Move the Windows sandbox to sandbox/win

This is a rather large refactor to move the Windows sandbox to the right place.

BUG=
TEST=
NOTRY=true
TBR=sky@chromium.org

Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10689170

git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@147151 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98

1 files changed, 107 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sandbox/win/src/policy_engine_processor.cc b/sandbox/win/src/policy_engine_processor.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a35eabf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sandbox/win/src/policy_engine_processor.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2006-2008 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "sandbox/win/src/policy_engine_processor.h"
+
+namespace sandbox {
+
+void PolicyProcessor::SetInternalState(size_t index, EvalResult result) {
+  state_.current_index_ = index;
+  state_.current_result_ = result;
+}
+
+EvalResult PolicyProcessor::GetAction() const {
+  return state_.current_result_;
+}
+
+// Decides if an opcode can be skipped (not evaluated) or not. The function
+// takes as inputs the opcode and the current evaluation context and returns
+// true if the opcode should be skipped or not and also can set keep_skipping
+// to false to signal that the current instruction should be skipped but not
+// the next after the current one.
+bool SkipOpcode(PolicyOpcode& opcode, MatchContext* context,
+                bool* keep_skipping) {
+  if (opcode.IsAction()) {
+    uint32 options = context->options;
+    context->Clear();
+    *keep_skipping = false;
+    return (kPolUseOREval == options)? false : true;
+  }
+  *keep_skipping = true;
+  return true;
+}
+
+PolicyResult PolicyProcessor::Evaluate(uint32 options,
+                                       ParameterSet* parameters,
+                                       size_t param_count) {
+  if (NULL == policy_) {
+    return NO_POLICY_MATCH;
+  }
+  if (0 == policy_->opcode_count) {
+    return NO_POLICY_MATCH;
+  }
+  if (!(kShortEval & options)) {
+    return POLICY_ERROR;
+  }
+
+  MatchContext context;
+  bool evaluation = false;
+  bool skip_group = false;
+  SetInternalState(0, EVAL_FALSE);
+  size_t count = policy_->opcode_count;
+
+  // Loop over all the opcodes Evaluating in sequence. Since we only support
+  // short circuit evaluation, we stop as soon as we find an 'action' opcode
+  // and the current evaluation is true.
+  //
+  // Skipping opcodes can happen when we are in AND mode (!kPolUseOREval) and
+  // have got EVAL_FALSE or when we are in OR mode (kPolUseOREval) and got
+  // EVAL_TRUE. Skipping will stop at the next action opcode or at the opcode
+  // after the action depending on kPolUseOREval.
+
+  for (size_t ix = 0; ix != count; ++ix) {
+    PolicyOpcode& opcode = policy_->opcodes[ix];
+    // Skipping block.
+    if (skip_group) {
+      if (SkipOpcode(opcode, &context, &skip_group)) {
+        continue;
+      }
+    }
+    // Evaluation block.
+    EvalResult result = opcode.Evaluate(parameters, param_count, &context);
+    switch (result) {
+      case EVAL_FALSE:
+        evaluation = false;
+        if (kPolUseOREval != context.options) {
+          skip_group = true;
+        }
+        break;
+      case EVAL_ERROR:
+        if (kStopOnErrors & options) {
+          return POLICY_ERROR;
+        }
+        break;
+      case EVAL_TRUE:
+        evaluation = true;
+        if (kPolUseOREval == context.options) {
+          skip_group = true;
+        }
+        break;
+      default:
+        // We have evaluated an action.
+        SetInternalState(ix, result);
+        return POLICY_MATCH;
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (evaluation) {
+    // Reaching the end of the policy with a positive evaluation is probably
+    // an error: we did not find a final action opcode?
+    return POLICY_ERROR;
+  }
+  return NO_POLICY_MATCH;
+}
+
+
+}  // namespace sandbox