diff options
author | dewittj@chromium.org <dewittj@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2014-08-21 16:59:03 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | dewittj@chromium.org <dewittj@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2014-08-21 17:01:18 +0000 |
commit | 4bd8cb53744003fe107f75aa87c2ba610959708d (patch) | |
tree | 0ce265864ed0c45de18d3d78f346c650bf5d9fa7 /third_party | |
parent | 7fd5f1380d7c572394d92ffd339730a8c89dbc4b (diff) | |
download | chromium_src-4bd8cb53744003fe107f75aa87c2ba610959708d.zip chromium_src-4bd8cb53744003fe107f75aa87c2ba610959708d.tar.gz chromium_src-4bd8cb53744003fe107f75aa87c2ba610959708d.tar.bz2 |
Revert of Roll webrtc 6905:6948. (patchset #2 of https://codereview.chromium.org/497463002/)
Reason for revert:
Caused regression in static initializer count:
# webrtcvideoengine2.cc _GLOBAL__sub_I_webrtcvideoengine2.cc+0x53
# webrtcvideoengine2.cc _GLOBAL__sub_I_webrtcvideoengine2.cc+0x5a
# webrtcvideoengine2.cc _GLOBAL__sub_I_webrtcvideoengine2.cc+0x9
# webrtcvideoengine2.cc __divdi3@plt
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Linux/builds/52540
Original issue's description:
> Roll webrtc 6905:6948.
>
> TBR=hclam@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=291082
TBR=hclam@chromium.org,grunell@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/495103003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#291106}
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@291106 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party')
-rw-r--r-- | third_party/libjingle/README.chromium | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/libjingle/README.chromium b/third_party/libjingle/README.chromium index 75f8c35..0534eaf 100644 --- a/third_party/libjingle/README.chromium +++ b/third_party/libjingle/README.chromium @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Name: libjingle URL: http://code.google.com/p/webrtc/ Version: unknown -Revision: 6948 +Revision: 6898 License: BSD License File: source/talk/COPYING Security Critical: yes |