| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MessageLoop. A MessageLoop now has a MessagePump.
This will make it possible to port the MessagePump interface to other platforms
as well as to use an IO completion port for our worker threads on Windows.
Currently, there is only MessagePumpWin, which attempts to preserve the
pre-existing behavior of the MessageLoop.
API changes to MessageLoop:
1. MessageLoop::Quit means return from Run when the MessageLoop would
otherwise wait for more work.
2. MessageLoop::Quit can no longer be called outside the context of an active Run
call. So, things like this:
MessageLoop::current()->Quit();
MessageLoop::current()->Run();
are now:
MessageLoop::current()->RunAllPending();
3. MessageLoop::Quit can no longer be called from other threads. This means that
PostTask(..., new MessageLoop::QuitTask()) must be used explicitly to Quit across
thread boundaries.
4. No protection is made to deal with nested MessageLoops involving watched
objects or APCs. In fact, an assertion is added to flag such cases. This is a
temporary measure until object watching and APC facilities are removed in favor
of a MessagePump designed around an IO completion port.
As part of this CL, I also changed the automation system to use an
IPC::ChannelProxy instead of an IPC::Channel. This moves the automation IPC
onto Chrome's IO thread where it belongs. I also fixed some abuses of
RefCounted in the AutomationProvider class. It was deleting itself in some
cases! This led to having to fix the ownership model for AutomationProvider,
which explains the changes to AutomationProviderList and so on.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@928 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in test (it was a redundant use of quit which was caught
when I wrote code to detect this construct, which caused
hangs in some race scenarios).
r=darin
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@848 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
TBR
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@299 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I use a counter of MessageLoop::Quit() calls so that I can re-post "extra" calls when MessageLoop::Run() terminates. This assures that no quits are lost... but I'm not sure if some code abused the Quit() calls, and already posts many-too-many quits :-/. I want to see if the tree tests go red, and how the distributed reliability test responds.
The test should already pass the basic unit_test and base_unittest, but I'm not sure what the rest of the UI tests etc will do. If I'm lucky, they'll be "less" flakey. ...but they may just go red all over :-(
TBR
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@298 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=1282556
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@112 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
|
|
|
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@8 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
|
