From 83b964bbf82eb13a8f31bb49ca420787fe01f7a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Wilson Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:49:16 -0400 Subject: mm: arch: make in_gate_area take an mm_struct instead of a task_struct Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked with respect to an mm, not a particular task. Moreover, dropping the dependency on task_struct will help make existing and future operations on mm's more flexible and convenient. Signed-off-by: Stephen Wilson Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/mm.h') diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 18b4a63..5c6d916 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1581,10 +1581,10 @@ static inline bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page) { return true; } extern struct vm_area_struct *get_gate_vma(struct mm_struct *mm); #ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA int in_gate_area_no_task(unsigned long addr); -int in_gate_area(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long addr); +int in_gate_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr); #else int in_gate_area_no_task(unsigned long addr); -#define in_gate_area(task, addr) ({(void)task; in_gate_area_no_task(addr);}) +#define in_gate_area(mm, addr) ({(void)mm; in_gate_area_no_task(addr);}) #endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA */ int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int, -- cgit v1.1