diff options
| author | kkimlabs <kkimlabs@chromium.org> | 2015-03-09 16:54:46 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Commit bot <commit-bot@chromium.org> | 2015-03-09 23:55:58 +0000 |
| commit | 2bdff99f3766d74ee9223125270599b5fe7000ed (patch) | |
| tree | 76a279e40dbcaf9d85fb56e976ed0d91fab9593d /content | |
| parent | eedb763e54c4c79c7110c2daa21435a390982a71 (diff) | |
| download | chromium_src-2bdff99f3766d74ee9223125270599b5fe7000ed.zip chromium_src-2bdff99f3766d74ee9223125270599b5fe7000ed.tar.gz chromium_src-2bdff99f3766d74ee9223125270599b5fe7000ed.tar.bz2 | |
Revert of [Andorid] ClipDrawable progress bar experiment. (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/960733002/)
Reason for revert:
Although ClipDrawableProgressBar showed some perf improvement on blink_perf.svg, it didn't show any meaningful difference on page_cycler.top_10_mobile test.
Original issue's description:
> [Andorid] ClipDrawable progress bar experiment.
>
> Recently it was discovered that ClipDrawable is much faster than our
> default ToolbarProgressBar on content shell.
>
> So we plan to experiment with ClipDrawable based progress bar
> implementation.
>
> BUG=455891
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/b13144e2f2b4ac80f81cee8ce4d4c7f4831b625e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#318292}
TBR=dtrainor@chromium.org,jaekyun@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=false
NOTREECHECKS=false
NOTRY=false
BUG=455891
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/994753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#319777}
Diffstat (limited to 'content')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions