isci: merge smp request substates into primary state machine

Remove usage of the request substate machine for smp requests identified by:
	task->task_proto == SAS_PROTOCOL_SMP

While merging over the smp_request infrastructure noticed that all the
assign buffer implementations are now equal, so moved it to
scic_sds_general_request_construct.

Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

1 files changed, 422 insertions, 40 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
index 5f51681..5201dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
@@ -158,12 +158,6 @@ void scic_sds_request_build_sgl(struct scic_sds_request *sds_request)
 	}
 }
 
-static void scic_sds_ssp_io_request_assign_buffers(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
-{
-	if (sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user == false)
-		sci_req->task_context_buffer = &sci_req->tc;
-}
-
 static void scic_sds_io_request_build_ssp_command_iu(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
 {
 	struct ssp_cmd_iu *cmd_iu;
@@ -341,12 +335,6 @@ static void scu_ssp_io_request_construct_task_context(
 		scic_sds_request_build_sgl(sci_req);
 }
 
-static void scic_sds_ssp_task_request_assign_buffers(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
-{
-	if (sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user == false)
-		sci_req->task_context_buffer = &sci_req->tc;
-}
-
 /**
  * This method will fill in the SCU Task Context for a SSP Task request.  The
  *    following important settings are utilized: -# priority ==
@@ -1261,6 +1249,196 @@ static enum sci_status scic_sds_ssp_task_request_await_tc_response_frame_handler
 	return SCI_SUCCESS;
 }
 
