s) describes itself properly.
+TEST(HasSubstrTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<string> m = HasSubstr("foo\n\"");
+  EXPECT_EQ("has substring \"foo\\n\\\"\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests StartsWith(s).
+
+TEST(StartsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenPrefix) {
+  const Matcher<const char*> m1 = StartsWith(string(""));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const string&> m2 = StartsWith("Hi");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hi Hi!"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("High"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("H"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(" Hi"));
+}
+
+TEST(StartsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const std::string> m = StartsWith("Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("starts with \"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests EndsWith(s).
+
+TEST(EndsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenSuffix) {
+  const Matcher<const char*> m1 = EndsWith("");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const string&> m2 = EndsWith(string("Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Wow Hi Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Super Hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("i"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hi "));
+}
+
+TEST(EndsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const std::string> m = EndsWith("Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("ends with \"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+#ifdef GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+
+// Tests MatchesRegex().
+
+TEST(MatchesRegexTest, MatchesStringMatchingGivenRegex) {
+  const Matcher<const char*> m1 = MatchesRegex("a.*z");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("az"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("abcz"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const string&> m2 = MatchesRegex(new RE("a.*z"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("azbz"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("az1"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("1az"));
+}
+
+TEST(MatchesRegexTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const std::string> m1 = MatchesRegex(string("Hi.*"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"Hi.*\"", Describe(m1));
+
+  Matcher<const char*> m2 = MatchesRegex(new RE("[a-z].*"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"[a-z].*\"", Describe(m2));
+}
+
+// Tests ContainsRegex().
+
+TEST(ContainsRegexTest, MatchesStringContainingGivenRegex) {
+  const Matcher<const char*> m1 = ContainsRegex(string("a.*z"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("az"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("0abcz1"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const string&> m2 = ContainsRegex(new RE("a.*z"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("azbz"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("az1"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("1a"));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsRegexTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const std::string> m1 = ContainsRegex("Hi.*");
+  EXPECT_EQ("contains regular expression \"Hi.*\"", Describe(m1));
+
+  Matcher<const char*> m2 = ContainsRegex(new RE("[a-z].*"));
+  EXPECT_EQ("contains regular expression \"[a-z].*\"", Describe(m2));
+}
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+
+// Tests for wide strings.
+#if GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING
+TEST(StdWideStrEqTest, MatchesEqual) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrEq(::std::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m2 = StrEq(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m3 = StrEq(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74E"));
+
+  ::std::wstring str(L"01204500800");
+  str[3] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m4 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m4.Matches(str));
+  str[0] = str[6] = str[7] = str[9] = str[10] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m5 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m5.Matches(str));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher< ::std::wstring> m = StrEq(L"Hi-\'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\r\t\v");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"Hi-\'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\v\"",
+    Describe(m));
+
+  Matcher< ::std::wstring> m2 = StrEq(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"\\xD3\\x576\\x8D3\\xC74D\"",
+    Describe(m2));
+
+  ::std::wstring str(L"01204500800");
+  str[3] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m4 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"012\\04500800\"", Describe(m4));
+  str[0] = str[6] = str[7] = str[9] = str[10] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m5 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"\\012\\045\\0\\08\\0\\0\"", Describe(m5));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrNeTest, MatchesUnequalString) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrNe(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+
+  Matcher< ::std::wstring> m2 = StrNe(::std::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hello"));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrNe(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringIgnoringCase) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrCaseEq(::std::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m2 = StrCaseEq(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringWith0IgnoringCase) {
+  ::std::wstring str1(L"oabocdooeoo");
+  ::std::wstring str2(L"OABOCDOOEOO");
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m0 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m0.Matches(str2 + ::std::wstring(1, L'\0')));
+
+  str1[3] = str2[3] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m1 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(str2));
+
+  str1[0] = str1[6] = str1[7] = str1[10] = L'\0';
+  str2[0] = str2[6] = str2[7] = str2[10] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m2 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  str1[9] = str2[9] = L'\0';
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(str2));
+
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m3 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(str2));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2 + L"x"));
+  str2.append(1, L'\0');
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(::std::wstring(str2, 0, 9)));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrCaseEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher< ::std::wstring> m = StrCaseEq(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to (ignoring case) L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrCaseNeTest, MatchesUnequalStringIgnoringCase) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrCaseNe(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"hello"));
+
+  Matcher< ::std::wstring> m2 = StrCaseNe(::std::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hello"));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStrCaseNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrCaseNe(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to (ignoring case) L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching wstring-typed values.
+TEST(StdWideHasSubstrTest, WorksForStringClasses) {
+  const Matcher< ::std::wstring> m1 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(::std::wstring(L"I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(::std::wstring(L"tofo")));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m2 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(::std::wstring(L"I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(::std::wstring(L"tofo")));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching C-wide-string-typed values.
+TEST(StdWideHasSubstrTest, WorksForCStrings) {
+  const Matcher<wchar_t*> m1 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(const_cast<wchar_t*>(L"I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(const_cast<wchar_t*>(L"tofo")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const wchar_t*> m2 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"I love food."));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"tofo"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr(s) describes itself properly.
+TEST(StdWideHasSubstrTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher< ::std::wstring> m = HasSubstr(L"foo\n\"");
+  EXPECT_EQ("has substring L\"foo\\n\\\"\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests StartsWith(s).
+
+TEST(StdWideStartsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenPrefix) {
+  const Matcher<const wchar_t*> m1 = StartsWith(::std::wstring(L""));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m2 = StartsWith(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hi Hi!"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"High"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"H"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L" Hi"));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideStartsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring> m = StartsWith(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("starts with L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests EndsWith(s).
+
+TEST(StdWideEndsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenSuffix) {
+  const Matcher<const wchar_t*> m1 = EndsWith(L"");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::std::wstring&> m2 = EndsWith(::std::wstring(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Wow Hi Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Super Hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"i"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hi "));
+}
+
+TEST(StdWideEndsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const ::std::wstring> m = EndsWith(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("ends with L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING
+TEST(GlobalWideStrEqTest, MatchesEqual) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrEq(::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m2 = StrEq(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m3 = StrEq(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74E"));
+
+  ::wstring str(L"01204500800");
+  str[3] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m4 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m4.Matches(str));
+  str[0] = str[6] = str[7] = str[9] = str[10] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m5 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m5.Matches(str));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher< ::wstring> m = StrEq(L"Hi-\'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\r\t\v");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"Hi-\'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\v\"",
+    Describe(m));
+
+  Matcher< ::wstring> m2 = StrEq(L"\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"\\xD3\\x576\\x8D3\\xC74D\"",
+    Describe(m2));
+
+  ::wstring str(L"01204500800");
+  str[3] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m4 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"012\\04500800\"", Describe(m4));
+  str[0] = str[6] = str[7] = str[9] = str[10] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m5 = StrEq(str);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to L\"\\012\\045\\0\\08\\0\\0\"", Describe(m5));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrNeTest, MatchesUnequalString) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrNe(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+
+  Matcher< ::wstring> m2 = StrNe(::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hello"));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrNe(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringIgnoringCase) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrCaseEq(::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m2 = StrCaseEq(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringWith0IgnoringCase) {
+  ::wstring str1(L"oabocdooeoo");
+  ::wstring str2(L"OABOCDOOEOO");
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m0 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m0.Matches(str2 + ::wstring(1, L'\0')));
+
+  str1[3] = str2[3] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m1 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(str2));
+
+  str1[0] = str1[6] = str1[7] = str1[10] = L'\0';
+  str2[0] = str2[6] = str2[7] = str2[10] = L'\0';
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m2 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  str1[9] = str2[9] = L'\0';
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(str2));
+
+  Matcher<const ::wstring&> m3 = StrCaseEq(str1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(str2));
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2 + L"x"));
+  str2.append(1, L'\0');
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(::wstring(str2, 0, 9)));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrCaseEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher< ::wstring> m = StrCaseEq(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is equal to (ignoring case) L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrCaseNeTest, MatchesUnequalStringIgnoringCase) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrCaseNe(L"Hello");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(L"hello"));
+
+  Matcher< ::wstring> m2 = StrCaseNe(::wstring(L"Hello"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hello"));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStrCaseNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const wchar_t*> m = StrCaseNe(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to (ignoring case) L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching wstring-typed values.
+TEST(GlobalWideHasSubstrTest, WorksForStringClasses) {
+  const Matcher< ::wstring> m1 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(::wstring(L"I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(::wstring(L"tofo")));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::wstring&> m2 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(::wstring(L"I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(::wstring(L"tofo")));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching C-wide-string-typed values.
+TEST(GlobalWideHasSubstrTest, WorksForCStrings) {
+  const Matcher<wchar_t*> m1 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(const_cast<wchar_t*>(L"I love food.")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(const_cast<wchar_t*>(L"tofo")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const wchar_t*> m2 = HasSubstr(L"foo");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"I love food."));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"tofo"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests that HasSubstr(s) describes itself properly.
+TEST(GlobalWideHasSubstrTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher< ::wstring> m = HasSubstr(L"foo\n\"");
+  EXPECT_EQ("has substring L\"foo\\n\\\"\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests StartsWith(s).
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStartsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenPrefix) {
+  const Matcher<const wchar_t*> m1 = StartsWith(::wstring(L""));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::wstring&> m2 = StartsWith(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hi Hi!"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"High"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"H"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L" Hi"));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideStartsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const ::wstring> m = StartsWith(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("starts with L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests EndsWith(s).
+
+TEST(GlobalWideEndsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenSuffix) {
+  const Matcher<const wchar_t*> m1 = EndsWith(L"");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(L""));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::wstring&> m2 = EndsWith(::wstring(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Wow Hi Hi"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(L"Super Hi"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"i"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(L"Hi "));
+}
+
+TEST(GlobalWideEndsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const ::wstring> m = EndsWith(L"Hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("ends with L\"Hi\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING
+
+
+typedef ::std::tr1::tuple<long, int> Tuple2;  // NOLINT
+
+// Tests that Eq() matches a 2-tuple where the first field == the
+// second field.
+TEST(Eq2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Eq();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 5)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 6)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Eq() describes itself properly.
+TEST(Eq2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Eq();
+  EXPECT_EQ("argument #0 is equal to argument #1", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ge() matches a 2-tuple where the first field >= the
+// second field.
+TEST(Ge2Test, MatchesGreaterThanOrEqualArguments) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Ge();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 4)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 5)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 6)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ge() describes itself properly.
+TEST(Ge2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Ge();
+  EXPECT_EQ("argument #0 is greater than or equal to argument #1",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Gt() matches a 2-tuple where the first field > the
+// second field.
+TEST(Gt2Test, MatchesGreaterThanArguments) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Gt();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 4)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 5)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 6)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Gt() describes itself properly.
+TEST(Gt2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Gt();
+  EXPECT_EQ("argument #0 is greater than argument #1", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Le() matches a 2-tuple where the first field <= the
+// second field.
+TEST(Le2Test, MatchesLessThanOrEqualArguments) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Le();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 6)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 5)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 4)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Le() describes itself properly.
+TEST(Le2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Le();
+  EXPECT_EQ("argument #0 is less than or equal to argument #1",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Lt() matches a 2-tuple where the first field < the
+// second field.
+TEST(Lt2Test, MatchesLessThanArguments) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Lt();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 6)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 5)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 4)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Lt() describes itself properly.
+TEST(Lt2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Lt();
+  EXPECT_EQ("argument #0 is less than argument #1", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ne() matches a 2-tuple where the first field != the
+// second field.
+TEST(Ne2Test, MatchesUnequalArguments) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Ne();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 6)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 4)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple2(5L, 5)));
+}
+
+// Tests that Ne() describes itself properly.
+TEST(Ne2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const Tuple2&> m = Ne();
+  EXPECT_EQ("argument #0 is not equal to argument #1", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Not(m) matches any value that doesn't match m.
+TEST(NotTest, NegatesMatcher) {
+  Matcher<int> m;
+  m = Not(Eq(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(3));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(2));
+}
+
+// Tests that Not(m) describes itself properly.
+TEST(NotTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Not(Eq(5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not equal to 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that monomorphic matchers are safely cast by the Not matcher.
+TEST(NotTest, NotMatcherSafelyCastsMonomorphicMatchers) {
+  // greater_than_5 is a monomorphic matcher.
+  Matcher<int> greater_than_5 = Gt(5);
+
+  Matcher<const int&> m = Not(greater_than_5);
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = Not(greater_than_5);
+  Matcher<int&> m3 = Not(m);
+}
+
+// Tests that AllOf(m1, ..., mn) matches any value that matches all of
+// the given matchers.
+TEST(AllOfTest, MatchesWhenAllMatch) {
+  Matcher<int> m;
+  m = AllOf(Le(2), Ge(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(3));
+
+  m = AllOf(Gt(0), Ne(1), Ne(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(3));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(0));
+
+  m = AllOf(Gt(0), Ne(1), Ne(2), Ne(3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(4));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(3));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(0));
+
+  m = AllOf(Ge(0), Lt(10), Ne(3), Ne(5), Ne(7));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(3));
+}
+
+// Tests that AllOf(m1, ..., mn) describes itself properly.
+TEST(AllOfTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m;
+  m = AllOf(Le(2), Ge(1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is less than or equal to 2) and "
+            "(is greater than or equal to 1)",
+            Describe(m));
+
+  m = AllOf(Gt(0), Ne(1), Ne(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is greater than 0) and "
+            "((is not equal to 1) and "
+            "(is not equal to 2))",
+            Describe(m));
+
+
+  m = AllOf(Gt(0), Ne(1), Ne(2), Ne(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is greater than 0) and "
+            "((is not equal to 1) and "
+            "((is not equal to 2) and "
+            "(is not equal to 3)))",
+            Describe(m));
+
+
+  m = AllOf(Ge(0), Lt(10), Ne(3), Ne(5), Ne(7));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is greater than or equal to 0) and "
+            "((is less than 10) and "
+            "((is not equal to 3) and "
+            "((is not equal to 5) and "
+            "(is not equal to 7))))", Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that monomorphic matchers are safely cast by the AllOf matcher.
+TEST(AllOfTest, AllOfMatcherSafelyCastsMonomorphicMatchers) {
+  // greater_than_5 and less_than_10 are monomorphic matchers.
+  Matcher<int> greater_than_5 = Gt(5);
+  Matcher<int> less_than_10 = Lt(10);
+
+  Matcher<const int&> m = AllOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10);
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = AllOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10);
+  Matcher<int&> m3 = AllOf(greater_than_5, m2);
+
+  // Tests that BothOf works when composing itself.
+  Matcher<const int&> m4 = AllOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10, less_than_10);
+  Matcher<int&> m5 = AllOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10, less_than_10);
+}
+
+// Tests that AnyOf(m1, ..., mn) matches any value that matches at
+// least one of the given matchers.
+TEST(AnyOfTest, MatchesWhenAnyMatches) {
+  Matcher<int> m;
+  m = AnyOf(Le(1), Ge(3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(4));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(2));
+
+  m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(-1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(0));
+
+  m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2), Eq(3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(-1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(2));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(3));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(0));
+
+  m = AnyOf(Le(0), Gt(10), 3, 5, 7);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(11));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(3));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(2));
+}
+
+// Tests that AnyOf(m1, ..., mn) describes itself properly.
+TEST(AnyOfTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<int> m;
+  m = AnyOf(Le(1), Ge(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is less than or equal to 1) or "
+            "(is greater than or equal to 3)",
+            Describe(m));
+
+  m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is less than 0) or "
+            "((is equal to 1) or (is equal to 2))",
+            Describe(m));
+
+  m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2), Eq(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is less than 0) or "
+            "((is equal to 1) or "
+            "((is equal to 2) or "
+            "(is equal to 3)))",
+            Describe(m));
+
+  m = AnyOf(Le(0), Gt(10), 3, 5, 7);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is less than or equal to 0) or "
+            "((is greater than 10) or "
+            "((is equal to 3) or "
+            "((is equal to 5) or "
+            "(is equal to 7))))",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that monomorphic matchers are safely cast by the AnyOf matcher.
+TEST(AnyOfTest, AnyOfMatcherSafelyCastsMonomorphicMatchers) {
+  // greater_than_5 and less_than_10 are monomorphic matchers.
+  Matcher<int> greater_than_5 = Gt(5);
+  Matcher<int> less_than_10 = Lt(10);
+
+  Matcher<const int&> m = AnyOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10);
+  Matcher<int&> m2 = AnyOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10);
+  Matcher<int&> m3 = AnyOf(greater_than_5, m2);
+
+  // Tests that EitherOf works when composing itself.
+  Matcher<const int&> m4 = AnyOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10, less_than_10);
+  Matcher<int&> m5 = AnyOf(greater_than_5, less_than_10, less_than_10);
+}
+
+// The following predicate function and predicate functor are for
+// testing the Truly(predicate) matcher.
+
+// Returns non-zero if the input is positive.  Note that the return
+// type of this function is not bool.  It's OK as Truly() accepts any
+// unary function or functor whose return type can be implicitly
+// converted to bool.
+int IsPositive(double x) {
+  return x > 0 ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+// This functor returns true if the input is greater than the given
+// number.
+class IsGreaterThan {
+ public:
+  explicit IsGreaterThan(int threshold) : threshold_(threshold) {}
+
+  bool operator()(int n) const { return n > threshold_; }
+ private:
+  const int threshold_;
+};
+
+// For testing Truly().
+const int foo = 0;
+
+// This predicate returns true iff the argument references foo and has
+// a zero value.
+bool ReferencesFooAndIsZero(const int& n) {
+  return (&n == &foo) && (n == 0);
+}
+
+// Tests that Truly(predicate) matches what satisfies the given
+// predicate.
+TEST(TrulyTest, MatchesWhatSatisfiesThePredicate) {
+  Matcher<double> m = Truly(IsPositive);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(2.0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(-1.5));
+}
+
+// Tests that Truly(predicate_functor) works too.
+TEST(TrulyTest, CanBeUsedWithFunctor) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Truly(IsGreaterThan(5));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(6));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(4));
+}
+
+// Tests that Truly(predicate) can describe itself properly.
+TEST(TrulyTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<double> m = Truly(IsPositive);
+  EXPECT_EQ("satisfies the given predicate",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Truly(predicate) works when the matcher takes its
+// argument by reference.
+TEST(TrulyTest, WorksForByRefArguments) {
+  Matcher<const int&> m = Truly(ReferencesFooAndIsZero);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(foo));
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(n));
+}
+
+// Tests that Matches(m) is a predicate satisfied by whatever that
+// matches matcher m.
+TEST(MatchesTest, IsSatisfiedByWhatMatchesTheMatcher) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Matches(Ge(0))(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Matches(Eq('a'))('b'));
+}
+
+// Tests that Matches(m) works when the matcher takes its argument by
+// reference.
+TEST(MatchesTest, WorksOnByRefArguments) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Matches(AllOf(Ref(n), Eq(0)))(n));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Matches(Ref(m))(n));
+}
+
+// Tests that a Matcher on non-reference type can be used in
+// Matches().
+TEST(MatchesTest, WorksWithMatcherOnNonRefType) {
+  Matcher<int> eq5 = Eq(5);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Matches(eq5)(5));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Matches(eq5)(2));
+}
+
+// Tests that ASSERT_THAT() and EXPECT_THAT() work when the value
+// matches the matcher.
+TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksWhenMatcherIsSatisfied) {
+  ASSERT_THAT(5, Ge(2)) << "This should succeed.";
+  ASSERT_THAT("Foo", EndsWith("oo"));
+  EXPECT_THAT(2, AllOf(Le(7), Ge(0))) << "This should succeed too.";
+  EXPECT_THAT("Hello", StartsWith("Hell"));
+}
+
+// Tests that ASSERT_THAT() and EXPECT_THAT() work when the value
+// doesn't match the matcher.
+TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksWhenMatcherIsNotSatisfied) {
+  // 'n' must be static as it is used in an EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(),
+  // which cannot reference auto variables.
+  static int n;
+  n = 5;
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, Gt(10)) << "This should fail.",
+                       "Value of: n\n"
+                       "Expected: is greater than 10\n"
+                       "  Actual: 5\n"
+                       "This should fail.");
+  n = 0;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_THAT(n, AllOf(Le(7), Ge(5))),
+                          "Value of: n\n"
+                          "Expected: (is less than or equal to 7) and "
+                          "(is greater than or equal to 5)\n"
+                          "  Actual: 0");
+}
+
+// Tests that ASSERT_THAT() and EXPECT_THAT() work when the argument
+// has a reference type.
+TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksForByRefArguments) {
+  // We use a static variable here as EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() cannot
+  // reference auto variables.
+  static int n;
+  n = 0;
+  EXPECT_THAT(n, AllOf(Le(7), Ref(n)));
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, Not(Ref(n))),
+                       "Value of: n\n"
+                       "Expected: does not reference the variable @");
+  // Tests the "Actual" part.
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, Not(Ref(n))),
+                       "Actual: 0 (is located @");
+}
+
+// Tests that ASSERT_THAT() and EXPECT_THAT() work when the matcher is
+// monomorphic.
+TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksForMonomorphicMatcher) {
+  Matcher<const char*> starts_with_he = StartsWith("he");
+  ASSERT_THAT("hello", starts_with_he);
+
+  Matcher<const string&> ends_with_ok = EndsWith("ok");
+  ASSERT_THAT("book", ends_with_ok);
+
+  Matcher<int> is_greater_than_5 = Gt(5);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_THAT(5, is_greater_than_5),
+                          "Value of: 5\n"
+                          "Expected: is greater than 5\n"
+                          "  Actual: 5");
+}
+
+// Tests floating-point matchers.
+template <typename RawType>
+class FloatingPointTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  typedef typename testing::internal::FloatingPoint<RawType> Floating;
+  typedef typename Floating::Bits Bits;
+
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    const size_t max_ulps = Floating::kMaxUlps;
+
+    // The bits that represent 0.0.
+    const Bits zero_bits = Floating(0).bits();
+
+    // Makes some numbers close to 0.0.
+    close_to_positive_zero_ = Floating::ReinterpretBits(zero_bits + max_ulps/2);
+    close_to_negative_zero_ = -Floating::ReinterpretBits(
+        zero_bits + max_ulps - max_ulps/2);
+    further_from_negative_zero_ = -Floating::ReinterpretBits(
+        zero_bits + max_ulps + 1 - max_ulps/2);
+
+    // The bits that represent 1.0.
+    const Bits one_bits = Floating(1).bits();
+
+    // Makes some numbers close to 1.0.
+    close_to_one_ = Floating::ReinterpretBits(one_bits + max_ulps);
+    further_from_one_ = Floating::ReinterpretBits(one_bits + max_ulps + 1);
+
+    // +infinity.
+    infinity_ = Floating::Infinity();
+
+    // The bits that represent +infinity.
+    const Bits infinity_bits = Floating(infinity_).bits();
+
+    // Makes some numbers close to infinity.
+    close_to_infinity_ = Floating::ReinterpretBits(infinity_bits - max_ulps);
+    further_from_infinity_ = Floating::ReinterpretBits(
+        infinity_bits - max_ulps - 1);
+
+    // Makes some NAN's.
+    nan1_ = Floating::ReinterpretBits(Floating::kExponentBitMask | 1);
+    nan2_ = Floating::ReinterpretBits(Floating::kExponentBitMask | 200);
+  }
+
+  void TestSize() {
+    EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(RawType), sizeof(Bits));
+  }
+
+  // A battery of tests for FloatingEqMatcher::Matches.
