aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* tcm_fc: Do not report target role when target is not definedMark Rustad2013-01-211-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit edec8dfefa1f372b2dd8197da555352e76a10c03 upstream. Clear the target role when no target is provided for the node performing a PRLI. Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi <bprakash@broadcom.com> Acked by Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* tcm_fc: Do not indicate retry capability to initiatorsMark Rustad2013-01-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit f2eeba214bcd0215b7f558cab6420e5fd153042b upstream. When generating a PRLI response to an initiator, clear the FCP_SPPF_RETRY bit in the response. Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi <bprakash@broadcom.com> Acked by Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* target/tcm_fc: fix the lockdep warning due to inconsistent lock stateYi Zou2013-01-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 9f4ad44b264f8bb61ffdd607148215566568430d upstream. The lockdep warning below is in theory correct but it will be in really weird rare situation that ends up that deadlock since the tcm fc session is hashed based the rport id. Nonetheless, the complaining below is about rcu callback that does the transport_deregister_session() is happening in softirq, where transport_register_session() that happens earlier is not. This triggers the lockdep warning below. So, just fix this to make lockdep happy by disabling the soft irq before calling transport_register_session() in ft_prli. BTW, this was found in FCoE VN2VN over two VMs, couple of create and destroy would get this triggered. v1: was enforcing register to be in softirq context which was not righ. See, http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg03614.html v2: following comments from Roland&Nick (thanks), it seems we don't have to do transport_deregister_session() in rcu callback, so move it into ft_sess_free() but still do kfree() of the corresponding ft_sess struct in rcu callback to make sure the ft_sess is not freed till the rcu callback. ... [ 1328.370592] scsi2 : FCoE Driver [ 1328.383429] fcoe: No FDMI support. [ 1328.384509] host2: libfc: Link up on port (000000) [ 1328.934229] host2: Assigned Port ID 00a292 [ 1357.232132] host2: rport 00a393: Remove port [ 1357.232568] host2: rport 00a393: Port sending LOGO from Ready state [ 1357.233692] host2: rport 00a393: Delete port [ 1357.234472] host2: rport 00a393: work event 3 [ 1357.234969] host2: rport 00a393: callback ev 3 [ 1357.235979] host2: rport 00a393: Received a LOGO response closed [ 1357.236706] host2: rport 00a393: work delete [ 1357.237481] [ 1357.237631] ================================= [ 1357.238064] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 1357.238450] 3.7.0-rc7-yikvm+ #3 Tainted: G O [ 1357.238450] --------------------------------- [ 1357.238450] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 1357.238450] ksoftirqd/0/3 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 1357.238450] (&(&se_tpg->session_lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod] [ 1357.238450] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810834f5>] mark_held_locks+0x6d/0x95 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8108364a>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x12d/0x197 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810836c1>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149caba>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x45 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01e8d10>] __transport_register_session+0xb8/0x122 [target_core_mod] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01e8dbe>] transport_register_session+0x44/0x5a [target_core_mod] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa018e32c>] ft_prli+0x1e3/0x275 [tcm_fc] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa0160e8d>] fc_rport_recv_req+0x95e/0xdc5 [libfc] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa015be88>] fc_lport_recv_els_req+0xc4/0xd5 [libfc] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa015c778>] fc_lport_recv_req+0x12f/0x18f [libfc] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa015a6d7>] fc_exch_recv+0x8ba/0x981 [libfc] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa0176d7a>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x47a/0x4e2 [fcoe] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810549f1>] kthread+0xb1/0xb9 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff814a40ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 1357.238450] irq event stamp: 275411 [ 1357.238450] hardirqs last enabled at (275410): [<ffffffff810bb6a0>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x229/0x42a [ 1357.238450] hardirqs last disabled at (275411): [<ffffffff8149c2f7>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x8e [ 1357.238450] softirqs last enabled at (275394): [<ffffffff8103d669>] __do_softirq+0x246/0x26f [ 1357.238450] softirqs last disabled at (275399): [<ffffffff8103d6bb>] run_ksoftirqd+0x29/0x62 [ 1357.238450] [ 1357.238450] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1357.238450] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1357.238450] [ 1357.238450] CPU0 [ 1357.238450] ---- [ 1357.238450] lock(&(&se_tpg->session_lock)->rlock); [ 1357.238450] <Interrupt> [ 1357.238450] lock(&(&se_tpg->session_lock)->rlock); [ 1357.238450] [ 1357.238450] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1357.238450] [ 1357.238450] no locks held by ksoftirqd/0/3. [ 1357.238450] [ 1357.238450] stack backtrace: [ 1357.238450] Pid: 3, comm: ksoftirqd/0 Tainted: G O 3.7.0-rc7-yikvm+ #3 [ 1357.238450] Call Trace: [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149399a>] print_usage_bug+0x1f5/0x206 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8100da59>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2c/0x49 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81082aae>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug.part.14+0x1ae/0x1ae [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81083336>] mark_lock+0x106/0x258 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81084e34>] __lock_acquire+0x2e7/0xe53 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8102903d>] ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x48/0xb4 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810ba6a3>] ? rcu_process_gp_end+0xc0/0xc9 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] ? transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81085ef1>] lock_acquire+0x119/0x143 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] ? transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149c329>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x8e [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] ? transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810bb6a0>] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0x229/0x42a [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa018ddc5>] ft_sess_rcu_free+0x17/0x24 [tcm_fc] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa018ddae>] ? ft_sess_free+0x1b/0x1b [tcm_fc] [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810bb6d7>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x260/0x42a [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8103d55d>] __do_softirq+0x13a/0x26f [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149b34e>] ? __schedule+0x65f/0x68e [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8103d6bb>] run_ksoftirqd+0x29/0x62 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8105c83c>] smpboot_thread_fn+0x1a5/0x1aa [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8105c697>] ? smpboot_unregister_percpu_thread+0x47/0x47 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810549f1>] kthread+0xb1/0xb9 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149b49d>] ? wait_for_common+0xbb/0x10a [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81054940>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x59/0x59 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff814a40ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81054940>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x59/0x59 [ 1417.440099] rport-2:0-0: blocked FC remote port time out: removing rport Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com> Cc: Open-FCoE <devel@open-fcoe.org> Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@risingtidesystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* tcm_fc: Resolve suspicious RCU usage warningsMark Rustad2012-07-161-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 863555be0c81558b1af277addcf68acb8f778860 upstream. Use rcu_dereference_protected to tell rcu that the ft_lport_lock is held during ft_lport_create. This resolved "suspicious RCU usage" warnings when debugging options are turned on. Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com> Tested-by: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* tcm_fc: Fix possible lock to unlock type deadlockDan Carpenter2011-06-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | There is a typo here, it should be an unlock instead of a lock. The original code will deadlock. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
* target: Fix ERR_PTR dereferencing bugsDan Carpenter2011-06-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | transport_init_session() and core_tmr_alloc_req() never return NULL, they only return ERR_PTRs on error. v2: Fix patch to return PTR_ERR(tl_nexus->se_sess) from Ankit Jain's feedback. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ankit Jain <jankit@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
* [SCSI] tcm_fc: Adding FC_FC4 provider (tcm_fc) for FCoE target (TCM - target ↵Kiran Patil2011-05-171-0/+541
core) support This is a comprehensive patch for FC-FC4 provider. tcm_fc is a FC-FC4 provider which glues target core (TCM) with Fiber channel library (libfc). tcm_fc uses existing FC4 provider hooks from Fiber channel library. This Fiber channel library is used by FCoE (transport - FC over Ethernet) protocol driver as well. Combination of modules such as Fiber channel library, tcm_fc, TCM target core, and FCoE protocol driver enables functional FCoE target. This patch includes initial commit for tcm_fc plus additional enhancement, bug fixes. This tcm_fc module essentially contains 3 entry points such as "prli", "prlo", "recv". When process login request (ELS_PRLI) request is received, Fiber channel library (libfc) module calls passive providers (FC-FC4, tcm_fc) (if any registered) "prli" function. Likewise when LOGO request is received, "prlo" function of passive provider is invoked by libfc. For all other request (e.g. any read/write, task management, LUN inquiry commands), "recv" function of passiver provider is invoked by libfc. Those passive providers "prli, prlo, recv" functions interact with TCM target core for requested operation. This module was primarily developed by "Joe Eykholt" and there were significant contributions from the people listed under signed-off. Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com> Acked-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>