+/**
+ * This method processes an abnormal TC completion while the SMP request is
+ *    waiting for a response frame.  It decides what happened to the IO based
+ *    on TC completion status.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the request for which the TC
+ *    completion was received.
+ * @completion_code: This parameter indicates the completion status information
+ *    for the TC.
+ *
+ * Indicate if the tc completion handler was successful. SCI_SUCCESS currently
+ * this method always returns success.
+ */
+static enum sci_status scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_tc_completion_handler(
+	struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+	u32 completion_code)
+{
+	switch (SCU_GET_COMPLETION_TL_STATUS(completion_code)) {
+	case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD):
+		/*
+		 * In the AWAIT RESPONSE state, any TC completion is unexpected.
+		 * but if the TC has success status, we complete the IO anyway. */
+		scic_sds_request_set_status(
+			sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD, SCI_SUCCESS
+			);
+
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+			&sci_req->state_machine,
+			SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+		break;
+
+	case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_RESP_TO_ERR):
+	case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_UFI_ERR):
+	case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_FRM_TYPE_ERR):
+	case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_LL_RX_ERR):
+		/*
+		 * These status has been seen in a specific LSI expander, which sometimes
+		 * is not able to send smp response within 2 ms. This causes our hardware
+		 * break the connection and set TC completion with one of these SMP_XXX_XX_ERR
+		 * status. For these type of error, we ask scic user to retry the request. */
+		scic_sds_request_set_status(
+			sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_RESP_TO_ERR, SCI_FAILURE_RETRY_REQUIRED
+			);
+
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+			&sci_req->state_machine,
+			SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		/*
+		 * All other completion status cause the IO to be complete.  If a NAK
+		 * was received, then it is up to the user to retry the request. */
+		scic_sds_request_set_status(
+			sci_req,
+			SCU_NORMALIZE_COMPLETION_STATUS(completion_code),
+			SCI_FAILURE_CONTROLLER_SPECIFIC_IO_ERR
+			);
+
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+			&sci_req->state_machine,
+			SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function processes an unsolicited frame while the SMP request is waiting
+ *    for a response frame.  It will copy the response data, release the
+ *    unsolicited frame, and transition the request to the
+ *    SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED state.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the request for which the
+ *    unsolicited frame was received.
+ * @frame_index: This parameter indicates the unsolicited frame index that
+ *    should contain the response.
+ *
+ * This function returns an indication of whether the response frame was handled
+ * successfully or not. SCI_SUCCESS Currently this value is always returned and
+ * indicates successful processing of the TC response.
+ */
+static enum sci_status
+scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_frame_handler(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+						  u32 frame_index)
+{
+	enum sci_status status;
+	void *frame_header;
+	struct smp_resp *rsp_hdr = &sci_req->smp.rsp;
+	ssize_t word_cnt = SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ / sizeof(u32);
+
+	status = scic_sds_unsolicited_frame_control_get_header(
+		&(scic_sds_request_get_controller(sci_req)->uf_control),
+		frame_index,
+		&frame_header);
+
+	/* byte swap the header. */
+	sci_swab32_cpy(rsp_hdr, frame_header, word_cnt);
+
+	if (rsp_hdr->frame_type == SMP_RESPONSE) {
+		void *smp_resp;
+
+		status = scic_sds_unsolicited_frame_control_get_buffer(
+			&(scic_sds_request_get_controller(sci_req)->uf_control),
+			frame_index,
+			&smp_resp);
+
+		word_cnt = (sizeof(struct smp_req) - SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ) /
+			sizeof(u32);
+
+		sci_swab32_cpy(((u8 *) rsp_hdr) + SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ,
+			       smp_resp, word_cnt);
+
+		scic_sds_request_set_status(
+			sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD, SCI_SUCCESS);
+
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(&sci_req->state_machine,
+			SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION);
+	} else {
+		/* This was not a response frame why did it get forwarded? */
+		dev_err(scic_to_dev(sci_req->owning_controller),
+			"%s: SCIC SMP Request 0x%p received unexpected frame "
+			"%d type 0x%02x\n",
+			__func__,
+			sci_req,
+			frame_index,
+			rsp_hdr->frame_type);
+
+		scic_sds_request_set_status(
+			sci_req,
+			SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_FRM_TYPE_ERR,
+			SCI_FAILURE_CONTROLLER_SPECIFIC_IO_ERR);
+
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+			&sci_req->state_machine,
+			SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+	}
+
+	scic_sds_controller_release_frame(sci_req->owning_controller,
+					  frame_index);
+
+	return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/**
+ * This method processes the completions transport layer (TL) status to
+ *    determine if the SMP request was sent successfully. If the SMP request
+ *    was sent successfully, then the state for the SMP request transits to
+ *    waiting for a response frame.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the request for which the TC
+ *    completion was received.
+ * @completion_code: This parameter indicates the completion status information
+ *    for the TC.
+ *
+ * Indicate if the tc completion handler was successful. SCI_SUCCESS currently
+ * this method always returns success.
+ */
+static enum sci_status scic_sds_smp_request_await_tc_completion_tc_completion_handler(
+	struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+	u32 completion_code)
+{
+	switch (SCU_GET_COMPLETION_TL_STATUS(completion_code)) {
+	case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD):
+		scic_sds_request_set_status(
+			sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD, SCI_SUCCESS
+			);
+
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+			&sci_req->state_machine,
+			SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		/*
+		 * All other completion status cause the IO to be complete.  If a NAK
+		 * was received, then it is up to the user to retry the request. */
+		scic_sds_request_set_status(
+			sci_req,
+			SCU_NORMALIZE_COMPLETION_STATUS(completion_code),
+			SCI_FAILURE_CONTROLLER_SPECIFIC_IO_ERR
+			);
+
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+			&sci_req->state_machine,
+			SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
 static const struct scic_sds_io_request_state_handler scic_sds_request_state_handler_table[] = {
 	[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_INITIAL] = { },
 	[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_CONSTRUCTED] = {
@@ -1280,6 +1458,15 @@ static const struct scic_sds_io_request_state_handler scic_sds_request_state_han
 		.abort_handler		= scic_sds_ssp_task_request_await_tc_response_abort_handler,
 		.frame_handler		= scic_sds_ssp_task_request_await_tc_response_frame_handler,
 	},
+	[SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE] = {
+		.abort_handler		= scic_sds_request_started_state_abort_handler,
+		.tc_completion_handler	= scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_tc_completion_handler,
+		.frame_handler		= scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_frame_handler,
+	},
+	[SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION] = {
+		.abort_handler		= scic_sds_request_started_state_abort_handler,
+		.tc_completion_handler	=  scic_sds_smp_request_await_tc_completion_tc_completion_handler,
+	},
 	[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED] = {
 		.complete_handler	= scic_sds_request_completed_state_complete_handler,
 	},
@@ -2038,6 +2225,12 @@ static void scic_sds_request_started_state_enter(void *object)
 	struct sci_base_state_machine *sm = &sci_req->state_machine;
 	struct isci_request *ireq = sci_req_to_ireq(sci_req);
 	struct domain_device *dev = sci_dev_to_domain(sci_req->target_device);
+	struct sas_task *task;
+
+	/* XXX as hch said always creating an internal sas_task for tmf
+	 * requests would simplify the driver
+	 */
+	task = ireq->ttype == io_task ? isci_request_access_task(ireq) : NULL;
 
