diff options
author | Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> | 2008-10-18 20:26:39 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2008-10-20 08:50:26 -0700 |
commit | 894bc310419ac95f4fa4142dc364401a7e607f65 (patch) | |
tree | 15d56a7333b41620016b845d2323dd06e822b621 /mm/vmscan.c | |
parent | 8a7a8544a4f6554ec2d8048ac9f9672f442db5a2 (diff) | |
download | kernel_samsung_smdk4412-894bc310419ac95f4fa4142dc364401a7e607f65.zip kernel_samsung_smdk4412-894bc310419ac95f4fa4142dc364401a7e607f65.tar.gz kernel_samsung_smdk4412-894bc310419ac95f4fa4142dc364401a7e607f65.tar.bz2 |
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 149 |
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index a8347b6..154b9b6 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -470,6 +470,79 @@ int remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page) return 0; } +/** + * putback_lru_page - put previously isolated page onto appropriate LRU list + * @page: page to be put back to appropriate lru list + * + * Add previously isolated @page to appropriate LRU list. + * Page may still be unevictable for other reasons. + * + * lru_lock must not be held, interrupts must be enabled. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU +void putback_lru_page(struct page *page) +{ + int lru; + int active = !!TestClearPageActive(page); + + VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page)); + +redo: + ClearPageUnevictable(page); + + if (page_evictable(page, NULL)) { + /* + * For evictable pages, we can use the cache. + * In event of a race, worst case is we end up with an + * unevictable page on [in]active list. + * We know how to handle that. + */ + lru = active + page_is_file_cache(page); + lru_cache_add_lru(page, lru); + } else { + /* + * Put unevictable pages directly on zone's unevictable + * list. + */ + lru = LRU_UNEVICTABLE; + add_page_to_unevictable_list(page); + } + mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); + + /* + * page's status can change while we move it among lru. If an evictable + * page is on unevictable list, it never be freed. To avoid that, + * check after we added it to the list, again. + */ + if (lru == LRU_UNEVICTABLE && page_evictable(page, NULL)) { + if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) { + put_page(page); + goto redo; + } + /* This means someone else dropped this page from LRU + * So, it will be freed or putback to LRU again. There is + * nothing to do here. + */ + } + + put_page(page); /* drop ref from isolate */ +} + +#else /* CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU */ + +void putback_lru_page(struct page *page) +{ + int lru; + VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page)); + + lru = !!TestClearPageActive(page) + page_is_file_cache(page); + lru_cache_add_lru(page, lru); + mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); + put_page(page); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU */ + + /* * shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages */ @@ -503,6 +576,12 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, sc->nr_scanned++; + if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page, NULL))) { + unlock_page(page); + putback_lru_page(page); + continue; + } + if (!sc->may_swap && page_mapped(page)) goto keep_locked; @@ -602,7 +681,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, * possible for a page to have PageDirty set, but it is actually * clean (all its buffers are clean). This happens if the * buffers were written out directly, with submit_bh(). ext3 - * will do this, as well as the blockdev mapping. + * will do this, as well as the blockdev mapping. * try_to_release_page() will discover that cleanness and will * drop the buffers and mark the page clean - it can be freed. * @@ -650,6 +729,7 @@ activate_locked: /* Not a candidate for swapping, so reclaim swap space. */ if (PageSwapCache(page) && vm_swap_full()) remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(page); + VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page)); SetPageActive(page); pgactivate++; keep_locked: @@ -699,6 +779,14 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file) if (mode != ISOLATE_BOTH && (!page_is_file_cache(page) != !file)) return ret; + /* + * When this function is being called for lumpy reclaim, we + * initially look into all LRU pages, active, inactive and + * unevictable; only give shrink_page_list evictable pages. + */ + if (PageUnevictable(page)) + return ret; + ret = -EBUSY; if (likely(get_page_unless_zero(page))) { /* @@ -810,7 +898,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan, /* else it is being freed elsewhere */ list_move(&cursor_page->lru, src); default: - break; + break; /* ! on LRU or wrong list */ } } } @@ -870,8 +958,9 @@ static unsigned long clear_active_flags(struct list_head *page_list, * Returns -EBUSY if the page was not on an LRU list. * * The returned page will have PageLRU() cleared. If it was found on - * the active list, it will have PageActive set. That flag may need - * to be cleared by the caller before letting the page go. + * the active list, it will have PageActive set. If it was found on + * the unevictable list, it will have the PageUnevictable bit set. That flag + * may need to be cleared by the caller before letting the page go. * * The vmstat statistic corresponding to the list on which the page was * found will be decremented. @@ -892,11 +981,10 @@ int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page) spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); if (PageLRU(page) && get_page_unless_zero(page)) { - int lru = LRU_BASE; + int lru = page_lru(page); ret = 0; ClearPageLRU(page); - lru += page_is_file_cache(page) + !!PageActive(page); del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, lru); } spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); @@ -1008,11 +1096,20 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan, * Put back any unfreeable pages. */ while (!list_empty(&page_list)) { + int lru; page = lru_to_page(&page_list); VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page)); - SetPageLRU(page); list_del(&page->lru); - add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, page_lru(page)); + if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page, NULL))) { + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); + putback_lru_page(page); + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); + continue; + } + SetPageLRU(page); + lru = page_lru(page); + add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru); + mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); if (PageActive(page) && scan_global_lru(sc)) { int file = !!page_is_file_cache(page); zone->recent_rotated[file]++; @@ -1107,6 +1204,11 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone, page = lru_to_page(&l_hold); list_del(&page->lru); + if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page, NULL))) { + putback_lru_page(page); + continue; + } + /* page_referenced clears PageReferenced */ if (page_mapping_inuse(page) && page_referenced(page, 0, sc->mem_cgroup)) @@ -1140,7 +1242,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone, ClearPageActive(page); list_move(&page->lru, &zone->lru[lru].list); - mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, false); + mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); pgmoved++; if (!pagevec_add(&pvec, page)) { __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, pgmoved); @@ -1286,7 +1388,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, get_scan_ratio(zone, sc, percent); - for_each_lru(l) { + for_each_evictable_lru(l) { if (scan_global_lru(sc)) { int file = is_file_lru(l); int scan; @@ -1318,7 +1420,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] || nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) { - for_each_lru(l) { + for_each_evictable_lru(l) { if (nr[l]) { nr_to_scan = min(nr[l], (unsigned long)sc->swap_cluster_max); @@ -1875,8 +1977,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_all_zones(unsigned long nr_pages, int prio, if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) && prio != DEF_PRIORITY) continue; - for_each_lru(l) { - /* For pass = 0 we don't shrink the active list */ + for_each_evictable_lru(l) { + /* For pass = 0, we don't shrink the active list */ if (pass == 0 && (l == LRU_ACTIVE || l == LRU_ACTIVE_FILE)) continue; @@ -2213,3 +2315,24 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) return ret; } #endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU +/* + * page_evictable - test whether a page is evictable + * @page: the page to test + * @vma: the VMA in which the page is or will be mapped, may be NULL + * + * Test whether page is evictable--i.e., should be placed on active/inactive + * lists vs unevictable list. + * + * Reasons page might not be evictable: + * TODO - later patches + */ +int page_evictable(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + + /* TODO: test page [!]evictable conditions */ + + return 1; +} +#endif |