aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/sunrpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>2012-08-17 17:31:53 -0400
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2012-09-14 10:00:39 -0700
commit299ee067572cf58dd38d03770263cbca212e5332 (patch)
tree7fe1fb1336c14637aeb989d154fd741bfc22d128 /net/sunrpc
parente684493e06addddaf273964dff6fa0f2204953b8 (diff)
downloadkernel_samsung_smdk4412-299ee067572cf58dd38d03770263cbca212e5332.zip
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-299ee067572cf58dd38d03770263cbca212e5332.tar.gz
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-299ee067572cf58dd38d03770263cbca212e5332.tar.bz2
svcrpc: fix svc_xprt_enqueue/svc_recv busy-looping
commit d10f27a750312ed5638c876e4bd6aa83664cccd8 upstream. The rpc server tries to ensure that there will be room to send a reply before it receives a request. It does this by tracking, in xpt_reserved, an upper bound on the total size of the replies that is has already committed to for the socket. Currently it is adding in the estimate for a new reply *before* it checks whether there is space available. If it finds that there is not space, it then subtracts the estimate back out. This may lead the subsequent svc_xprt_enqueue to decide that there is space after all. The results is a svc_recv() that will repeatedly return -EAGAIN, causing server threads to loop without doing any actual work. Reported-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Tested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc')
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c7
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 9d7ed0b..dad7af5 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -323,7 +323,6 @@ static bool svc_xprt_has_something_to_do(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
*/
void svc_xprt_enqueue(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
{
- struct svc_serv *serv = xprt->xpt_server;
struct svc_pool *pool;
struct svc_rqst *rqstp;
int cpu;
@@ -369,8 +368,6 @@ void svc_xprt_enqueue(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
rqstp, rqstp->rq_xprt);
rqstp->rq_xprt = xprt;
svc_xprt_get(xprt);
- rqstp->rq_reserved = serv->sv_max_mesg;
- atomic_add(rqstp->rq_reserved, &xprt->xpt_reserved);
pool->sp_stats.threads_woken++;
wake_up(&rqstp->rq_wait);
} else {
@@ -650,8 +647,6 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
if (xprt) {
rqstp->rq_xprt = xprt;
svc_xprt_get(xprt);
- rqstp->rq_reserved = serv->sv_max_mesg;
- atomic_add(rqstp->rq_reserved, &xprt->xpt_reserved);
/* As there is a shortage of threads and this request
* had to be queued, don't allow the thread to wait so
@@ -748,6 +743,8 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
else
len = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_recvfrom(rqstp);
dprintk("svc: got len=%d\n", len);
+ rqstp->rq_reserved = serv->sv_max_mesg;
+ atomic_add(rqstp->rq_reserved, &xprt->xpt_reserved);
}
svc_xprt_received(xprt);