From 7a7eaa40a39bde4eefc91aadeb1ce3dc4e6a1252 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:54:33 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: take away the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction I keep forgetting that btrfs_join_transaction() just ignores the num_items argument, which leads me to sending pointless patches and looking stupid :). So just kill the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction and btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction, since neither of them use it. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/transaction.h') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h index e441acc..1f573f0 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h @@ -92,12 +92,9 @@ int btrfs_end_transaction_nolock(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root); struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_items); -struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, - int num_blocks); -struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(struct btrfs_root *root, - int num_blocks); -struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction(struct btrfs_root *r, - int num_blocks); +struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root); +struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(struct btrfs_root *root); +struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root); int btrfs_wait_for_commit(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 transid); int btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root); -- cgit v1.1