diff options
author | thestig@chromium.org <thestig@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2012-04-24 03:44:16 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | thestig@chromium.org <thestig@chromium.org@0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98> | 2012-04-24 03:44:16 +0000 |
commit | 4d449e455a049e909801540be4c218c2dbfc3986 (patch) | |
tree | 3111b88733f598dbe5b141007f15234e322e8d84 /third_party | |
parent | 3576b9e625bb5982d234d51cf08c714684bf5dd2 (diff) | |
download | chromium_src-4d449e455a049e909801540be4c218c2dbfc3986.zip chromium_src-4d449e455a049e909801540be4c218c2dbfc3986.tar.gz chromium_src-4d449e455a049e909801540be4c218c2dbfc3986.tar.bz2 |
Fix a bunch of bad line endings.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@133626 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party')
-rw-r--r-- | third_party/swiftshader/required.html | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/README_windows.txt | 236 |
2 files changed, 119 insertions, 119 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/swiftshader/required.html b/third_party/swiftshader/required.html index 2bd4caf..a83a141 100644 --- a/third_party/swiftshader/required.html +++ b/third_party/swiftshader/required.html @@ -1 +1 @@ -<img src="swiftshader.jpg">
+<img src="swiftshader.jpg"> diff --git a/third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/README_windows.txt b/third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/README_windows.txt index f74ee05..16ea9d6 100644 --- a/third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/README_windows.txt +++ b/third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/README_windows.txt @@ -1,118 +1,118 @@ ---- COMPILING
-
-This project has begun being ported to Windows. A working solution
-file exists in this directory:
- gperftools.sln
-
-You can load this solution file into VC++ 7.1 (Visual Studio 2003) or
-later -- in the latter case, it will automatically convert the files
-to the latest format for you.
-
-When you build the solution, it will create a number of unittests,
-which you can run by hand (or, more easily, under the Visual Studio
-debugger) to make sure everything is working properly on your system.
-The binaries will end up in a directory called "debug" or "release" in
-the top-level directory (next to the .sln file). It will also create
-two binaries, nm-pdb and addr2line-pdb, which you should install in
-the same directory you install the 'pprof' perl script.
-
-I don't know very much about how to install DLLs on Windows, so you'll
-have to figure out that part for yourself. If you choose to just
-re-use the existing .sln, make sure you set the IncludeDir's
-appropriately! Look at the properties for libtcmalloc_minimal.dll.
-
-Note that these systems are set to build in Debug mode by default.
-You may want to change them to Release mode.
-
-To use tcmalloc_minimal in your own projects, you should only need to
-build the dll and install it someplace, so you can link it into
-further binaries. To use the dll, you need to add the following to
-the linker line of your executable:
- "libtcmalloc_minimal.lib" /INCLUDE:"__tcmalloc"
-
-Here is how to accomplish this in Visual Studio 2005 (VC8):
-
-1) Have your executable depend on the tcmalloc library by selecting
- "Project Dependencies..." from the "Project" menu. Your executable
- should depend on "libtcmalloc_minimal".
-
-2) Have your executable depend on a tcmalloc symbol -- this is
- necessary so the linker doesn't "optimize out" the libtcmalloc
- dependency -- by right-clicking on your executable's project (in
- the solution explorer), selecting Properties from the pull-down
- menu, then selecting "Configuration Properties" -> "Linker" ->
- "Input". Then, in the "Force Symbol References" field, enter the
- text "__tcmalloc" (without the quotes). Be sure to do this for both
- debug and release modes!
-
-You can also link tcmalloc code in statically -- see the example
-project tcmalloc_minimal_unittest-static, which does this. For this
-to work, you'll need to add "/D PERFTOOLS_DLL_DECL=" to the compile
-line of every perftools .cc file. You do not need to depend on the
-tcmalloc symbol in this case (that is, you don't need to do either
-step 1 or step 2 from above).
-
-An alternative to all the above is to statically link your application
-with libc, and then replace its malloc with tcmalloc. This allows you
-to just build and link your program normally; the tcmalloc support
-comes in a post-processing step. This is more reliable than the above
-technique (which depends on run-time patching, which is inherently
-fragile), though more work to set up. For details, see
- https://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/41cd3710af85e57b
-
-
---- THE HEAP-PROFILER
-
-The heap-profiler has had a preliminary port to Windows. It has not
-been well tested, and probably does not work at all when Frame Pointer
-Optimization (FPO) is enabled -- that is, in release mode. The other
-features of perftools, such as the cpu-profiler and leak-checker, have
-not yet been ported to Windows at all.
-
-
---- WIN64
-
-The function-patcher has to disassemble code, and is very
-x86-specific. However, the rest of perftools should work fine for
-both x86 and x64. In particular, if you use the 'statically link with
-libc, and replace its malloc with tcmalloc' approach, mentioned above,
-it should be possible to use tcmalloc with 64-bit windows.
-
-As of perftools 1.10, there is some support for disassembling x86_64
-instructions, for work with win64. This work is preliminary, but the
-test file preamble_patcher_test.cc is provided to play around with
-that a bit. preamble_patcher_test will not compile on win32.
-
-
---- ISSUES
-
-NOTE FOR WIN2K USERS: According to reports
-(http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/detail?id=127)
-the stack-tracing necessary for the heap-profiler does not work on
-Win2K. The best workaround is, if you are building on a Win2k system
-is to add "/D NO_TCMALLOC_SAMPLES=" to your build, to turn off the
-stack-tracing. You will not be able to use the heap-profiler if you
-do this.
