diff options
| author | Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> | 2005-06-20 23:54:27 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> | 2005-06-26 23:47:57 -0400 |
| commit | a26c074c1cf130df95e9c297ef98fdd98348acf0 (patch) | |
| tree | c595ac72c0b9cbda8f5a1f6513d2d529e4581389 /drivers/net/pcnet32.c | |
| parent | 62595eb9066ea09f7f8a789a38bec16d70ee0321 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_smdk4412-a26c074c1cf130df95e9c297ef98fdd98348acf0.zip kernel_samsung_smdk4412-a26c074c1cf130df95e9c297ef98fdd98348acf0.tar.gz kernel_samsung_smdk4412-a26c074c1cf130df95e9c297ef98fdd98348acf0.tar.bz2 | |
[PATCH] net/sb1000: replace nicedelay() with ssleep()
Use ssleep() instead of nicedelay()
to guarantee the task delays as expected. Remove the prototype and
definition of nicedelay(). This is a very weird function, because it is
called to sleep in terms of usecs, but always sleeps for 1 second,
completely ignoring the parameter. I have gone ahead and followed suit,
just sleeping for a second in all cases, but maybe someone with the
hardware could tell me if perhaps the paramter *should* matter. Additionally,
nicedelay() is called in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state, but doesn't deal with signals
in case these longer delays do not complete, so I believe ssleep() is more
appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/pcnet32.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions