aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/mempolicy.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>2006-09-25 23:31:19 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2006-09-26 08:48:47 -0700
commit19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5 (patch)
tree8d0aaa216bd32bd64e3a9652fd34d40bdb9d1075 /mm/mempolicy.c
parent2f6726e54a9410e2e4cee864947c05e954051916 (diff)
downloadkernel_samsung_smdk4412-19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5.zip
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5.tar.gz
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5.tar.bz2
[PATCH] linearly index zone->node_zonelists[]
I wonder why we need this bitmask indexing into zone->node_zonelists[]? We always start with the highest zone and then include all lower zones if we build zonelists. Are there really cases where we need allocation from ZONE_DMA or ZONE_HIGHMEM but not ZONE_NORMAL? It seems that the current implementation of highest_zone() makes that already impossible. If we go linear on the index then gfp_zone() == highest_zone() and a lot of definitions fall by the wayside. We can now revert back to the use of gfp_zone() in mempolicy.c ;-) Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mempolicy.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/mempolicy.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 7da4142..c3429a7 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static struct zonelist *zonelist_policy(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
case MPOL_BIND:
/* Lower zones don't get a policy applied */
/* Careful: current->mems_allowed might have moved */
- if (highest_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone)
+ if (gfp_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone)
if (cpuset_zonelist_valid_mems_allowed(policy->v.zonelist))
return policy->v.zonelist;
/*FALL THROUGH*/