 	SET_STATE_HANDLER(
 		sci_req,
@@ -2045,15 +2238,19 @@ static void scic_sds_request_started_state_enter(void *object)
 		SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_STARTED
 		);
 
-	if (ireq->ttype == tmf_task && dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV)
-		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(sm,
-			SCIC_SDS_IO_REQUEST_STARTED_TASK_MGMT_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION);
-
 	/* Most of the request state machines have a started substate machine so
 	 * start its execution on the entry to the started state.
 	 */
 	if (sci_req->has_started_substate_machine == true)
 		sci_base_state_machine_start(&sci_req->started_substate_machine);
+
+	if (!task && dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV) {
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(sm,
+			SCIC_SDS_IO_REQUEST_STARTED_TASK_MGMT_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION);
+	} else if (task && task->task_proto == SAS_PROTOCOL_SMP) {
+		sci_base_state_machine_change_state(sm,
+			SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE);
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2173,6 +2370,28 @@ static void scic_sds_io_request_started_task_mgmt_await_task_response_substate_e
 		);
 }
 
+static void scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_response_substate_enter(void *object)
+{
+	struct scic_sds_request *sci_req = object;
+
+	SET_STATE_HANDLER(
+		sci_req,
+		scic_sds_request_state_handler_table,
+		SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE
+		);
+}
+
+static void scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_tc_completion_substate_enter(void *object)
+{
+	struct scic_sds_request *sci_req = object;
+
+	SET_STATE_HANDLER(
+		sci_req,
+		scic_sds_request_state_handler_table,
+		SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION
+		);
+}
+
 static const struct sci_base_state scic_sds_request_state_table[] = {
 	[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_INITIAL] = {
 		.enter_state = scic_sds_request_initial_state_enter,
@@ -2190,6 +2409,12 @@ static const struct sci_base_state scic_sds_request_state_table[] = {
 	[SCIC_SDS_IO_REQUEST_STARTED_TASK_MGMT_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_RESPONSE] = {
 		.enter_state = scic_sds_io_request_started_task_mgmt_await_task_response_substate_enter,
 	},
+	[SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE] = {
+		.enter_state = scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_response_substate_enter,
+	},
+	[SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION] = {
+		.enter_state = scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_tc_completion_substate_enter,
+	},
 	[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED] = {
 		.enter_state = scic_sds_request_completed_state_enter,
 	},
@@ -2225,7 +2450,7 @@ static void scic_sds_general_request_construct(struct scic_sds_controller *scic,
 
 	if (io_tag == SCI_CONTROLLER_INVALID_IO_TAG) {
 		sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user = false;
-		sci_req->task_context_buffer = NULL;
+		sci_req->task_context_buffer = &sci_req->tc;
 	} else {
 		sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user = true;
 
@@ -2245,26 +2470,20 @@ scic_io_request_construct(struct scic_sds_controller *scic,
 	/* Build the common part of the request */
 	scic_sds_general_request_construct(scic, sci_dev, io_tag, sci_req);
 
-	if (sci_dev->rnc.remote_node_index ==
-			SCIC_SDS_REMOTE_NODE_CONTEXT_INVALID_INDEX)
+	if (sci_dev->rnc.remote_node_index == SCIC_SDS_REMOTE_NODE_CONTEXT_INVALID_INDEX)
 		return SCI_FAILURE_INVALID_REMOTE_DEVICE;
 
 	if (dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV)
-		scic_sds_ssp_io_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
-	else if ((dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV) ||
-		 (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP)) {
-		scic_sds_stp_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
+		/* pass */;
+	else if (dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV || (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP))
 		memset(&sci_req->stp.cmd, 0, sizeof(sci_req->stp.cmd));
-	} else if (dev_is_expander(dev)) {
-		scic_sds_smp_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
+	else if (dev_is_expander(dev))
 		memset(&sci_req->smp.cmd, 0, sizeof(sci_req->smp.cmd));
-	} else
-		status = SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
+	else
+		return SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
 
-	if (status == SCI_SUCCESS) {
-		memset(sci_req->task_context_buffer, 0,
-		       offsetof(struct scu_task_context, sgl_pair_ab));
-	}
+	memset(sci_req->task_context_buffer, 0,
+	       offsetof(struct scu_task_context, sgl_pair_ab));
 
 	return status;
 }
@@ -2279,17 +2498,12 @@ enum sci_status scic_task_request_construct(struct scic_sds_controller *scic,
 	/* Build the common part of the request */
 	scic_sds_general_request_construct(scic, sci_dev, io_tag, sci_req);
 
-	if (dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV)
-		scic_sds_ssp_task_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
-	else if (dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV || (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP))
-		scic_sds_stp_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
-	else
-		status = SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
-
-	if (status == SCI_SUCCESS) {
+	if (dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV ||
+	    dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV || (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP)) {
 		sci_req->is_task_management_request = true;
 		memset(sci_req->task_context_buffer, 0, sizeof(struct scu_task_context));
-	}
+	} else
+		status = SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
 
 	return status;
 }
@@ -2341,6 +2555,174 @@ static enum sci_status isci_request_stp_request_construct(
 }
 
