diff options
author | Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> | 2008-08-20 00:22:26 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-08-20 12:18:57 +0200 |
commit | d45de40934897c6ee5b05141f7895bbb28512395 (patch) | |
tree | 1b4c4a011071d188a08d0f5bce8caf6b2b0a93c2 /arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c | |
parent | 8343ef2437c599d30568e6b5a257a40bf2f4902b (diff) | |
download | kernel_samsung_smdk4412-d45de40934897c6ee5b05141f7895bbb28512395.zip kernel_samsung_smdk4412-d45de40934897c6ee5b05141f7895bbb28512395.tar.gz kernel_samsung_smdk4412-d45de40934897c6ee5b05141f7895bbb28512395.tar.bz2 |
x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring
This is the 1st patch in the series. Here the aim was to avoid any
significant changes, logically-wise.
So it's mainly about generic interface refactoring: e.g. make
microcode_{intel,amd}.c more about arch-specific details and less
about policies like make-sure-we-run-on-a-target-cpu
(no more set_cpus_allowed_ptr() here) and generic synchronization (no
more microcode_mutex here).
All in all, more line have been deleted than added.
4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c | 155 |
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 53 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c index ad136ad..b2f84ce 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ * Thanks to Stuart Swales for pointing out this bug. */ -/*#define DEBUG pr_debug */ +/* #define DEBUG pr_debug */ #include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/init.h> @@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); struct microcode_ops *microcode_ops; /* no concurrent ->write()s are allowed on /dev/cpu/microcode */ -DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex); -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(microcode_mutex); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex); struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS]; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ucode_cpu_info); @@ -234,22 +233,6 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(MICROCODE_MINOR); struct platform_device *microcode_pdev; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(microcode_pdev); -static void microcode_init_cpu(int cpu, int resume) -{ - cpumask_t old; - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; - - old = current->cpus_allowed; - - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu)); - mutex_lock(µcode_mutex); - microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu); - if (uci->valid && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING && !resume) - microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu); - mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex); - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old); -} - static ssize_t reload_store(struct sys_device *dev, struct sysdev_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t sz) @@ -266,14 +249,15 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct sys_device *dev, cpumask_t old = current->cpus_allowed; get_online_cpus(); - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu)); - - mutex_lock(µcode_mutex); - if (uci->valid) - err = microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu); - mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex); + if (cpu_online(cpu)) { + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu)); + mutex_lock(µcode_mutex); + if (uci->valid) + err = microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu); + mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex); + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old); + } put_online_cpus(); - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old); } if (err) return err; @@ -285,7 +269,7 @@ static ssize_t version_show(struct sys_device *dev, { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + dev->id; - return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->rev); + return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->cpu_sig.rev); } static ssize_t pf_show(struct sys_device *dev, @@ -293,7 +277,7 @@ static ssize_t pf_show(struct sys_device *dev, { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + dev->id; - return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->pf); + return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->cpu_sig.pf); } static SYSDEV_ATTR(reload, 0200, NULL, reload_store); @@ -312,7 +296,85 @@ static struct attribute_group mc_attr_group = { .name = "microcode", }; -static int __mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev, int resume) +static void microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu) +{ + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; + + mutex_lock(µcode_mutex); + microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); + uci->valid = 0; + mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex); +} + +static void collect_cpu_info(int cpu) +{ + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; + + memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci)); + if (!microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu, &uci->cpu_sig)) + uci->valid = 1; +} + +static void microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu) +{ + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; + struct cpu_signature nsig; + + pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d resumed\n", cpu); + + if (!uci->mc.valid_mc) + return; + + /* + * Let's verify that the 'cached' ucode does belong + * to this cpu (a bit of paranoia): + */ + if (microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu, &nsig)) { + microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); + return; + } + + if (memcmp(&nsig, &uci->cpu_sig, sizeof(nsig))) { + microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); + /* Should we look for a new ucode here? */ + return; + } + + microcode_ops->apply_microcode(cpu); +} + +void microcode_update_cpu(int cpu) +{ + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; + + /* We should bind the task to the CPU */ + BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu); + + mutex_lock(µcode_mutex); + /* + * Check if the system resume is in progress (uci->valid != NULL), + * otherwise just request a firmware: + */ + if (uci->valid) { + microcode_resume_cpu(cpu); + } else { + collect_cpu_info(cpu); + if (uci->valid && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) + microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu); + } + mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex); +} + +static void microcode_init_cpu(int cpu) +{ + cpumask_t old = current->cpus_allowed; + + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu)); + microcode_update_cpu(cpu); + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old); +} + +static int mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev) { int err, cpu = sys_dev->id; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; @@ -327,16 +389,10 @@ static int __mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev, int resume) if (err) return err; - microcode_init_cpu(cpu, resume); - + microcode_init_cpu(cpu); return 0; } -static int mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev) -{ - return __mc_sysdev_add(sys_dev, 0); -} - static int mc_sysdev_remove(struct sys_device *sys_dev) { int cpu = sys_dev->id; @@ -345,7 +401,7 @@ static int mc_sysdev_remove(struct sys_device *sys_dev) return 0; pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d removed\n", cpu); - microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); + microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group); return 0; } @@ -376,33 +432,26 @@ mc_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu) sys_dev = get_cpu_sysdev(cpu); switch (action) { - case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN: - /* The CPU refused to come up during a system resume */ - microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); - break; case CPU_ONLINE: - case CPU_DOWN_FAILED: - mc_sysdev_add(sys_dev); - break; case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN: - /* System-wide resume is in progress, try to apply microcode */ - if (microcode_ops->apply_microcode_check_cpu(cpu)) { - /* The application of microcode failed */ - microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); - __mc_sysdev_add(sys_dev, 1); - break; - } + microcode_init_cpu(cpu); + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED: case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN: + pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d added\n", cpu); if (sysfs_create_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group)) printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: Failed to create the sysfs " "group for CPU%d\n", cpu); break; case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE: - mc_sysdev_remove(sys_dev); - break; case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN: /* Suspend is in progress, only remove the interface */ sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group); + pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d removed\n", cpu); + break; + case CPU_DEAD: + case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN: + /* The CPU refused to come up during a system resume */ + microcode_fini_cpu(cpu); break; } return NOTIFY_OK; |