diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc | 17 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc b/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc index d0f0d2b..901c1eb 100644 --- a/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc +++ b/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ class SpdyNetworkTransactionTest std::vector<std::string> next_protos; next_protos.push_back("http/1.1"); next_protos.push_back("spdy/2"); + next_protos.push_back("spdy/2.1"); switch (test_type_) { case SPDYNPN: @@ -1851,7 +1852,7 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, ResponseWithTwoSynReplies) { // limitations as described above and it's not deterministic, tests may // fail under specific circumstances. TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, WindowUpdateReceived) { - SpdySession::set_flow_control(true); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(true); static int kFrameCount = 2; scoped_ptr<std::string> content( @@ -1922,13 +1923,13 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, WindowUpdateReceived) { kMaxSpdyFrameChunkSize * kFrameCount, stream->stream()->send_window_size()); helper.VerifyDataConsumed(); - SpdySession::set_flow_control(false); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(false); } // Test that received data frames and sent WINDOW_UPDATE frames change // the recv_window_size_ correctly. TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, WindowUpdateSent) { - SpdySession::set_flow_control(true); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(true); scoped_ptr<spdy::SpdyFrame> req(ConstructSpdyGet(NULL, 0, false, 1, LOWEST)); scoped_ptr<spdy::SpdyFrame> window_update( @@ -2005,13 +2006,13 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, WindowUpdateSent) { data->CompleteRead(); helper.VerifyDataConsumed(); - SpdySession::set_flow_control(false); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(false); } // Test that WINDOW_UPDATE frame causing overflow is handled correctly. We // use the same trick as in the above test to enforce our scenario. TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, WindowUpdateOverflow) { - SpdySession::set_flow_control(true); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(true); // number of full frames we hope to write (but will not, used to // set content-length header correctly) @@ -2084,7 +2085,7 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, WindowUpdateOverflow) { helper.session()->spdy_session_pool()->CloseAllSessions(); helper.VerifyDataConsumed(); - SpdySession::set_flow_control(false); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(false); } // Test that after hitting a send window size of 0, the write process @@ -2103,7 +2104,7 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, WindowUpdateOverflow) { // After that, next read is artifically enforced, which causes a // WINDOW_UPDATE to be read and I/O process resumes. TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, FlowControlStallResume) { - SpdySession::set_flow_control(true); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(true); // Number of frames we need to send to zero out the window size: data // frames plus SYN_STREAM plus the last data frame; also we need another @@ -2194,7 +2195,7 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, FlowControlStallResume) { rv = callback.WaitForResult(); helper.VerifyDataConsumed(); - SpdySession::set_flow_control(false); + SpdySession::set_use_flow_control(false); } TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, CancelledTransaction) { |