summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>2013-12-14 08:01:30 +0000
committerBill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>2013-12-14 08:01:30 +0000
commite09cd8d42b7621050d2dcdccc37ee341a1b553d5 (patch)
tree91ff1a2b9ae8c7cfeca98d07ec25f6795e40a840 /lib
parentda6317f81fea568240bd1d2760ee1cf02d341be8 (diff)
downloadexternal_llvm-e09cd8d42b7621050d2dcdccc37ee341a1b553d5.zip
external_llvm-e09cd8d42b7621050d2dcdccc37ee341a1b553d5.tar.gz
external_llvm-e09cd8d42b7621050d2dcdccc37ee341a1b553d5.tar.bz2
Merging r197228:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r197228 | d0k | 2013-12-13 05:40:24 -0800 (Fri, 13 Dec 2013) | 8 lines X86: When lowering shl_parts, don't emit shift amounts larger than the bit width. While it's safe for the X86-specific shift nodes, dag combining will kill generic nodes. Insert an AND to make it safe, isel will nuke it as x86's shift instructions have an implicit AND. Fixes PR16108, which contains a contraption to hit this case in between constant folders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_34@197321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp12
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 12d40c4..d0667ff 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -8424,6 +8424,11 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerShiftParts(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const{
SDValue ShOpLo = Op.getOperand(0);
SDValue ShOpHi = Op.getOperand(1);
SDValue ShAmt = Op.getOperand(2);
+ // X86ISD::SHLD and X86ISD::SHRD have defined overflow behavior but the
+ // generic ISD nodes haven't. Insert an AND to be safe, it's optimized away
+ // during isel.
+ SDValue SafeShAmt = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, dl, MVT::i8, ShAmt,
+ DAG.getConstant(VTBits - 1, MVT::i8));
SDValue Tmp1 = isSRA ? DAG.getNode(ISD::SRA, dl, VT, ShOpHi,
DAG.getConstant(VTBits - 1, MVT::i8))
: DAG.getConstant(0, VT);
@@ -8431,12 +8436,15 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerShiftParts(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const{
SDValue Tmp2, Tmp3;
if (Op.getOpcode() == ISD::SHL_PARTS) {
Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SHLD, dl, VT, ShOpHi, ShOpLo, ShAmt);
- Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, dl, VT, ShOpLo, ShAmt);
+ Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, dl, VT, ShOpLo, SafeShAmt);
} else {
Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SHRD, dl, VT, ShOpLo, ShOpHi, ShAmt);
- Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(isSRA ? ISD::SRA : ISD::SRL, dl, VT, ShOpHi, ShAmt);
+ Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(isSRA ? ISD::SRA : ISD::SRL, dl, VT, ShOpHi, SafeShAmt);
}
+ // If the shift amount is larger or equal than the width of a part we can't
+ // rely on the results of shld/shrd. Insert a test and select the appropriate
+ // values for large shift amounts.
SDValue AndNode = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, dl, MVT::i8, ShAmt,
DAG.getConstant(VTBits, MVT::i8));
SDValue Cond = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::CMP, dl, MVT::i32,