From 650f17ba853c11607ba24cf4ba1caf41dfa65956 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "slightlyoff@chromium.org" Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:26:06 +0000 Subject: supress valgrind complaints about zlib conditional jump performance optimization. See: http://www.zlib.net/zlib_faq.html#faq36 BUG=None TBR=mbelshe TEST=None Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/503057 git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@34979 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98 --- tools/valgrind/memcheck/suppressions.txt | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/valgrind/memcheck/suppressions.txt') diff --git a/tools/valgrind/memcheck/suppressions.txt b/tools/valgrind/memcheck/suppressions.txt index 7c353d0..3992523 100644 --- a/tools/valgrind/memcheck/suppressions.txt +++ b/tools/valgrind/memcheck/suppressions.txt @@ -421,6 +421,15 @@ fun:_Znw* fun:_ZN13TCMallocGuardC1Ev } +{ + # zlib is smarter than we are: + # http://www.zlib.net/zlib_faq.html#faq36 + zlib_conditional_jump_performance + Memcheck:Value4 + fun:inflate_fast + fun:inflate + ... +} #----------------------------------------------------------------------- # 2. intentional unit test errors, or stuff that is somehow a false positive # in our own code, or stuff that is so trivial it's not worth fixing -- cgit v1.1