-
-NOTE ON _MSIZE and _RECALLOC: The tcmalloc version of _msize returns
-the size of the region tcmalloc allocated for you -- which is at least
-as many bytes you asked for, but may be more. (btw, these *are* bytes
-you own, even if you didn't ask for all of them, so it's correct code
-to access all of them if you want.) Unfortunately, the Windows CRT
-_recalloc() routine assumes that _msize returns exactly as many bytes
-as were requested. As a result, _recalloc() may not zero out new
-bytes correctly. IT'S SAFEST NOT TO USE _RECALLOC WITH TCMALLOC.
-_recalloc() is a tricky routine to use in any case (it's not safe to
-use with realloc, for instance).
-
-
-I have little experience with Windows programming, so there may be
-better ways to set this up than I've done! If you run across any
-problems, please post to the google-perftools Google Group, or report
-them on the gperftools Google Code site:
- http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools
- http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/list
-
--- craig
-
-Last modified: 2 February 2012
+--- COMPILING + +This project has begun being ported to Windows. A working solution +file exists in this directory: + gperftools.sln + +You can load this solution file into VC++ 7.1 (Visual Studio 2003) or +later -- in the latter case, it will automatically convert the files +to the latest format for you. + +When you build the solution, it will create a number of unittests, +which you can run by hand (or, more easily, under the Visual Studio +debugger) to make sure everything is working properly on your system. +The binaries will end up in a directory called "debug" or "release" in +the top-level directory (next to the .sln file). It will also create +two binaries, nm-pdb and addr2line-pdb, which you should install in +the same directory you install the 'pprof' perl script. + +I don't know very much about how to install DLLs on Windows, so you'll +have to figure out that part for yourself. If you choose to just +re-use the existing .sln, make sure you set the IncludeDir's +appropriately! Look at the properties for libtcmalloc_minimal.dll. + +Note that these systems are set to build in Debug mode by default. +You may want to change them to Release mode. + +To use tcmalloc_minimal in your own projects, you should only need to +build the dll and install it someplace, so you can link it into +further binaries. To use the dll, you need to add the following to +the linker line of your executable: + "libtcmalloc_minimal.lib" /INCLUDE:"__tcmalloc" + +Here is how to accomplish this in Visual Studio 2005 (VC8): + +1) Have your executable depend on the tcmalloc library by selecting + "Project Dependencies..." from the "Project" menu. Your executable + should depend on "libtcmalloc_minimal". + +2) Have your executable depend on a tcmalloc symbol -- this is + necessary so the linker doesn't "optimize out" the libtcmalloc + dependency -- by right-clicking on your executable's project (in + the solution explorer), selecting Properties from the pull-down + menu, then selecting "Configuration Properties" -> "Linker" -> + "Input". Then, in the "Force Symbol References" field, enter the + text "__tcmalloc" (without the quotes). Be sure to do this for both + debug and release modes! + +You can also link tcmalloc code in statically -- see the example +project tcmalloc_minimal_unittest-static, which does this. For this +to work, you'll need to add "/D PERFTOOLS_DLL_DECL=" to the compile +line of every perftools .cc file. You do not need to depend on the +tcmalloc symbol in this case (that is, you don't need to do either +step 1 or step 2 from above). + +An alternative to all the above is to statically link your application +with libc, and then replace its malloc with tcmalloc. This allows you +to just build and link your program normally; the tcmalloc support +comes in a post-processing step. This is more reliable than the above +technique (which depends on run-time patching, which is inherently +fragile), though more work to set up. For details, see + https://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/41cd3710af85e57b + + +--- THE HEAP-PROFILER + +The heap-profiler has had a preliminary port to Windows. It has not +been well tested, and probably does not work at all when Frame Pointer +Optimization (FPO) is enabled -- that is, in release mode. The other +features of perftools, such as the cpu-profiler and leak-checker, have +not yet been ported to Windows at all. + + +--- WIN64 + +The function-patcher has to disassemble code, and is very +x86-specific. However, the rest of perftools should work fine for +both x86 and x64. In particular, if you use the 'statically link with +libc, and replace its malloc with tcmalloc' approach, mentioned above, +it should be possible to use tcmalloc with 64-bit windows. + +As of perftools 1.10, there is some support for disassembling x86_64 +instructions, for work with win64. This work is preliminary, but the +test file preamble_patcher_test.cc is provided to play around with +that a bit. preamble_patcher_test will not compile on win32. + + +--- ISSUES + +NOTE FOR WIN2K USERS: According to reports +(http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/detail?id=127) +the stack-tracing necessary for the heap-profiler does not work on +Win2K. The best workaround is, if you are building on a Win2k system +is to add "/D NO_TCMALLOC_SAMPLES=" to your build, to turn off the +stack-tracing. You will not be able to use the heap-profiler if you +do this. + +NOTE ON _MSIZE and _RECALLOC: The tcmalloc version of _msize returns +the size of the region tcmalloc allocated for you -- which is at least +as many bytes you asked for, but may be more. (btw, these *are* bytes +you own, even if you didn't ask for all of them, so it's correct code +to access all of them if you want.) Unfortunately, the Windows CRT +_recalloc() routine assumes that _msize returns exactly as many bytes +as were requested. As a result, _recalloc() may not zero out new +bytes correctly. IT'S SAFEST NOT TO USE _RECALLOC WITH TCMALLOC. +_recalloc() is a tricky routine to use in any case (it's not safe to +use with realloc, for instance). + + +I have little experience with Windows programming, so there may be +better ways to set this up than I've done! If you run across any +problems, please post to the google-perftools Google Group, or report +them on the gperftools Google Code site: + http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools + http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/list + +-- craig + +Last modified: 2 February 2012 |