aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>2009-08-12 00:50:09 -0700
committerDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>2009-08-12 01:09:50 -0700
commit25a70e38cd57952b09a013bf070e03705ee4f2ff (patch)
treec82d3c61ccd60b022dd9df7ded927f4591a85f9e /drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
parent09113aea553cfaf074fd669cd0465daac4cea6e8 (diff)
downloadkernel_samsung_smdk4412-25a70e38cd57952b09a013bf070e03705ee4f2ff.zip
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-25a70e38cd57952b09a013bf070e03705ee4f2ff.tar.gz
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-25a70e38cd57952b09a013bf070e03705ee4f2ff.tar.bz2
Input: eeti_ts - allow active high irq lines
This adds a struct eeti_ts_platform_data which currently holds only one value to specify the interrupt polarity. The driver has a fallback if no platform data is passed in via the i2c_board_info, so no regression is caused. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c22
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
index 3ab9222..9029bd3 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/i2c.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/input/eeti_ts.h>
static int flip_x;
module_param(flip_x, bool, 0644);
@@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ struct eeti_ts_priv {
struct input_dev *input;
struct work_struct work;
struct mutex mutex;
- int irq;
+ int irq, irq_active_high;
};
#define EETI_TS_BITDEPTH (11)
@@ -58,6 +59,11 @@ struct eeti_ts_priv {
#define REPORT_BIT_HAS_PRESSURE (1 << 6)
#define REPORT_RES_BITS(v) (((v) >> 1) + EETI_TS_BITDEPTH)
+static inline int eeti_ts_irq_active(struct eeti_ts_priv *priv)
+{
+ return gpio_get_value(irq_to_gpio(priv->irq)) == priv->irq_active_high;
+}
+
static void eeti_ts_read(struct work_struct *work)
{
char buf[6];
@@ -67,7 +73,7 @@ static void eeti_ts_read(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
- while (!gpio_get_value(irq_to_gpio(priv->irq)) && --to)
+ while (eeti_ts_irq_active(priv) && --to)
i2c_master_recv(priv->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
if (!to) {
@@ -140,8 +146,10 @@ static void eeti_ts_close(struct input_dev *dev)
static int __devinit eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
const struct i2c_device_id *idp)
{
+ struct eeti_ts_platform_data *pdata;
struct eeti_ts_priv *priv;
struct input_dev *input;
+ unsigned int irq_flags;
int err = -ENOMEM;
/* In contrast to what's described in the datasheet, there seems
@@ -180,6 +188,14 @@ static int __devinit eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
priv->input = input;
priv->irq = client->irq;
+ pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
+
+ if (pdata)
+ priv->irq_active_high = pdata->irq_active_high;
+
+ irq_flags = priv->irq_active_high ?
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
+
INIT_WORK(&priv->work, eeti_ts_read);
i2c_set_clientdata(client, priv);
input_set_drvdata(input, priv);
@@ -188,7 +204,7 @@ static int __devinit eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (err)
goto err1;
- err = request_irq(priv->irq, eeti_ts_isr, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
+ err = request_irq(priv->irq, eeti_ts_isr, irq_flags,
client->name, priv);
if (err) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to request touchscreen IRQ.\n");