diff options
author | Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> | 2008-01-25 21:08:07 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-01-25 21:08:07 +0100 |
commit | f65eda4f789168ba5ff3fa75546c29efeed19f58 (patch) | |
tree | 235e6daad2bc37b22cc5b21907608c79f944f036 | |
parent | 4fd29176b7cd24909f8ceba2105cb3ae2857b90c (diff) | |
download | kernel_samsung_smdk4412-f65eda4f789168ba5ff3fa75546c29efeed19f58.zip kernel_samsung_smdk4412-f65eda4f789168ba5ff3fa75546c29efeed19f58.tar.gz kernel_samsung_smdk4412-f65eda4f789168ba5ff3fa75546c29efeed19f58.tar.bz2 |
sched: pull RT tasks from overloaded runqueues
This patch adds the algorithm to pull tasks from RT overloaded runqueues.
When a pull RT is initiated, all overloaded runqueues are examined for
a RT task that is higher in prio than the highest prio task queued on the
target runqueue. If another runqueue holds a RT task that is of higher
prio than the highest prio task on the target runqueue is found it is pulled
to the target runqueue.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched_rt.c | 187 |
2 files changed, 178 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 97cab60..c917971 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -3721,6 +3721,8 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible: switch_count = &prev->nvcsw; } + schedule_balance_rt(rq, prev); + if (unlikely(!rq->nr_running)) idle_balance(cpu, rq); diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c index 547f858..bacb320 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c @@ -179,8 +179,17 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest); static void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep); +static int pick_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu) +{ + if (!task_running(rq, p) && + (cpu < 0 || cpu_isset(cpu, p->cpus_allowed))) + return 1; + return 0; +} + /* Return the second highest RT task, NULL otherwise */ -static struct task_struct *pick_next_highest_task_rt(struct rq *rq) +static struct task_struct *pick_next_highest_task_rt(struct rq *rq, + int cpu) { struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active; struct task_struct *next; @@ -199,26 +208,36 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_highest_task_rt(struct rq *rq) } queue = array->queue + idx; + BUG_ON(list_empty(queue)); + next = list_entry(queue->next, struct task_struct, run_list); - if (unlikely(next != rq->curr)) - return next; + if (unlikely(pick_rt_task(rq, next, cpu))) + goto out; if (queue->next->next != queue) { /* same prio task */ next = list_entry(queue->next->next, struct task_struct, run_list); - return next; + if (pick_rt_task(rq, next, cpu)) + goto out; } + retry: /* slower, but more flexible */ idx = find_next_bit(array->bitmap, MAX_RT_PRIO, idx+1); - if (unlikely(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)) { - WARN_ON(1); /* rt_nr_running was 2 and above! */ + if (unlikely(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)) return NULL; - } queue = array->queue + idx; - next = list_entry(queue->next, struct task_struct, run_list); + BUG_ON(list_empty(queue)); + + list_for_each_entry(next, queue, run_list) { + if (pick_rt_task(rq, next, cpu)) + goto out; + } + + goto retry; + out: return next; } @@ -305,13 +324,15 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) assert_spin_locked(&this_rq->lock); - next_task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(this_rq); + next_task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(this_rq, -1); if (!next_task) return 0; retry: - if (unlikely(next_task == this_rq->curr)) + if (unlikely(next_task == this_rq->curr)) { + WARN_ON(1); return 0; + } /* * It's possible that the next_task slipped in of @@ -335,7 +356,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) * so it is possible that next_task has changed. * If it has, then try again. */ - task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(this_rq); + task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(this_rq, -1); if (unlikely(task != next_task) && task && paranoid--) { put_task_struct(next_task); next_task = task; @@ -378,6 +399,149 @@ static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq) ; } +static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) +{ + struct task_struct *next; + struct task_struct *p; + struct rq *src_rq; + cpumask_t *rto_cpumask; + int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu; + int cpu; + int ret = 0; + + assert_spin_locked(&this_rq->lock); + + /* + * If cpusets are used, and we have overlapping + * run queue cpusets, then this algorithm may not catch all. + * This is just the price you pay on trying to keep + * dirtying caches down on large SMP machines. + */ + if (likely(!rt_overloaded())) + return 0; + + next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq); + + rto_cpumask = rt_overload(); + + for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *rto_cpumask) { + if (this_cpu == cpu) + continue; + + src_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); + if (unlikely(src_rq->rt.rt_nr_running <= 1)) { + /* + * It is possible that overlapping cpusets + * will miss clearing a non overloaded runqueue. + * Clear it now. + */ + if (double_lock_balance(this_rq, src_rq)) { + /* unlocked our runqueue lock */ + struct task_struct *old_next = next; + next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq); + if (next != old_next) + ret = 1; + } + if (likely(src_rq->rt.rt_nr_running <= 1)) + /* + * Small chance that this_rq->curr changed + * but it's really harmless here. + */ + rt_clear_overload(this_rq); + else + /* + * Heh, the src_rq is now overloaded, since + * we already have the src_rq lock, go straight + * to pulling tasks from it. + */ + goto try_pulling; + spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock); + continue; + } + + /* + * We can potentially drop this_rq's lock in + * double_lock_balance, and another CPU could + * steal our next task - hence we must cause + * the caller to recalculate the next task + * in that case: + */ + if (double_lock_balance(this_rq, src_rq)) { + struct task_struct *old_next = next; + next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq); + if (next != old_next) + ret = 1; + } + + /* + * Are there still pullable RT tasks? + */ + if (src_rq->rt.rt_nr_running <= 1) { + spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock); + continue; + } + + try_pulling: + p = pick_next_highest_task_rt(src_rq, this_cpu); + + /* + * Do we have an RT task that preempts + * the to-be-scheduled task? + */ + if (p && (!next || (p->prio < next->prio))) { + WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr); + WARN_ON(!p->se.on_rq); + + /* + * There's a chance that p is higher in priority + * than what's currently running on its cpu. + * This is just that p is wakeing up and hasn't + * had a chance to schedule. We only pull + * p if it is lower in priority than the + * current task on the run queue or + * this_rq next task is lower in prio than + * the current task on that rq. + */ + if (p->prio < src_rq->curr->prio || + (next && next->prio < src_rq->curr->prio)) + goto bail; + + ret = 1; + + deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0); + set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu); + activate_task(this_rq, p, 0); + /* + * We continue with the search, just in + * case there's an even higher prio task + * in another runqueue. (low likelyhood + * but possible) + */ + + /* + * Update next so that we won't pick a task + * on another cpu with a priority lower (or equal) + * than the one we just picked. + */ + next = p; + + } + bail: + spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock); + } + + return ret; +} + +static void schedule_balance_rt(struct rq *rq, + struct task_struct *prev) +{ + /* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */ + if (unlikely(rt_task(prev)) && + rq->rt.highest_prio > prev->prio) + pull_rt_task(rq); +} + static void schedule_tail_balance_rt(struct rq *rq) { /* @@ -500,6 +664,7 @@ move_one_task_rt(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest, } #else /* CONFIG_SMP */ # define schedule_tail_balance_rt(rq) do { } while (0) +# define schedule_balance_rt(rq, prev) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) |