From a386f99025f13b32502fe5dedf223c20d7283826 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 06:38:11 +0000
Subject: bridge: add proper RCU annotation to should_route_hook

Add br_should_route_hook_t typedef, this is the only way we can
get a clean RCU implementation for function pointer.

Move route_hook to location where it is used.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 net/bridge/br.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'net/bridge/br.c')

diff --git a/net/bridge/br.c b/net/bridge/br.c
index c8436fa..84bbb82 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br.c
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
 
 #include "br_private.h"
 
-int (*br_should_route_hook)(struct sk_buff *skb);
-
 static const struct stp_proto br_stp_proto = {
 	.rcv	= br_stp_rcv,
 };
@@ -102,8 +100,6 @@ static void __exit br_deinit(void)
 	br_fdb_fini();
 }
 
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(br_should_route_hook);
-
 module_init(br_init)
 module_exit(br_deinit)
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
cgit v1.1