Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Remove DirectoryWatcher and the only thing using it. | phajdan.jr@chromium.org | 2010-02-09 | 1 | -20/+0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | DirectoryWatcher was problematic. We couldn't get it right on Linux, it can hit the disk on UI thread on Windows (Really Bad, tm). And finally, the UserScriptMaster didn't work right with it. TEST=Covered by unit_tests and browser_tests BUG=8968, 6051, 6080, 20832 Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/586010 git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@38456 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98 | ||||
* | Add support for almost-recursive watches in Linux DirectoryWatcher | phajdan.jr@chromium.org | 2009-05-14 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | After this patch DirectoryWatcher when asked for recursive watch will scan the subtree and add inotify watches for each subfolder, but further changes to the tree structure won't trigger adding/removing watches. Support for really recursive watches is planned. This is just to divide the work, because the task is not easy. Based on patch by Janwar Dinata <j.dinata@gmail.com> reviewed at http://codereview.chromium.org/92151 http://crbug.com/8968 Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/115229 git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@16070 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98 | ||||
* | Linux: build fix for systems without inotify headers | agl@chromium.org | 2009-03-18 | 1 | -0/+20 |
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/42363 git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@12024 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98 |