diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/re2/util/hash.cc')
| -rw-r--r-- | third_party/re2/util/hash.cc | 231 |
1 files changed, 231 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/re2/util/hash.cc b/third_party/re2/util/hash.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dfef7b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/third_party/re2/util/hash.cc @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +// Modified by Russ Cox to add "namespace re2". +// Also threw away all but hashword and hashword2. +// http://burtleburtle.net/bob/c/lookup3.c + +/* +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +lookup3.c, by Bob Jenkins, May 2006, Public Domain. + +These are functions for producing 32-bit hashes for hash table lookup. +hashword(), hashlittle(), hashlittle2(), hashbig(), mix(), and final() +are externally useful functions. Routines to test the hash are included +if SELF_TEST is defined. You can use this free for any purpose. It's in +the public domain. It has no warranty. + +You probably want to use hashlittle(). hashlittle() and hashbig() +hash byte arrays. hashlittle() is is faster than hashbig() on +little-endian machines. Intel and AMD are little-endian machines. +On second thought, you probably want hashlittle2(), which is identical to +hashlittle() except it returns two 32-bit hashes for the price of one. +You could implement hashbig2() if you wanted but I haven't bothered here. + +If you want to find a hash of, say, exactly 7 integers, do + a = i1; b = i2; c = i3; + mix(a,b,c); + a += i4; b += i5; c += i6; + mix(a,b,c); + a += i7; + final(a,b,c); +then use c as the hash value. If you have a variable length array of +4-byte integers to hash, use hashword(). If you have a byte array (like +a character string), use hashlittle(). If you have several byte arrays, or +a mix of things, see the comments above hashlittle(). + +Why is this so big? I read 12 bytes at a time into 3 4-byte integers, +then mix those integers. This is fast (you can do a lot more thorough +mixing with 12*3 instructions on 3 integers than you can with 3 instructions +on 1 byte), but shoehorning those bytes into integers efficiently is messy. +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ + +#include "util/util.h" + +#define rot(x,k) (((x)<<(k)) | ((x)>>(32-(k)))) + +/* +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +mix -- mix 3 32-bit values reversibly. + +This is reversible, so any information in (a,b,c) before mix() is +still in (a,b,c) after mix(). + +If four pairs of (a,b,c) inputs are run through mix(), or through +mix() in reverse, there are at least 32 bits of the output that +are sometimes the same for one pair and different for another pair. +This was tested for: +* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination + of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of + (a,b,c). +* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed + the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as + is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit + difference. +* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or + all zero plus a counter that starts at zero. + +Some k values for my "a-=c; a^=rot(c,k); c+=b;" arrangement that +satisfy this are + 4 6 8 16 19 4 + 9 15 3 18 27 15 + 14 9 3 7 17 3 +Well, "9 15 3 18 27 15" didn't quite get 32 bits diffing +for "differ" defined as + with a one-bit base and a two-bit delta. I +used http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/avalanche.html to choose +the operations, constants, and arrangements of the variables. + +This does not achieve avalanche. There are input bits of (a,b,c) +that fail to affect some output bits of (a,b,c), especially of a. The +most thoroughly mixed value is c, but it doesn't really even achieve +avalanche in c. + +This allows some parallelism. Read-after-writes are good at doubling +the number of bits affected, so the goal of mixing pulls in the opposite +direction as the goal of parallelism. I did what I could. Rotates +seem to cost as much as shifts on every machine I could lay my hands +on, and rotates are much kinder to the top and bottom bits, so I used +rotates. +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +#define mix(a,b,c) \ +{ \ + a -= c; a ^= rot(c, 4); c += b; \ + b -= a; b ^= rot(a, 6); a += c; \ + c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 8); b += a; \ + a -= c; a ^= rot(c,16); c += b; \ + b -= a; b ^= rot(a,19); a += c; \ + c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 4); b += a; \ +} + +/* +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +final -- final mixing of 3 32-bit values (a,b,c) into c + +Pairs of (a,b,c) values differing in only a few bits will usually +produce values of c that look totally different. This was tested for +* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination + of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of + (a,b,c). +* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed + the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as + is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit + difference. +* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or + all zero plus a counter that starts at zero. + +These constants passed: + 14 11 25 16 4 14 24 + 12 14 25 16 4 14 24 +and these came close: + 4 8 15 26 3 22 24 + 10 8 15 26 3 22 24 + 11 8 15 26 3 22 24 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +#define final(a,b,c) \ +{ \ + c ^= b; c -= rot(b,14); \ + a ^= c; a -= rot(c,11); \ + b ^= a; b -= rot(a,25); \ + c ^= b; c -= rot(b,16); \ + a ^= c; a -= rot(c,4); \ + b ^= a; b -= rot(a,14); \ + c ^= b; c -= rot(b,24); \ +} + +namespace re2 { + +/* +-------------------------------------------------------------------- + This works on all machines. To be useful, it requires + -- that the key be an array of uint32_t's, and + -- that the length be the number of uint32_t's in the key + + The function hashword() is identical to hashlittle() on little-endian + machines, and identical to hashbig() on big-endian machines, + except that the length has to be measured in uint32_ts rather than in + bytes. hashlittle() is more complicated than hashword() only because + hashlittle() has to dance around fitting the key bytes into registers. +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +uint32 hashword( +const uint32 *k, /* the key, an array of uint32_t values */ +size_t length, /* the length of the key, in uint32_ts */ +uint32 initval) /* the previous hash, or an arbitrary value */ +{ + uint32_t a,b,c; + + /* Set up the internal state */ + a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + (((uint32_t)length)<<2) + initval; + + /*------------------------------------------------- handle most of the key */ + while (length > 3) + { + a += k[0]; + b += k[1]; + c += k[2]; + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 3; + k += 3; + } + + /*------------------------------------------- handle the last 3 uint32_t's */ + switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */ + { + case 3 : c+=k[2]; + case 2 : b+=k[1]; + case 1 : a+=k[0]; + final(a,b,c); + case 0: /* case 0: nothing left to add */ + break; + } + /*------------------------------------------------------ report the result */ + return c; +} + + +/* +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +hashword2() -- same as hashword(), but take two seeds and return two +32-bit values. pc and pb must both be nonnull, and *pc and *pb must +both be initialized with seeds. If you pass in (*pb)==0, the output +(*pc) will be the same as the return value from hashword(). +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +void hashword2 ( +const uint32 *k, /* the key, an array of uint32_t values */ +size_t length, /* the length of the key, in uint32_ts */ +uint32 *pc, /* IN: seed OUT: primary hash value */ +uint32 *pb) /* IN: more seed OUT: secondary hash value */ +{ + uint32_t a,b,c; + + /* Set up the internal state */ + a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + ((uint32_t)(length<<2)) + *pc; + c += *pb; + + /*------------------------------------------------- handle most of the key */ + while (length > 3) + { + a += k[0]; + b += k[1]; + c += k[2]; + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 3; + k += 3; + } + + /*------------------------------------------- handle the last 3 uint32_t's */ + switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */ + { + case 3 : c+=k[2]; + case 2 : b+=k[1]; + case 1 : a+=k[0]; + final(a,b,c); + case 0: /* case 0: nothing left to add */ + break; + } + /*------------------------------------------------------ report the result */ + *pc=c; *pb=b; +} + +} // namespace re2 |