 /*
+ * This function will fill in the SCU Task Context for a SMP request. The
+ *    following important settings are utilized: -# task_type ==
+ *    SCU_TASK_TYPE_SMP.  This simply indicates that a normal request type
+ *    (i.e. non-raw frame) is being utilized to perform task management. -#
+ *    control_frame == 1.  This ensures that the proper endianess is set so
+ *    that the bytes are transmitted in the right order for a smp request frame.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the smp request object being
+ *    constructed.
+ *
+ */
+static void
+scu_smp_request_construct_task_context(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+				       struct smp_req *smp_req)
+{
+	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+	struct scic_sds_controller *scic;
+	struct scic_sds_remote_device *sci_dev;
+	struct scic_sds_port *sci_port;
+	struct scu_task_context *task_context;
+	ssize_t word_cnt = sizeof(struct smp_req) / sizeof(u32);
+
+	/* byte swap the smp request. */
+	sci_swab32_cpy(&sci_req->smp.cmd, smp_req,
+		       word_cnt);
+
+	task_context = scic_sds_request_get_task_context(sci_req);
+
+	scic = scic_sds_request_get_controller(sci_req);
+	sci_dev = scic_sds_request_get_device(sci_req);
+	sci_port = scic_sds_request_get_port(sci_req);
+
+	/*
+	 * Fill in the TC with the its required data
+	 * 00h
+	 */
+	task_context->priority = 0;
+	task_context->initiator_request = 1;
+	task_context->connection_rate = sci_dev->connection_rate;
+	task_context->protocol_engine_index =
+		scic_sds_controller_get_protocol_engine_group(scic);
+	task_context->logical_port_index = scic_sds_port_get_index(sci_port);
+	task_context->protocol_type = SCU_TASK_CONTEXT_PROTOCOL_SMP;
+	task_context->abort = 0;
+	task_context->valid = SCU_TASK_CONTEXT_VALID;
+	task_context->context_type = SCU_TASK_CONTEXT_TYPE;
+
+	/* 04h */
+	task_context->remote_node_index = sci_dev->rnc.remote_node_index;
+	task_context->command_code = 0;
+	task_context->task_type = SCU_TASK_TYPE_SMP_REQUEST;
+
+	/* 08h */
+	task_context->link_layer_control = 0;
+	task_context->do_not_dma_ssp_good_response = 1;
+	task_context->strict_ordering = 0;
+	task_context->control_frame = 1;
+	task_context->timeout_enable = 0;
+	task_context->block_guard_enable = 0;
+
+	/* 0ch */
+	task_context->address_modifier = 0;
+
+	/* 10h */
+	task_context->ssp_command_iu_length = smp_req->req_len;
+
+	/* 14h */
+	task_context->transfer_length_bytes = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * 18h ~ 30h, protocol specific
+	 * since commandIU has been build by framework at this point, we just
+	 * copy the frist DWord from command IU to this location. */
+	memcpy(&task_context->type.smp, &sci_req->smp.cmd, sizeof(u32));
+
+	/*
+	 * 40h
+	 * "For SMP you could program it to zero. We would prefer that way
+	 * so that done code will be consistent." - Venki
+	 */
+	task_context->task_phase = 0;
+
+	if (sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user) {
+		/*
+		 * Build the task context now since we have already read
+		 * the data
+		 */
+		sci_req->post_context =
+			(SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_REQUEST_TYPE_POST_TC |
+			 (scic_sds_controller_get_protocol_engine_group(scic) <<
+			  SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_PROTOCOL_ENGINE_GROUP_SHIFT) |
+			 (scic_sds_port_get_index(sci_port) <<
+			  SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_LOGICAL_PORT_SHIFT) |
+			 scic_sds_io_tag_get_index(sci_req->io_tag));
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * Build the task context now since we have already read
+		 * the data.
+		 * I/O tag index is not assigned because we have to wait
+		 * until we get a TCi.
+		 */
+		sci_req->post_context =
+			(SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_REQUEST_TYPE_POST_TC |
+			 (scic_sds_controller_get_protocol_engine_group(scic) <<
+			  SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_PROTOCOL_ENGINE_GROUP_SHIFT) |
+			 (scic_sds_port_get_index(sci_port) <<
+			  SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_LOGICAL_PORT_SHIFT));
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Copy the physical address for the command buffer to the SCU Task
+	 * Context command buffer should not contain command header.
+	 */
+	dma_addr = scic_io_request_get_dma_addr(sci_req,
+						((char *) &sci_req->smp.cmd) +
+						sizeof(u32));
+
+	task_context->command_iu_upper = upper_32_bits(dma_addr);
+	task_context->command_iu_lower = lower_32_bits(dma_addr);
+
+	/* SMP response comes as UF, so no need to set response IU address. */
+	task_context->response_iu_upper = 0;
+	task_context->response_iu_lower = 0;
+}
+
+static enum sci_status scic_io_request_construct_smp(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
+{
+	struct smp_req *smp_req = kmalloc(sizeof(*smp_req), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (!smp_req)
+		return SCI_FAILURE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES;
+
+	sci_req->protocol = SCIC_SMP_PROTOCOL;
+
+	/* Construct the SMP SCU Task Context */
+	memcpy(smp_req, &sci_req->smp.cmd, sizeof(*smp_req));
+
+	/*
+	 * Look at the SMP requests' header fields; for certain SAS 1.x SMP
+	 * functions under SAS 2.0, a zero request length really indicates
+	 * a non-zero default length. */
+	if (smp_req->req_len == 0) {
+		switch (smp_req->func) {
+		case SMP_DISCOVER:
+		case SMP_REPORT_PHY_ERR_LOG:
+		case SMP_REPORT_PHY_SATA:
+		case SMP_REPORT_ROUTE_INFO:
+			smp_req->req_len = 2;
+			break;
+		case SMP_CONF_ROUTE_INFO:
+		case SMP_PHY_CONTROL:
+		case SMP_PHY_TEST_FUNCTION:
+			smp_req->req_len = 9;
+			break;
+			/* Default - zero is a valid default for 2.0. */
+		}
+	}
+
+	scu_smp_request_construct_task_context(sci_req, smp_req);
+
+	sci_base_state_machine_change_state(&sci_req->state_machine,
+		SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_CONSTRUCTED);
+
+	kfree(smp_req);
+
+	return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
  * isci_smp_request_build() - This function builds the smp request.
  * @ireq: This parameter points to the isci_request allocated in the
  *    request construct function.