+  // matcher_maker is a pointer to a function which creates a FloatingEqMatcher.
+  void TestMatches(
+      testing::internal::FloatingEqMatcher<RawType> (*matcher_maker)(RawType)) {
+    Matcher<RawType> m1 = matcher_maker(0.0);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(-0.0));
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(close_to_positive_zero_));
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(close_to_negative_zero_));
+    EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(1.0));
+
+    Matcher<RawType> m2 = matcher_maker(close_to_positive_zero_);
+    EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(further_from_negative_zero_));
+
+    Matcher<RawType> m3 = matcher_maker(1.0);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(close_to_one_));
+    EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(further_from_one_));
+
+    // Test commutativity: matcher_maker(0.0).Matches(1.0) was tested above.
+    EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(0.0));
+
+    Matcher<RawType> m4 = matcher_maker(-infinity_);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m4.Matches(-close_to_infinity_));
+
+    Matcher<RawType> m5 = matcher_maker(infinity_);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m5.Matches(close_to_infinity_));
+
+    // This is interesting as the representations of infinity_ and nan1_
+    // are only 1 DLP apart.
+    EXPECT_FALSE(m5.Matches(nan1_));
+
+    // matcher_maker can produce a Matcher<const RawType&>, which is needed in
+    // some cases.
+    Matcher<const RawType&> m6 = matcher_maker(0.0);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m6.Matches(-0.0));
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m6.Matches(close_to_positive_zero_));
+    EXPECT_FALSE(m6.Matches(1.0));
+
+    // matcher_maker can produce a Matcher<RawType&>, which is needed in some
+    // cases.
+    Matcher<RawType&> m7 = matcher_maker(0.0);
+    RawType x = 0.0;
+    EXPECT_TRUE(m7.Matches(x));
+    x = 0.01f;
+    EXPECT_FALSE(m7.Matches(x));
+  }
+
+  // Pre-calculated numbers to be used by the tests.
+
+  static RawType close_to_positive_zero_;
+  static RawType close_to_negative_zero_;
+  static RawType further_from_negative_zero_;
+
+  static RawType close_to_one_;
+  static RawType further_from_one_;
+
+  static RawType infinity_;
+  static RawType close_to_infinity_;
+  static RawType further_from_infinity_;
+
+  static RawType nan1_;
+  static RawType nan2_;
+};
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::close_to_positive_zero_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::close_to_negative_zero_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::further_from_negative_zero_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::close_to_one_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::further_from_one_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::infinity_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::close_to_infinity_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::further_from_infinity_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::nan1_;
+
+template <typename RawType>
+RawType FloatingPointTest<RawType>::nan2_;
+
+// Instantiate FloatingPointTest for testing floats.
+typedef FloatingPointTest<float> FloatTest;
+
+TEST_F(FloatTest, FloatEqApproximatelyMatchesFloats) {
+  TestMatches(&FloatEq);
+}
+
+TEST_F(FloatTest, NanSensitiveFloatEqApproximatelyMatchesFloats) {
+  TestMatches(&NanSensitiveFloatEq);
+}
+
+TEST_F(FloatTest, FloatEqCannotMatchNaN) {
+  // FloatEq never matches NaN.
+  Matcher<float> m = FloatEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(nan1_));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(nan2_));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(1.0));
+}
+
+TEST_F(FloatTest, NanSensitiveFloatEqCanMatchNaN) {
+  // NanSensitiveFloatEq will match NaN.
+  Matcher<float> m = NanSensitiveFloatEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(nan1_));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(nan2_));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(1.0));
+}
+
+TEST_F(FloatTest, FloatEqCanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<float> m1 = FloatEq(2.0f);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 2", Describe(m1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 2", DescribeNegation(m1));
+
+  Matcher<float> m2 = FloatEq(0.5f);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 0.5", Describe(m2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 0.5", DescribeNegation(m2));
+
+  Matcher<float> m3 = FloatEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_EQ("never matches", Describe(m3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is anything", DescribeNegation(m3));
+}
+
+TEST_F(FloatTest, NanSensitiveFloatEqCanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<float> m1 = NanSensitiveFloatEq(2.0f);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 2", Describe(m1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 2", DescribeNegation(m1));
+
+  Matcher<float> m2 = NanSensitiveFloatEq(0.5f);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 0.5", Describe(m2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 0.5", DescribeNegation(m2));
+
+  Matcher<float> m3 = NanSensitiveFloatEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is NaN", Describe(m3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not NaN", DescribeNegation(m3));
+}
+
+// Instantiate FloatingPointTest for testing doubles.
+typedef FloatingPointTest<double> DoubleTest;
+
+TEST_F(DoubleTest, DoubleEqApproximatelyMatchesDoubles) {
+  TestMatches(&DoubleEq);
+}
+
+TEST_F(DoubleTest, NanSensitiveDoubleEqApproximatelyMatchesDoubles) {
+  TestMatches(&NanSensitiveDoubleEq);
+}
+
+TEST_F(DoubleTest, DoubleEqCannotMatchNaN) {
+  // DoubleEq never matches NaN.
+  Matcher<double> m = DoubleEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(nan1_));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(nan2_));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(1.0));
+}
+
+TEST_F(DoubleTest, NanSensitiveDoubleEqCanMatchNaN) {
+  // NanSensitiveDoubleEq will match NaN.
+  Matcher<double> m = NanSensitiveDoubleEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(nan1_));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(nan2_));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(1.0));
+}
+
+TEST_F(DoubleTest, DoubleEqCanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<double> m1 = DoubleEq(2.0);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 2", Describe(m1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 2", DescribeNegation(m1));
+
+  Matcher<double> m2 = DoubleEq(0.5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 0.5", Describe(m2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 0.5", DescribeNegation(m2));
+
+  Matcher<double> m3 = DoubleEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_EQ("never matches", Describe(m3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is anything", DescribeNegation(m3));
+}
+
+TEST_F(DoubleTest, NanSensitiveDoubleEqCanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<double> m1 = NanSensitiveDoubleEq(2.0);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 2", Describe(m1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 2", DescribeNegation(m1));
+
+  Matcher<double> m2 = NanSensitiveDoubleEq(0.5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is approximately 0.5", Describe(m2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not approximately 0.5", DescribeNegation(m2));
+
+  Matcher<double> m3 = NanSensitiveDoubleEq(nan1_);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is NaN", Describe(m3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not NaN", DescribeNegation(m3));
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeTest, RawPointer) {
+  const Matcher<int*> m = Pointee(Ge(0));
+
+  int n = 1;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&n));
+  n = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&n));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeTest, RawPointerToConst) {
+  const Matcher<const double*> m = Pointee(Ge(0));
+
+  double x = 1;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&x));
+  x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&x));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeTest, ReferenceToConstRawPointer) {
+  const Matcher<int* const &> m = Pointee(Ge(0));
+
+  int n = 1;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&n));
+  n = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&n));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeTest, ReferenceToNonConstRawPointer) {
+  const Matcher<double* &> m = Pointee(Ge(0));
+
+  double x = 1.0;
+  double* p = &x;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(p));
+  x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(p));
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeTest, NeverMatchesNull) {
+  const Matcher<const char*> m = Pointee(_);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can write Pointee(value) instead of Pointee(Eq(value)).
+TEST(PointeeTest, MatchesAgainstAValue) {
+  const Matcher<int*> m = Pointee(5);
+
+  int n = 5;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&n));
+  n = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&n));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  const Matcher<int*> m = Pointee(Gt(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("points to a value that is greater than 3", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("does not point to a value that is greater than 3",
+            DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+// For testing ExplainMatchResultTo().
+class GreaterThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<int> {
+ public:
+  explicit GreaterThanMatcher(int rhs) : rhs_(rhs) {}
+
+  virtual bool Matches(int lhs) const { return lhs > rhs_; }
+
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "is greater than " << rhs_;
+  }
+
+  virtual void ExplainMatchResultTo(int lhs, ::std::ostream* os) const {
+    const int diff = lhs - rhs_;
+    if (diff > 0) {
+      *os << "is " << diff << " more than " << rhs_;
+    } else if (diff == 0) {
+      *os << "is the same as " << rhs_;
+    } else {
+      *os << "is " << -diff << " less than " << rhs_;
+    }
+  }
+ private:
+  const int rhs_;
+};
+
+Matcher<int> GreaterThan(int n) {
+  return MakeMatcher(new GreaterThanMatcher(n));
+}
+
+TEST(PointeeTest, CanExplainMatchResult) {
+  const Matcher<const string*> m = Pointee(StartsWith("Hi"));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, static_cast<const string*>(NULL)));
+
+  const Matcher<int*> m2 = Pointee(GreaterThan(1));
+  int n = 3;
+  EXPECT_EQ("points to a value that is 2 more than 1", Explain(m2, &n));
+}
+
+// An uncopyable class.
+class Uncopyable {
+ public:
+  explicit Uncopyable(int value) : value_(value) {}
+
+  int value() const { return value_; }
+ private:
+  const int value_;
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(Uncopyable);
+};
+
+// Returns true iff x.value() is positive.
+bool ValueIsPositive(const Uncopyable& x) { return x.value() > 0; }
+
+// A user-defined struct for testing Field().
+struct AStruct {
+  AStruct() : x(0), y(1.0), z(5), p(NULL) {}
+  AStruct(const AStruct& rhs)
+      : x(rhs.x), y(rhs.y), z(rhs.z.value()), p(rhs.p) {}
+
+  int x;           // A non-const field.
+  const double y;  // A const field.
+  Uncopyable z;    // An uncopyable field.
+  const char* p;   // A pointer field.
+};
+
+// A derived struct for testing Field().
+struct DerivedStruct : public AStruct {
+  char ch;
+};
+
+// Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when field is non-const.
+TEST(FieldTest, WorksForNonConstField) {
+  Matcher<AStruct> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  AStruct a;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  a.x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when field is const.
+TEST(FieldTest, WorksForConstField) {
+  AStruct a;
+
+  Matcher<AStruct> m = Field(&AStruct::y, Ge(0.0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  m = Field(&AStruct::y, Le(0.0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when field is not copyable.
+TEST(FieldTest, WorksForUncopyableField) {
+  AStruct a;
+
+  Matcher<AStruct> m = Field(&AStruct::z, Truly(ValueIsPositive));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  m = Field(&AStruct::z, Not(Truly(ValueIsPositive)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when field is a pointer.
+TEST(FieldTest, WorksForPointerField) {
+  // Matching against NULL.
+  Matcher<AStruct> m = Field(&AStruct::p, static_cast<const char*>(NULL));
+  AStruct a;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  a.p = "hi";
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+
+  // Matching a pointer that is not NULL.
+  m = Field(&AStruct::p, StartsWith("hi"));
+  a.p = "hill";
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  a.p = "hole";
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() works when the object is passed by reference.
+TEST(FieldTest, WorksForByRefArgument) {
+  Matcher<const AStruct&> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  AStruct a;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  a.x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when the argument's type
+// is a sub-type of Foo.
+TEST(FieldTest, WorksForArgumentOfSubType) {
+  // Note that the matcher expects DerivedStruct but we say AStruct
+  // inside Field().
+  Matcher<const DerivedStruct&> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  DerivedStruct d;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(d));
+  d.x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(d));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field(&Foo::field, m) works when field's type and m's
+// argument type are compatible but not the same.
+TEST(FieldTest, WorksForCompatibleMatcherType) {
+  // The field is an int, but the inner matcher expects a signed char.
+  Matcher<const AStruct&> m = Field(&AStruct::x,
+                                    Matcher<signed char>(Ge(0)));
+
+  AStruct a;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  a.x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() can describe itself.
+TEST(FieldTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const AStruct&> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given field is greater than or equal to 0", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given field is not greater than or equal to 0",
+            DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() can explain the match result.
+TEST(FieldTest, CanExplainMatchResult) {
+  Matcher<const AStruct&> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  AStruct a;
+  a.x = 1;
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, a));
+
+  m = Field(&AStruct::x, GreaterThan(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given field is 1 more than 0", Explain(m, a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() works when the argument is a pointer to const.
+TEST(FieldForPointerTest, WorksForPointerToConst) {
+  Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  AStruct a;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&a));
+  a.x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() works when the argument is a pointer to non-const.
+TEST(FieldForPointerTest, WorksForPointerToNonConst) {
+  Matcher<AStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  AStruct a;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&a));
+  a.x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() does not match the NULL pointer.
+TEST(FieldForPointerTest, DoesNotMatchNull) {
+  Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, _);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when the argument's type
+// is a sub-type of const Foo*.
+TEST(FieldForPointerTest, WorksForArgumentOfSubType) {
+  // Note that the matcher expects DerivedStruct but we say AStruct
+  // inside Field().
+  Matcher<DerivedStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  DerivedStruct d;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&d));
+  d.x = -1;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&d));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() can describe itself when used to match a pointer.
+TEST(FieldForPointerTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given field is greater than or equal to 0", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given field is not greater than or equal to 0",
+            DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Field() can explain the result of matching a pointer.
+TEST(FieldForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResult) {
+  Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0));
+
+  AStruct a;
+  a.x = 1;
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, static_cast<const AStruct*>(NULL)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, &a));
+
+  m = Field(&AStruct::x, GreaterThan(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given field is 1 more than 0", Explain(m, &a));
+}
+
+// A user-defined class for testing Property().
+class AClass {
+ public:
+  AClass() : n_(0) {}
+
+  // A getter that returns a non-reference.
+  int n() const { return n_; }
+
+  void set_n(int new_n) { n_ = new_n; }
+
+  // A getter that returns a reference to const.
+  const string& s() const { return s_; }
+
+  void set_s(const string& new_s) { s_ = new_s; }
+
+  // A getter that returns a reference to non-const.
+  double& x() const { return x_; }
+ private:
+  int n_;
+  string s_;
+
+  static double x_;
+};
+
+double AClass::x_ = 0.0;
+
+// A derived class for testing Property().
+class DerivedClass : public AClass {
+ private:
+  int k_;
+};
+
+// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property()
+// returns a non-reference.
+TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForNonReferenceProperty) {
+  Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  AClass a;
+  a.set_n(1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+
+  a.set_n(-1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property()
+// returns a reference to const.
+TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForReferenceToConstProperty) {
+  Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::s, StartsWith("hi"));
+
+  AClass a;
+  a.set_s("hill");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+
+  a.set_s("hole");
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property()
+// returns a reference to non-const.
+TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForReferenceToNonConstProperty) {
+  double x = 0.0;
+  AClass a;
+
+  Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::x, Ref(x));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+
+  m = Property(&AClass::x, Not(Ref(x)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when the argument is
+// passed by value.
+TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForByValueArgument) {
+  Matcher<AClass> m = Property(&AClass::s, StartsWith("hi"));
+
+  AClass a;
+  a.set_s("hill");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+
+  a.set_s("hole");
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when the argument's
+// type is a sub-type of Foo.
+TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForArgumentOfSubType) {
+  // The matcher expects a DerivedClass, but inside the Property() we
+  // say AClass.
+  Matcher<const DerivedClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  DerivedClass d;
+  d.set_n(1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(d));
+
+  d.set_n(-1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(d));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, m) works when property()'s type
+// and m's argument type are compatible but different.
+TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForCompatibleMatcherType) {
+  // n() returns an int but the inner matcher expects a signed char.
+  Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n,
+                                      Matcher<signed char>(Ge(0)));
+
+  AClass a;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a));
+  a.set_n(-1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property() can describe itself.
+TEST(PropertyTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given property is greater than or equal to 0", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given property is not greater than or equal to 0",
+            DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property() can explain the match result.
+TEST(PropertyTest, CanExplainMatchResult) {
+  Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  AClass a;
+  a.set_n(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, a));
+
+  m = Property(&AClass::n, GreaterThan(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given property is 1 more than 0", Explain(m, a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property() works when the argument is a pointer to const.
+TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, WorksForPointerToConst) {
+  Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  AClass a;
+  a.set_n(1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&a));
+
+  a.set_n(-1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property() works when the argument is a pointer to non-const.
+TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, WorksForPointerToNonConst) {
+  Matcher<AClass*> m = Property(&AClass::s, StartsWith("hi"));
+
+  AClass a;
+  a.set_s("hill");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&a));
+
+  a.set_s("hole");
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&a));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property() does not match the NULL pointer.
+TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, WorksForReferenceToNonConstProperty) {
+  Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property(&AClass::x, _);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when the argument's
+// type is a sub-type of const Foo*.
+TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, WorksForArgumentOfSubType) {
+  // The matcher expects a DerivedClass, but inside the Property() we
+  // say AClass.
+  Matcher<const DerivedClass*> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  DerivedClass d;
+  d.set_n(1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&d));
+
+  d.set_n(-1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(&d));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property() can describe itself when used to match a pointer.
+TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
+  Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given property is greater than or equal to 0", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given property is not greater than or equal to 0",
+            DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that Property() can explain the result of matching a pointer.
+TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResult) {
+  Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0));
+
+  AClass a;
+  a.set_n(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, static_cast<const AClass*>(NULL)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, &a));
+
+  m = Property(&AClass::n, GreaterThan(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ("the given property is 1 more than 0", Explain(m, &a));
+}
+
+// Tests ResultOf.
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a
+// function pointer.
+string IntToStringFunction(int input) { return input == 1 ? "foo" : "bar"; }
+
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForFunctionPointers) {
+  Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(&IntToStringFunction, Eq(string("foo")));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(2));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf() can describe itself.
+TEST(ResultOfTest, CanDescribeItself) {
+  Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(&IntToStringFunction, StrEq("foo"));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("result of the given callable is equal to \"foo\"",
+            Describe(matcher));
+  EXPECT_EQ("result of the given callable is not equal to \"foo\"",
+            DescribeNegation(matcher));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf() can explain the match result.
+int IntFunction(int input) { return input == 42 ? 80 : 90; }
+
+TEST(ResultOfTest, CanExplainMatchResult) {
+  Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(&IntFunction, Ge(85));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(matcher, 36));
+
+  matcher = ResultOf(&IntFunction, GreaterThan(85));
+  EXPECT_EQ("result of the given callable is 5 more than 85",
+            Explain(matcher, 36));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f(x)
+// returns a non-reference.
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForNonReferenceResults) {
+  Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(&IntFunction, Eq(80));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(42));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(36));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f(x)
+// returns a reference to non-const.
+double& DoubleFunction(double& input) { return input; }
+
+Uncopyable& RefUncopyableFunction(Uncopyable& obj) {
+  return obj;
+}
+
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForReferenceToNonConstResults) {
+  double x = 3.14;
+  double x2 = x;
+  Matcher<double&> matcher = ResultOf(&DoubleFunction, Ref(x));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(x));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(x2));
+
+  // Test that ResultOf works with uncopyable objects
+  Uncopyable obj(0);
+  Uncopyable obj2(0);
+  Matcher<Uncopyable&> matcher2 =
+      ResultOf(&RefUncopyableFunction, Ref(obj));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher2.Matches(obj));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher2.Matches(obj2));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f(x)
+// returns a reference to const.
+const string& StringFunction(const string& input) { return input; }
+
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForReferenceToConstResults) {
+  string s = "foo";
+  string s2 = s;
+  Matcher<const string&> matcher = ResultOf(&StringFunction, Ref(s));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(s));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(s2));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, m) works when f(x) and m's
+// argument types are compatible but different.
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForCompatibleMatcherTypes) {
+  // IntFunction() returns int but the inner matcher expects a signed char.
+  Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(IntFunction, Matcher<signed char>(Ge(85)));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(36));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(42));
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+// Tests that the program aborts when ResultOf is passed
+// a NULL function pointer.
+TEST(ResultOfDeathTest, DiesOnNullFunctionPointers) {
+  EXPECT_DEATH(
+      ResultOf(static_cast<string(*)(int)>(NULL), Eq(string("foo"))),
+               "NULL function pointer is passed into ResultOf\\(\\)\\.");
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a
+// function reference.
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForFunctionReferences) {
+  Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(IntToStringFunction, StrEq("foo"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(2));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a
+// function object.
+struct Functor : public ::std::unary_function<int, string> {
+  result_type operator()(argument_type input) const {
+    return IntToStringFunction(input);
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForFunctors) {
+  Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(Functor(), Eq(string("foo")));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(2));
+}
+
+// Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a
+// functor with more then one operator() defined. ResultOf() must work
+// for each defined operator().
+struct PolymorphicFunctor {
+  typedef int result_type;
+  int operator()(int n) { return n; }
+  int operator()(const char* s) { return static_cast<int>(strlen(s)); }
+};
+
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForPolymorphicFunctors) {
+  Matcher<int> matcher_int = ResultOf(PolymorphicFunctor(), Ge(5));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher_int.Matches(10));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher_int.Matches(2));
+
+  Matcher<const char*> matcher_string = ResultOf(PolymorphicFunctor(), Ge(5));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher_string.Matches("long string"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher_string.Matches("shrt"));
+}
+
+const int* ReferencingFunction(const int& n) { return &n; }
+
+struct ReferencingFunctor {
+  typedef const int* result_type;
+  result_type operator()(const int& n) { return &n; }
+};
+
+TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForReferencingCallables) {
+  const int n = 1;
+  const int n2 = 1;
+  Matcher<const int&> matcher2 = ResultOf(ReferencingFunction, Eq(&n));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher2.Matches(n));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher2.Matches(n2));
+
+  Matcher<const int&> matcher3 = ResultOf(ReferencingFunctor(), Eq(&n));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matcher3.Matches(n));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(matcher3.Matches(n2));
+}
+
+
+class DivisibleByImpl {
+ public:
+  explicit DivisibleByImpl(int divider) : divider_(divider) {}
+
+  template <typename T>
+  bool Matches(const T& n) const {
+    return (n % divider_) == 0;
+  }
+
+  void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "is divisible by " << divider_;
+  }
+
+  void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "is not divisible by " << divider_;
+  }
+
+  int divider() const { return divider_; }
+ private:
+  const int divider_;
+};
+
+// For testing using ExplainMatchResultTo() with polymorphic matchers.
+template <typename T>
+void ExplainMatchResultTo(const DivisibleByImpl& impl, const T& n,
+                          ::std::ostream* os) {
+  *os << "is " << (n % impl.divider()) << " modulo "
+      << impl.divider();
+}
+
+PolymorphicMatcher<DivisibleByImpl> DivisibleBy(int n) {
+  return MakePolymorphicMatcher(DivisibleByImpl(n));
+}
+
+// Tests that when AllOf() fails, only the first failing matcher is
+// asked to explain why.
+TEST(ExplainMatchResultTest, AllOf_False_False) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = AllOf(DivisibleBy(4), DivisibleBy(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is 1 modulo 4", Explain(m, 5));
+}
+
+// Tests that when AllOf() fails, only the first failing matcher is
+// asked to explain why.
+TEST(ExplainMatchResultTest, AllOf_False_True) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = AllOf(DivisibleBy(4), DivisibleBy(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is 2 modulo 4", Explain(m, 6));
+}
+
+// Tests that when AllOf() fails, only the first failing matcher is
+// asked to explain why.
+TEST(ExplainMatchResultTest, AllOf_True_False) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = AllOf(Ge(1), DivisibleBy(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is 2 modulo 3", Explain(m, 5));
+}
+
+// Tests that when AllOf() succeeds, all matchers are asked to explain
+// why.
