wimax/i2400m: fix deadlock: don't do BUS reset under i2400m->init_mutex

Since the addition of the pre/post reset handlers, it became clear
that we cannot do a I2400M-RT-BUS type reset while holding the
init_mutex, as in the case of USB, it will deadlock when trying to
call i2400m_pre_reset().

Thus, the following changes:

 - clarify the fact that calling bus_reset() w/ I2400M_RT_BUS while
   holding init_mutex is a no-no.

 - i2400m_dev_reset_handle() will do a BUS reset to recover a gone
   device after unlocking init_mutex.

 - in the USB reset implementation, when cold and warm reset fails,
   fallback to QUEUING a usb reset, not executing a USB reset, so it
   happens from another context and does not deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m.h b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m.h
index 8fc8a0c..f5ed7d5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m.h
@@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ struct i2400m_barker_db;
  *     process, so it cannot rely on common infrastructure being laid
  *     out.
  *
+ *     IMPORTANT: don't call reset on RT_BUS with i2400m->init_mutex
+ *     held, as the .pre/.post reset handlers will deadlock.
+ *
  * @bus_bm_retries: [fill] How many times shall a firmware upload /
  *     device initialization be retried? Different models of the same
  *     device might need different values, hence it is set by the