1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
|
// Copyright (c) 2006-2009 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
#include "chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command.h"
#include "chrome/browser/sync/protocol/bookmark_specifics.pb.h"
#include "chrome/browser/sync/sessions/sync_session.h"
#include "chrome/browser/sync/syncable/directory_manager.h"
#include "chrome/browser/sync/syncable/syncable.h"
#include "chrome/browser/sync/syncable/syncable_id.h"
#include "chrome/test/sync/engine/syncer_command_test.h"
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
namespace browser_sync {
using sessions::SyncSession;
using std::string;
using syncable::Entry;
using syncable::Id;
using syncable::MutableEntry;
using syncable::ReadTransaction;
using syncable::ScopedDirLookup;
using syncable::UNITTEST;
using syncable::WriteTransaction;
// A test fixture for tests exercising ApplyUpdatesCommand.
class ApplyUpdatesCommandTest : public SyncerCommandTest {
public:
protected:
ApplyUpdatesCommandTest() : next_revision_(1) {}
virtual ~ApplyUpdatesCommandTest() {}
// Create a new unapplied update.
void CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent(const string& item_id,
const string& parent_id) {
ScopedDirLookup dir(syncdb().manager(), syncdb().name());
ASSERT_TRUE(dir.good());
WriteTransaction trans(dir, UNITTEST, __FILE__, __LINE__);
MutableEntry entry(&trans, syncable::CREATE_NEW_UPDATE_ITEM,
Id::CreateFromServerId(item_id));
ASSERT_TRUE(entry.good());
entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_VERSION, next_revision_++);
entry.Put(syncable::IS_UNAPPLIED_UPDATE, true);
entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_NON_UNIQUE_NAME, item_id);
entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_PARENT_ID, Id::CreateFromServerId(parent_id));
entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_IS_DIR, true);
sync_pb::EntitySpecifics default_bookmark_specifics;
default_bookmark_specifics.MutableExtension(sync_pb::bookmark);
entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_SPECIFICS, default_bookmark_specifics);
}
ApplyUpdatesCommand apply_updates_command_;
private:
int64 next_revision_;
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest);
};
TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, Simple) {
string root_server_id = syncable::kNullId.GetServerId();
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("parent", root_server_id);
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("child", "parent");
apply_updates_command_.ModelChangingExecuteImpl(session());
sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "Simple update shouldn't result in conflicts";
EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "All items should have been successfully applied";
}
TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, UpdateWithChildrenBeforeParents) {
// Set a bunch of updates which are difficult to apply in the order
// they're received due to dependencies on other unseen items.
string root_server_id = syncable::kNullId.GetServerId();
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("a_child_created_first", "parent");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("x_child_created_first", "parent");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("parent", root_server_id);
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("a_child_created_second", "parent");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("x_child_created_second", "parent");
apply_updates_command_.ModelChangingExecuteImpl(session());
sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
EXPECT_EQ(5, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "Simple update shouldn't result in conflicts, even if out-of-order";
EXPECT_EQ(5, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "All updates should have been successfully applied";
}
TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, NestedItemsWithUnknownParent) {
// We shouldn't be able to do anything with either of these items.
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("some_item", "unknown_parent");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("some_other_item", "some_item");
apply_updates_command_.ModelChangingExecuteImpl(session());
sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "All updates with an unknown ancestors should be in conflict";
EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "No item with an unknown ancestor should be applied";
}
TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, ItemsBothKnownAndUnknown) {
// See what happens when there's a mixture of good and bad updates.
string root_server_id = syncable::kNullId.GetServerId();
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("first_unknown_item", "unknown_parent");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("first_known_item", root_server_id);
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("second_unknown_item", "unknown_parent");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("second_known_item", "first_known_item");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("third_known_item", "fourth_known_item");
CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("fourth_known_item", root_server_id);
apply_updates_command_.ModelChangingExecuteImpl(session());
sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
EXPECT_EQ(6, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates with unknown ancestors should be in conflict";
EXPECT_EQ(4, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The updates with known ancestors should be successfully applied";
}
} // namespace browser_sync
|