+TEST(ExplainMatchResultTest, AllOf_True_True) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = AllOf(DivisibleBy(2), DivisibleBy(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is 0 modulo 2; is 0 modulo 3", Explain(m, 6));
+}
+
+TEST(ExplainMatchResultTest, AllOf_True_True_2) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = AllOf(Ge(2), Le(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 2));
+}
+
+TEST(ExplainmatcherResultTest, MonomorphicMatcher) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = GreaterThan(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("is 1 more than 5", Explain(m, 6));
+}
+
+// The following two tests verify that values without a public copy
+// ctor can be used as arguments to matchers like Eq(), Ge(), and etc
+// with the help of ByRef().
+
+class NotCopyable {
+ public:
+  explicit NotCopyable(int value) : value_(value) {}
+
+  int value() const { return value_; }
+
+  bool operator==(const NotCopyable& rhs) const {
+    return value() == rhs.value();
+  }
+
+  bool operator>=(const NotCopyable& rhs) const {
+    return value() >= rhs.value();
+  }
+ private:
+  int value_;
+
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(NotCopyable);
+};
+
+TEST(ByRefTest, AllowsNotCopyableConstValueInMatchers) {
+  const NotCopyable const_value1(1);
+  const Matcher<const NotCopyable&> m = Eq(ByRef(const_value1));
+
+  const NotCopyable n1(1), n2(2);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(n1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(n2));
+}
+
+TEST(ByRefTest, AllowsNotCopyableValueInMatchers) {
+  NotCopyable value2(2);
+  const Matcher<NotCopyable&> m = Ge(ByRef(value2));
+
+  NotCopyable n1(1), n2(2);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(n1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(n2));
+}
+
+// Tests ContainerEq with different container types, and
+// different element types.
+
+template <typename T>
+class ContainerEqTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+};
+
+typedef testing::Types<
+    std::set<int>,
+    std::vector<size_t>,
+    std::multiset<size_t>,
+    std::list<int> >
+    ContainerEqTestTypes;
+
+TYPED_TEST_CASE(ContainerEqTest, ContainerEqTestTypes);
+
+// Tests that the filled container is equal to itself.
+TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, EqualsSelf) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  TypeParam my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  const Matcher<TypeParam> m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(my_set));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, my_set));
+}
+
+// Tests that missing values are reported.
+TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, ValueMissing) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {2, 1, 8, 5};
+  TypeParam my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  TypeParam test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 4);
+  const Matcher<TypeParam> m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_set));
+  EXPECT_EQ("Not in actual: 3", Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests that added values are reported.
+TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, ValueAdded) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 46};
+  TypeParam my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  TypeParam test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 6);
+  const Matcher<const TypeParam&> m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_set));
+  EXPECT_EQ("Only in actual: 46", Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests that added and missing values are reported together.
+TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, ValueAddedAndRemoved) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {1, 2, 3, 8, 46};
+  TypeParam my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  TypeParam test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 5);
+  const Matcher<TypeParam> m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_set));
+  EXPECT_EQ("Only in actual: 46; not in actual: 5", Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests duplicated value -- expect no explanation.
+TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, DuplicateDifference) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  TypeParam my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  TypeParam test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 5);
+  const Matcher<const TypeParam&> m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  // Depending on the container, match may be true or false
+  // But in any case there should be no explanation.
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests that mutliple missing values are reported.
+// Using just vector here, so order is predicatble.
+TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultipleValuesMissing) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {2, 1, 5};
+  std::vector<int> my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  std::vector<int> test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 3);
+  const Matcher<std::vector<int> > m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_set));
+  EXPECT_EQ("Not in actual: 3, 8", Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests that added values are reported.
+// Using just vector here, so order is predicatble.
+TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultipleValuesAdded) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {1, 2, 92, 3, 5, 8, 46};
+  std::list<size_t> my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  std::list<size_t> test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 7);
+  const Matcher<const std::list<size_t>&> m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_set));
+  EXPECT_EQ("Only in actual: 92, 46", Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests that added and missing values are reported together.
+TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultipleValuesAddedAndRemoved) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {1, 2, 3, 92, 46};
+  std::list<size_t> my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  std::list<size_t> test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 5);
+  const Matcher<const std::list<size_t> > m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_set));
+  EXPECT_EQ("Only in actual: 92, 46; not in actual: 5, 8",
+            Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests to see that duplicate elements are detected,
+// but (as above) not reported in the explanation.
+TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultiSetOfIntDuplicateDifference) {
+  static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  static const int test_vals[] = {1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
+  std::vector<int> my_set(vals, vals + 6);
+  std::vector<int> test_set(test_vals, test_vals + 5);
+  const Matcher<std::vector<int> > m = ContainerEq(my_set);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(my_set));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_set));
+  // There is nothing to report when both sets contain all the same values.
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, test_set));
+}
+
+// Tests that ContainerEq works for non-trivial associative containers,
+// like maps.
+TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, WorksForMaps) {
+  std::map<int, std::string> my_map;
+  my_map[0] = "a";
+  my_map[1] = "b";
+
+  std::map<int, std::string> test_map;
+  test_map[0] = "aa";
+  test_map[1] = "b";
+
+  const Matcher<const std::map<int, std::string>&> m = ContainerEq(my_map);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(my_map));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_map));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("Only in actual: (0, \"aa\"); not in actual: (0, \"a\")",
+            Explain(m, test_map));
+}
+
+// Tests GetParamIndex().
+
+TEST(GetParamIndexTest, WorksForEmptyParamList) {
+  const char* params[] = { NULL };
+  EXPECT_EQ(kTupleInterpolation, GetParamIndex(params, "*"));
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInvalidInterpolation, GetParamIndex(params, "a"));
+}
+
+TEST(GetParamIndexTest, RecognizesStar) {
+  const char* params[] = { "a", "b", NULL };
+  EXPECT_EQ(kTupleInterpolation, GetParamIndex(params, "*"));
+}
+
+TEST(GetParamIndexTest, RecognizesKnownParam) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", NULL };
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, GetParamIndex(params, "foo"));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParamIndex(params, "bar"));
+}
+
+TEST(GetParamIndexTest, RejectsUnknownParam) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", NULL };
+  EXPECT_EQ(kInvalidInterpolation, GetParamIndex(params, "foobar"));
+}
+
+// Tests SkipPrefix().
+
+TEST(SkipPrefixTest, SkipsWhenPrefixMatches) {
+  const char* const str = "hello";
+
+  const char* p = str;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(SkipPrefix("", &p));
+  EXPECT_EQ(str, p);
+
+  p = str;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(SkipPrefix("hell", &p));
+  EXPECT_EQ(str + 4, p);
+}
+
+TEST(SkipPrefixTest, DoesNotSkipWhenPrefixDoesNotMatch) {
+  const char* const str = "world";
+
+  const char* p = str;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(SkipPrefix("W", &p));
+  EXPECT_EQ(str, p);
+
+  p = str;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(SkipPrefix("world!", &p));
+  EXPECT_EQ(str, p);
+}
+
+// Tests FormatMatcherDescriptionSyntaxError().
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionSyntaxErrorTest, FormatsCorrectly) {
+  const char* const description = "hello%world";
+  EXPECT_EQ("Syntax error at index 5 in matcher description \"hello%world\": ",
+            FormatMatcherDescriptionSyntaxError(description, description + 5));
+}
+
+// Tests ValidateMatcherDescription().
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, AcceptsEmptyDescription) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", NULL };
+  EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, ""),
+              ElementsAre());
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     AcceptsNonEmptyDescriptionWithNoInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", NULL };
+  EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, "a simple description"),
+              ElementsAre());
+}
+
+// We use MATCHER_P3() to define a matcher for testing
+// ValidateMatcherDescription(); otherwise we'll end up with much
+// plumbing code.  This is not circular as
+// ValidateMatcherDescription() doesn't affect whether the matcher
+// matches a value or not.
+MATCHER_P3(EqInterpolation, start, end, index, "equals Interpolation%(*)s") {
+  return arg.start_pos == start && arg.end_pos == end &&
+      arg.param_index == index;
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, AcceptsPercentInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", NULL };
+  const char* const desc = "one %%";
+  EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, desc),
+              ElementsAre(EqInterpolation(desc + 4, desc + 6,
+                                          kPercentInterpolation)));
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, AcceptsTupleInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", "baz", NULL };
+  const char* const desc = "%(*)s after";
+  EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, desc),
+              ElementsAre(EqInterpolation(desc, desc + 5,
+                                          kTupleInterpolation)));
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, AcceptsParamInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", "baz", NULL };
+  const char* const desc = "a %(bar)s.";
+  EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, desc),
+              ElementsAre(EqInterpolation(desc + 2, desc + 9, 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, AcceptsMultiplenterpolations) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", "baz", NULL };
+  const char* const desc = "%(baz)s %(foo)s %(bar)s";
+  EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, desc),
+              ElementsAre(EqInterpolation(desc, desc + 7, 2),
+                          EqInterpolation(desc + 8, desc + 15, 0),
+                          EqInterpolation(desc + 16, desc + 23, 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, AcceptsRepeatedParams) {
+  const char* params[] = { "foo", "bar", NULL };
+  const char* const desc = "%(foo)s and %(foo)s";
+  EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, desc),
+              ElementsAre(EqInterpolation(desc, desc + 7, 0),
+                          EqInterpolation(desc + 12, desc + 19, 0)));
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, RejectsUnknownParam) {
+  const char* params[] = { "a", "bar", NULL };
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, "%(foo)s"),
+                ElementsAre());
+  }, "Syntax error at index 2 in matcher description \"%(foo)s\": "
+     "\"foo\" is an invalid parameter name.");
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, RejectsUnfinishedParam) {
+  const char* params[] = { "a", "bar", NULL };
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, "%(foo)"),
+                ElementsAre());
+  }, "Syntax error at index 0 in matcher description \"%(foo)\": "
+     "an interpolation must end with \")s\", but \"%(foo)\" does not.");
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, "x%(a"),
+                ElementsAre());
+  }, "Syntax error at index 1 in matcher description \"x%(a\": "
+     "an interpolation must end with \")s\", but \"%(a\" does not.");
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateMatcherDescriptionTest, RejectsSinglePercent) {
+  const char* params[] = { "a", NULL };
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    EXPECT_THAT(ValidateMatcherDescription(params, "a %."),
+                ElementsAre());
+  }, "Syntax error at index 2 in matcher description \"a %.\": "
+     "use \"%%\" instead of \"%\" to print \"%\".");
+
+}
+
+// Tests JoinAsTuple().
+
+TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsEmptyTuple) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("", JoinAsTuple(Strings()));
+}
+
+TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsOneTuple) {
+  const char* fields[] = { "1" };
+  EXPECT_EQ("1", JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsTwoTuple) {
+  const char* fields[] = { "1", "a" };
+  EXPECT_EQ("(1, a)", JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsTenTuple) {
+  const char* fields[] = { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10" };
+  EXPECT_EQ("(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)",
+            JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests FormatMatcherDescription().
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest, WorksForEmptyDescription) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("is even",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("IsEven", "", Interpolations(),
+                                     Strings()));
+
+  const char* params[] = { "5" };
+  EXPECT_EQ("equals 5",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Equals", "", Interpolations(),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 1)));
+
+  const char* params2[] = { "5", "8" };
+  EXPECT_EQ("is in range (5, 8)",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("IsInRange", "", Interpolations(),
+                                     Strings(params2, params2 + 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest, WorksForDescriptionWithNoInterpolation) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("is positive",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Gt0", "is positive", Interpolations(),
+                                     Strings()));
+
+  const char* params[] = { "5", "6" };
+  EXPECT_EQ("is negative",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Lt0", "is negative", Interpolations(),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     WorksWhenDescriptionStartsWithInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "5" };
+  const char* const desc = "%(num)s times bigger";
+  const Interpolation interp[] = { Interpolation(desc, desc + 7, 0) };
+  EXPECT_EQ("5 times bigger",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Foo", desc,
+                                     Interpolations(interp, interp + 1),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     WorksWhenDescriptionEndsWithInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "5", "6" };
+  const char* const desc = "is bigger than %(y)s";
+  const Interpolation interp[] = { Interpolation(desc + 15, desc + 20, 1) };
+  EXPECT_EQ("is bigger than 6",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Foo", desc,
+                                     Interpolations(interp, interp + 1),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     WorksWhenDescriptionStartsAndEndsWithInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "5", "6" };
+  const char* const desc = "%(x)s <= arg <= %(y)s";
+  const Interpolation interp[] = {
+    Interpolation(desc, desc + 5, 0),
+    Interpolation(desc + 16, desc + 21, 1)
+  };
+  EXPECT_EQ("5 <= arg <= 6",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Foo", desc,
+                                     Interpolations(interp, interp + 2),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     WorksWhenDescriptionDoesNotStartOrEndWithInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "5.2" };
+  const char* const desc = "has %(x)s cents";
+  const Interpolation interp[] = { Interpolation(desc + 4, desc + 9, 0) };
+  EXPECT_EQ("has 5.2 cents",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Foo", desc,
+                                     Interpolations(interp, interp + 1),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     WorksWhenDescriptionContainsMultipleInterpolations) {
+  const char* params[] = { "5", "6" };
+  const char* const desc = "in %(*)s or [%(x)s, %(y)s]";
+  const Interpolation interp[] = {
+    Interpolation(desc + 3, desc + 8, kTupleInterpolation),
+    Interpolation(desc + 13, desc + 18, 0),
+    Interpolation(desc + 20, desc + 25, 1)
+  };
+  EXPECT_EQ("in (5, 6) or [5, 6]",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Foo", desc,
+                                     Interpolations(interp, interp + 3),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     WorksWhenDescriptionContainsRepeatedParams) {
+  const char* params[] = { "9" };
+  const char* const desc = "in [-%(x)s, %(x)s]";
+  const Interpolation interp[] = {
+    Interpolation(desc + 5, desc + 10, 0),
+    Interpolation(desc + 12, desc + 17, 0)
+  };
+  EXPECT_EQ("in [-9, 9]",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Foo", desc,
+                                     Interpolations(interp, interp + 2),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
+     WorksForDescriptionWithInvalidInterpolation) {
+  const char* params[] = { "9" };
+  const char* const desc = "> %(x)s %(x)";
+  const Interpolation interp[] = { Interpolation(desc + 2, desc + 7, 0)  };
+  EXPECT_EQ("> 9 %(x)",
+            FormatMatcherDescription("Foo", desc,
+                                     Interpolations(interp, interp + 1),
+                                     Strings(params, params + 1)));
+}
+
+}  // namespace gmock_matchers_test
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..955961c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h>
+
+#include <string>
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace gmock_nice_strict_test {
+
+using testing::internal::string;
+using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
+using testing::HasSubstr;
+using testing::NiceMock;
+using testing::StrictMock;
+
+// Defines some mock classes needed by the tests.
+
+class Foo {
+ public:
+  virtual ~Foo() {}
+
+  virtual void DoThis() = 0;
+  virtual int DoThat(bool flag) = 0;
+};
+
+class MockFoo : public Foo {
+ public:
+  void Delete() { delete this; }
+
+  MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, void());
+  MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, int(bool flag));
+};
+
+class MockBar {
+ public:
+  explicit MockBar(const string& s) : str_(s) {}
+
+  MockBar(char a1, char a2, string a3, string a4, int a5, int a6,
+          const string& a7, const string& a8, bool a9, bool a10) {
+    str_ = string() + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + static_cast<char>(a5) +
+        static_cast<char>(a6) + a7 + a8 + (a9 ? 'T' : 'F') + (a10 ? 'T' : 'F');
+  }
+
+  virtual ~MockBar() {}
+
+  const string& str() const { return str_; }
+
+  MOCK_METHOD0(This, int());
+  MOCK_METHOD2(That, string(int, bool));
+
+ private:
+  string str_;
+};
+
+// TODO(wan@google.com): find a way to re-enable these tests.
+#if 0
+
+// Tests that a nice mock generates no warning for uninteresting calls.
+TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCall) {
+  NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
+
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  nice_foo.DoThis();
+  nice_foo.DoThat(true);
+  EXPECT_EQ("", GetCapturedTestStdout());
+}
+
+// Tests that a nice mock generates no warning for uninteresting calls
+// that delete the mock object.
+TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) {
+  NiceMock<MockFoo>* const nice_foo = new NiceMock<MockFoo>;
+
+  ON_CALL(*nice_foo, DoThis())
+      .WillByDefault(Invoke(nice_foo, &MockFoo::Delete));
+
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  nice_foo->DoThis();
+  EXPECT_EQ("", GetCapturedTestStdout());
+}
+
+// Tests that a nice mock generates informational logs for
+// uninteresting calls.
+TEST(NiceMockTest, InfoForUninterestingCall) {
+  NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
+
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info";
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  nice_foo.DoThis();
+  EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedTestStdout(),
+              HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call"));
+
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  nice_foo.DoThat(true);
+  EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedTestStdout(),
+              HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call"));
+}
+
+#endif  // 0
+
+// Tests that a nice mock allows expected calls.
+TEST(NiceMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) {
+  NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(nice_foo, DoThis());
+  nice_foo.DoThis();
+}
+
+// Tests that an unexpected call on a nice mock fails.
+TEST(NiceMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) {
+  NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(nice_foo, DoThis()).Times(0);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(nice_foo.DoThis(), "called more times than expected");
+}
+
+// Tests that NiceMock works with a mock class that has a non-default
+// constructor.
+TEST(NiceMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor) {
+  NiceMock<MockBar> nice_bar("hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("hi", nice_bar.str());
+
+  nice_bar.This();
+  nice_bar.That(5, true);
+}
+
+// Tests that NiceMock works with a mock class that has a 10-ary
+// non-default constructor.
+TEST(NiceMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) {
+  NiceMock<MockBar> nice_bar('a', 'b', "c", "d", 'e', 'f',
+                             "g", "h", true, false);
+  EXPECT_EQ("abcdefghTF", nice_bar.str());
+
+  nice_bar.This();
+  nice_bar.That(5, true);
+}
+
+// Tests that a strict mock allows expected calls.
+TEST(StrictMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) {
+  StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(strict_foo, DoThis());
+  strict_foo.DoThis();
+}
+
+// Tests that an unexpected call on a strict mock fails.
+TEST(StrictMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) {
+  StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(strict_foo, DoThis()).Times(0);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo.DoThis(),
+                          "called more times than expected");
+}
+
+// Tests that an uninteresting call on a strict mock fails.
+TEST(StrictMockTest, UninterestingCallFails) {
+  StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo.DoThis(),
+                          "Uninteresting mock function call");
+}
+
+// Tests that an uninteresting call on a strict mock fails, even if
+// the call deletes the mock object.
+TEST(StrictMockTest, UninterestingCallFailsAfterDeath) {
+  StrictMock<MockFoo>* const strict_foo = new StrictMock<MockFoo>;
+
+  ON_CALL(*strict_foo, DoThis())
+      .WillByDefault(Invoke(strict_foo, &MockFoo::Delete));
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo->DoThis(),
+                          "Uninteresting mock function call");
+}
+
+// Tests that StrictMock works with a mock class that has a
+// non-default constructor.
+TEST(StrictMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor) {
+  StrictMock<MockBar> strict_bar("hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ("hi", strict_bar.str());
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_bar.That(5, true),
+                          "Uninteresting mock function call");
+}
+
+// Tests that StrictMock works with a mock class that has a 10-ary
+// non-default constructor.
+TEST(StrictMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) {
+  StrictMock<MockBar> strict_bar('a', 'b', "c", "d", 'e', 'f',
+                                 "g", "h", true, false);
+  EXPECT_EQ("abcdefghTF", strict_bar.str());
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_bar.That(5, true),
+                          "Uninteresting mock function call");
+}
+
+}  // namespace gmock_nice_strict_test
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-port_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-port_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2e85bcc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-port_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the internal cross-platform support utilities.
+
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-port.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+TEST(GmockCheckSyntaxTest, BehavesLikeASingleStatement) {
+  if (false)
+    GMOCK_CHECK_(false) << "This should never be executed; "
+                           "It's a compilation test only.";
+
+  if (true)
+    GMOCK_CHECK_(true);
+  else
+    ;
+
+  if (false)
+    ;
+  else
+    GMOCK_CHECK_(true) << "";
+}
+
+TEST(GmockCheckSyntaxTest, WorksWithSwitch) {
+  switch (0) {
+    case 1:
+      break;
+    default:
+      GMOCK_CHECK_(true);
+  }
+
+  switch(0)
+    case 0:
+      GMOCK_CHECK_(true) << "Check failed in switch case";
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+TEST(GmockCheckDeathTest, DiesWithCorrectOutputOnFailure) {
+  const bool a_false_condition = false;
+  // MSVC and gcc use different formats to print source file locations.
+  // Google Mock's failure messages use the same format as used by the
+  // compiler, in order for the IDE to recognize them.  Therefore we look
+  // for different patterns here depending on the compiler.
+  const char regex[] =
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+     "gmock-port_test\\.cc\\(\\d+\\):"
+#else
+     "gmock-port_test\\.cc:[0-9]+"
+#endif  // _MSC_VER
+     ".*a_false_condition.*Extra info";
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH(GMOCK_CHECK_(a_false_condition) << "Extra info", regex);
+}
+
+TEST(GmockCheckDeathTest, LivesSilentlyOnSuccess) {
+  EXPECT_EXIT({
+      GMOCK_CHECK_(true) << "Extra info";
+      ::std::cerr << "Success\n";
+      exit(0); },
+      ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "Success");
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-printers_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-printers_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..29a0db8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-printers_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,1051 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the universal value printer.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-printers.h>
+
+#include <ctype.h>
+#include <limits.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <algorithm>
+#include <deque>
+#include <list>
+#include <map>
+#include <set>
+#include <sstream>
+#include <string>
+#include <utility>
+#include <vector>
+#include <gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h>
+#include <gmock/gmock-matchers.h>
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-port.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+// hash_map and hash_set are available on Windows.
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+#define GMOCK_HAS_HASH_MAP_ 1  // Indicates that hash_map is available.
+#include <hash_map>            // NOLINT
+#define GMOCK_HAS_HASH_SET_ 1  // Indicates that hash_set is available.
+#include <hash_set>            // NOLINT
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+// Some user-defined types for testing the universal value printer.
+
+// A user-defined unprintable class template in the global namespace.
+template <typename T>
+class UnprintableTemplateInGlobal {
+ public:
+  UnprintableTemplateInGlobal() : value_() {}
+ private:
+  T value_;
+};
+
+// A user-defined streamable type in the global namespace.
+class StreamableInGlobal {
+ public:
+  virtual ~StreamableInGlobal() {}
+};
+
+inline void operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const StreamableInGlobal& x) {
+  os << "StreamableInGlobal";
+}
+
+namespace foo {
+
+// A user-defined unprintable type in a user namespace.
+class UnprintableInFoo {
+ public:
+  UnprintableInFoo() : x_(0x12EF), y_(0xAB34), z_(0) {}
+ private:
+  testing::internal::Int32 x_;
+  testing::internal::Int32 y_;
+  double z_;
+};
+
+// A user-defined printable type in a user-chosen namespace.
+struct PrintableViaPrintTo {
+  PrintableViaPrintTo() : value() {}
+  int value;
+};
+
+void PrintTo(const PrintableViaPrintTo& x, ::std::ostream* os) {
+  *os << "PrintableViaPrintTo: " << x.value;
+}
+
+// A user-defined printable class template in a user-chosen namespace.
