diff options
author | Alkis Evlogimenos <alkis@evlogimenos.com> | 2004-02-04 22:17:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alkis Evlogimenos <alkis@evlogimenos.com> | 2004-02-04 22:17:40 +0000 |
commit | 14be64018fb38d1fa535b9cd12d11371f4eba3b5 (patch) | |
tree | 2c3d0a9d629d6c3998e976920255848c298d4d42 /lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp | |
parent | a33ceaa2d46f6bf50c979e28581d9e4941b45d44 (diff) | |
download | external_llvm-14be64018fb38d1fa535b9cd12d11371f4eba3b5.zip external_llvm-14be64018fb38d1fa535b9cd12d11371f4eba3b5.tar.gz external_llvm-14be64018fb38d1fa535b9cd12d11371f4eba3b5.tar.bz2 |
Modify the two address instruction pass to remove the duplicate
operand of the instruction and thus simplify the register allocation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11124 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp | 124 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 57 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp index 991be42..dd94d40 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp @@ -16,11 +16,14 @@ // to: // // A = B -// A = A op C +// A op= C // -// Note that if a register allocator chooses to use this pass, that it has to -// be capable of handling the non-SSA nature of these rewritten virtual -// registers. +// Note that if a register allocator chooses to use this pass, that it +// has to be capable of handling the non-SSA nature of these rewritten +// virtual registers. +// +// It is also worth noting that the duplicate operand of the two +// address instruction is removed. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -98,63 +101,70 @@ bool TwoAddressInstructionPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { mi->getOperand(1).isUse() && "two address instruction invalid"); - // we have nothing to do if the two operands are the same + // if the two operands are the same we just remove the use + // and mark the def as def&use if (mi->getOperand(0).getAllocatedRegNum() == - mi->getOperand(1).getAllocatedRegNum()) - continue; - - MadeChange = true; - - // rewrite: - // a = b op c - // to: - // a = b - // a = a op c - unsigned regA = mi->getOperand(0).getAllocatedRegNum(); - unsigned regB = mi->getOperand(1).getAllocatedRegNum(); - - assert(MRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(regA) && - MRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(regB) && - "cannot update physical register live information"); - - // first make sure we do not have a use of a in the - // instruction (a = b + a for example) because our - // transformation will not work. This should never occur - // because we are in SSA form. - for (unsigned i = 1; i != mi->getNumOperands(); ++i) - assert(!mi->getOperand(i).isRegister() || - mi->getOperand(i).getAllocatedRegNum() != (int)regA); - - const TargetRegisterClass* rc =MF.getSSARegMap()->getRegClass(regA); - unsigned Added = MRI.copyRegToReg(*mbbi, mii, regA, regB, rc); - numInstrsAdded += Added; - - MachineInstr* prevMi = *(mii - 1); - DEBUG(std::cerr << "\t\tadded instruction: "; - prevMi->print(std::cerr, TM)); - - // update live variables for regA - assert(Added == 1 && "Cannot handle multi-instruction copies yet!"); - LiveVariables::VarInfo& varInfo = LV.getVarInfo(regA); - varInfo.DefInst = prevMi; - - // update live variables for regB - if (LV.removeVirtualRegisterKilled(regB, &*mbbi, mi)) - LV.addVirtualRegisterKilled(regB, &*mbbi, prevMi); - - if (LV.removeVirtualRegisterDead(regB, &*mbbi, mi)) - LV.addVirtualRegisterDead(regB, &*mbbi, prevMi); - - // replace all occurences of regB with regA - for (unsigned i = 1; i < mi->getNumOperands(); ++i) { - if (mi->getOperand(i).isRegister() && - mi->getOperand(i).getReg() == regB) - mi->SetMachineOperandReg(i, regA); + mi->getOperand(1).getAllocatedRegNum()) { } + else { + MadeChange = true; + + // rewrite: + // a = b op c + // to: + // a = b + // a = a op c + unsigned regA = mi->getOperand(0).getAllocatedRegNum(); + unsigned regB = mi->getOperand(1).getAllocatedRegNum(); + + assert(MRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(regA) && + MRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(regB) && + "cannot update physical register live information"); + + // first make sure we do not have a use of a in the + // instruction (a = b + a for example) because our + // transformation will not work. This should never occur + // because we are in SSA form. + for (unsigned i = 1; i != mi->getNumOperands(); ++i) + assert(!mi->getOperand(i).isRegister() || + mi->getOperand(i).getAllocatedRegNum() != (int)regA); + + const TargetRegisterClass* rc = + MF.getSSARegMap()->getRegClass(regA); + unsigned Added = MRI.copyRegToReg(*mbbi, mii, regA, regB, rc); + numInstrsAdded += Added; + + MachineInstr* prevMi = *(mii - 1); + DEBUG(std::cerr << "\t\tadded instruction: "; + prevMi->print(std::cerr, TM)); + + // update live variables for regA + assert(Added == 1 && + "Cannot handle multi-instruction copies yet!"); + LiveVariables::VarInfo& varInfo = LV.getVarInfo(regA); + varInfo.DefInst = prevMi; + + // update live variables for regB + if (LV.removeVirtualRegisterKilled(regB, &*mbbi, mi)) + LV.addVirtualRegisterKilled(regB, &*mbbi, prevMi); + + if (LV.removeVirtualRegisterDead(regB, &*mbbi, mi)) + LV.addVirtualRegisterDead(regB, &*mbbi, prevMi); + + // replace all occurences of regB with regA + for (unsigned i = 1, e = mi->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) { + if (mi->getOperand(i).isRegister() && + mi->getOperand(i).getReg() == regB) + mi->SetMachineOperandReg(i, regA); + } + } + + assert(mi->getOperand(0).isDef()); + mi->getOperand(0).setUse(); + mi->RemoveOperand(1); + DEBUG(std::cerr << "\t\tmodified original to: "; mi->print(std::cerr, TM)); - assert(mi->getOperand(0).getAllocatedRegNum() == - mi->getOperand(1).getAllocatedRegNum()); } } |