From ad1afb00393915a51c21b1ae8704562bf036855f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pedro Garcia Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:38:44 -0700 Subject: vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) - Without the 8021q module loaded in the kernel, all 802.1p packets (VLAN 0 but QoS tagging) are silently discarded (as expected, as the protocol is not loaded). - Without this patch in 8021q module, these packets are forwarded to the module, but they are discarded also if VLAN 0 is not configured, which should not be the default behaviour, as VLAN 0 is not really a VLANed packet but a 802.1p packet. Defining VLAN 0 makes it almost impossible to communicate with mixed 802.1p and non 802.1p devices on the same network due to arp table issues. - Changed logic to skip vlan specific code in vlan_skb_recv if VLAN is 0 and we have not defined a VLAN with ID 0, but we accept the packet with the encapsulated proto and pass it later to netif_rx. - In the vlan device event handler, added some logic to add VLAN 0 to HW filter in devices that support it (this prevented any traffic in VLAN 0 to reach the stack in e1000e with HW filter under 2.6.35, and probably also with other HW filtered cards, so we fix it here). - In the vlan unregister logic, prevent the elimination of VLAN 0 in devices with HW filter. - The default behaviour is to ignore the VLAN 0 tagging and accept the packet as if it was not tagged, but we can still define a VLAN 0 if desired (so it is backwards compatible). Signed-off-by: Pedro Garcia Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/8021q/vlan_core.c') diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c index 1b9406a..01ddb04 100644 --- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ int __vlan_hwaccel_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct vlan_group *grp, u16 vlan_tci, int polling) { + struct net_device *vlan_dev; + u16 vlan_id; + if (netpoll_rx(skb)) return NET_RX_DROP; @@ -16,9 +19,12 @@ int __vlan_hwaccel_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct vlan_group *grp, skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex; __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, vlan_tci); - skb->dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK); + vlan_id = vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK; + vlan_dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_id); - if (!skb->dev) + if (vlan_dev) + skb->dev = vlan_dev; + else if (vlan_id) goto drop; return (polling ? netif_receive_skb(skb) : netif_rx(skb)); @@ -83,15 +89,20 @@ vlan_gro_common(struct napi_struct *napi, struct vlan_group *grp, unsigned int vlan_tci, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct sk_buff *p; + struct net_device *vlan_dev; + u16 vlan_id; if (skb_bond_should_drop(skb, ACCESS_ONCE(skb->dev->master))) skb->deliver_no_wcard = 1; skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex; __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, vlan_tci); - skb->dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK); + vlan_id = vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK; + vlan_dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_id); - if (!skb->dev) + if (vlan_dev) + skb->dev = vlan_dev; + else if (vlan_id) goto drop; for (p = napi->gro_list; p; p = p->next) { -- cgit v1.1