+template <typename T>
+class PrintableViaPrintToTemplate {
+ public:
+  explicit PrintableViaPrintToTemplate(const T& value) : value_(value) {}
+
+  const T& value() const { return value_; }
+ private:
+  T value_;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+void PrintTo(const PrintableViaPrintToTemplate<T>& x, ::std::ostream* os) {
+  *os << "PrintableViaPrintToTemplate: " << x.value();
+}
+
+// A user-defined streamable class template in a user namespace.
+template <typename T>
+class StreamableTemplateInFoo {
+ public:
+  StreamableTemplateInFoo() : value_() {}
+
+  const T& value() const { return value_; }
+ private:
+  T value_;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+inline ::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os,
+                                  const StreamableTemplateInFoo<T>& x) {
+  return os << "StreamableTemplateInFoo: " << x.value();
+}
+
+}  // namespace foo
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace gmock_printers_test {
+
+using ::std::deque;
+using ::std::list;
+using ::std::make_pair;
+using ::std::map;
+using ::std::multimap;
+using ::std::multiset;
+using ::std::pair;
+using ::std::set;
+using ::std::tr1::make_tuple;
+using ::std::tr1::tuple;
+using ::std::vector;
+using ::testing::ElementsAre;
+using ::testing::StartsWith;
+using ::testing::internal::Strings;
+using ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrint;
+using ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings;
+using ::testing::internal::UniversalPrinter;
+using ::testing::internal::string;
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+// MSVC defines the following classes in the ::stdext namespace while
+// gcc defines them in the :: namespace.  Note that they are not part
+// of the C++ standard.
+
+using ::stdext::hash_map;
+using ::stdext::hash_set;
+using ::stdext::hash_multimap;
+using ::stdext::hash_multiset;
+
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+// Prints a value to a string using the universal value printer.  This
+// is a helper for testing UniversalPrinter<T>::Print() for various types.
+template <typename T>
+string Print(const T& value) {
+  ::std::stringstream ss;
+  UniversalPrinter<T>::Print(value, &ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Prints a value passed by reference to a string, using the universal
+// value printer.  This is a helper for testing
+// UniversalPrinter<T&>::Print() for various types.
+template <typename T>
+string PrintByRef(const T& value) {
+  ::std::stringstream ss;
+  UniversalPrinter<T&>::Print(value, &ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Tests printing various char types.
+
+// char.
+TEST(PrintCharTest, PlainChar) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\0'", Print('\0'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\'' (39)", Print('\''));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\"' (34)", Print('"'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\?' (63)", Print('\?'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\\\' (92)", Print('\\'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\a' (7)", Print('\a'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\b' (8)", Print('\b'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\f' (12)", Print('\f'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\n' (10)", Print('\n'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\r' (13)", Print('\r'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\t' (9)", Print('\t'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\v' (11)", Print('\v'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\x7F' (127)", Print('\x7F'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\xFF' (255)", Print('\xFF'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("' ' (32)", Print(' '));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'a' (97)", Print('a'));
+}
+
+// signed char.
+TEST(PrintCharTest, SignedChar) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\0'", Print(static_cast<signed char>('\0')));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\xCE' (-50)",
+            Print(static_cast<signed char>(-50)));
+}
+
+// unsigned char.
+TEST(PrintCharTest, UnsignedChar) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\0'", Print(static_cast<unsigned char>('\0')));
+  EXPECT_EQ("'b' (98)",
+            Print(static_cast<unsigned char>('b')));
+}
+
+// Tests printing other simple, built-in types.
+
+// bool.
+TEST(PrintBuiltInTypeTest, Bool) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("false", Print(false));
+  EXPECT_EQ("true", Print(true));
+}
+
+// wchar_t.
+TEST(PrintBuiltInTypeTest, Wchar_t) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\0'", Print(L'\0'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\'' (39)", Print(L'\''));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\"' (34)", Print(L'"'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\?' (63)", Print(L'\?'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\\\' (92)", Print(L'\\'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\a' (7)", Print(L'\a'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\b' (8)", Print(L'\b'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\f' (12)", Print(L'\f'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\n' (10)", Print(L'\n'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\r' (13)", Print(L'\r'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\t' (9)", Print(L'\t'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\v' (11)", Print(L'\v'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\x7F' (127)", Print(L'\x7F'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\xFF' (255)", Print(L'\xFF'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L' ' (32)", Print(L' '));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'a' (97)", Print(L'a'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\x576' (1398)", Print(L'\x576'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L'\\xC74D' (51021)", Print(L'\xC74D'));
+}
+
+// Test that Int64 provides more storage than wchar_t.
+TEST(PrintTypeSizeTest, Wchar_t) {
+  EXPECT_LT(sizeof(wchar_t), sizeof(testing::internal::Int64));
+}
+
+// Various integer types.
+TEST(PrintBuiltInTypeTest, Integer) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\xFF' (255)", Print(static_cast<unsigned char>(255)));  // uint8
+  EXPECT_EQ("'\\x80' (-128)", Print(static_cast<signed char>(-128)));  // int8
+  EXPECT_EQ("65535", Print(USHRT_MAX));  // uint16
+  EXPECT_EQ("-32768", Print(SHRT_MIN));  // int16
+  EXPECT_EQ("4294967295", Print(UINT_MAX));  // uint32
+  EXPECT_EQ("-2147483648", Print(INT_MIN));  // int32
+  EXPECT_EQ("18446744073709551615",
+            Print(static_cast<testing::internal::UInt64>(-1)));  // uint64
+  EXPECT_EQ("-9223372036854775808",
+            Print(static_cast<testing::internal::Int64>(1) << 63));  // int64
+}
+
+// Size types.
+TEST(PrintBuiltInTypeTest, Size_t) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("1", Print(sizeof('a')));  // size_t.
+#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  // Windows has no ssize_t type.
+  EXPECT_EQ("-2", Print(static_cast<ssize_t>(-2)));  // ssize_t.
+#endif  // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+}
+
+// Floating-points.
+TEST(PrintBuiltInTypeTest, FloatingPoints) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("1.5", Print(1.5f));   // float
+  EXPECT_EQ("-2.5", Print(-2.5));  // double
+}
+
+// Since ::std::stringstream::operator<<(const void *) formats the pointer
+// output differently with different compilers, we have to create the expected
+// output first and use it as our expectation.
+static string PrintPointer(const void *p) {
+  ::std::stringstream expected_result_stream;
+  expected_result_stream << p;
+  return expected_result_stream.str();
+}
+
+// Tests printing C strings.
+
+// const char*.
+TEST(PrintCStringTest, Const) {
+  const char* p = "World";
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p) + " pointing to \"World\"", Print(p));
+}
+
+// char*.
+TEST(PrintCStringTest, NonConst) {
+  char p[] = "Hi";
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p) + " pointing to \"Hi\"",
+            Print(static_cast<char*>(p)));
+}
+
+// NULL C string.
+TEST(PrintCStringTest, Null) {
+  const char* p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// Tests that C strings are escaped properly.
+TEST(PrintCStringTest, EscapesProperly) {
+  const char* p = "'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\x7F\xFF a";
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p) + " pointing to \"'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f"
+            "\\n\\r\\t\\v\\x7F\\xFF a\"",
+            Print(p));
+}
+
+
+
+// MSVC compiler can be configured to define whar_t as a typedef
+// of unsigned short. Defining an overload for const wchar_t* in that case
+// would cause pointers to unsigned shorts be printed as wide strings,
+// possibly accessing more memory than intended and causing invalid
+// memory accesses. MSVC defines _NATIVE_WCHAR_T_DEFINED symbol when
+// wchar_t is implemented as a native type.
+#if !defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(_NATIVE_WCHAR_T_DEFINED)
+
+// const wchar_t*.
+TEST(PrintWideCStringTest, Const) {
+  const wchar_t* p = L"World";
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p) + " pointing to L\"World\"", Print(p));
+}
+
+// wchar_t*.
+TEST(PrintWideCStringTest, NonConst) {
+  wchar_t p[] = L"Hi";
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p) + " pointing to L\"Hi\"",
+            Print(static_cast<wchar_t*>(p)));
+}
+
+// NULL wide C string.
+TEST(PrintWideCStringTest, Null) {
+  const wchar_t* p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// Tests that wide C strings are escaped properly.
+TEST(PrintWideCStringTest, EscapesProperly) {
+  const wchar_t* p = L"'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D a";
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p) + " pointing to L\"'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f"
+            "\\n\\r\\t\\v\\xD3\\x576\\x8D3\\xC74D a\"",
+            Print(p));
+}
+#endif  // native wchar_t
+
+// Tests printing pointers to other char types.
+
+// signed char*.
+TEST(PrintCharPointerTest, SignedChar) {
+  signed char* p = reinterpret_cast<signed char*>(0x1234);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// const signed char*.
+TEST(PrintCharPointerTest, ConstSignedChar) {
+  signed char* p = reinterpret_cast<signed char*>(0x1234);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// unsigned char*.
+TEST(PrintCharPointerTest, UnsignedChar) {
+  unsigned char* p = reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(0x1234);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// const unsigned char*.
+TEST(PrintCharPointerTest, ConstUnsignedChar) {
+  const unsigned char* p = reinterpret_cast<const unsigned char*>(0x1234);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// Tests printing pointers to simple, built-in types.
+
+// bool*.
+TEST(PrintPointerToBuiltInTypeTest, Bool) {
+  bool* p = reinterpret_cast<bool*>(0xABCD);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// void*.
+TEST(PrintPointerToBuiltInTypeTest, Void) {
+  void* p = reinterpret_cast<void*>(0xABCD);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// const void*.
+TEST(PrintPointerToBuiltInTypeTest, ConstVoid) {
+  const void* p = reinterpret_cast<const void*>(0xABCD);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// Tests printing pointers to pointers.
+TEST(PrintPointerToPointerTest, IntPointerPointer) {
+  int** p = reinterpret_cast<int**>(0xABCD);
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(p), Print(p));
+  p = NULL;
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// Tests printing (non-member) function pointers.
+
+void MyFunction(int n) {}
+
+TEST(PrintPointerTest, NonMemberFunctionPointer) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&MyFunction)),
+            Print(&MyFunction));
+  int (*p)(bool) = NULL;  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", Print(p));
+}
+
+// Tests printing member variable pointers.  Although they are called
+// pointers, they don't point to a location in the address space.
+// Their representation is implementation-defined.  Thus they will be
+// printed as raw bytes.
+
+struct Foo {
+ public:
+  virtual ~Foo() {}
+  int MyMethod(char x) { return x + 1; }
+  virtual char MyVirtualMethod(int n) { return 'a'; }
+
+  int value;
+};
+
+TEST(PrintPointerTest, MemberVariablePointer) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(Print(&Foo::value),
+              StartsWith(Print(sizeof(&Foo::value)) + "-byte object "));
+  int (Foo::*p) = NULL;  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(Print(p),
+              StartsWith(Print(sizeof(p)) + "-byte object "));
+}
+
+// Tests printing member function pointers.  Although they are called
+// pointers, they don't point to a location in the address space.
+// Their representation is implementation-defined.  Thus they will be
+// printed as raw bytes.
+TEST(PrintPointerTest, MemberFunctionPointer) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(Print(&Foo::MyMethod),
+              StartsWith(Print(sizeof(&Foo::MyMethod)) + "-byte object "));
+  EXPECT_THAT(Print(&Foo::MyVirtualMethod),
+              StartsWith(Print(sizeof((&Foo::MyVirtualMethod)))
+                               + "-byte object "));
+  int (Foo::*p)(char) = NULL;  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(Print(p),
+              StartsWith(Print(sizeof(p)) + "-byte object "));
+}
+
+// Tests printing C arrays.
+
+// One-dimensional array.
+
+void ArrayHelper1(int (&a)[5]) {  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }", Print(a));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintArrayTest, OneDimensionalArray) {
+  int a[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
+  ArrayHelper1(a);
+}
+
+// Two-dimensional array.
+
+void ArrayHelper2(int (&a)[2][5]) {  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }, { 6, 7, 8, 9, 0 } }", Print(a));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintArrayTest, TwoDimensionalArray) {
+  int a[2][5] = {
+    { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 },
+    { 6, 7, 8, 9, 0 }
+  };
+  ArrayHelper2(a);
+}
+
+// Array of const elements.
+
+void ArrayHelper3(const bool (&a)[1]) {  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ false }", Print(a));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintArrayTest, ConstArray) {
+  const bool a[1] = { false };
+  ArrayHelper3(a);
+}
+
+// Char array.
+
+void ArrayHelper4(char (&a)[3]) {  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(a) + " pointing to \"Hi\"", Print(a));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintArrayTest, CharArray) {
+  char a[3] = "Hi";
+  ArrayHelper4(a);
+}
+
+// Const char array.
+
+void ArrayHelper5(const char (&a)[3]) {  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(Print(a), PrintPointer(a) + " pointing to \"Hi\"");
+}
+
+TEST(PrintArrayTest, ConstCharArray) {
+  const char a[3] = "Hi";
+  ArrayHelper5(a);
+}
+
+// Array of objects.
+TEST(PrintArrayTest, ObjectArray) {
+  string a[3] = { "Hi", "Hello", "Ni hao" };
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ \"Hi\", \"Hello\", \"Ni hao\" }", Print(a));
+}
+
+// Array with many elements.
+TEST(PrintArrayTest, BigArray) {
+  int a[100] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ..., 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }",
+            Print(a));
+}
+
+// Tests printing ::string and ::std::string.
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING
+// ::string.
+TEST(PrintStringTest, StringInGlobalNamespace) {
+  const char s[] = "'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\0\r\t\v\x7F\xFF a";
+  const ::string str(s, sizeof(s));
+  EXPECT_EQ("\"'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\0\\r\\t\\v\\x7F\\xFF a\\0\"",
+            Print(str));
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING
+// ::std::string.
+TEST(PrintStringTest, StringInStdNamespace) {
+  const char s[] = "'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\0\r\t\v\x7F\xFF a";
+  const ::std::string str(s, sizeof(s));
+  EXPECT_EQ("\"'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\0\\r\\t\\v\\x7F\\xFF a\\0\"",
+            Print(str));
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING
+
+// Tests printing ::wstring and ::std::wstring.
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING
+// ::wstring.
+TEST(PrintWideStringTest, StringInGlobalNamespace) {
+  const wchar_t s[] = L"'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\0\r\t\v\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D a";
+  const ::wstring str(s, sizeof(s)/sizeof(wchar_t));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L\"'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\0\\r\\t\\v"
+            "\\xD3\\x576\\x8D3\\xC74D a\\0\"",
+            Print(str));
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING
+// ::std::wstring.
+TEST(PrintWideStringTest, StringInStdNamespace) {
+  const wchar_t s[] = L"'\"\?\\\a\b\f\n\0\r\t\v\xD3\x576\x8D3\xC74D a";
+  const ::std::wstring str(s, sizeof(s)/sizeof(wchar_t));
+  EXPECT_EQ("L\"'\\\"\\?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\0\\r\\t\\v"
+            "\\xD3\\x576\\x8D3\\xC74D a\\0\"",
+            Print(str));
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING
+
+// Tests printing types that support generic streaming (i.e. streaming
+// to std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits> for any valid Char and
+// CharTraits types).
+
+// Tests printing a non-template type that supports generic streaming.
+
+class AllowsGenericStreaming {};
+
+template <typename Char, typename CharTraits>
+std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& operator<<(
+    std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& os,
+    const AllowsGenericStreaming& a) {
+  return os << "AllowsGenericStreaming";
+}
+
+TEST(PrintTypeWithGenericStreamingTest, NonTemplateType) {
+  AllowsGenericStreaming a;
+  EXPECT_EQ("AllowsGenericStreaming", Print(a));
+}
+
+// Tests printing a template type that supports generic streaming.
+
+template <typename T>
+class AllowsGenericStreamingTemplate {};
+
+template <typename Char, typename CharTraits, typename T>
+std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& operator<<(
+    std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& os,
+    const AllowsGenericStreamingTemplate<T>& a) {
+  return os << "AllowsGenericStreamingTemplate";
+}
+
+TEST(PrintTypeWithGenericStreamingTest, TemplateType) {
+  AllowsGenericStreamingTemplate<int> a;
+  EXPECT_EQ("AllowsGenericStreamingTemplate", Print(a));
+}
+
+// Tests printing a type that supports generic streaming and can be
+// implicitly converted to another printable type.
+
+template <typename T>
+class AllowsGenericStreamingAndImplicitConversionTemplate {
+ public:
+  operator bool() const { return false; }
+};
+
+template <typename Char, typename CharTraits, typename T>
+std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& operator<<(
+    std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& os,
+    const AllowsGenericStreamingAndImplicitConversionTemplate<T>& a) {
+  return os << "AllowsGenericStreamingAndImplicitConversionTemplate";
+}
+
+TEST(PrintTypeWithGenericStreamingTest, TypeImplicitlyConvertible) {
+  AllowsGenericStreamingAndImplicitConversionTemplate<int> a;
+  EXPECT_EQ("AllowsGenericStreamingAndImplicitConversionTemplate", Print(a));
+}
+
+// Tests printing STL containers.
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, EmptyDeque) {
+  deque<char> empty;
+  EXPECT_EQ("{}", Print(empty));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, NonEmptyDeque) {
+  deque<int> non_empty;
+  non_empty.push_back(1);
+  non_empty.push_back(3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ 1, 3 }", Print(non_empty));
+}
+
+#if GMOCK_HAS_HASH_MAP_
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, OneElementHashMap) {
+  hash_map<int, char> map1;
+  map1[1] = 'a';
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ (1, 'a' (97)) }", Print(map1));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, HashMultiMap) {
+  hash_multimap<int, bool> map1;
+  map1.insert(make_pair(5, true));
+  map1.insert(make_pair(5, false));
+
+  // Elements of hash_multimap can be printed in any order.
+  const string result = Print(map1);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(result == "{ (5, true), (5, false) }" ||
+              result == "{ (5, false), (5, true) }")
+                  << " where Print(map1) returns \"" << result << "\".";
+}
+
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_HASH_MAP_
+
+#if GMOCK_HAS_HASH_SET_
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, HashSet) {
+  hash_set<string> set1;
+  set1.insert("hello");
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ \"hello\" }", Print(set1));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, HashMultiSet) {
+  const int kSize = 5;
+  int a[kSize] = { 1, 1, 2, 5, 1 };
+  hash_multiset<int> set1(a, a + kSize);
+
+  // Elements of hash_multiset can be printed in any order.
+  const string result = Print(set1);
+  const string expected_pattern = "{ d, d, d, d, d }";  // d means a digit.
+
+  // Verifies the result matches the expected pattern; also extracts
+  // the numbers in the result.
+  ASSERT_EQ(expected_pattern.length(), result.length());
+  std::vector<int> numbers;
+  for (size_t i = 0; i != result.length(); i++) {
+    if (expected_pattern[i] == 'd') {
+      ASSERT_TRUE(isdigit(result[i]));
+      numbers.push_back(result[i] - '0');
+    } else {
+      EXPECT_EQ(expected_pattern[i], result[i]) << " where result is "
+                                                << result;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Makes sure the result contains the right numbers.
+  std::sort(numbers.begin(), numbers.end());
+  std::sort(a, a + kSize);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(std::equal(a, a + kSize, numbers.begin()));
+}
+
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_HASH_SET_
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, List) {
+  const char* a[] = {
+    "hello",
+    "world"
+  };
+  const list<string> strings(a, a + 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ \"hello\", \"world\" }", Print(strings));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, Map) {
+  map<int, bool> map1;
+  map1[1] = true;
+  map1[5] = false;
+  map1[3] = true;
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ (1, true), (3, true), (5, false) }", Print(map1));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, MultiMap) {
+  multimap<bool, int> map1;
+  map1.insert(make_pair(true, 0));
+  map1.insert(make_pair(true, 1));
+  map1.insert(make_pair(false, 2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ (false, 2), (true, 0), (true, 1) }", Print(map1));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, Set) {
+  const unsigned int a[] = { 3, 0, 5 };
+  set<unsigned int> set1(a, a + 3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ 0, 3, 5 }", Print(set1));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, MultiSet) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 1, 2, 5, 1 };
+  multiset<int> set1(a, a + 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ 1, 1, 1, 2, 5 }", Print(set1));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, Pair) {
+  pair<const bool, int> p(true, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(true, 5)", Print(p));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, Vector) {
+  vector<int> v;
+  v.push_back(1);
+  v.push_back(2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ 1, 2 }", Print(v));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, LongSequence) {
+  const int a[100] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  const vector<int> v(a, a + 100);
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, "
+            "0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ... }", Print(v));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, NestedContainer) {
+  const int a1[] = { 1, 2 };
+  const int a2[] = { 3, 4, 5 };
+  const list<int> l1(a1, a1 + 2);
+  const list<int> l2(a2, a2 + 3);
+
+  vector<list<int> > v;
+  v.push_back(l1);
+  v.push_back(l2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("{ { 1, 2 }, { 3, 4, 5 } }", Print(v));
+}
+
+
+// Tests printing tuples.
+
+// Tuples of various arities.
+TEST(PrintTupleTest, VariousSizes) {
+  tuple<> t0;
+  EXPECT_EQ("()", Print(t0));
+
+  tuple<int> t1(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(5)", Print(t1));
+
+  tuple<char, bool> t2('a', true);
+  EXPECT_EQ("('a' (97), true)", Print(t2));
+
+  tuple<bool, int, int> t3(false, 2, 3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 2, 3)", Print(t3));
+
+  tuple<bool, int, int, int> t4(false, 2, 3, 4);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 2, 3, 4)", Print(t4));
+
+  tuple<bool, int, int, int, bool> t5(false, 2, 3, 4, true);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 2, 3, 4, true)", Print(t5));
+
+  tuple<bool, int, int, int, bool, int> t6(false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6)", Print(t6));
+
+  tuple<bool, int, int, int, bool, int, int> t7(false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6, 7);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6, 7)", Print(t7));
+
+  tuple<bool, int, int, int, bool, int, int, bool> t8(
+      false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6, 7, true);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6, 7, true)", Print(t8));
+
+  tuple<bool, int, int, int, bool, int, int, bool, int> t9(
+      false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6, 7, true, 9);
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 2, 3, 4, true, 6, 7, true, 9)", Print(t9));
+
+  const char* const str = "8";
+  tuple<bool, char, short, testing::internal::Int32,  // NOLINT
+      testing::internal::Int64, float, double, const char*, void*, string>
+      t10(false, 'a', 3, 4, 5, 6.5F, 7.5, str, NULL, "10");
+  EXPECT_EQ("(false, 'a' (97), 3, 4, 5, 6.5, 7.5, " + PrintPointer(str) +
+            " pointing to \"8\", NULL, \"10\")",
+            Print(t10));
+}
+
+// Nested tuples.
+TEST(PrintTupleTest, NestedTuple) {
+  tuple<tuple<int, double>, char> nested(make_tuple(5, 9.5), 'a');
+  EXPECT_EQ("((5, 9.5), 'a' (97))", Print(nested));
+}
+
+// Tests printing user-defined unprintable types.
+
+// Unprintable types in the global namespace.
+TEST(PrintUnprintableTypeTest, InGlobalNamespace) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("1-byte object <00>",
+            Print(UnprintableTemplateInGlobal<bool>()));
+}
+
+// Unprintable types in a user namespace.
+TEST(PrintUnprintableTypeTest, InUserNamespace) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("16-byte object <EF12 0000 34AB 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000>",
+            Print(::foo::UnprintableInFoo()));
+}
+
+// Unprintable types are that too big to be printed completely.
+
+struct Big {
+  Big() { memset(array, 0, sizeof(array)); }
+  char array[257];
+};
+
+TEST(PrintUnpritableTypeTest, BigObject) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("257-byte object <0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 "
+            "0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 "
+            "0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 "
+            "0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ... 0000 0000 0000 "
+            "0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 "
+            "0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 "
+            "0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 00>",
+            Print(Big()));
+}
+
+// Tests printing user-defined streamable types.
+
+// Streamable types in the global namespace.
+TEST(PrintStreamableTypeTest, InGlobalNamespace) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("StreamableInGlobal",
+            Print(StreamableInGlobal()));
+}
+
+// Printable template types in a user namespace.
+TEST(PrintStreamableTypeTest, TemplateTypeInUserNamespace) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("StreamableTemplateInFoo: 0",
+            Print(::foo::StreamableTemplateInFoo<int>()));
+}
+
+// Tests printing user-defined types that have a PrintTo() function.
+TEST(PrintPrintableTypeTest, InUserNamespace) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("PrintableViaPrintTo: 0",
+            Print(::foo::PrintableViaPrintTo()));
+}
+
+// Tests printing user-defined class template that have a PrintTo() function.
+TEST(PrintPrintableTypeTest, TemplateInUserNamespace) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("PrintableViaPrintToTemplate: 5",
+            Print(::foo::PrintableViaPrintToTemplate<int>(5)));
+}
+
+#if GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+
+// Tests printing a protocol message.
+TEST(PrintProtocolMessageTest, PrintsShortDebugString) {
+  testing::internal::TestMessage msg;
+  msg.set_member("yes");
+  EXPECT_EQ("<member:\"yes\">", Print(msg));
+}
+
+// Tests printing a proto2 message.
+TEST(PrintProto2MessageTest, PrintsShortDebugString) {
+  testing::internal::FooMessage msg;
+  msg.set_int_field(2);
+  EXPECT_PRED2(RE::FullMatch, Print(msg),
+               "<int_field:\\s*2\\s*>");
+}
+
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_PROTOBUF_
+
+// Tests that the universal printer prints both the address and the
+// value of a reference.
+TEST(PrintReferenceTest, PrintsAddressAndValue) {
+  int n = 5;
+  EXPECT_EQ("@" + PrintPointer(&n) + " 5", PrintByRef(n));
+
+  int a[2][3] = {
+    { 0, 1, 2 },
+    { 3, 4, 5 }
+  };
+  EXPECT_EQ("@" + PrintPointer(a) + " { { 0, 1, 2 }, { 3, 4, 5 } }",
+            PrintByRef(a));
+
+  const ::foo::UnprintableInFoo x;
+  EXPECT_EQ("@" + PrintPointer(&x) + " 16-byte object "
+            "<EF12 0000 34AB 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000>",
+            PrintByRef(x));
+}
+
+// Tests that the universal printer prints a function pointer passed by
+// reference.
+TEST(PrintReferenceTest, HandlesFunctionPointer) {
+  void (*fp)(int n) = &MyFunction;
+  const string fp_pointer_string =
+      PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&fp));
+  const string fp_string = PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>(fp));
+  EXPECT_EQ("@" + fp_pointer_string + " " + fp_string,
+            PrintByRef(fp));
+}
+
+// Tests that the universal printer prints a member function pointer
+// passed by reference.
+TEST(PrintReferenceTest, HandlesMemberFunctionPointer) {
+  int (Foo::*p)(char ch) = &Foo::MyMethod;
+  EXPECT_THAT(PrintByRef(p),
+              StartsWith("@" + PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&p))
+                         + " " + Print(sizeof(p)) + "-byte object "));
+
+  char (Foo::*p2)(int n) = &Foo::MyVirtualMethod;
+  EXPECT_THAT(PrintByRef(p2),
+              StartsWith("@" + PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&p2))
+                         + " " + Print(sizeof(p2)) + "-byte object "));
+}
+
+// Tests that the universal printer prints a member variable pointer
+// passed by reference.
+TEST(PrintReferenceTest, HandlesMemberVariablePointer) {
+  int (Foo::*p) = &Foo::value;  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(PrintByRef(p),
+              StartsWith("@" + PrintPointer(&p)
+                         + " " + Print(sizeof(p)) + "-byte object "));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintToStringTest, WorksForNonReference) {
+  EXPECT_EQ("123", UniversalPrinter<int>::PrintToString(123));
+}
+
+TEST(PrintToStringTest, WorksForReference) {
+  int n = 123;
+  EXPECT_EQ("@" + PrintPointer(&n) + " 123",
+            UniversalPrinter<const int&>::PrintToString(n));
+}
+
+TEST(UniversalTersePrintTest, WorksForNonReference) {
+  ::std::stringstream ss;
+  UniversalTersePrint(123, &ss);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123", ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(UniversalTersePrintTest, WorksForReference) {
+  const int& n = 123;
+  ::std::stringstream ss;
+  UniversalTersePrint(n, &ss);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123", ss.str());
+}
+
+TEST(UniversalTersePrintTest, WorksForCString) {
+  const char* s1 = "abc";
+  ::std::stringstream ss1;
+  UniversalTersePrint(s1, &ss1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("\"abc\"", ss1.str());
+
+  char* s2 = const_cast<char*>(s1);
+  ::std::stringstream ss2;
+  UniversalTersePrint(s2, &ss2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("\"abc\"", ss2.str());
+
+  const char* s3 = NULL;
+  ::std::stringstream ss3;
+  UniversalTersePrint(s3, &ss3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("NULL", ss3.str());
+}
+
+TEST(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStringsTest, PrintsEmptyTuple) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(make_tuple()),
+              ElementsAre());
+}
+
+TEST(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStringsTest, PrintsOneTuple) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(make_tuple(1)),
+              ElementsAre("1"));
+}
+
+TEST(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStringsTest, PrintsTwoTuple) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(make_tuple(1, 'a')),
+              ElementsAre("1", "'a' (97)"));
+}
+
+TEST(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStringsTest, PrintsTersely) {
+  const int n = 1;
+  EXPECT_THAT(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(
+                  tuple<const int&, const char*>(n, "a")),
+              ElementsAre("1", "\"a\""));
+}
+
+}  // namespace gmock_printers_test
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e8c3902
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,1966 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the spec builder syntax.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h>
+
+#include <ostream>  // NOLINT
+#include <sstream>
+#include <string>
+
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gmock/internal/gmock-port.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace internal {
+
+// Helper class for testing the Expectation class template.
+class ExpectationTester {
+ public:
+  // Sets the call count of the given expectation to the given number.
+  void SetCallCount(int n, ExpectationBase* exp) {
+    exp->call_count_ = n;
+  }
+};
+
+}  // namespace internal
+}  // namespace testing
+
+namespace {
+
+using testing::_;
+using testing::AnyNumber;
+using testing::AtLeast;
+using testing::AtMost;
+using testing::Between;
+using testing::Cardinality;
+using testing::CardinalityInterface;
+using testing::Const;
+using testing::DoAll;
+using testing::DoDefault;
+using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
+using testing::InSequence;
+using testing::Invoke;
+using testing::InvokeWithoutArgs;
+using testing::IsSubstring;
+using testing::Lt;
+using testing::Message;
+using testing::Mock;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::Sequence;
+using testing::internal::g_gmock_mutex;
+using testing::internal::kErrorVerbosity;
+using testing::internal::kInfoVerbosity;
+using testing::internal::kWarningVerbosity;
+using testing::internal::Expectation;
+using testing::internal::ExpectationTester;
+using testing::internal::string;
+
+class Result {};
+
+class MockA {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD1(DoA, void(int n));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD1(ReturnResult, Result(int n));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD2(Binary, bool(int x, int y));  // NOLINT
+};
+
+class MockB {
+ public:
+  MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(DoB, int());  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD1(DoB, int(int n));  // NOLINT
+};
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_CALL and ON_CALL compile in a presence of macro
+// redefining a mock method name. This could happen, for example, when
+// the tested code #includes Win32 API headers which define many APIs
+// as macros, e.g. #define TextOut TextOutW.
+
+#define Method MethodW
+
+class CC {
+ public:
+  virtual ~CC() {}
+  virtual int Method() = 0;
+};
+class MockCC : public CC {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD0(Method, int());
+};
+
+// Tests that a method with expanded name compiles.
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, CompilesWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro) {
+  MockCC cc;
+  ON_CALL(cc, Method());
+}
+
+// Tests that the method with expanded name not only compiles but runs
+// and returns a correct value, too.
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, WorksWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro) {
+  MockCC cc;
+  ON_CALL(cc, Method()).WillByDefault(Return(42));
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, cc.Method());
+}
+
+// Tests that a method with expanded name compiles.
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, CompilesWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro) {
+  MockCC cc;
+  EXPECT_CALL(cc, Method());
+  cc.Method();
+}
+
+// Tests that it works, too.
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WorksWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro) {
+  MockCC cc;
+  EXPECT_CALL(cc, Method()).WillOnce(Return(42));
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, cc.Method());
+}
+
+#undef Method  // Done with macro redefinition tests.
+
+// Tests that ON_CALL evaluates its arguments exactly once as promised
+// by Google Mock.
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, EvaluatesFirstArgumentOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+  MockA* pa = &a;
+
+  ON_CALL(*pa++, DoA(_));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&a + 1, pa);
+}
+
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, EvaluatesSecondArgumentOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+  int n = 0;
+
+  ON_CALL(a, DoA(n++));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the syntax of ON_CALL() is enforced at run time.
+
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, WithArgumentsIsOptional) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  ON_CALL(a, DoA(5))
+      .WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(a, DoA(_))
+      .WithArguments(_)
+      .WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, WithArgumentsCanAppearAtMostOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    ON_CALL(a, ReturnResult(_))
+        .WithArguments(_)
+        .WithArguments(_)
+        .WillByDefault(Return(Result()));
+  }, ".WithArguments() cannot appear more than once in an ON_CALL()");
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, WillByDefaultIsMandatory) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    ON_CALL(a, DoA(5));
+    a.DoA(5);
+  }, "");
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+TEST(OnCallSyntaxTest, WillByDefaultCanAppearAtMostOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    ON_CALL(a, DoA(5))
+        .WillByDefault(Return())
+        .WillByDefault(Return());
+  }, ".WillByDefault() must appear exactly once in an ON_CALL()");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_CALL evaluates its arguments exactly once as
+// promised by Google Mock.
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, EvaluatesFirstArgumentOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+  MockA* pa = &a;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(*pa++, DoA(_));
+  a.DoA(0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&a + 1, pa);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, EvaluatesSecondArgumentOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+  int n = 0;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(n++));
+  a.DoA(0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the syntax of EXPECT_CALL() is enforced at run time.
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WithArgumentsIsOptional) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(5))
+      .Times(0);
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(6))
+      .WithArguments(_)
+      .Times(0);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WithArgumentsCanAppearAtMostOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(6))
+        .WithArguments(_)
+        .WithArguments(_);
+  }, ".WithArguments() cannot appear more than once in "
+     "an EXPECT_CALL()");
+
+  a.DoA(6);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WithArgumentsMustBeFirstClause) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .Times(1)
+        .WithArguments(_);
+  }, ".WithArguments() must be the first clause in an "
+     "EXPECT_CALL()");
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2))
+        .WillOnce(Return())
+        .WithArguments(_);
+  }, ".WithArguments() must be the first clause in an "
+     "EXPECT_CALL()");
+
+  a.DoA(2);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, TimesCanBeInferred) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return());
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2))
+      .WillOnce(Return())
+      .WillRepeatedly(Return());
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(2);
+  a.DoA(2);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, TimesCanAppearAtMostOnce) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .Times(1)
+        .Times(2);
+  }, ".Times() cannot appear more than once in an EXPECT_CALL()");
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, TimesMustBeBeforeInSequence) {
+  MockA a;
+  Sequence s;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .InSequence(s)
+        .Times(1);
+  }, ".Times() cannot appear after ");
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, InSequenceIsOptional) {
+  MockA a;
+  Sequence s;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2))
+      .InSequence(s);
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(2);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, InSequenceCanAppearMultipleTimes) {
+  MockA a;
+  Sequence s1, s2;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+      .InSequence(s1, s2)
+      .InSequence(s1);
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, InSequenceMustBeBeforeWill) {
+  MockA a;
+  Sequence s;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return())
+        .InSequence(s);
+  }, ".InSequence() cannot appear after ");
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WillIsOptional) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2))
+      .WillOnce(Return());
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(2);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WillCanAppearMultipleTimes) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+      .Times(AnyNumber())
+      .WillOnce(Return())
+      .WillOnce(Return())
+      .WillOnce(Return());
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WillMustBeBeforeWillRepeatedly) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return())
+        .WillOnce(Return());
+  }, ".WillOnce() cannot appear after ");
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WillRepeatedlyIsOptional) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return());
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2))
+      .WillOnce(Return())
+      .WillRepeatedly(Return());
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(2);
+  a.DoA(2);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WillRepeatedlyCannotAppearMultipleTimes) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return())
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return());
+  }, ".WillRepeatedly() cannot appear more than once in an "
+     "EXPECT_CALL()");
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WillRepeatedlyMustBeBeforeRetiresOnSaturation) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .RetiresOnSaturation()
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return());
+  }, ".WillRepeatedly() cannot appear after ");
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, RetiresOnSaturationIsOptional) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+      .RetiresOnSaturation();
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, RetiresOnSaturationCannotAppearMultipleTimes) {
+  MockA a;
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+        .RetiresOnSaturation()
+        .RetiresOnSaturation();
+  }, ".RetiresOnSaturation() cannot appear more than once");
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, DefaultCardinalityIsOnce) {
+  {
+    MockA a;
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+    a.DoA(1);
+  }
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    MockA a;
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+  }, "to be called once");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    MockA a;
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+    a.DoA(1);
+    a.DoA(1);
+  }, "to be called once");
+}
+
+// TODO(wan@google.com): find a way to re-enable these tests.
+#if 0
+
+// Tests that Google Mock doesn't print a warning when the number of
+// WillOnce() is adequate.
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, DoesNotWarnOnAdequateActionCount) {
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  {
+    MockB b;
+
+    // It's always fine to omit WillOnce() entirely.
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .Times(0);
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+        .Times(AtMost(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(2))
+        .Times(1)
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(1));
+
+    // It's fine for the number of WillOnce()s to equal the upper bound.
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(3))
+        .Times(Between(1, 2))
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+    // It's fine for the number of WillOnce()s to be smaller than the
+    // upper bound when there is a WillRepeatedly().
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(4))
+        .Times(AtMost(3))
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+
+    // Satisfies the above expectations.
+    b.DoB(2);
+    b.DoB(3);
+  }
+  const string& output = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_EQ("", output);
+}
+
+// Tests that Google Mock warns on having too many actions in an
+// expectation compared to its cardinality.
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WarnsOnTooManyActions) {
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  {
+    MockB b;
+
+    // Warns when the number of WillOnce()s is larger than the upper bound.
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .Times(0)
+        .WillOnce(Return(1));  // #1
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .Times(AtMost(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(2));  // #2
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+        .Times(1)
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(2))
+        .RetiresOnSaturation();  // #3
+
+    // Warns when the number of WillOnce()s equals the upper bound and
+    // there is a WillRepeatedly().
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .Times(0)
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(1));  // #4
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(2))
+        .Times(1)
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));  // #5
+
+    // Satisfies the above expectations.
+    b.DoB(1);
+    b.DoB(2);
+  }
+  const string& output = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring,
+                      "Too many actions specified.\n"
+                      "Expected to be never called, but has 1 WillOnce().",
+                      output);  // #1
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring,
+                      "Too many actions specified.\n"
+                      "Expected to be called at most once, "
+                      "but has 2 WillOnce()s.",
+                      output);  // #2
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring,
+                      "Too many actions specified.\n"
+                      "Expected to be called once, but has 2 WillOnce()s.",
+                      output);  // #3
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring,
+                      "Too many actions specified.\n"
+                      "Expected to be never called, but has 0 WillOnce()s "
+                      "and a WillRepeatedly().",
+                      output);  // #4
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring,
+                      "Too many actions specified.\n"
+                      "Expected to be called once, but has 1 WillOnce() "
+                      "and a WillRepeatedly().",
+                      output);  // #5
+}
+
+// Tests that Google Mock warns on having too few actions in an
+// expectation compared to its cardinality.
+TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WarnsOnTooFewActions) {
+  MockB b;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .Times(Between(2, 3))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  b.DoB();
+  const string& output = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring,
+                      "Too few actions specified.\n"
+                      "Expected to be called between 2 and 3 times, "
+                      "but has only 1 WillOnce().",
+                      output);
+  b.DoB();
+}
+
+#endif  // 0
+
+// Tests the semantics of ON_CALL().
+
+// Tests that the built-in default action is taken when no ON_CALL()
+// is specified.
+TEST(OnCallTest, TakesBuiltInDefaultActionWhenNoOnCall) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+}
+
+// Tests that the built-in default action is taken when no ON_CALL()
+// matches the invocation.
+TEST(OnCallTest, TakesBuiltInDefaultActionWhenNoOnCallMatches) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(2));
+}
+
+// Tests that the last matching ON_CALL() action is taken.
+TEST(OnCallTest, PicksLastMatchingOnCall) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(3));
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(2))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(2));
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB(2));
+}
+
+// Tests the semantics of EXPECT_CALL().
+
+// Tests that any call is allowed when no EXPECT_CALL() is specified.
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, AllowsAnyCallWhenNoSpec) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB());
+  // There is no expectation on DoB(int).
+
+  b.DoB();
+
+  // DoB(int) can be called any number of times.
+  b.DoB(1);
+  b.DoB(2);
+}
+
+// Tests that the last matching EXPECT_CALL() fires.
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, PicksLastMatchingExpectCall) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+      .WillRepeatedly(Return(1));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests lower-bound violation.
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, CatchesTooFewCalls) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    MockB b;
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(5))
+        .Times(AtLeast(2));
+
+    b.DoB(5);
+  }, "Actual function call count doesn't match this expectation.\n"
+     "         Expected: to be called at least twice\n"
+     "           Actual: called once - unsatisfied and active");
+}
+
+// Tests that the cardinality can be inferred when no Times(...) is
+// specified.
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, InfersCardinalityWhenThereIsNoWillRepeatedly) {
+  {
+    MockB b;
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+    EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    MockB b;
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+  }, "to be called twice");
+
+  {  // NOLINT
+    MockB b;
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+    EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+    EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(b.DoB(), "to be called twice");
+  }
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, InfersCardinality1WhenThereIsWillRepeatedly) {
+  {
+    MockB b;
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+  }
+
+  {  // NOLINT
+    MockB b;
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+    EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+    EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    MockB b;
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .WillOnce(Return(1))
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+  }, "to be called at least once");
+}
+
+// Tests that the n-th action is taken for the n-th matching
+// invocation.
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, NthMatchTakesNthAction) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2))
+      .WillOnce(Return(3));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, b.DoB());
+}
+
+// TODO(wan@google.com): find a way to re-enable these tests.
+#if 0
+
+// Tests that the default action is taken when the WillOnce(...) list is
+// exhausted and there is no WillRepeatedly().
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, TakesDefaultActionWhenWillListIsExhausted) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .Times(1);
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .Times(AnyNumber())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));  // Shouldn't generate a warning as the
+                           // expectation has no action clause at all.
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+  const string& output1 = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_EQ("", output1);
+
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  const string& output2 = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED2(RE::PartialMatch, output2,
+               "Actions ran out\\.\n"
+               "Called 3 times, but only 2 WillOnce\\(\\)s are specified - "
+               "returning default value\\.");
+  EXPECT_PRED2(RE::PartialMatch, output2,
+               "Actions ran out\\.\n"
+               "Called 4 times, but only 2 WillOnce\\(\\)s are specified - "
+               "returning default value\\.");
+}
+
+#endif  // 0
+
+// Tests that the WillRepeatedly() action is taken when the WillOnce(...)
+// list is exhausted.
+TEST(ExpectCallTest, TakesRepeatedActionWhenWillListIsExhausted) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, b.DoB());
+}
+
+// Tests that an uninteresting call performs the default action.
+TEST(UninterestingCallTest, DoesDefaultAction) {
+  // When there is an ON_CALL() statement, the action specified by it
+  // should be taken.
+  MockA a;
+  ON_CALL(a, Binary(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Binary(1, 2));
+
+  // When there is no ON_CALL(), the default value for the return type
+  // should be returned.
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+}
+
+// Tests that an unexpected call performs the default action.
+TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, DoesDefaultAction) {
+  // When there is an ON_CALL() statement, the action specified by it
+  // should be taken.
+  MockA a;
+  ON_CALL(a, Binary(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, Binary(0, 0));
+  a.Binary(0, 0);
+  bool result = false;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(result = a.Binary(1, 2),
+                          "Unexpected mock function call");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(result);
+
+  // When there is no ON_CALL(), the default value for the return type
+  // should be returned.
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(0))
+      .Times(0);
+  int n = -1;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(n = b.DoB(1),
+                          "Unexpected mock function call");
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that when an unexpected void function generates the right
+// failure message.
+TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, GeneratesFailureForVoidFunction) {
+  // First, tests the message when there is only one EXPECT_CALL().
+  MockA a1;
+  EXPECT_CALL(a1, DoA(1));
+  a1.DoA(1);
+  // Ideally we should match the failure message against a regex, but
+  // EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE doesn't support that, so we test for
+  // multiple sub-strings instead.
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      a1.DoA(9),
+      "Unexpected mock function call - returning directly.\n"
+      "    Function call: DoA(9)\n"
+      "Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      a1.DoA(9),
+      "  Expected arg #0: is equal to 1\n"
+      "           Actual: 9\n"
+      "         Expected: to be called once\n"
+      "           Actual: called once - saturated and active");
+
+  // Next, tests the message when there are more than one EXPECT_CALL().
+  MockA a2;
+  EXPECT_CALL(a2, DoA(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(a2, DoA(3));
+  a2.DoA(1);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      a2.DoA(2),
+      "Unexpected mock function call - returning directly.\n"
+      "    Function call: DoA(2)\n"
+      "Google Mock tried the following 2 expectations, but none matched:");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      a2.DoA(2),
+      "tried expectation #0\n"
+      "  Expected arg #0: is equal to 1\n"
+      "           Actual: 2\n"
+      "         Expected: to be called once\n"
+      "           Actual: called once - saturated and active");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      a2.DoA(2),
+      "tried expectation #1\n"
+      "  Expected arg #0: is equal to 3\n"
+      "           Actual: 2\n"
+      "         Expected: to be called once\n"
+      "           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active");
+  a2.DoA(3);
+}
+
+// Tests that an unexpected non-void function generates the right
+// failure message.
+TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, GeneartesFailureForNonVoidFunction) {
+  MockB b1;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b1, DoB(1));
+  b1.DoB(1);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      b1.DoB(2),
+      "Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.\n"
+      "    Function call: DoB(2)\n"
+      "          Returns: 0\n"
+      "Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      b1.DoB(2),
+      "  Expected arg #0: is equal to 1\n"
+      "           Actual: 2\n"
+      "         Expected: to be called once\n"
+      "           Actual: called once - saturated and active");
+}
+
+// Tests that Google Mock explains that an retired expectation doesn't
+// match the call.
+TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, RetiredExpectation) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+      .RetiresOnSaturation();
+
+  b.DoB(1);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      b.DoB(1),
+      "         Expected: the expectation is active\n"
+      "           Actual: it is retired");
+}
+
+// Tests that Google Mock explains that an expectation that doesn't
+// match the arguments doesn't match the call.
+TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, UnmatchedArguments) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(1));
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      b.DoB(2),
+      "  Expected arg #0: is equal to 1\n"
+      "           Actual: 2\n");
+  b.DoB(1);
+}
+
+#ifdef GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+
+// Tests that Google Mock explains that an expectation with
+// unsatisfied pre-requisites doesn't match the call.
+TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, UnsatisifiedPrerequisites) {
+  Sequence s1, s2;
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+      .InSequence(s1);
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(2))
+      .Times(AnyNumber())
+      .InSequence(s1);
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(3))
+      .InSequence(s2);
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(4))
+      .InSequence(s1, s2);
+
+  ::testing::TestPartResultArray failures;
+  {
+    ::testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(&failures);
+    b.DoB(4);
+    // Now 'failures' contains the Google Test failures generated by
+    // the above statement.
+  }
+
+  // There should be one non-fatal failure.
+  ASSERT_EQ(1, failures.size());
+  const ::testing::TestPartResult& r = failures.GetTestPartResult(0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(::testing::TPRT_NONFATAL_FAILURE, r.type());
+
+  // Verifies that the failure message contains the two unsatisfied
+  // pre-requisites but not the satisfied one.
+  const char* const pattern =
+#if GMOCK_USES_PCRE
+      // PCRE has trouble using (.|\n) to match any character, but
+      // supports the (?s) prefix for using . to match any character.
+      "(?s)the following immediate pre-requisites are not satisfied:\n"
+      ".*: pre-requisite #0\n"
+      ".*: pre-requisite #1";
+#else
+      // POSIX RE doesn't understand the (?s) prefix, but has no trouble
+      // with (.|\n).
+      "the following immediate pre-requisites are not satisfied:\n"
+      "(.|\n)*: pre-requisite #0\n"
+      "(.|\n)*: pre-requisite #1";
+#endif  // GMOCK_USES_PCRE
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(
+      ::testing::internal::RE::PartialMatch(r.message(), pattern))
+              << " where the message is " << r.message();
+  b.DoB(1);
+  b.DoB(3);
+  b.DoB(4);
+}
+
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+TEST(UndefinedReturnValueTest, ReturnValueIsMandatory) {
+  MockA a;
+  // TODO(wan@google.com): We should really verify the output message,
+  // but we cannot yet due to that EXPECT_DEATH only captures stderr
+  // while Google Mock logs to stdout.
+  EXPECT_DEATH(a.ReturnResult(1), "");
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that an excessive call (one whose arguments match the
+// matchers but is called too many times) performs the default action.
+TEST(ExcessiveCallTest, DoesDefaultAction) {
+  // When there is an ON_CALL() statement, the action specified by it
+  // should be taken.
+  MockA a;
+  ON_CALL(a, Binary(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, Binary(0, 0));
+  a.Binary(0, 0);
+  bool result = false;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(result = a.Binary(0, 0),
+                          "Mock function called more times than expected");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(result);
+
+  // When there is no ON_CALL(), the default value for the return type
+  // should be returned.
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(0))
+      .Times(0);
+  int n = -1;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(n = b.DoB(0),
+                          "Mock function called more times than expected");
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that when a void function is called too many times,
+// the failure message contains the argument values.
+TEST(ExcessiveCallTest, GeneratesFailureForVoidFunction) {
+  MockA a;
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(_))
+      .Times(0);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      a.DoA(9),
+      "Mock function called more times than expected - returning directly.\n"
+      "    Function call: DoA(9)\n"
+      "         Expected: to be never called\n"
+      "           Actual: called once - over-saturated and active");
+}
+
+// Tests that when a non-void function is called too many times, the
+// failure message contains the argument values and the return value.
+TEST(ExcessiveCallTest, GeneratesFailureForNonVoidFunction) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_));
+  b.DoB(1);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      b.DoB(2),
+      "Mock function called more times than expected - "
+      "returning default value.\n"
+      "    Function call: DoB(2)\n"
+      "          Returns: 0\n"
+      "         Expected: to be called once\n"
+      "           Actual: called twice - over-saturated and active");
+}
+
+// Tests using sequences.
+
+TEST(InSequenceTest, AllExpectationInScopeAreInSequence) {
+  MockA a;
+  {
+    InSequence dummy;
+
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2));
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    a.DoA(2);
+  }, "Unexpected mock function call");
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(2);
+}
+
+TEST(InSequenceTest, NestedInSequence) {
+  MockA a;
+  {
+    InSequence dummy;
+
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+    {
+      InSequence dummy2;
+
+      EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2));
+      EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(3));
+    }
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    a.DoA(1);
+    a.DoA(3);
+  }, "Unexpected mock function call");
+
+  a.DoA(2);
+  a.DoA(3);
+}
+
+TEST(InSequenceTest, ExpectationsOutOfScopeAreNotAffected) {
+  MockA a;
+  {
+    InSequence dummy;
+
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2));
+  }
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(3));
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({  // NOLINT
+    a.DoA(2);
+  }, "Unexpected mock function call");
+
+  a.DoA(3);
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(2);
+}
+
+// Tests that any order is allowed when no sequence is used.
+TEST(SequenceTest, AnyOrderIsOkByDefault) {
+  {
+    MockA a;
+    MockB b;
+
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .Times(AnyNumber());
+
+    a.DoA(1);
+    b.DoB();
+  }
+
+  {  // NOLINT
+    MockA a;
+    MockB b;
+
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+        .Times(AnyNumber());
+
+    b.DoB();
+    a.DoA(1);
+  }
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests that the calls must be in strict order when a complete order
+// is specified.
+TEST(SequenceTest, CallsMustBeInStrictOrderWhenSaidSo) {
+  MockA a;
+  Sequence s;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, ReturnResult(1))
+      .InSequence(s)
+      .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, ReturnResult(2))
+      .InSequence(s)
+      .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, ReturnResult(3))
+      .InSequence(s)
+      .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    a.ReturnResult(1);
+    a.ReturnResult(3);
+    a.ReturnResult(2);
+  }, "");
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    a.ReturnResult(2);
+    a.ReturnResult(1);
+    a.ReturnResult(3);
+  }, "");
+
+  a.ReturnResult(1);
+  a.ReturnResult(2);
+  a.ReturnResult(3);
+}
+
+// Tests specifying a DAG using multiple sequences.
+TEST(SequenceTest, CallsMustConformToSpecifiedDag) {
+  MockA a;
+  MockB b;
+  Sequence x, y;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, ReturnResult(1))
+      .InSequence(x)
+      .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .Times(2)
+      .InSequence(y);
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, ReturnResult(2))
+      .InSequence(x, y)
+      .WillRepeatedly(Return(Result()));
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, ReturnResult(3))
+      .InSequence(x)
+      .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    a.ReturnResult(1);
+    b.DoB();
+    a.ReturnResult(2);
+  }, "");
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    a.ReturnResult(2);
+  }, "");
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    a.ReturnResult(3);
+  }, "");
+
+  EXPECT_DEATH({  // NOLINT
+    a.ReturnResult(1);
+    b.DoB();
+    b.DoB();
+    a.ReturnResult(3);
+    a.ReturnResult(2);
+  }, "");
+
+  b.DoB();
+  a.ReturnResult(1);
+  b.DoB();
+  a.ReturnResult(3);
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+TEST(SequenceTest, Retirement) {
+  MockA a;
+  Sequence s;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+      .InSequence(s);
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(_))
+      .InSequence(s)
+      .RetiresOnSaturation();
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
+      .InSequence(s);
+
+  a.DoA(1);
+  a.DoA(2);
+  a.DoA(1);
+}
+
+// Tests that Google Mock correctly handles calls to mock functions
+// after a mock object owning one of their pre-requisites has died.
+
+// Tests that calls that satisfy the original spec are successful.
+TEST(DeletingMockEarlyTest, Success1) {
+  MockB* const b1 = new MockB;
+  MockA* const a = new MockA;
+  MockB* const b2 = new MockB;
+
+  {
+    InSequence dummy;
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b1, DoB(_))
+        .WillOnce(Return(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(*a, Binary(_, _))
+        .Times(AnyNumber())
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(true));
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b2, DoB(_))
+        .Times(AnyNumber())
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b1->DoB(1));
+  delete b1;
+  // a's pre-requisite has died.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a->Binary(0, 1));
+  delete b2;
+  // a's successor has died.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a->Binary(1, 2));
+  delete a;
+}
+
+// Tests that calls that satisfy the original spec are successful.
+TEST(DeletingMockEarlyTest, Success2) {
+  MockB* const b1 = new MockB;
+  MockA* const a = new MockA;
+  MockB* const b2 = new MockB;
+
+  {
+    InSequence dummy;
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b1, DoB(_))
+        .WillOnce(Return(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(*a, Binary(_, _))
+        .Times(AnyNumber());
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b2, DoB(_))
+        .Times(AnyNumber())
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+  }
+
+  delete a;  // a is trivially satisfied.
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b1->DoB(1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, b2->DoB(2));
+  delete b1;
+  delete b2;
+}
+
+// Tests that it's OK to delete a mock object itself in its action.
+
+ACTION_P(Delete, ptr) { delete ptr; }
+
+TEST(DeletingMockEarlyTest, CanDeleteSelfInActionReturningVoid) {
+  MockA* const a = new MockA;
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, DoA(_)).WillOnce(Delete(a));
+  a->DoA(42);  // This will cause a to be deleted.
+}
+
+TEST(DeletingMockEarlyTest, CanDeleteSelfInActionReturningValue) {
+  MockA* const a = new MockA;
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, ReturnResult(_))
+      .WillOnce(DoAll(Delete(a), Return(Result())));
+  a->ReturnResult(42);  // This will cause a to be deleted.
+}
+
+// Tests that calls that violate the original spec yield failures.
+TEST(DeletingMockEarlyTest, Failure1) {
+  MockB* const b1 = new MockB;
+  MockA* const a = new MockA;
+  MockB* const b2 = new MockB;
+
+  {
+    InSequence dummy;
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b1, DoB(_))
+        .WillOnce(Return(1));
+    EXPECT_CALL(*a, Binary(_, _))
+        .Times(AnyNumber());
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b2, DoB(_))
+        .Times(AnyNumber())
+        .WillRepeatedly(Return(2));
+  }
+
+  delete a;  // a is trivially satisfied.
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    b2->DoB(2);
+  }, "Unexpected mock function call");
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b1->DoB(1));
+  delete b1;
+  delete b2;
+}
+
+// Tests that calls that violate the original spec yield failures.
+TEST(DeletingMockEarlyTest, Failure2) {
+  MockB* const b1 = new MockB;
+  MockA* const a = new MockA;
+  MockB* const b2 = new MockB;
+
+  {
+    InSequence dummy;
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b1, DoB(_));
+    EXPECT_CALL(*a, Binary(_, _))
+        .Times(AnyNumber());
+    EXPECT_CALL(*b2, DoB(_))
+        .Times(AnyNumber());
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(delete b1,
+                          "Actual: never called");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(a->Binary(0, 1),
+                          "Unexpected mock function call");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(b2->DoB(1),
+                          "Unexpected mock function call");
+  delete a;
+  delete b2;
+}
+
+class EvenNumberCardinality : public CardinalityInterface {
+ public:
+  // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality.
+  virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const {
+    return call_count % 2 == 0;
+  }
+
+  // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality.
+  virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const { return false; }
+
+  // Describes self to an ostream.
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "called even number of times";
+  }
+};
+
+Cardinality EvenNumber() {
+  return Cardinality(new EvenNumberCardinality);
+}
+
+TEST(ExpectationBaseTest,
+     AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfiedWorksForNonMonotonicCardinality) {
+  MockA* a = new MockA;
+  Sequence s;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, DoA(1))
+      .Times(EvenNumber())
+      .InSequence(s);
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, DoA(2))
+      .Times(AnyNumber())
+      .InSequence(s);
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, DoA(3))
+      .Times(AnyNumber());
+
+  a->DoA(3);
+  a->DoA(1);
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(a->DoA(2), "Unexpected mock function call");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(delete a, "to be called even number of times");
+}
+
+// The following tests verify the message generated when a mock
+// function is called.
+
+struct Printable {
+};
+
+inline void operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const Printable&) {
+  os << "Printable";
+}
+
+struct Unprintable {
+  Unprintable() : value(0) {}
+  int value;
+};
+
+class MockC {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD6(VoidMethod, void(bool cond, int n, string s, void* p,
+                                const Printable& x, Unprintable y));
+  MOCK_METHOD0(NonVoidMethod, int());  // NOLINT
+};
+
+// TODO(wan@google.com): find a way to re-enable these tests.
+#if 0
+
+// Tests that an uninteresting mock function call generates a warning
+// containing the stack trace.
+TEST(FunctionCallMessageTest, UninterestingCallGeneratesFyiWithStackTrace) {
+  MockC c;
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  c.VoidMethod(false, 5, "Hi", NULL, Printable(), Unprintable());
+  const string& output = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "GMOCK WARNING", output);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "Stack trace:", output);
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+  // We check the stack trace content in dbg-mode only, as opt-mode
+  // may inline the call we are interested in seeing.
+
+  // Verifies that a void mock function's name appears in the stack
+  // trace.
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "::MockC::VoidMethod(", output);
+
+  // Verifies that a non-void mock function's name appears in the
+  // stack trace.
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  c.NonVoidMethod();
+  const string& output2 = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "::MockC::NonVoidMethod(", output2);
+#endif  // NDEBUG
+}
+
+// Tests that an uninteresting mock function call causes the function
+// arguments and return value to be printed.
+TEST(FunctionCallMessageTest, UninterestingCallPrintsArgumentsAndReturnValue) {
+  // A non-void mock function.
+  MockB b;
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  b.DoB();
+  const string& output1 = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(
+      IsSubstring,
+      "Uninteresting mock function call - returning default value.\n"
+      "    Function call: DoB()\n"
+      "          Returns: 0\n", output1);
+  // Makes sure the return value is printed.
+
+  // A void mock function.
+  MockC c;
+  CaptureTestStdout();
+  c.VoidMethod(false, 5, "Hi", NULL, Printable(), Unprintable());
+  const string& output2 = GetCapturedTestStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED2(RE::PartialMatch, output2,
+               "Uninteresting mock function call - returning directly\\.\n"
+               "    Function call: VoidMethod"
+               "\\(false, 5, \"Hi\", NULL, @0x\\w+ "
+               "Printable, 4-byte object <0000 0000>\\)");
+  // A void function has no return value to print.
+}
+
+// Tests how the --gmock_verbose flag affects Google Mock's output.
+
+class GMockVerboseFlagTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+  // Verifies that the given Google Mock output is correct.  (When
+  // should_print is true, the output should match the given regex and
+  // contain the given function name in the stack trace.  When it's
+  // false, the output should be empty.)
+  void VerifyOutput(const string& output, bool should_print,
+                    const string& regex,
+                    const string& function_name) {
+    if (should_print) {
+      EXPECT_PRED2(RE::PartialMatch, output, regex);
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+      // We check the stack trace content in dbg-mode only, as opt-mode
+      // may inline the call we are interested in seeing.
+      EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, function_name, output);
+#endif  // NDEBUG
+    } else {
+      EXPECT_EQ("", output);
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Tests how the flag affects expected calls.
+  void TestExpectedCall(bool should_print) {
+    MockA a;
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(5));
+    EXPECT_CALL(a, Binary(_, 1))
+        .WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+    // A void-returning function.
+    CaptureTestStdout();
+    a.DoA(5);
+    VerifyOutput(
+        GetCapturedTestStdout(),
+        should_print,
+        "Expected mock function call\\.\n"
+        "    Function call: DoA\\(5\\)\n"
+        "Stack trace:",
+        "MockA::DoA");
+
+    // A non-void-returning function.
+    CaptureTestStdout();
+    a.Binary(2, 1);
+    VerifyOutput(
+        GetCapturedTestStdout(),
+        should_print,
+        "Expected mock function call\\.\n"
+        "    Function call: Binary\\(2, 1\\)\n"
+        "          Returns: true\n"
+        "Stack trace:",
+        "MockA::Binary");
+  }
+
+  // Tests how the flag affects uninteresting calls.
+  void TestUninterestingCall(bool should_print) {
+    MockA a;
+
+    // A void-returning function.
+    CaptureTestStdout();
+    a.DoA(5);
+    VerifyOutput(
+        GetCapturedTestStdout(),
+        should_print,
+        "\nGMOCK WARNING:\n"
+        "Uninteresting mock function call - returning directly\\.\n"
+        "    Function call: DoA\\(5\\)\n"
+        "Stack trace:\n"
+        "[\\s\\S]*",
+        "MockA::DoA");
+
+    // A non-void-returning function.
+    CaptureTestStdout();
+    a.Binary(2, 1);
+    VerifyOutput(
+        GetCapturedTestStdout(),
+        should_print,
+        "\nGMOCK WARNING:\n"
+        "Uninteresting mock function call - returning default value\\.\n"
+        "    Function call: Binary\\(2, 1\\)\n"
+        "          Returns: false\n"
+        "Stack trace:\n"
+        "[\\s\\S]*",
+        "MockA::Binary");
+  }
+};
+
+// Tests that --gmock_verbose=info causes both expected and
+// uninteresting calls to be reported.
+TEST_F(GMockVerboseFlagTest, Info) {
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = kInfoVerbosity;
+  TestExpectedCall(true);
+  TestUninterestingCall(true);
+}
+
+// Tests that --gmock_verbose=warning causes uninteresting calls to be
+// reported.
+TEST_F(GMockVerboseFlagTest, Warning) {
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = kWarningVerbosity;
+  TestExpectedCall(false);
+  TestUninterestingCall(true);
+}
+
+// Tests that --gmock_verbose=warning causes neither expected nor
+// uninteresting calls to be reported.
+TEST_F(GMockVerboseFlagTest, Error) {
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = kErrorVerbosity;
+  TestExpectedCall(false);
+  TestUninterestingCall(false);
+}
+
+// Tests that --gmock_verbose=SOME_INVALID_VALUE has the same effect
+// as --gmock_verbose=warning.
+TEST_F(GMockVerboseFlagTest, InvalidFlagIsTreatedAsWarning) {
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "invalid";  // Treated as "warning".
+  TestExpectedCall(false);
+  TestUninterestingCall(true);
+}
+
+#endif  // 0
+
+TEST(AllowLeakTest, AllowsLeakingUnusedMockObject) {
+  MockA* a = new MockA;
+  Mock::AllowLeak(a);
+}
+
+TEST(AllowLeakTest, CanBeCalledBeforeOnCall) {
+  MockA* a = new MockA;
+  Mock::AllowLeak(a);
+  ON_CALL(*a, DoA(_)).WillByDefault(Return());
+  a->DoA(0);
+}
+
+TEST(AllowLeakTest, CanBeCalledAfterOnCall) {
+  MockA* a = new MockA;
+  ON_CALL(*a, DoA(_)).WillByDefault(Return());
+  Mock::AllowLeak(a);
+}
+
+TEST(AllowLeakTest, CanBeCalledBeforeExpectCall) {
+  MockA* a = new MockA;
+  Mock::AllowLeak(a);
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, DoA(_));
+  a->DoA(0);
+}
+
+TEST(AllowLeakTest, CanBeCalledAfterExpectCall) {
+  MockA* a = new MockA;
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, DoA(_)).Times(AnyNumber());
+  Mock::AllowLeak(a);
+}
+
+TEST(AllowLeakTest, WorksWhenBothOnCallAndExpectCallArePresent) {
+  MockA* a = new MockA;
+  ON_CALL(*a, DoA(_)).WillByDefault(Return());
+  EXPECT_CALL(*a, DoA(_)).Times(AnyNumber());
+  Mock::AllowLeak(a);
+}
+
+// Tests that we can verify and clear a mock object's expectations
+// when none of its methods has expectations.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearExpectationsTest, NoMethodHasExpectations) {
+  MockB b;
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b));
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can verify and clear a mock object's expectations
+// when some, but not all, of its methods have expectations *and* the
+// verification succeeds.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearExpectationsTest, SomeMethodsHaveExpectationsAndSucceed) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  b.DoB();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b));
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can verify and clear a mock object's expectations
+// when some, but not all, of its methods have expectations *and* the
+// verification fails.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearExpectationsTest, SomeMethodsHaveExpectationsAndFail) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  bool result;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(result = Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b),
+                          "Actual: never called");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(result);
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can verify and clear a mock object's expectations
+// when all of its methods have expectations.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearExpectationsTest, AllMethodsHaveExpectations) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+  b.DoB();
+  b.DoB(1);
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b));
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can verify and clear a mock object's expectations
+// when a method has more than one expectation.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearExpectationsTest, AMethodHasManyExpectations) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(0))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+  b.DoB(1);
+  bool result;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(result = Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b),
+                          "Actual: never called");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(result);
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can call VerifyAndClearExpectations() on the same
+// mock object multiple times.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearExpectationsTest, CanCallManyTimes) {
+  MockB b;
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB());
+  b.DoB();
+  Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b);
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  b.DoB(1);
+  Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b);
+  Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&b);
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can clear a mock object's default actions when none
+// of its methods has default actions.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, NoMethodHasDefaultActions) {
+  MockB b;
+  // If this crashes or generates a failure, the test will catch it.
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+}
+
+// Tests that we can clear a mock object's default actions when some,
+// but not all of its methods have default actions.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, SomeMethodsHaveDefaultActions) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+
+  // Verifies that the default action of int DoB() was removed.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+}
+
+// Tests that we can clear a mock object's default actions when all of
+// its methods have default actions.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, AllMethodsHaveDefaultActions) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(2));
+
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+
+  // Verifies that the default action of int DoB() was removed.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+
+  // Verifies that the default action of int DoB(int) was removed.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(0));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can clear a mock object's default actions when a
+// method has more than one ON_CALL() set on it.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, AMethodHasManyDefaultActions) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(0))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(2));
+
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+
+  // Verifies that the default actions (there are two) of int DoB(int)
+  // were removed.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can call VerifyAndClear() on a mock object multiple
+// times.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, CanCallManyTimes) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that VerifyAndClear() works when the verification succeeds.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, Success) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+  b.DoB();
+  b.DoB(1);
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b));
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that VerifyAndClear() works when the verification fails.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, Failure) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+  b.DoB(1);
+  bool result;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(result = Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b),
+                          "Actual: never called");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(result);
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that VerifyAndClear() works when the default actions and
+// expectations are set on a const mock object.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, Const) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(Const(b), DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(Const(b), DoB())
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault())
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+  b.DoB();
+  b.DoB();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b));
+
+  // There should be no expectations on the methods now, so we can
+  // freely call them.
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can set default actions and expectations on a mock
+// object after VerifyAndClear() has been called on it.
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, CanSetDefaultActionsAndExpectationsAfterwards) {
+  MockB b;
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+  b.DoB(1);
+
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b);
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(b, DoB())
+      .WillOnce(Return(3));
+  ON_CALL(b, DoB(_))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(4));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, b.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, b.DoB(1));
+}
+
+// Tests that calling VerifyAndClear() on one mock object does not
+// affect other mock objects (either of the same type or not).
+TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, DoesNotAffectOtherMockObjects) {
+  MockA a;
+  MockB b1;
+  MockB b2;
+
+  ON_CALL(a, Binary(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));
+  EXPECT_CALL(a, Binary(_, _))
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault())
+      .WillOnce(Return(false));
+
+  ON_CALL(b1, DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b1, DoB(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+  ON_CALL(b2, DoB())
+      .WillByDefault(Return(3));
+  EXPECT_CALL(b2, DoB(_));
+
+  b2.DoB(0);
+  Mock::VerifyAndClear(&b2);
+
+  // Verifies that the default actions and expectations of a and b1
+  // are still in effect.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Binary(0, 0));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Binary(0, 0));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, b1.DoB());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, b1.DoB(0));
+}
+
+// Tests that a mock function's action can call a mock function
+// (either the same function or a different one) either as an explicit
+// action or as a default action without causing a dead lock.  It
+// verifies that the action is not performed inside the critical
+// section.
+
+void Helper(MockC* c) {
+  c->NonVoidMethod();
+}
+
+}  // namespace
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+  testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv);
+
+  // Ensures that the tests pass no matter what value of
+  // --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks and --gmock_verbose the user specifies.
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(catch_leaked_mocks) = true;
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = testing::internal::kWarningVerbosity;
+
+  return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+}
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_leak_test.py b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_leak_test.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..1337e0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_leak_test.py
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+#
+# Copyright 2009, Google Inc.
+# All rights reserved.
+#
+# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+# met:
+#
+#     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+#     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+# distribution.
+#     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+# this software without specific prior written permission.
+#
+# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+"""Tests that leaked mock objects can be caught be Google Mock."""
+
+__author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)'
+
+import gmock_test_utils
+import os
+import unittest
+
+IS_WINDOWS = os.name == 'nt'
+
+if IS_WINDOWS:
+  # TODO(wan@google.com): test the opt build too.  We should do it
+  # when Vlad Losev's work on Google Test's Python test driver is
+  # done, such that we can reuse the work.
+  PROGRAM = r'..\build.dbg\gmock_leak_test_.exe'
+else:
+  PROGRAM = 'gmock_leak_test_'
+
+PROGRAM_PATH = os.path.join(gmock_test_utils.GetBuildDir(), PROGRAM)
+TEST_WITH_EXPECT_CALL = PROGRAM_PATH + ' --gtest_filter=*ExpectCall*'
+TEST_WITH_ON_CALL = PROGRAM_PATH + ' --gtest_filter=*OnCall*'
+TEST_MULTIPLE_LEAKS = PROGRAM_PATH + ' --gtest_filter=*MultipleLeaked*'
+
+
+class GMockLeakTest(unittest.TestCase):
+
+  def testCatchesLeakedMockByDefault(self):
+    self.assertNotEqual(os.system(TEST_WITH_EXPECT_CALL), 0)
+    self.assertNotEqual(os.system(TEST_WITH_ON_CALL), 0)
+
+  def testDoesNotCatchLeakedMockWhenDisabled(self):
+    self.assertEquals(
+        0, os.system(TEST_WITH_EXPECT_CALL + ' --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks=0'))
+    self.assertEquals(
+        0, os.system(TEST_WITH_ON_CALL + ' --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks=0'))
+
+  def testCatchesLeakedMockWhenEnabled(self):
+    self.assertNotEqual(
+        os.system(TEST_WITH_EXPECT_CALL + ' --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks'), 0)
+    self.assertNotEqual(
+        os.system(TEST_WITH_ON_CALL + ' --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks'), 0)
+
+  def testCatchesLeakedMockWhenEnabledWithExplictFlagValue(self):
+    self.assertNotEqual(
+        os.system(TEST_WITH_EXPECT_CALL + ' --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks=1'), 0)
+
+  def testCatchesMultipleLeakedMocks(self):
+    self.assertNotEqual(
+        os.system(TEST_MULTIPLE_LEAKS + ' --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks'), 0)
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+  gmock_test_utils.Main()
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_leak_test_.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_leak_test_.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..157bd7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_leak_test_.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+// Copyright 2009, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This program is for verifying that a leaked mock object can be
+// caught by Google Mock's leak detector.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+
+namespace {
+
+using ::testing::Return;
+
+class FooInterface {
+ public:
+  virtual ~FooInterface() {}
+  virtual void DoThis() = 0;
+};
+
+class MockFoo : public FooInterface {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, void());
+};
+
+TEST(LeakTest, LeakedMockWithExpectCallCausesFailureWhenLeakCheckingIsEnabled) {
+  MockFoo* foo = new MockFoo;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(*foo, DoThis());
+  foo->DoThis();
+
+  // In order to test the leak detector, we deliberately leak foo.
+
+  // Makes sure Google Mock's leak detector can change the exit code
+  // to 1 even when the code is already exiting with 0.
+  exit(0);
+}
+
+TEST(LeakTest, LeakedMockWithOnCallCausesFailureWhenLeakCheckingIsEnabled) {
+  MockFoo* foo = new MockFoo;
+
+  ON_CALL(*foo, DoThis()).WillByDefault(Return());
+
+  // In order to test the leak detector, we deliberately leak foo.
+
+  // Makes sure Google Mock's leak detector can change the exit code
+  // to 1 even when the code is already exiting with 0.
+  exit(0);
+}
+
+TEST(LeakTest, CatchesMultipleLeakedMockObjects) {
+  MockFoo* foo1 = new MockFoo;
+  MockFoo* foo2 = new MockFoo;
+
+  ON_CALL(*foo1, DoThis()).WillByDefault(Return());
+  EXPECT_CALL(*foo2, DoThis());
+  foo2->DoThis();
+
+  // In order to test the leak detector, we deliberately leak foo1 and
+  // foo2.
+
+  // Makes sure Google Mock's leak detector can change the exit code
+  // to 1 even when the code is already exiting with 0.
+  exit(0);
+}
+
+}  // namespace
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link2_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link2_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c310c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link2_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan), vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file is for verifying that various Google Mock constructs do not
+// produce linker errors when instantiated in different translation units.
+// Please see gmock_link_test.h for details.
+
+#define LinkTest LinkTest2
+
+#include  "test/gmock_link_test.h"
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..61e97d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan), vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file is for verifying that various Google Mock constructs do not
+// produce linker errors when instantiated in different translation units.
+// Please see gmock_link_test.h for details.
+
+#define LinkTest LinkTest1
+
+#include  "test/gmock_link_test.h"
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link_test.h b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link_test.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4e0adb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_link_test.h
@@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
+// Copyright 2009, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests that:
+// a. A header file defining a mock class can be included in multiple
+//    translation units without causing a link error.
+// b. Actions and matchers can be instantiated with identical template
+//    arguments in different translation units without causing link
+//    errors.
+//    The following constructs are currently tested:
+//    Actions:
+//      Return()
+//      Return(value)
+//      ReturnNull
+//      ReturnRef
+//      Assign
+//      SetArgumentPointee
+//      SetArrayArgument
+//      SetErrnoAndReturn
+//      Invoke(function)
+//      Invoke(object, method)
+//      InvokeWithoutArgs(function)
+//      InvokeWithoutArgs(object, method)
+//      InvokeArgument
+//      WithArg
+//      WithArgs
+//      WithoutArgs
+//      DoAll
+//      DoDefault
+//      IgnoreResult
+//      Throw
+//      ACTION()-generated
+//      ACTION_P()-generated
+//      ACTION_P2()-generated
+//    Matchers:
+//      _
+//      A
+//      An
+//      Eq
+//      Gt, Lt, Ge, Le, Ne
+//      NotNull
+//      Ref
+//      TypedEq
+//      DoubleEq
+//      FloatEq
+//      NanSensitiveDoubleEq
+//      NanSensitiveFloatEq
+//      ContainsRegex
+//      MatchesRegex
+//      EndsWith
+//      HasSubstr
+//      StartsWith
+//      StrCaseEq
+//      StrCaseNe
+//      StrEq
+//      StrNe
+//      ElementsAre
+//      ElementsAreArray
+//      ContainerEq
+//      Field
+//      Property
+//      ResultOf(function)
+//      Pointee
+//      Truly(predicate)
+//      AllOf
+//      AnyOf
+//      Not
+//      MatcherCast<T>
+//
+//  Please note: this test does not verify the functioning of these
+//  constructs, only that the programs using them will link successfully.
+//
+// Implementation note:
+// This test requires identical definitions of Interface and Mock to be
+// included in different translation units.  We achieve this by writing
+// them in this header and #including it in gmock_link_test.cc and
+// gmock_link2_test.cc.  Because the symbols generated by the compiler for
+// those constructs must be identical in both translation units,
+// definitions of Interface and Mock tests MUST be kept in the SAME
+// NON-ANONYMOUS namespace in this file.  The test fixture class LinkTest
+// is defined as LinkTest1 in gmock_link_test.cc and as LinkTest2 in
+// gmock_link2_test.cc to avoid producing linker errors.
+
+#ifndef GMOCK_TEST_GMOCK_LINK_TEST_H_
+#define GMOCK_TEST_GMOCK_LINK_TEST_H_
+
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+
+#ifndef _WIN32_WCE
+#include <errno.h>
+#endif
+
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <iostream>
+#include <vector>
+
+using testing::_;
+using testing::A;
+using testing::AllOf;
+using testing::AnyOf;
+using testing::Assign;
+using testing::ContainerEq;
+using testing::DoAll;
+using testing::DoDefault;
+using testing::DoubleEq;
+using testing::ElementsAre;
+using testing::ElementsAreArray;
+using testing::EndsWith;
+using testing::Eq;
+using testing::Field;
+using testing::FloatEq;
+using testing::Ge;
+using testing::Gt;
+using testing::HasSubstr;
+using testing::IgnoreResult;
+using testing::Invoke;
+using testing::InvokeArgument;
+using testing::InvokeWithoutArgs;
+using testing::Le;
+using testing::Lt;
+using testing::Matcher;
+using testing::MatcherCast;
+using testing::NanSensitiveDoubleEq;
+using testing::NanSensitiveFloatEq;
+using testing::Ne;
+using testing::Not;
+using testing::NotNull;
+using testing::Pointee;
+using testing::Property;
+using testing::Ref;
+using testing::ResultOf;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::ReturnNull;
+using testing::ReturnRef;
+using testing::SetArgumentPointee;
+using testing::SetArrayArgument;
+using testing::StartsWith;
+using testing::StrCaseEq;
+using testing::StrCaseNe;
+using testing::StrEq;
+using testing::StrNe;
+using testing::Truly;
+using testing::TypedEq;
+using testing::WithArg;
+using testing::WithArgs;
+using testing::WithoutArgs;
+
+#ifndef _WIN32_WCE
+using testing::SetErrnoAndReturn;
+#endif  // _WIN32_WCE
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+using testing::Throw;
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+#if GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+using testing::ContainsRegex;
+using testing::MatchesRegex;
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+
+class Interface {
+ public:
+  virtual ~Interface() {}
+  virtual void VoidFromString(char* str) = 0;
+  virtual char* StringFromString(char* str) = 0;
+  virtual int IntFromString(char* str) = 0;
+  virtual int& IntRefFromString(char* str) = 0;
+  virtual void VoidFromFunc(void(*)(char*)) = 0;
+  virtual void VoidFromIntRef(int& n) = 0;
+  virtual void VoidFromFloat(float n) = 0;
+  virtual void VoidFromDouble(double n) = 0;
+  virtual void VoidFromVector(const std::vector<int>& v) = 0;
+};
+
+class Mock: public Interface {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD1(VoidFromString, void(char* str));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(StringFromString, char*(char* str));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(IntFromString, int(char* str));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(IntRefFromString, int&(char* str));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(VoidFromFunc, void(void(*func)(char* str)));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(VoidFromIntRef, void(int& n));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(VoidFromFloat, void(float n));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(VoidFromDouble, void(double n));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(VoidFromVector, void(const std::vector<int>& v));
+};
+
+class InvokeHelper {
+ public:
+  static void StaticVoidFromVoid() {}
+  void VoidFromVoid() {}
+  static void StaticVoidFromString(char*) {}
+  void VoidFromString(char*) {}
+  static int StaticIntFromString(char*) { return 1; }
+  static bool StaticBoolFromString(const char*) { return true; }
+};
+
+class FieldHelper {
+ public:
+  FieldHelper(int field) : field_(field) {}
+  int field() const { return field_; }
+  int field_;  // NOLINT -- need external access to field_ to test
+               //           the Field matcher.
+};
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ReturnVoid action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestReturnVoid) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(Return());
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Return action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestReturn) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, StringFromString(_)).WillOnce(Return(&ch));
+  mock.StringFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ReturnNull action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestReturnNull) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(Return());
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ReturnRef action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestReturnRef) {
+  Mock mock;
+  int n = 42;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntRefFromString(_)).WillOnce(ReturnRef(n));
+  mock.IntRefFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Assign action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestAssign) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(Assign(&ch, 'y'));
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the SetArgumentPointee action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestSetArgumentPointee) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(SetArgumentPointee<0>('y'));
+  mock.VoidFromString(&ch);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the SetArrayArgument action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestSetArrayArgument) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+  char ch2 = 'y';
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(SetArrayArgument<0>(&ch2,
+                                                                    &ch2 + 1));
+  mock.VoidFromString(&ch);
+}
+
+#ifndef _WIN32_WCE
+
+// Tests the linkage of the SetErrnoAndReturn action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestSetErrnoAndReturn) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  int saved_errno = errno;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFromString(_)).WillOnce(SetErrnoAndReturn(1, -1));
+  mock.IntFromString(NULL);
+  errno = saved_errno;
+}
+
+#endif  // _WIN32_WCE
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Invoke(function) and Invoke(object, method) actions.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestInvoke) {
+  Mock mock;
+  InvokeHelper test_invoke_helper;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_))
+      .WillOnce(Invoke(&InvokeHelper::StaticVoidFromString))
+      .WillOnce(Invoke(&test_invoke_helper, &InvokeHelper::VoidFromString));
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the InvokeWithoutArgs action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestInvokeWithoutArgs) {
+  Mock mock;
+  InvokeHelper test_invoke_helper;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_))
+      .WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs(&InvokeHelper::StaticVoidFromVoid))
+      .WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs(&test_invoke_helper,
+                                  &InvokeHelper::VoidFromVoid));
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the InvokeArgument action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestInvokeArgument) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromFunc(_)).WillOnce(InvokeArgument<0>(&ch));
+  mock.VoidFromFunc(InvokeHelper::StaticVoidFromString);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the WithArg action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestWithArg) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_))
+      .WillOnce(WithArg<0>(Invoke(&InvokeHelper::StaticVoidFromString)));
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the WithArgs action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestWithArgs) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_))
+      .WillOnce(WithArgs<0>(Invoke(&InvokeHelper::StaticVoidFromString)));
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the WithoutArgs action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestWithoutArgs) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(WithoutArgs(Return()));
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the DoAll action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestDoAll) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_))
+      .WillOnce(DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>('y'), Return()));
+  mock.VoidFromString(&ch);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the DoDefault action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestDoDefault) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillByDefault(Return());
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(DoDefault());
+  mock.VoidFromString(&ch);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the IgnoreResult action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestIgnoreResult) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(IgnoreResult(Return(42)));
+  mock.VoidFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+// Tests the linkage of the Throw action.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestThrow) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(Throw(42));
+  EXPECT_THROW(mock.VoidFromString(NULL), int);
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests the linkage of actions created using ACTION macro.
+namespace {
+ACTION(Return1) { return 1; }
+}
+
+TEST(LinkTest, TestActionMacro) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFromString(_)).WillOnce(Return1());
+  mock.IntFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of actions created using ACTION_P macro.
+namespace {
+ACTION_P(ReturnArgument, ret_value) { return ret_value; }
+}
+
+TEST(LinkTest, TestActionPMacro) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFromString(_)).WillOnce(ReturnArgument(42));
+  mock.IntFromString(NULL);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of actions created using ACTION_P2 macro.
+namespace {
+ACTION_P2(ReturnEqualsEitherOf, first, second) {
+  return arg0 == first || arg0 == second;
+}
+}
+
+TEST(LinkTest, TestActionP2Macro) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char ch = 'x';
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, IntFromString(_))
+      .WillOnce(ReturnEqualsEitherOf("one", "two"));
+  mock.IntFromString(&ch);
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the "_" matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherAnything) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the A matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherA) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(A<char*>())).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Eq and the "bare value" matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatchersEq) {
+  Mock mock;
+  const char* p = "x";
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(Eq(p))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(const_cast<char*>("y")))
+      .WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Lt, Gt, Le, Ge, and Ne matchers.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatchersRelations) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromFloat(Lt(1.0f))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromFloat(Gt(1.0f))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromFloat(Le(1.0f))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromFloat(Ge(1.0f))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromFloat(Ne(1.0f))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the NotNull matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherNotNull) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(NotNull())).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Ref matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherRef) {
+  Mock mock;
+  int a = 0;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromIntRef(Ref(a))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the TypedEq matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherTypedEq) {
+  Mock mock;
+  long a = 0;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromIntRef(TypedEq<int&>(a))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the FloatEq, DoubleEq, NanSensitiveFloatEq and
+// NanSensitiveDoubleEq matchers.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatchersFloatingPoint) {
+  Mock mock;
+  float a = 0;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromFloat(FloatEq(a))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromDouble(DoubleEq(a))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromFloat(NanSensitiveFloatEq(a))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromDouble(NanSensitiveDoubleEq(a)))
+      .WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+#if GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+// Tests the linkage of the ContainsRegex matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherContainsRegex) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(ContainsRegex(".*"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the MatchesRegex matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherMatchesRegex) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(MatchesRegex(".*"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+#endif  // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
+
+// Tests the linkage of the StartsWith, EndsWith, and HasSubstr matchers.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatchersSubstrings) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(StartsWith("a"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(EndsWith("c"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(HasSubstr("b"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the StrEq, StrNe, StrCaseEq, and StrCaseNe matchers.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatchersStringEquality) {
+  Mock mock;
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(StrEq("a"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(StrNe("a"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(StrCaseEq("a"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(StrCaseNe("a"))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ElementsAre matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherElementsAre) {
+  Mock mock;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromVector(ElementsAre('a', _))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ElementsAreArray matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherElementsAreArray) {
+  Mock mock;
+  char arr[] = { 'a', 'b' };
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromVector(ElementsAreArray(arr))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ContainerEq matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherContainerEq) {
+  Mock mock;
+  std::vector<int> v;
+
+  ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromVector(ContainerEq(v))).WillByDefault(Return());
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Field matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherField) {
+  FieldHelper helper(0);
+
+  Matcher<const FieldHelper&> m = Field(&FieldHelper::field_, Eq(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(helper));
+
+  Matcher<const FieldHelper*> m2 = Field(&FieldHelper::field_, Eq(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(&helper));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Property matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherProperty) {
+  FieldHelper helper(0);
+
+  Matcher<const FieldHelper&> m = Property(&FieldHelper::field, Eq(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(helper));
+
+  Matcher<const FieldHelper*> m2 = Property(&FieldHelper::field, Eq(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(&helper));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ResultOf matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherResultOf) {
+  Matcher<char*> m = ResultOf(&InvokeHelper::StaticIntFromString, Eq(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the ResultOf matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherPointee) {
+  int n = 1;
+
+  Matcher<int*> m = Pointee(Eq(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(&n));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Truly matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherTruly) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = Truly(&InvokeHelper::StaticBoolFromString);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the AllOf matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherAllOf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = AllOf(_, Eq(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the AnyOf matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherAnyOf) {
+  Matcher<int> m = AnyOf(_, Eq(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the Not matcher.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherNot) {
+  Matcher<int> m = Not(_);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(1));
+}
+
+// Tests the linkage of the MatcherCast<T>() function.
+TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherCast) {
+  Matcher<const char*> m = MatcherCast<const char*>(_);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL));
+}
+
+#endif  // GMOCK_TEST_GMOCK_LINK_TEST_H_
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test.py b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..f43f707
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test.py
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+#
+# Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+# All rights reserved.
+#
+# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+# met:
+#
+#     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+#     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+# distribution.
+#     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+# this software without specific prior written permission.
+#
+# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+"""Tests the text output of Google C++ Mocking Framework.
+
+SYNOPSIS
+       gmock_output_test.py --gmock_build_dir=BUILD/DIR --gengolden
+         # where BUILD/DIR contains the built gmock_output_test_ file.
+       gmock_output_test.py --gengolden
+       gmock_output_test.py
+"""
+
+__author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)'
+
+import gmock_test_utils
+import os
+import re
+import string
+import sys
+import unittest
+
+
+# The flag for generating the golden file
+GENGOLDEN_FLAG = '--gengolden'
+
+IS_WINDOWS = os.name == 'nt'
+
+if IS_WINDOWS:
+  PROGRAM = r'..\build.dbg\gmock_output_test_.exe'
+else:
+  PROGRAM = 'gmock_output_test_'
+
+PROGRAM_PATH = os.path.join(gmock_test_utils.GetBuildDir(), PROGRAM)
+COMMAND = PROGRAM_PATH + ' --gtest_stack_trace_depth=0 --gtest_print_time=0'
+GOLDEN_NAME = 'gmock_output_test_golden.txt'
+GOLDEN_PATH = os.path.join(gmock_test_utils.GetSourceDir(),
+                           GOLDEN_NAME)
+
+
+def ToUnixLineEnding(s):
+  """Changes all Windows/Mac line endings in s to UNIX line endings."""
+
+  return s.replace('\r\n', '\n').replace('\r', '\n')
+
+
+def RemoveReportHeaderAndFooter(output):
+  """Removes Google Test result report's header and footer from the output."""
+
+  output = re.sub(r'.*gtest_main.*\n', '', output)
+  output = re.sub(r'\[.*\d+ tests.*\n', '', output)
+  output = re.sub(r'\[.* test environment .*\n', '', output)
+  output = re.sub(r'\[=+\] \d+ tests .* ran.*', '', output)
+  output = re.sub(r'.* FAILED TESTS\n', '', output)
+  return output
+
+
+def RemoveLocations(output):
+  """Removes all file location info from a Google Test program's output.
+
+  Args:
+       output:  the output of a Google Test program.
+
+  Returns:
+       output with all file location info (in the form of
+       'DIRECTORY/FILE_NAME:LINE_NUMBER: 'or
+       'DIRECTORY\\FILE_NAME(LINE_NUMBER): ') replaced by
+       'FILE:#: '.
+  """
+
+  return re.sub(r'.*[/\\](.+)(\:\d+|\(\d+\))\:', 'FILE:#:', output)
+
+
+def NormalizeErrorMarker(output):
+  """Normalizes the error marker, which is different on Windows vs on Linux."""
+
+  return re.sub(r' error: ', ' Failure\n', output)
+
+
+def RemoveMemoryAddresses(output):
+  """Removes memory addresses from the test output."""
+
+  return re.sub(r'@\w+', '@0x#', output)
+
+
+def RemoveTestNamesOfLeakedMocks(output):
+  """Removes the test names of leaked mock objects from the test output."""
+
+  return re.sub(r'\(used in test .+\) ', '', output)
+
+
+def GetLeakyTests(output):
+  """Returns a list of test names that leak mock objects."""
+
+  # findall() returns a list of all matches of the regex in output.
+  # For example, if '(used in test FooTest.Bar)' is in output, the
+  # list will contain 'FooTest.Bar'.
