summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/sync/sessions/status_controller_unittest.cc
blob: 8fec64d15379b183bc079ff3f29c354301680f71 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.

#include "sync/sessions/sync_session.h"
#include "sync/test/engine/test_id_factory.h"
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"

namespace syncer {
namespace sessions {

class StatusControllerTest : public testing::Test {
 public:
  virtual void SetUp() {
    routes_[BOOKMARKS] = GROUP_UI;
  }
 protected:
  ModelSafeRoutingInfo routes_;
};

// This test is useful, as simple as it sounds, due to the copy-paste prone
// nature of status_controller.cc (we have had bugs in the past where a set_foo
// method was actually setting |bar_| instead!).
TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, ReadYourWrites) {
  StatusController status(routes_);
  status.set_num_server_changes_remaining(13);
  EXPECT_EQ(13, status.num_server_changes_remaining());

  EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflicts_resolved());
  status.update_conflicts_resolved(true);
  EXPECT_TRUE(status.conflicts_resolved());

  status.set_last_download_updates_result(SYNCER_OK);
  EXPECT_EQ(SYNCER_OK,
            status.model_neutral_state().last_download_updates_result);

  status.set_commit_result(SYNC_AUTH_ERROR);
  EXPECT_EQ(SYNC_AUTH_ERROR, status.model_neutral_state().commit_result);

  for (int i = 0; i < 14; i++)
    status.increment_num_successful_commits();
  EXPECT_EQ(14, status.model_neutral_state().num_successful_commits);
}

TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, HasConflictingUpdates) {
  StatusController status(routes_);
  EXPECT_FALSE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
  {
    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS,
        syncable::Id());
    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_SIMPLE,
        syncable::Id());
    EXPECT_TRUE(status.update_progress()->HasConflictingUpdates());
  }

  EXPECT_TRUE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());

  {
    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
  }
}

TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, HasConflictingUpdates_NonBlockingUpdates) {
  StatusController status(routes_);
  EXPECT_FALSE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
  {
    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS,
        syncable::Id());
    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_HIERARCHY,
        syncable::Id());
    EXPECT_TRUE(status.update_progress()->HasConflictingUpdates());
  }

  EXPECT_TRUE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
}

TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, CountUpdates) {
  StatusController status(routes_);
  EXPECT_EQ(0, status.CountUpdates());
  sync_pb::ClientToServerResponse* response(status.mutable_updates_response());
  sync_pb::SyncEntity* entity1 = response->mutable_get_updates()->add_entries();
  sync_pb::SyncEntity* entity2 = response->mutable_get_updates()->add_entries();
  ASSERT_TRUE(entity1 != NULL && entity2 != NULL);
  EXPECT_EQ(2, status.CountUpdates());
}

// Test TotalNumConflictingItems
TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, TotalNumConflictingItems) {
  StatusController status(routes_);
  TestIdFactory f;
  {
    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
    EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflict_progress());
    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
    EXPECT_EQ(2, status.conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize());
  }
  EXPECT_EQ(2, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
  {
    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_DB);
    EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflict_progress());
    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
    EXPECT_EQ(2, status.conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize());
  }
  EXPECT_EQ(4, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
}

// Basic test that non group-restricted state accessors don't cause violations.
TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, Unrestricted) {
  StatusController status(routes_);
  const UpdateProgress* progress =
      status.GetUnrestrictedUpdateProgress(GROUP_UI);
  EXPECT_FALSE(progress);
  status.model_neutral_state();
  status.download_updates_succeeded();
  status.ServerSaysNothingMoreToDownload();
  status.group_restriction();
}

}  // namespace sessions
}  // namespace syncer