+  return re.findall(r'\(used in test (.+)\)', output)
+
+
+def GetNormalizedOutputAndLeakyTests(output):
+  """Normalizes the output of gmock_output_test_.
+
+  Args:
+    output: The test output.
+
+  Returns:
+    A tuple (the normalized test output, the list of test names that have
+    leaked mocks).
+  """
+
+  output = ToUnixLineEnding(output)
+  output = RemoveReportHeaderAndFooter(output)
+  output = NormalizeErrorMarker(output)
+  output = RemoveLocations(output)
+  output = RemoveMemoryAddresses(output)
+  return (RemoveTestNamesOfLeakedMocks(output), GetLeakyTests(output))
+
+
+def IterShellCommandOutput(cmd, stdin_string=None):
+  """Runs a command in a sub-process, and iterates the lines in its STDOUT.
+
+  Args:
+
+    cmd:           The shell command.
+    stdin_string:  The string to be fed to the STDIN of the sub-process;
+                   If None, the sub-process will inherit the STDIN
+                   from the parent process.
+  """
+
+  # Spawns cmd in a sub-process, and gets its standard I/O file objects.
+  stdin_file, stdout_file = os.popen2(cmd, 'b')
+
+  # If the caller didn't specify a string for STDIN, gets it from the
+  # parent process.
+  if stdin_string is None:
+    stdin_string = sys.stdin.read()
+
+  # Feeds the STDIN string to the sub-process.
+  stdin_file.write(stdin_string)
+  stdin_file.close()
+
+  while True:
+    line = stdout_file.readline()
+    if not line:  # EOF
+      stdout_file.close()
+      break
+
+    yield line
+
+
+def GetShellCommandOutput(cmd, stdin_string=None):
+  """Runs a command in a sub-process, and returns its STDOUT in a string.
+
+  Args:
+
+    cmd:           The shell command.
+    stdin_string:  The string to be fed to the STDIN of the sub-process;
+                   If None, the sub-process will inherit the STDIN
+                   from the parent process.
+  """
+
+  lines = list(IterShellCommandOutput(cmd, stdin_string))
+  return string.join(lines, '')
+
+
+def GetNormalizedCommandOutputAndLeakyTests(cmd):
+  """Runs a command and returns its normalized output and a list of leaky tests.
+
+  Args:
+    cmd:  the shell command.
+  """
+
+  # Disables exception pop-ups on Windows.
+  os.environ['GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS'] = '1'
+  return GetNormalizedOutputAndLeakyTests(GetShellCommandOutput(cmd, ''))
+
+
+class GMockOutputTest(unittest.TestCase):
+  def testOutput(self):
+    (output, leaky_tests) = GetNormalizedCommandOutputAndLeakyTests(COMMAND)
+    golden_file = open(GOLDEN_PATH, 'rb')
+    golden = golden_file.read()
+    golden_file.close()
+
+    # The normalized output should match the golden file.
+    self.assertEquals(golden, output)
+
+    # The raw output should contain 2 leaked mock object errors for
+    # test GMockOutputTest.CatchesLeakedMocks.
+    self.assertEquals(['GMockOutputTest.CatchesLeakedMocks',
+                       'GMockOutputTest.CatchesLeakedMocks'],
+                      leaky_tests)
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+  if sys.argv[1:] == [GENGOLDEN_FLAG]:
+    (output, _) = GetNormalizedCommandOutputAndLeakyTests(COMMAND)
+    golden_file = open(GOLDEN_PATH, 'wb')
+    golden_file.write(output)
+    golden_file.close()
+  else:
+    gmock_test_utils.Main()
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test_.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test_.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..97619af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test_.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Tests Google Mock's output in various scenarios.  This ensures that
+// Google Mock's messages are readable and useful.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string>
+
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+using testing::_;
+using testing::AnyNumber;
+using testing::Ge;
+using testing::InSequence;
+using testing::Ref;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::Sequence;
+
+class MockFoo {
+ public:
+  MOCK_METHOD3(Bar, char(const std::string& s, int i, double x));
+  MOCK_METHOD2(Bar2, bool(int x, int y));
+  MOCK_METHOD2(Bar3, void(int x, int y));
+};
+
+class GMockOutputTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  MockFoo foo_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, ExpectedCall) {
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info";
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, _));
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 0);  // Expected call
+
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning";
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, ExpectedCallToVoidFunction) {
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info";
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar3(0, _));
+  foo_.Bar3(0, 0);  // Expected call
+
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning";
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, ExplicitActionsRunOut) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(_, _))
+      .Times(2)
+      .WillOnce(Return(false));
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 2);
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 1);  // Explicit actions in EXPECT_CALL run out.
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UnexpectedCall) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, _));
+
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 0);  // Unexpected call
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 0);  // Expected call
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UnexpectedCallToVoidFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar3(0, _));
+
+  foo_.Bar3(1, 0);  // Unexpected call
+  foo_.Bar3(0, 0);  // Expected call
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, ExcessiveCall) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, _));
+
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 0);  // Expected call
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 1);  // Excessive call
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, ExcessiveCallToVoidFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar3(0, _));
+
+  foo_.Bar3(0, 0);  // Expected call
+  foo_.Bar3(0, 1);  // Excessive call
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UninterestingCall) {
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 1);  // Uninteresting call
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UninterestingCallToVoidFunction) {
+  foo_.Bar3(0, 1);  // Uninteresting call
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, RetiredExpectation) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(_, _))
+      .RetiresOnSaturation();
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, 0));
+
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 1);
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 1);  // Matches a retired expectation
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UnsatisfiedPrerequisite) {
+  {
+    InSequence s;
+    EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar(_, 0, _));
+    EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, 0));
+    EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(1, _));
+  }
+
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 0);  // Has one immediate unsatisfied pre-requisite
+  foo_.Bar("Hi", 0, 0);
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 0);
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UnsatisfiedPrerequisites) {
+  Sequence s1, s2;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar(_, 0, _))
+      .InSequence(s1);
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, 0))
+      .InSequence(s2);
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(1, _))
+      .InSequence(s1, s2);
+
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 0);  // Has two immediate unsatisfied pre-requisites
+  foo_.Bar("Hi", 0, 0);
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 0);
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UnsatisfiedExpectation) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar(_, _, _));
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, _))
+      .Times(2);
+
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 1);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, MismatchArguments) {
+  const std::string s = "Hi";
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar(Ref(s), _, Ge(0)));
+
+  foo_.Bar("Ho", 0, -0.1);  // Mismatch arguments
+  foo_.Bar(s, 0, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, MismatchWithArguments) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(Ge(2), Ge(1)))
+      .WithArguments(Ge());
+
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 3);  // Mismatch WithArguments()
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 1);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, MismatchArgumentsAndWithArguments) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(Ge(2), Ge(1)))
+      .WithArguments(Ge());
+
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 3);  // Mismatch arguments and mismatch WithArguments()
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 1);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UnexpectedCallWithDefaultAction) {
+  ON_CALL(foo_, Bar2(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));   // Default action #1
+  ON_CALL(foo_, Bar2(1, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(false));  // Default action #2
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(2, 2));
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 0);  // Unexpected call, takes default action #2.
+  foo_.Bar2(0, 0);  // Unexpected call, takes default action #1.
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 2);  // Expected call.
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, ExcessiveCallWithDefaultAction) {
+  ON_CALL(foo_, Bar2(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));   // Default action #1
+  ON_CALL(foo_, Bar2(1, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(false));  // Default action #2
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(2, 2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(1, 1));
+
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 2);  // Expected call.
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 2);  // Excessive call, takes default action #1.
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 1);  // Expected call.
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 1);  // Excessive call, takes default action #2.
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, UninterestingCallWithDefaultAction) {
+  ON_CALL(foo_, Bar2(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));   // Default action #1
+  ON_CALL(foo_, Bar2(1, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(false));  // Default action #2
+
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 2);  // Uninteresting call, takes default action #1.
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 1);  // Uninteresting call, takes default action #2.
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, ExplicitActionsRunOutWithDefaultAction) {
+  ON_CALL(foo_, Bar2(_, _))
+      .WillByDefault(Return(true));   // Default action #1
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(_, _))
+      .Times(2)
+      .WillOnce(Return(false));
+  foo_.Bar2(2, 2);
+  foo_.Bar2(1, 1);  // Explicit actions in EXPECT_CALL run out.
+}
+
+TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, CatchesLeakedMocks) {
+  MockFoo* foo1 = new MockFoo;
+  MockFoo* foo2 = new MockFoo;
+
+  // Invokes ON_CALL on foo1.
+  ON_CALL(*foo1, Bar(_, _, _)).WillByDefault(Return('a'));
+
+  // Invokes EXPECT_CALL on foo2.
+  EXPECT_CALL(*foo2, Bar2(_, _));
+  EXPECT_CALL(*foo2, Bar2(1, _));
+  EXPECT_CALL(*foo2, Bar3(_, _)).Times(AnyNumber());
+  foo2->Bar2(2, 1);
+  foo2->Bar2(1, 1);
+
+  // Both foo1 and foo2 are deliberately leaked.
+}
+
+void TestCatchesLeakedMocksInAdHocTests() {
+  MockFoo* foo = new MockFoo;
+
+  // Invokes EXPECT_CALL on foo.
+  EXPECT_CALL(*foo, Bar2(_, _));
+  foo->Bar2(2, 1);
+
+  // foo is deliberately leaked.
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+  testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv);
+
+  // Ensures that the tests pass no matter what value of
+  // --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks and --gmock_verbose the user specifies.
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(catch_leaked_mocks) = true;
+  testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning";
+
+  TestCatchesLeakedMocksInAdHocTests();
+  return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+}
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..887b7be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,302 @@
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExpectedCall
+
+FILE:#: EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar2(0, _)) invoked
+Stack trace:
+
+FILE:#: Expected mock function call.
+    Function call: Bar2(0, 0)
+          Returns: false
+Stack trace:
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.ExpectedCall
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExpectedCallToVoidFunction
+
+FILE:#: EXPECT_CALL(foo_, Bar3(0, _)) invoked
+Stack trace:
+
+FILE:#: Expected mock function call.
+    Function call: Bar3(0, 0)
+Stack trace:
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.ExpectedCallToVoidFunction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExplicitActionsRunOut
+
+GMOCK WARNING:
+FILE:#: Too few actions specified.
+Expected to be called twice, but has only 1 WillOnce().
+GMOCK WARNING:
+FILE:#: Actions ran out.
+Called 2 times, but only 1 WillOnce() is specified - returning default value.
+Stack trace:
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.ExplicitActionsRunOut
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCall
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 0)
+          Returns: false
+Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:
+
+FILE:#: 
+  Expected arg #0: is equal to 0
+           Actual: 1
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCall
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallToVoidFunction
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning directly.
+    Function call: Bar3(1, 0)
+Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:
+
+FILE:#: 
+  Expected arg #0: is equal to 0
+           Actual: 1
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallToVoidFunction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCall
+FILE:#: Failure
+Mock function called more times than expected - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(0, 1)
+          Returns: false
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: called twice - over-saturated and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCall
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCallToVoidFunction
+FILE:#: Failure
+Mock function called more times than expected - returning directly.
+    Function call: Bar3(0, 1)
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: called twice - over-saturated and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCallToVoidFunction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCall
+
+GMOCK WARNING:
+Uninteresting mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(0, 1)
+          Returns: false
+Stack trace:
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCall
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCallToVoidFunction
+
+GMOCK WARNING:
+Uninteresting mock function call - returning directly.
+    Function call: Bar3(0, 1)
+Stack trace:
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCallToVoidFunction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.RetiredExpectation
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 1)
+          Returns: false
+Google Mock tried the following 2 expectations, but none matched:
+
+FILE:#: tried expectation #0
+         Expected: the expectation is active
+           Actual: it is retired
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: called once - saturated and retired
+FILE:#: tried expectation #1
+  Expected arg #0: is equal to 0
+           Actual: 1
+  Expected arg #1: is equal to 0
+           Actual: 1
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.RetiredExpectation
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedPrerequisite
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 0)
+          Returns: false
+Google Mock tried the following 2 expectations, but none matched:
+
+FILE:#: tried expectation #0
+  Expected arg #0: is equal to 0
+           Actual: 1
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+FILE:#: tried expectation #1
+         Expected: all pre-requisites are satisfied
+           Actual: the following immediate pre-requisites are not satisfied:
+FILE:#: pre-requisite #0
+                   (end of pre-requisites)
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedPrerequisite
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedPrerequisites
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 0)
+          Returns: false
+Google Mock tried the following 2 expectations, but none matched:
+
+FILE:#: tried expectation #0
+  Expected arg #0: is equal to 0
+           Actual: 1
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+FILE:#: tried expectation #1
+         Expected: all pre-requisites are satisfied
+           Actual: the following immediate pre-requisites are not satisfied:
+FILE:#: pre-requisite #0
+FILE:#: pre-requisite #1
+                   (end of pre-requisites)
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedPrerequisites
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedExpectation
+FILE:#: Failure
+Actual function call count doesn't match this expectation.
+         Expected: to be called twice
+           Actual: called once - unsatisfied and active
+FILE:#: Failure
+Actual function call count doesn't match this expectation.
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedExpectation
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchArguments
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar(@0x# "Ho", 0, -0.1)
+          Returns: '\0'
+Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:
+
+FILE:#: 
+  Expected arg #0: references the variable @0x# "Hi"
+           Actual: "Ho" (is located @0x#)
+  Expected arg #2: is greater than or equal to 0
+           Actual: -0.1
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchArguments
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchWithArguments
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(2, 3)
+          Returns: false
+Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:
+
+FILE:#: 
+         Expected: argument #0 is greater than or equal to argument #1
+           Actual: false
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchWithArguments
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchArgumentsAndWithArguments
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - returning default value.
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 3)
+          Returns: false
+Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:
+
+FILE:#: 
+  Expected arg #0: is greater than or equal to 2
+           Actual: 1
+         Expected: argument #0 is greater than or equal to argument #1
+           Actual: false
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchArgumentsAndWithArguments
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallWithDefaultAction
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - taking default action specified at:
+FILE:#:
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 0)
+          Returns: false
+Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:
+
+FILE:#: 
+  Expected arg #0: is equal to 2
+           Actual: 1
+  Expected arg #1: is equal to 2
+           Actual: 0
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+unknown file: Failure
+
+Unexpected mock function call - taking default action specified at:
+FILE:#:
+    Function call: Bar2(0, 0)
+          Returns: true
+Google Mock tried the following 1 expectation, but it didn't match:
+
+FILE:#: 
+  Expected arg #0: is equal to 2
+           Actual: 0
+  Expected arg #1: is equal to 2
+           Actual: 0
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallWithDefaultAction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCallWithDefaultAction
+FILE:#: Failure
+Mock function called more times than expected - taking default action specified at:
+FILE:#:
+    Function call: Bar2(2, 2)
+          Returns: true
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: called twice - over-saturated and active
+FILE:#: Failure
+Mock function called more times than expected - taking default action specified at:
+FILE:#:
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 1)
+          Returns: false
+         Expected: to be called once
+           Actual: called twice - over-saturated and active
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCallWithDefaultAction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCallWithDefaultAction
+
+GMOCK WARNING:
+Uninteresting mock function call - taking default action specified at:
+FILE:#:
+    Function call: Bar2(2, 2)
+          Returns: true
+Stack trace:
+
+GMOCK WARNING:
+Uninteresting mock function call - taking default action specified at:
+FILE:#:
+    Function call: Bar2(1, 1)
+          Returns: false
+Stack trace:
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCallWithDefaultAction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExplicitActionsRunOutWithDefaultAction
+
+GMOCK WARNING:
+FILE:#: Too few actions specified.
+Expected to be called twice, but has only 1 WillOnce().
+GMOCK WARNING:
+FILE:#: Actions ran out.
+Called 2 times, but only 1 WillOnce() is specified - taking default action specified at:
+FILE:#:
+Stack trace:
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.ExplicitActionsRunOutWithDefaultAction
+[ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.CatchesLeakedMocks
+[       OK ] GMockOutputTest.CatchesLeakedMocks
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCall
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallToVoidFunction
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCall
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCallToVoidFunction
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.RetiredExpectation
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedPrerequisite
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedPrerequisites
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnsatisfiedExpectation
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchArguments
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchWithArguments
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchArgumentsAndWithArguments
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallWithDefaultAction
+[  FAILED  ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCallWithDefaultAction
+
+
+FILE:#: ERROR: this mock object should be deleted but never is. Its address is @0x#.
+FILE:#: ERROR: this mock object should be deleted but never is. Its address is @0x#.
+FILE:#: ERROR: this mock object should be deleted but never is. Its address is @0x#.
+ERROR: 3 leaked mock objects found at program exit.
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0c83260
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests code in gmock.cc.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+
+#include <string>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
+using testing::InitGoogleMock;
+using testing::internal::g_init_gtest_count;
+
+// Verifies that calling InitGoogleMock() on argv results in new_argv,
+// and the gmock_verbose flag's value is set to expected_gmock_verbose.
+template <typename Char, int M, int N>
+void TestInitGoogleMock(const Char* (&argv)[M], const Char* (&new_argv)[N],
+                        const ::std::string& expected_gmock_verbose) {
+  const ::std::string old_verbose = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
+
+  int argc = M;
+  InitGoogleMock(&argc, const_cast<Char**>(argv));
+  ASSERT_EQ(N, argc) << "The new argv has wrong number of elements.";
+
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
+    EXPECT_STREQ(new_argv[i], argv[i]);
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(expected_gmock_verbose, GMOCK_FLAG(verbose).c_str());
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = old_verbose;  // Restores the gmock_verbose flag.
+}
+
+TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesInvalidCommandLine) {
+  const char* argv[] = {
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const char* new_argv[] = {
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, GMOCK_FLAG(verbose));
+}
+
+TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesEmptyCommandLine) {
+  const char* argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const char* new_argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, GMOCK_FLAG(verbose));
+}
+
+TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesSingleFlag) {
+  const char* argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    "--gmock_verbose=info",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const char* new_argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "info");
+}
+
+TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesUnrecognizedFlag) {
+  const char* argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    "--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const char* new_argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    "--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, GMOCK_FLAG(verbose));
+}
+
+TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesGoogleMockFlagAndUnrecognizedFlag) {
+  const char* argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    "--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    "--gmock_verbose=error",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const char* new_argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    "--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "error");
+}
+
+TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, CallsInitGoogleTest) {
+  const int old_init_gtest_count = g_init_gtest_count;
+  const char* argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    "--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    "--gmock_verbose=error",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const char* new_argv[] = {
+    "foo.exe",
+    "--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "error");
+  EXPECT_EQ(old_init_gtest_count + 1, g_init_gtest_count);
+}
+
+TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesInvalidCommandLine) {
+  const wchar_t* argv[] = {
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const wchar_t* new_argv[] = {
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, GMOCK_FLAG(verbose));
+}
+
+TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesEmptyCommandLine) {
+  const wchar_t* argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const wchar_t* new_argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, GMOCK_FLAG(verbose));
+}
+
+TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesSingleFlag) {
+  const wchar_t* argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    L"--gmock_verbose=info",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const wchar_t* new_argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "info");
+}
+
+TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesUnrecognizedFlag) {
+  const wchar_t* argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    L"--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const wchar_t* new_argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    L"--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, GMOCK_FLAG(verbose));
+}
+
+TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesGoogleMockFlagAndUnrecognizedFlag) {
+  const wchar_t* argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    L"--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    L"--gmock_verbose=error",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const wchar_t* new_argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    L"--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "error");
+}
+
+TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, CallsInitGoogleTest) {
+  const int old_init_gtest_count = g_init_gtest_count;
+  const wchar_t* argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    L"--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    L"--gmock_verbose=error",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  const wchar_t* new_argv[] = {
+    L"foo.exe",
+    L"--non_gmock_flag=blah",
+    NULL
+  };
+
+  TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "error");
+  EXPECT_EQ(old_init_gtest_count + 1, g_init_gtest_count);
+}
+
+// Makes sure Google Mock flags can be accessed in code.
+TEST(FlagTest, IsAccessibleInCode) {
+  bool dummy = testing::GMOCK_FLAG(catch_leaked_mocks) &&
+      testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) == "";
+  dummy = dummy;  // Avoids the "unused local variable" warning.
+}
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock_test_utils.py b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_test_utils.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..4c09e39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock_test_utils.py
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+#!/usr/bin/python2.4
+#
+# Copyright 2006, Google Inc.
+# All rights reserved.
+#
+# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+# met:
+#
+#     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+#     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+# distribution.
+#     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+# this software without specific prior written permission.
+#
+# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+"""Unit test utilities for Google C++ Mocking Framework."""
+
+__author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)'
+
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+
+
+# Initially maps a flag to its default value.  After
+# _ParseAndStripGMockFlags() is called, maps a flag to its actual
+# value.
+_flag_map = {'gmock_source_dir': os.path.dirname(sys.argv[0]),
+             'gmock_build_dir': os.path.dirname(sys.argv[0])}
+_gmock_flags_are_parsed = False
+
+
+def _ParseAndStripGMockFlags(argv):
+  """Parses and strips Google Test flags from argv.  This is idempotent."""
+
+  global _gmock_flags_are_parsed
+  if _gmock_flags_are_parsed:
+    return
+
+  _gmock_flags_are_parsed = True
+  for flag in _flag_map:
+    # The environment variable overrides the default value.
+    if flag.upper() in os.environ:
+      _flag_map[flag] = os.environ[flag.upper()]
+
+    # The command line flag overrides the environment variable.
+    i = 1  # Skips the program name.
+    while i < len(argv):
+      prefix = '--' + flag + '='
+      if argv[i].startswith(prefix):
+        _flag_map[flag] = argv[i][len(prefix):]
+        del argv[i]
+        break
+      else:
+        # We don't increment i in case we just found a --gmock_* flag
+        # and removed it from argv.
+        i += 1
+
+
+def GetFlag(flag):
+  """Returns the value of the given flag."""
+
+  # In case GetFlag() is called before Main(), we always call
+  # _ParseAndStripGMockFlags() here to make sure the --gmock_* flags
+  # are parsed.
+  _ParseAndStripGMockFlags(sys.argv)
+
+  return _flag_map[flag]
+
+
+def GetSourceDir():
+  """Returns the absolute path of the directory where the .py files are."""
+
+  return os.path.abspath(GetFlag('gmock_source_dir'))
+
+
+def GetBuildDir():
+  """Returns the absolute path of the directory where the test binaries are."""
+
+  return os.path.abspath(GetFlag('gmock_build_dir'))
+
+
+def GetExitStatus(exit_code):
+  """Returns the argument to exit(), or -1 if exit() wasn't called.
+
+  Args:
+    exit_code: the result value of os.system(command).
+  """
+
+  if os.name == 'nt':
+    # On Windows, os.WEXITSTATUS() doesn't work and os.system() returns
+    # the argument to exit() directly.
+    return exit_code
+  else:
+    # On Unix, os.WEXITSTATUS() must be used to extract the exit status
+    # from the result of os.system().
+    if os.WIFEXITED(exit_code):
+      return os.WEXITSTATUS(exit_code)
+    else:
+      return -1
+
+
+def Main():
+  """Runs the unit test."""
+
+  # We must call _ParseAndStripGMockFlags() before calling
+  # unittest.main().  Otherwise the latter will be confused by the
+  # --gmock_* flags.
+  _ParseAndStripGMockFlags(sys.argv)
+  unittest.main()